patrick.net

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/more-bad-news-on-covid-vaccines-and/comments?source=patrick.net

A huge new study has found the risk of serious heart problems called myocarditis in men under 40 soars with each dose of a Covid mRNA vaccine - and is sharply higher than the risk from a coronavirus infection itself.

The findings call into sharp question the efforts by American colleges and universities to make their students receive booster shots before returning to school this January - especially since other studies have shown that the risk of post-vaccine myocarditis is concentrated not merely in men under 40 but in those aged 16-25.

The study, which British researchers released in late December, showed that the risk of myocarditis almost doubled after the first Pfizer shot in men under 40. Then it doubled again after the second and doubled again after the third - to almost eight times the baseline risk.

I think I've already posted this, but from the Oxford study: Risk of myocarditis following sequential COVID-19 vaccinations by age and sex.
Excess (myocarditis) events per million
Green: Pfizer
Blue: Moderna

So, it looks like it tops out at about 100 cases per million.

That's assuming there is no flaws in the data for example overweight and obese people more likely to get the jab than healthy people etc.

That is still a minimal chance of getting myocarditis.

Of course, for heathy people Covid, itself, presents a minimal risk especially with the Rin therapy.

As I have said before, the anti-vaxx propaganda is just as bad as the pro-vaxx narrative.

100 cases per million... maybe, maybe not.

A friend's nephew had myocarditis so bad (days after mRNA shots) he needed heart replacement - 21 year old NYU athlete
Neighbor's employee - his nephew (early 20s, athletic) died of myocarditis shortly after shots
Another friend of mine in healthcare - his best friend had a heart attack minutes after getting shot while at the hospital he worked, died the next day
Another coworker of mine - his mom, brother and sister all got vaccinated at same time, all died of blood clots within weeks of each other, another sister nearly lost her legs from clots
I'm questioning rarity.

Youngblood85 says

I'm questioning rarity.

You'd be right to do that.

I just heard that there’s another case of myocarditis at the school, so now there are now 4 cases in 285 vaccinated boys (estimate), bringing the incidence rate to nearly 1 in 70, assuming all the cases are boys (285/4=71.25). This is not rare. This is a disaster.

Furthermore, these are just the cases we know about. There could be other cases that we simply don’t know about because the families decided not to tell anyone. And there could be sub-clinical cases where the damage is being done slowly over time.

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/there-are-now-4-myocarditis-cases?source=patrick.net

Youngblood85 says

I'm questioning rarity.

Most of the risk is concentrated in males under 25. From the Kaiser study:
Risk of Myopericarditis following COVID-19 mRNA vaccination in a Large Integrated Health System

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/myocarditis-from-sars-cov-2-vaccination?source=patrick.net

Misc says

As I have said before, the anti-vaxx propaganda is just as bad as the pro-vaxx narrative.

No it's not.

The pro vax narrative wants us to have passports showing that we have the latest booster before we can enjoy our rights. The anti experimental biologic agent people, like me, just want to be left the fuck alone.

Onvacation says

Misc says

As I have said before, the anti-vaxx propaganda is just as bad as the pro-vaxx narrative.

No it's not.

The pro vax narrative wants us to have passports showing that we have the latest booster before we can enjoy our rights. The anti experimental biologic agent people, like me, just want to be left the fuck alone.

Some people just don't get it, I guess.

Patrick says

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/myocarditis-from-sars-cov-2-vaccination?source=patrick.net

The paper deals mostly with myocarditis being driven by victims getting Covid, not the vaccine.

WineHorror1 says

Onvacation says

Misc says

As I have said before, the anti-vaxx propaganda is just as bad as the pro-vaxx narrative.

No it's not.

The pro vax narrative wants us to have passports showing that we have the latest booster before we can enjoy our rights. The anti experimental biologic agent people, like me, just want to be left the fuck alone.

Some people just don't get it, I guess.

Oh, they get it alright. The jab pays big pharma $billions from the government which gives companies like Pfizer plenty of money to spread around buying influence. Remember Pfizer was fined $2.6 billion last November partly for payola to doctors and false advertising. Also consider the ad buys at major networks and organizations like Sinclair Communications. "Do not have your talking heads diss the jab, or we pull millions in ads." It used to be illegal for Pharma to advertise, and for good reason. Then there are all those colleges that force the jab on students. I wonder how much of that policy is based on receiving research grants from Pharma or outright payoffs. The jab policy is obviously not based on any scientific analysis of pros and cons of the jab.

Israeli study says that Fauci Flu itself does not cause pericarditis or myocarditis. So what on earth could be causing so many cases then? Lol.

https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/8/2219

We did not observe an increased incidence of neither pericarditis nor myocarditis in adult patients recovering from COVID-19 infection.

Let's forget about the myocarditis for just one moment. What's the essence of what Dr McCullough is saying?

He's saying that the vaccine components, a.k.a the mRNA/Spiked protein liposomes, accumulate in the heart tissue. Now ... why would anyone in the right mind want that?

Even if one doesn't get myocarditis, what about just plain heart disease ... ten years from now? Isn't that bad enough, especially if one is still young and has many decades of life ahead of him?

Rin says

Let's forget about the myocarditis for just one moment. What's the essence of what Dr McCullough is saying?

He's saying that the vaccine components, a.k.a the mRNA/Spiked protein liposomes, accumulate in the heart tissue. Now ... why would anyone in the right mind want that?

Even if one doesn't get myocarditis, what about just plain heart disease ... ten years from now? Isn't that bad enough, especially if one is still young and has many decades of life ahead of him?

How else will countries balance their Social Security budgets except over the dead bodies of useless eaters? Of course, environmentalists need more dead as well to reduce the Human Infestation Destroying The Planet!! These vaccines are a win-win!!

I wish I was wrong about this.

rocketjoe79 says

How else will countries balance their Social Security budgets except over the dead bodies of useless eaters?

Of that were the case, then they wouldn't try to jab the younger generations.

What does the Thailand Myocarditis Study Teach Us?
Taking safety signals seriously is imperative; the US CDC & others have failed to do that
The fact the US, CDC, NIAID, FDA, etc etc. have to rely on a Thailand preprint for the first prospective study of cardiac biomarkers is mind-boggling negligence. The US and this CDC have shown that either they are incompetent to take safety signals seriously, or indifferent to safety. They earn Grade F. This study should have been done in the USA, by Pfizer 1 month after EUA was granted. End of story.
...
Enter the new Thailand study. The US FDA has specifically asked Pfizer to prospectively assess the incidence of subclinical myocarditis for young people at time of EUA as part of post market commitments.
In keeping with the FDA’s tradition of being lax, the agency gave Pfizer till 2022 and 2024 to provide these data. That’s pretty shitty for a live problem that affects millions of boys, where the information can be generated in 1 month by a company shoveling billions into its pockets.
What happens next? Does the CDC skip Pfizer and go ahead and run biomarkers on the next 1000 kids who get the vax? pre-and post doses? with and without a control getting vax a month later? How about UK or WHO? Sadly, no one did. We turn to the first, and only prospective evaluation, and it comes from Thailand.
I will get right to the point. The authors ran a bunch of tests on kids (202 boys, 99 girls) aged 13-18 who got the 2nd dose of Pfizer, after getting the first dose without adverse events. The EKG changes in the pre-print are not the story. The story are rates of cardiac biomarkers and how often they are elevated. 3 patients had chest pain and biomarker elevation; 4 patients had no chest pain but elevated cardiac biomarkers. These were all in boys.
7/202 boys had overt or subclinical myocarditis (3.5%) or roughly 2 orders of magnitude more common than prior reports from passive adverse event reporting of myocarditis.
From cardiologist Dr. Anish Koka
Sudden cardiac death in young athletes is obviously a fearsome complication that is very real and it is likely some proportion of sudden cardiac death is from subclinical myocarditis.
Or if you prefer video, see Thailand Myocarditis After Vaccine Study | What can we learn? | A Doctor and Professor Reflects

Misc says

As I have said before, the anti-vaxx propaganda is just as bad as the pro-vaxx narrative.

I disagree with that.

The vaccines don't work, at all. They literally have absolutely no long term benefit. None at all.

Now, hear me out. The Federal Reserve can create as much money as they like, and Congress can borrow as much money as they like that is created. 5 trillion dollars was created for "covid relief" - that's when people got up to $1,200 in checks, and businesses received loans. Well, $1,200 * 330 million Americans (total population) = 0.4 trillion bucks. That means there's 4.6 trillion unaccounted for.

So since this money can be handed anywhere, it could have been given to anybody. So, they didn't need to push the vaccines so that Pfizer and Moderna, etc made money. They could have just been handed it. So why has there been relentless propaganda in the media, and relentless pushes by the government to get people to take this vaccine?

Who the fuck knows what you took but you took it. You have, absolutely, no idea what has been injected into you and neither do I. I know it doesn't protect against covid though. They CLAIM it reduces symptom - how the fuck would they know? When did they verify and test that? It's CONCEIVABLE that whatever you took, is CERTAIN to kill you.

And they are pushing like hell for kids to take it, they have a statistically 0% chance of dying from covid. Why this insane push?

GNL says

rocketjoe79 says

How else will countries balance their Social Security budgets except over the dead bodies of useless eaters?

Of that were the case, then they wouldn't try to jab the younger generations.

The jabs also contribute to infertility. They’re trying to reduce population, here, and their target number is obscene.

It's not anti-vax, its ANTI-HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION. WHY CAN'T THE PRO-VAX FUCKS UNDERSTAND THIS?

Forced human medical experimentation has been formally outlawed for 70 years. Yeah, I know most governments only paid lip service to Nuremburg, but still, there were no licenses for the Megeles to experiment upon the world. This is happening now.

stereotomy says

It's not anti-vax, its ANTI-HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION. WHY CAN'T THE PRO-VAX FUCKS UNDERSTAND THIS?

No, they can't.

They trust their government. WHY would they trust their government after they lied them into the Iraq War, the bombing of Libya, and the Syrian War, about Russian Collusion, about Hunter Biden's laptop being "Russian Disinformation"? Because they still trust their government, and don't think those lies are important.

Their government murdered 800,000 Iraqis - that's the current estimate and probably the closest. They don't care about that. They don't care about slavery being in Libya as a result of that "humanitarian intervention", they don't care about what is going on in Syria, they just think Assad is a bad man, if they even know who he is.

They don't understand the government is run by entirely evil people, or at least, they don't think this government would ever turn against them, or has turned against them.

Time will tell!

I'm kind of thankful for the last 2 years, I have learned more about people in this time frame than I did in the last 48 years. I enjoy dense, crash course learning sessions.

I have a sort of stupidity about me:

richwicks says

They trust their government. WHY would they trust their government after they lied them into the Iraq War, the bombing of Libya, and the Syrian War, about Russian Collusion, about Hunter Biden's laptop being "Russian Disinformation"? Because they still trust their government, and don't think those lies are important.

I think they would become very uncomfortable if they concluded they can't trust the government, or doctors, or academia.

They would feel worried, lost, betrayed - all uncomfortable feelings.

So they just keep trusting corrupt institutions and keep ignoring the evidence all around them.

Patrick says

I think they would become very uncomfortable if they concluded they can't trust the government, or doctors, or academia.

They would feel worried, lost, betrayed - all uncomfortable feelings.

So they just keep trusting corrupt institutions and keep ignoring the evidence all around them.

I listen to a guy named Michael Rivero who does a daily 1 hour 30 minute podcast - here: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/dg5xvkfH9lWS/

His hypothesis is that when people are confronted with "Would you stand up to the evil of your government?" most people wouldn't, but they still want to think they are a good person that would, and so they deny the evil their government does.

I DO think most people are good people. If a stranger dropped a $100 bill out of their back pocket, I think MOST people would return it. If an old person with dementia was lost, I think MOST people would help once they realized the situation instead of mugging them. But I also think most people are ultimately kind of moral cowards.

Super easy to condemn the evils of the past, who condemns the evils of today? "Slavery was baaaaad!" - yep sure was, how about the slavery in Libya today? "Fire bombing Dresden was baaaaaaaad!" - yep, sure was, what about Shock and Awe? In another 20 years, they'll condemn the carpet bombing of Baghdad and will call it what it was, a terror campaign.

You may spew anti-vaxx rhetoric among yourselves in an echo chamber without fear of opposing viewpoints in this forum.

You continue to congratulate yourselves as swallowing the correct propaganda.

You should not trust all the anti-vaxx propaganda. It is completely as disingenuous as the pro-vaxx.

Misc says

You may spew anti-vaxx rhetoric among yourselves in an echo chamber without fear of opposing viewpoints in this forum.

You continue to congratulate yourselves as swallowing the correct propaganda.

You should not trust all the anti-vaxx propaganda. It is completely as disingenuous as the pro-vaxx.

What benefit does the sars-cov2-19 "vaccine" give anybody?

Fauci has gotten the disease, Biden got it, Trump got it, Newsom got it, Trudeau got it - it doesn't give immunity, what evidence is there that it reduces severity or decreases mortality?

From my point of view, the "vaccines" seem to be worthless at best, and dangerous at worst. Certainly among children it's worthless, they have less than a 2 in a million chance of dying from the disease, and the victims of it had more than 2.4 comorbidities - they were already clinging to life. It's certainly sad, but childhood leukemia and cerebral palsy is a thing.

If you are an adult, make your own choice, but for anybody under 18, these vaccines have no value at all, quite the opposite.

For anybody else, let them make their own choice, right or wrong.

Since when have we had a "vaccination" that reduced the severity of the disease and didn't provide immunity? I am immune to polio thanks to a vaccination, it doesn't just reduce the severity of disease.

Your force people into a false dichotomy - I'm not ant-vax, I'm anti whatever the fuck this is. It's not a vaccine.

https://phillipaltman.substack.com/p/covid-19-vaccine-induced-myocarditis

Dr. McCullough references several important clinical papers on myocarditis in a presentation on November 22 to the Brazilian government.

https://rumble.com/v3xuo29-covid-19-vaccine-myocarditis-summary-dr.-mccullough-at-brazil-chamber-of-de.html

The highlights of his presentation are listed below:

· Prior to the pandemic myocarditis was extremely rare. Dr. McCullough, one of the world’s most experienced cardiologist, says he only ever saw 2 patients with myocarditis before the “pandemic”.

· Exercise can trigger sudden death in a person with myocarditis due to arrhythmias.

· Credible evidence suggests that SARS-CoV-2 infection has not been commonly found to cause symptomatic/serious myocarditis in people.

· Spike Protein is found in the hearts of people who have died of myocarditis.

· Myocarditis inflammation in the heart is not resolving over time.

· 2.5% per shot get myocarditis shown in 2 clinical trials using sensitive biomarkers.

· Myocarditis can be asymptomatic. The first sign of pathology can be sudden death.

· At 9 months according to scans the damaged hearts are not normalising.

· Certain lots of “vaccine” are associated with a higher incidence of adverse effects and there is evidence of a genetic predisposition to serious adverse events

· 57% of cases of myocarditis are asymptomatic (no obvious symptoms).

original link

https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202307.1198/v1

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/post-covid-19-myocarditis-is-not

Watanabe and Hama found that the myocarditis mortality rate ratio (MMRR) was significantly higher in the COVID-19 vaccinated population compared to the general population during the three years preceding the COVID-19 pandemic, with a pronounced increase among young adults (MMRR: 7.80 for individuals in their 30s) [6]. The OpenSAFELY study found that myocarditis occurred only among COVID-19 vaccinated children and not SARS-CoV-2 infected children, with a sample size of over 1 million participants [7]. ...

In conclusion, the study by Semenzato et al. is misleading. SARS-CoV-2 infection does not cause serious myocarditis [7, 10], whereas COVID-19 vaccination is well recognized to cause symptomatic and fatal myocarditis [6, 11]. Future prospective cohort studies should classify patients correctly, have extended and equal windows of observation, and clinical adjudication with exam, ECG, blood biomarkers, and cardiac imaging.

I have a good friend who is immune compromised. He contracted covid last year and has still not completely recovered with respect to his cardio stats. He's been taking McCullough's spike protein detox for months now:

https://covid19.onedaymd.com/2023/03/dr-peter-mccullough-prescription-and.html

I'm a pureblood, but I always dose up on ivermectin if I know I'll be in a population of spike protein shedders. It's fucked up - the "vaxxed" are the disease carriers now, but they think their shit doesn't stink.

https://eccentrik.substack.com/p/in-case-you-missed-it-study-shows

In case you missed it, there was a study somewhat recently…
A study like many before and many to come, and it’s very troubling, to say the least.

But that’s okay because the authorities have no concerns and assure us any dire consequences are purely coincidental. So cover your eyes, plug your ears, and turn your brain off (more injections will help with this last part).

The study, “Sex-specific differences in myocardial injury incidence after COVID-19 mRNA-1273 booster vaccination” tells us something many of us assumed since the beginning.

Myocarditis from the virus is virtually nil, and myocarditis from the jabs is censoriously understated.

In the study, Swiss researchers found that 22 out of 777, or 1 out of 35, participants showed signs of myocardial damage. These determinations were based on elevated troponin biomarkers.

“Hospital employees scheduled to undergo mRNA-1273 booster vaccination were assessed for mRNA-1273 vaccination-associated myocardial injury, defined as acute dynamic increase in high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) concentration above the sex-specific upper limit of normal on day 3 (48–96 h) after vaccination without evidence of an alternative cause.” ...

And that always seems to be the qualifier, doesn’t it?

“mild and transient”

I’ve heard that phrase so many times, it’s almost as if it’s been carved in stone for the Narrative. Almost as if it’s a psychological ploy. Almost as if the more it’s regurgitated the more the sheep will slurp it from the trough.

“safe and effective”

Besides, it’s just a little heart damage folks, right? I mean, let’s not get bent outta shape about it. Yeeeeesh ...

Dr. McCullough also has something to say exactly concerning the specific findings and conclusions of the Swiss study.

While the authors and others seem to overlook the ramifications of 1 in 35 with troponin levels elevated post-vaccination - it’s only mild and transient - McCullough quickly dismisses their dismissals:

“Four days is the standard elevation [of troponin] for a heart attack, so any damage to the heart takes several days to occur and then the scar formation occurs later on, and then the scar could be the basis for a future cardiac arrest.

And we’ve seen alarming case reports of young individuals dying suddenly with no other explanation…

This indicates that a large number of individuals who have taken the third dose have sustained heart injury and many don’t know about it.”