by mell ➕follow (10) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 753 - 792 of 891 Next » Last » Search these comments
Is ‘climate change’ causing weather records to fall? Probably not, since CO2 doesn’t exist in space. I’ll put one theory out there, a theory that is extremely hard to find anywhere in corporate media, probably since it contradicts the lucrative manmade climate theory. ...
Earth is rapidly losing its magnetic shielding at an accelerating rate of five percent per decade...
It seems self-evidence that as the field weakens, more solar radiation will get through, causing changes on Earth. Things like worldwide aurora, for example. But don’t believe your lying eyes.
Last year, corporate media collectively began “debunking” the commonsense notion that a weaker magnetic field will lead to more violent and extreme Earth weather. It’s just a coincidence.
But as usual, the certainty in the headline was betrayed by the details. Scientists aren’t quite as sure as National Geographic’s headline writers are. ...
Similarly, the data crunching on last week’s dramatic solar storms continues, and it looks like we weren’t over-selling its historic nature after all. ...
It was so unusual that they initially didn’t even consider the storms could cause strong deep-sea readings. But the same scientists will swear on a stack of Q’rans that all this extra solar energy has no effect on Earth’s climate, because science. Shut up! Don’t ruin it for everybody.
The indomitable Douglas Brodie argues that climate change is a politically motivated hoax designed to impose totalitarian control and redistribute wealth through flawed science and data manipulation.
He traces its origins to anti-capitalist ideologies and figures like Maurice Strong, criticizes the scientific basis for CO2-induced warming, and highlights manipulation by influential figures and organizations.
Doug contends that Net Zero policies are economically damaging and futile, urging skepticism towards the establishment and advocating for voting against mainstream political parties supporting climate policies.
Let’s not forget that DEATH VALLEY is currently a massive LAKE!
https://metatron.substack.com/p/debunking-the-climate-change-hoax
The indomitable Douglas Brodie argues that climate change is a politically motivated hoax designed to impose totalitarian control and redistribute wealth through flawed science and data manipulation.
He traces its origins to anti-capitalist ideologies and figures like Maurice Strong, criticizes the scientific basis for CO2-induced warming, and highlights manipulation by influential figures and organizations.
Doug contends that Net Zero policies are economically damaging and futile, urging skepticism towards the establishment and advocating for voting against mainstream political parties supporting climate policies.
Similar to Schrodinger’s cat, that was both dead and alive, the UK climate in May was apparently both hot and cold.
To us mere mortals, May was bloody freezing. I still had the central heating on and even wore gloves when I went for a run at one point.
But to the climate change, weather forecasting overlords, it was hot. According to the UK’s Met Office, provisional figures show May and spring were the warmest on record.
“Whilst it may not have felt like it” is excellent gaslighting. I’d rather trust my own empirical observations rather than some ever-changing, ideologically biased climate change models.
And to me it was cold and therefore I declare that May was not warm.
The world of climate science is in shock following extraordinary findings from a team of high-powered NASA scientists that suggest most of the recent global temperature increases are due to the introduction of draconian fuel shipping regulations designed to help prevent global warming. The fantasy world of Net Zero is of course full of unintended consequences, but it is claimed that the abrupt 80% cut in sulphur dioxide emissions from international shipping in 2020 has accounted for 80% of global warming since the turn of the decade. Although the extra heat is described as “transient”, the warming is extraordinary and is expected to rise during the 2020s at a rate of 0.24°C a decade, 20% higher than the claimed warming trend since 1980.
The news is likely to cause considerable concern among the mainstream climate hoaxers in media, academia and politics. They have had a field day of late by pointing to rises in temperature as evidence for their evidence-free prediction that the climate is in danger of imminent collapse. But the NASA scientists, working out of the Goddard Space Flight Centre, predict a trend of rising temperatures due to the IMO2020 regulations going forward, and state, “the 2023 record warmth is within the ranges of our expected trajectory”.
The science behind the NASA findings, which have been published in Nature, is simple. Fewer fuel particles injected into the atmosphere reduce cloud droplet density and this leads to clouds that reflect less solar radiation back into space. As the scientists note: “IMO2020 effectively represents a termination shock for the inadvertent geoengineering experiment through a reverse marine cloud dimming through reducing cloud droplet number concentration.” In the course of their work, the team calculated large particle reductions in major shipping routes in the North Atlantic, the Caribbean Sea and the South China Sea.
The European Space Agency even puts sensors on planes. With 40 million flights per year, tracked by radar and monitored by satellite, and reported by pilots as well, if there were trends in clear air turbulence on passenger planes, there would be a mountain of data, and we’d hear all about it. Instead all they have are modeled guesstimates and slightly worse conditions over the North Atlantic.
« First « Previous Comments 753 - 792 of 891 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,245,814 comments by 14,877 users - Misc online now