by Patrick ➕follow (61) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 536 - 575 of 589 Next » Last » Search these comments
200 Ways the Biden Administration and Democrats Have Made it Harder to Produce Oil & Gas
President Biden and Democrats have a plan for American energy: make it harder to produce and more expensive to purchase. Since Mr. Biden took office, his administration and its allies have taken over 200 actions deliberately designed to make it harder to produce energy here in America. A list of those actions, which includes a few high-profile actions taken in states like New York and California, appears below. A PDF of the full list is available to download here.
On January 20, 2021,
Besides canceling the Keystone XL pipeline,
President Biden restricted domestic production by issuing a moratorium on all oil and natural gas leasing activities in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
He also restored and expanded the use of the government-created social cost of carbon metric to artificially increase the regulatory costs of energy production of fossil fuels when performing analyses, as well as artificially increase the so-called “benefits” of decreasing production.
Biden continued to revoke Trump administration executive orders, including those related to the Waters of the United States rule and the Antiquities Act. The Trump-era actions decreased regulations on Federal land and expanded the ability to produce energy domestically. ...
Menlo Park:
...and now Wookie starts his "Who Gives A Shit About California" rant on a gasoline price thread that doesn't say 'except California' on it's main post.
Menlo Park:
When they see this station from CA-101 the Tesla-driving fuckbook employees will pat themselves on the back for being so smart and not needing any gasoline.
CA is going to get their tax money somehow or you guys will be driving on gravel roads.
$5.49 for premium in Martinez.
Filled my tank for less than a $100.
Onvacation says
$5.49 for premium in Martinez.
Filled my tank for less than a $100.
Seems you have been acclimated to think filling an 18 gallon tank for "under a $100" is cheap. Around here, during Trump's last year, filling an empty 18 gallon tank was less than $40.
There is usually $100 cut-off at the pump, which is annoying, so if you can fill up w/o swiping twice it registers as a positive event
RWSGFY says
There is usually $100 cut-off at the pump, which is annoying, so if you can fill up w/o swiping twice it registers as a positive event
Wow. Few people outside of CA would have any idea that such a cutoff issue would exist. I suppose that if one state had gas pumps that gave the user a static shock when you first lift the handle, the time you do not get that shock would also be welcomed as a positive event.
RV people know.
RWSGFY says
RV people know.
Yes, makes sense. I presume that RVs that use diesel do not have that $100 issue, as I cannot imagine that pumps that also serve Peterbilts do not routinely exceed $100 per fill.
Menlo Park:
That will be from tolls. You know, like the Ohio Turnpike. More and more roads will become toll roads and electric and ICE will use EasyPass.
It cost me $60 one way to get to central Ohio from IL
More tolls is how roads will be funded when gas consumption decreases.
Never heard of Jevon's Paradox, have you?
UkraineIsTotallyFucked says
Never heard of Jevon's Paradox, have you?
So you think that more fuel-efficient ICE, hybrid and electric cars will lower the demand for gas enough that the price falls and people will just buy more gas because it is cheap?
So you think that more fuel-efficient ICE, hybrid and electric cars will lower the demand for gas enough that the price falls and people will just buy more gas because it is cheap?
When cars became more fuel-efficient, people started driving more. This is an example of the Jevons Paradox because instead of saving gas from the better mileage, people used it as a reason to drive longer distances or more often, which led to more gas being used overall.
1) EVs are fucked. At best, they have plateaud in market share.
If people want zero emissions ride a fucking horse. Seriously. They're modestly fast in an urban settings. Exponentially cheaper than any EV on the market. Feed is less than gas.
WookieMan says
If people want zero emissions ride a fucking horse. Seriously. They're modestly fast in an urban settings. Exponentially cheaper than any EV on the market. Feed is less than gas.
You ever own a horse? They're not cheap, they need regular maintenance, you can't just have one, you need at least two, or some other companion animal like a donkey or something.
My grandparents had horses when they were young instead of cars, they would never want to go back to that.
I'm in the country. I literally was hanging out with horse people Sunday. Hell weekly, good people. It's cheaper than a Tesla by a large margin. They could ride it into town in 4 minutes if they wanted to go quick.
We have human shit on streets in cities, so what's the difference?
Well, I know how inconvenient they are.
I don't think the EV lovers understand this. A good percentage of the population simply won't buy them, specifically men.
An emissions reduction program by an environmental regulator will lead to a 50-cent per gallon of gasoline increase, according to a report by a state environment regulator.
Last year the California Air Resources Board (CARB) said gas prices would increase by 50 cents next year and every year after in order to reduce emissions.
This is in addition to California’s existing gas tax!
« First « Previous Comments 536 - 575 of 589 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,252,069 comments by 14,932 users - Patrick online now