by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 105 - 144 of 180 Next » Last » Search these comments
Joseph A. Ladapo, MD, PhD
@FLSurgeonGen
While the feds push false narratives, we assessed the data & here's the truth: Over 70% of CDC's so-called "COVID hospitalizations" in FL are not hospitalized FOR COVID. They may be in the ER with a broken leg, have no respiratory symptoms, but happen to test positive.
Joseph A. Ladapo, MD, PhD
FLSurgeonGen
While the feds push false narratives, we assessed the data & here's the truth: Over 70% of CDC's so-called "COVID hospitalizations" in FL are not hospitalized FOR COVID. They may be in the ER with a broken leg, have no respiratory symptoms, but happen to test positive.
"Toronto-area LTC residents died of ‘dehydration and malnourishment,’ new military documents reveal"; to read this headline makes my blood boil, those crooked killer Hospital & LTC & nursing home CEOs
In addition to deaths from COVID-19, residents at two long-term care homes in the Toronto area died of dehydration and neglect during outbreaks last spring; 26 residents died due to dehydration
Oh look, I caught the CDC scrubbing another document from the internet that shows they intentionally manipulated the RT-PCR cycle count for those who got the vaccine, to manufacture the narrative that it's a pandemic of the unvaccinated because they were still receiving 40+ cycle count tests. Just a few months later into the fall, they eventually admit false positives are a problem, and they phase out the use of RT-PCR for other tests and assays, which lead to the largest jump in COVID cases that we ever saw. How convenient.
Why does no one talk about RT-PCR fraud anymore? Why are people still trying to argue any of the COVID numbers as if they are legitimate?
Early vaccine efficacy data was predicated on RT-PCR.
Lockdowns, social distancing, etc, were predicated on RT-PCR.
Vaccine mandates were predicated on RT-PCR.
The foundation of the entire psyop relies on this one test, which was completely misused intentionally, per the inventor Kary Mullis. He criticized Fauci heavily for the same practices during AIDS, but no one cared. Fauci destroyed his career and sent him into obscurity for speaking truth, just like all the rest.
https://odysee.com/Kary-Mullis-on-PCR:5
Dead link:
https://cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/downloads/Information-for-laboratories-COVID-vaccine-breakthrough-case-investigation.pdf
Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20210429220602/https:/www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/downloads/Information-for-laboratories-COVID-vaccine-breakthrough-case-investigation.pdf
This paper also proves the entire pandemic was a fraud, so quit arguing their contrived data. They used these tests to capture deaths from the vaccine and cover it up. They classified people as unvaccinated until they had every shot + 2 weeks, to which they then used high cycle RT-PCR to manufacture a positive. Once they were considered vaccinated, down to 28 cycle count, and then not positive.
Thus reality was manufactured. Everything destroyed in its wake.
In summary, we have outlined eight different reasons why we suspect that the data surrounding the 2020 spring mortality wave in NYC might be incorrect. They are:
It is unlikely that Covid combined with iatrogenic and other factors could have caused a wave of mortality as recorded.
It is implausible that every age category should experience a spike in deaths simultaneously.
It is improbable that deaths occurred simultaneously independent of place of death.
The magnitude and steepness of the spike in deaths is indicative of an unparalleled non-natural mass casualty event. But no such event has been detected.
Records of hospital visits and ambulance transports do not correlate with what would be expected had the massive wave of mortality happened as stated.
Occupancy levels of hospital and ICU beds are not what one would expect if such a wave of death happened.
What happened in NYC is significantly worse than similar cities in the U.S..
Far too many younger people are reported to have died in a very short time frame, and to have died from Covid.
Therefore, we call upon the authorities to release basic daily hospital data so that admissions can be matched with bed occupancy, deaths and discharges. Death certificates should also be released in order to prove the number of deaths occurring each day and at each place of death. Officials must substantiate the timing and magnitude of the event with complete datasets, supported by records.
BBC confirms there was no pandemic
Their headline: 'Scotland's winter death toll worst in more than 30 years'
Lacking any self-awareness, British government broadcaster, the BBC, published this past month a report under the following headline:
Scotland's winter death toll worst in more than 30 years
The BBC was one of the important media enforcers globally of the entire pandemic narrative. Assiduously, they pushed lockdowns and vaccines, and shut down any debate.
And now, so very casually, the corporation inadvertently admits that there was indeed no pandemic. For how could there have been, if three years later, after the deaths of thousands, after the successful roll-out of a miracle vaccine, a Scottish winter produced more death than in 2020, than in three decades prior?
The evil of the media is perhaps only outstripped by its stupidity. Nowhere in the report is this connection made; nowhere is the obvious question asked.
"BBC confirms there was no pandemic"
It depicts the DEVIATION by month from the average number of deaths per 100,000 population during the time period 2015 - 2019 in Sweden for the years 2020 and 2021.
The first thing that struck me about this graph was that, in both 2020 and 2021, only about one fourth of the months had deaths per 100,000 higher than the average of 2015 to 2019.
In a PANDEMIC? You’ve got to be kidding! Then I looked at the worst month, April of 2020. The graph shows that SWEDEN, in that month, only experienced 26 excess deaths per one hundred thousand people.
26/100,000 = .00026 = .026 %
In other words, at the worst time of the pandemic, the deaths per 100,000 people went up only 2.6 hundredths of 1 %.
That’s what we stopped the world for. ...
... Covid would have come and gone without anyone noticing if the government hadn't gotten involved with the idiotic policies some of which were put in place by people who knew better. In addition to this, there were recommendations made which made absolutely no sense and resulted in the deaths of some patients. Continuing to get injected with vaccines that were made for strains three or four generations previous when you've had the disease and recovered is one such example of many.
A top government health official has admitted that hospitals were faking data for causes of death during the pandemic.
A former director of the UK government’s National Health Service (NHS) has spoken out to allege that a new system was introduced at the beginning of the Covid panoramic to certify deaths.
Prior to the pandemic, four types of pneumonia were grouped together as the highest cause of death in the United Kingdom.
However, after the new Medical Examiner System was implemented, medical examiners started certifying deaths from all types of pneumonia as being caused by Covid.
In a post on Twitter/X, former NHS director of End-of-Life Care Saineethan “Sai” Balasubramaniam exposed the changes to the death reporting system implemented by the UK government health service.
https://twitter.com/TheOriginalSai/status/1614332319111970816
Something else is killing most alleged Covid victims, not this virus …
Again, my major take-away from my research and contrarian analysis is that something else must have been the true cause of death for the vast majority of alleged Covid victims, especially among the younger age cohorts.
The spike in all-cause deaths that began after the lockdowns has to be explained by dozens of reasons instead of this virus. It was the response to the virus, not the virus, that better explains most of these purported “Covid deaths.”
These reasons would/might include ventilators, remdesivir, not giving pneumonia patients antibiotics, de-hydration, over prescription of powerful sedatives, isolation, panic, depression, etc.
If we’re counting all excess deaths, the mRNA “vaccines” probably caused millions of deaths. Spikes in suicides, homicides, domestic assaults, drug over-doses, accidents and deaths from delayed diagnoses from treatable diseases are other causes that no doubt explain the massive surge in extra deaths in the last three years.
Basically, if my hypothesis is correct that the Covid mortality rate should have remained constant, this would mean that, even today, millions of deaths attributed to Covid probably aren’t occurring from Covid or Covid alone.
Even I admit this would constitute a scandal almost too mind-boggling to consider … but I’m considering it because that’s what my “early spread” hypothesis strongly suggests.
If this virus wasn’t deadly in December 2019 or January 2020, it shouldn’t have suddenly become “deadly” a year later … nor today.
BBC ‘misrepresented’ Covid risk to boost lockdown support, inquiry told
Epidemiologist Prof Mark Woolhouse criticised corporation for reporting rare deaths among healthy adults as the norm during pandemic
The BBC was allowed to “misrepresent” the risk posed by Covid to most people to boost public support for lockdown, the UK Covid Inquiry has heard.
Prof Mark Woolhouse, an eminent epidemiologist and government adviser, lambasted the corporation for having “repeatedly reported rare deaths or illnesses among healthy adults as if they were the norm”.
He said this created the “misleading impression” among BBC News viewers at the start of the pandemic that “we are all at risk” and “the virus does not discriminate”.
In reality, he said it was known at the time that the risk of dying from Covid was 10,000 times higher in the over-75s than the under-15s.
But Prof Woolhouse told the inquiry the BBC did not correct its reporting, saying: “I suspect this misinformation was allowed to stand throughout 2020 because it provided a justification for locking down the entire population.”
The saga started almost immediately after he conducted one of the first comprehensive COVID-19 studies examining how the virus spread and impacted patients. The “Santa Clara Study,” released in April 2020, found that the mortality rate of the disease was close to .2%, or about 2 out of 1,000 people -- orders of magnitude below the World Health Organization's warnings at the time of 3% or 4%. The study showed that the virus had a steep age gradient and generally did not impact children. The elderly and immunocompromised were at high risk. Healthy children and adults faced relatively minimal harm. Many of the people who were infected with the virus showed no symptoms.
The study, followed by research in Los Angeles County and other studies that confirmed its findings, outraged the establishment, which was using radically higher mortality rates to demand draconian restrictions on travel, commerce, education, and all other manners of public life. Bhattacharya publicly criticized economic and school lockdowns, which he called unnecessary and likely to harm the young and the most vulnerable in society. These statements further made him a public enemy. ...
He has subsequently been vindicated on virtually every point of contention. The school lockdowns were a catastrophe that created a crisis of learning loss, particularly among low-income children in public schools. COVID-19 vaccines did not prevent transmission, as the Biden administration claimed. The mortality rate of the virus was much more in line with Bhattacharya’s early findings than with the stated claims of the WHO and the U.S. government public health agencies. The vaccine mandates for young, healthy adults were never remotely supported by scientific evidence.
What is the real Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) for Covid-19? ...
The only group I can think of that might have an IFR over 0.4 percent would be nursing home residents.
Indeed, common sense tells me that any group we can identify with people who are still working or going to school is going to have a microscopic Covid IFR. (The average age of a Covid victim ranges from age 76 to 82 in most countries).
My guess would be the IFR at the CDC and NIH is also either 0.000 percent or a smidgen above this microscopic figure.
One possible reason these public health agencies won’t provide an honest answer to a simple question is that the answer might prove the novel coronavirus is/was not a “deadly” virus to those who work in almost every single identifiable American group, industry or organization.
This information, in turn, might prove these agencies have been knowingly spreading disinformation to scare the daylights out of people who should have had no reason to fear dying from Covid.
Disabled Patients Given ‘Do Not Resuscitate’ Orders to Boost ‘Covid’ Deaths
An inquiry has heard shocking evidence that doctors were ordered to issue “do not resuscitate” (DNR) directives for disabled patients during the pandemic to boost the number of “Covid” deaths.
The allegations first emerged late last year when several disabled people in Scotland discovered that they had secretly been issued with “do not resuscitate” orders, without their knowledge or consent.
Several of those patients have now testified saying they feel like the government believes their lives are “not worth saving.”
According to a recent report from the Daily Mail, as Covid began to spread, doctors’ receptionists even called up those with disabilities to try to persuade them to sign up for the orders.
The DNR orders inform doctors that they do not want their lives saved in an emergency.
At the time, doctors were pushing for disabled patients who had tested positive for Covid to sign a DNR order.
Several of those patients have now testified saying they feel like the government believes their lives are “not worth saving.”
I am going to say this really loud.
HOW DANGEROUS WAS COVID?
PROTOCOLS used in the hospitals killed people.
THE MURDER OF PATIENTS was INCENTIVISED for patients WHO TESTED POSITIVE FOR COVID.
I don’t think people are hearing this very well, because they are very concerned about Gain of Function, but what should be at the top of their mind after hearing stories like this is that:
GAIN OF FUNCTION IS A RED HERRING!
GAIN of FUNCTION IS A DISTRACTION!
THEY MURDERED PEOPLE IN THE HOSPITAL SO THAT THEY COULD JUSTIFY THE ROLLOUT OF mRNA TECHNOLOGY!
The BBC was allowed to “misrepresent” the risk posed by Covid to most people to boost public support for lockdown, the UK Covid Inquiry has heard.
Prof Mark Woolhouse, an eminent epidemiologist and government adviser, lambasted the corporation for having “repeatedly reported rare deaths or illnesses among healthy adults as if they were the norm”.
He said this created the “misleading impression” among BBC News viewers at the start of the pandemic that “we are all at risk” and “the virus does not discriminate”.
In reality, he said it was known at the time that the risk of dying from Covid was 10,000 times higher in the over-75s than the under-15s.
But Prof Woolhouse told the inquiry the BBC did not correct its reporting, saying: “I suspect this misinformation was allowed to stand throughout 2020 because it provided a justification for locking down the entire population.”
CDC Says It Accidentally Inflated Children’s COVID Death Numbers In ‘Coding Logic Error’
You could be run over by a car, and you go into the ER, you say I'm short of breath because your blood is filling your lungs, and if they test you for covid, you died of covid, not of a car accident. You could have known, severe cardiovascular disease, which is what I partake in, and you come in with an absolute 100% heart attack, but they test you for covid, what did you die of? Covid.
What just happened about two weeks ago? CDC is now telling all the laboratories to stop using the PCRs that we've been using this whole time because they cannot decipher between the flu and covid. So we have to stop using them. That information alone should stop this whole ridiculousness, OK?
Number two, the masks. What is the dirtiest spot on your body? It is your mouth. If— I'm pretty sure no one here would sit there and smell their anus and their private parts all day because that seems disgusting. But your mouth is dirtier than your private parts. Why would you sniff the bacteria that comes out of your mouth all day long? And force that on our children? That is wrong. That is, psychologically affects them, and you're going to implore more infections on them. There are literally studies that I can prove to you that are on the CDC website that are randomized controlled studies that show that nor hand washing nor wearing surgical masks, especially anything less than that, actually prevents you from getting infected, whether if you're infected or you're trying to prevent an infection. I can sit here alone on that topic for least 3 hours and talk to you about how that is so ridiculous.
Let's get to the most important part because because I'm very limited on time and I could sit here for hours and talk to you about this.
The unvaccinated theory is nothing but BS. OK? Does anyone here know, especially the medical professionals here, that the CDC, about a month and a half ago, changed the requirement for hospitals and clinics to count a covid case. If you are now vaccinated, you don't have to register that person as a covid case if they have covid. Even if they're in the hospital and dying of covid, if they were vaccinated you don't have to count that as a covid case.
Why are people saying, oh, the unvaccinated are filling the hospitals? Because the CDC has literally changed that. So if you get covid and you're vaccinated you don't count into the pool of people that are vaccinated. Does anybody here know that? I doubt it. ...
And then the vaccines. Just a whole 'nother nutshow case in itself. In six months [time alarm sounds] more people have died from this vaccine than in 20 years of every single vaccine given in America. Let that sink in. In 6 months. 12,000.
And the VAERS reporting system?[2] Harvard, who everyone should trust here, did a major study. And they found out that only 1% of all the adverse effects and deaths are actually reported. So imagine that. If 12,000 we know now have died, that's only 1 percent. One percent.
What just came out last week that probably no one here knows because it's been censored? There was just now a lawsuit that went up against the CDC and the FDA because they found out that these pharmaceutical companies created their own adverse effects agencies where their reporting is happening there, and they found out that, it seems now, that in 3 days over 45,000 people have died because of vaccine.
The statement that “more than one million Americans lost their lives from this disease” is a preposterous claim, disinformation at its most egregious.
As a few non-indoctrinated Americans know, 94 percent of the people who allegedly died from “Covid” had multiple co-morbid conditions. What we had was not “a pandemic of the unvaccinated,” but a pandemic of Bogus PCR tests and a never-ending smorgasbord of Pure Government-created Propaganda.
Also, the majority of alleged Covid victims were over the age of 80 when they died. One’s not supposed to point this out, but the quality of life of many alleged Covid victims had long since disappeared.
« First « Previous Comments 105 - 144 of 180 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,259,014 comments by 15,027 users - gabbar, GreaterNYCDude, HANrongli, RayAmerica, RWSGFY online now