8
2

Not So Fast on Electric Cars - WSJ


 invite response                
2022 Dec 26, 9:49am   52,522 views  779 comments

by RWSGFY   ➕follow (4)   💰tip   ignore  

Not So Fast on Electric Cars - WSJ

Allysia FinleyDec. 25, 2022 6:20 pm ET

Toyota’s CEO delivers a timely warning, and many states echo it.

Toyota CEO Akio Toyoda recently caused the climate lobby to blow a fuse by speaking a truth about battery electric vehicles that his fellow auto executives dare not. “Just like the fully autonomous cars that we were all supposed to be driving by now,” Mr. Toyoda said in Thailand, “I think BEVs are just going to take longer to become mainstream than the media would like us to believe.” He added that a “silent majority” in the auto industry share his view, “but they think it’s the trend, so they can’t speak out loudly.”
The Biden administration seems to believe that millions of Americans will rush out to buy electric vehicles if only the government throws enough subsidies at them. Last year’s infrastructure bill included $7.5 billion in grants for states to expand their charging networks. But it’s a problem when even the states are warning the administration that electric vehicles aren’t ready to go mainstream.

Maine notes in a plan submitted to the Federal Highway Administration this summer that “cold temperatures will remain a top challenge” for adoption, since “cold weather reduces EV range and increases charging times.” When temperatures drop to 5 degrees Fahrenheit, the cars achieve only 54% of their quoted range. A vehicle that’s supposed to be able to go 250 miles between charges will make it only 135 miles on average. At 32 degrees—a typical winter day in much of the country—a Tesla Model 3 that in ideal conditions can go 282 miles between charges will make it only 173 miles.
Imagine if the 100 million Americans who took to the road over the holidays were driving electric cars. How many would have been stranded as temperatures plunged? There wouldn’t be enough tow trucks—or emergency medics—for people freezing in their cars.
The Transportation Department is requiring states to build charging stations every 50 miles along interstate highways and within a mile of off-ramps to reduce the likelihood of these scenarios. But most state electrical grids aren’t built to handle this many charging stations and will thus require expensive upgrades. Illinois, for one, warns of “challenges related to sufficient electric grid capacity, particularly in rural areas of the state.”

Charging stations in rural areas with little traffic are also unlikely to be profitable and could become “stranded assets,” as many states warn. Wyoming says out-of-state traffic from non-Tesla electric vehicles would have to increase 100-fold to cover charger costs under the administration’s rules. Tesla has already scoped out premier charging locations for its proprietary network. Good luck to competitors.

New Mexico warns that “poor station maintenance can lead to stations being perpetually broken and unusable, particularly in rural or hard to access locations. If an EV charging station is built in an area without electrical capacity and infrastructure to support its use, it will be unusable until the appropriate upgrades are installed.”

Read More Life Science

• Where Was Biden’s SEC Sheriff on Sam Bankman-Fried? December 18, 2022
• Western Scientists Cheered On China’s Covid Repression December 11, 2022
• Hardly Anyone Is Buying Biden’s Bivalent Boosters December 4, 2022
Arizona says “private businesses may build and operate a station if a grant pays for the first five years of operations and maintenance” but might abandon the project if it later proves unprofitable. Many other states echo this concern, noting that federal funds could result in stranded assets.

The administration aims to build 500,000 stations, but states will likely have to spend their own money to keep them running. Like other federal inducements, these grants may entice states to assume what could become huge financial liabilities.

Federal funds also come with many rules, including “buy America” procurement requirements, which demand that chargers consist of mostly U.S.-made components. New Jersey says these could “delay implementation by several years” since only a few manufacturers can currently meet them. New York also says it will be challenging to comply with the web of federal rules, including the National Environmental Policy Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, and a 1960 federal law that bars charging stations in rest areas.

Oh, and labor rules. The administration requires that electrical workers who install and maintain the stations be certified by the union-backed Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Training Program. New Mexico says much of the state lacks contractors that meet this mandate, which will reduce competition and increase costs.

Technical problems abound too. Virginia says fast-charging hardware “has a short track record” and is “prone to malfunctions.” Equipment “previously installed privately in Virginia has had a high failure rate shown in user comments and reports on social media,” and “even compatibility with credit card readers has been unexpectedly complicated.”

A study this spring led by University of California researchers found that more than a quarter of public direct-current fast-charging stations in the San Francisco Bay Area were unusable. Drivers will be playing roulette every time they head to a station. If all this weren’t disconcerting enough, Arizona warns cyber vulnerabilities could compromise customer financial transactions, charging infrastructure, electric vehicles and the grid.

Politicians and auto makers racing to eliminate the internal-combustion engine are bound to crash into technological, logistic and financial realities, as Mr. Toyoda warned. The casualties will be taxpayers, but the administration doesn’t seem to care.


https://archive.vn/pcjK3

« First        Comments 720 - 759 of 779       Last »     Search these comments

720   HeadSet   2024 Apr 28, 11:18am  

RWSGFY says

Toyota bz4x in a RWD form can now be leased for $229 per month, $0 down, $0 security deposit for 36 months with 12K miles allowance.

May get one for my daughter. Why not when they are that cheap? She only drives local.
721   WookieMan   2024 Apr 28, 11:50am  

HeadSet says

RWSGFY says


Toyota bz4x in a RWD form can now be leased for $229 per month, $0 down, $0 security deposit for 36 months with 12K miles allowance.

May get one for my daughter. Why not when they are that cheap? She only drives local.

The problem I see with Tesla is a market saturation thing. Certain people, like me, will NEVER buy an EV. Even once we're empty nesters in about 10 years. We have the fuel and oil network in place. We don't have the electric capacity to get to a certain level without unlocking nuclear to go ape shit on power production. Hybrids are and have been the answer.

My mom is currently on her way to my house. 90 mile range roughly on electric to get to my house. When she goes back home she either has gas in the tank or can top off with a quick 3 minute fuel up. She lives a touch over an hour away. If we had hills, no chance she'd make it back if she had a Tesla round trip. So even for a widow a model 3 wouldn't work and is more expensive than the RAV 4 that she currently has.

I don't do individual stocks generally. Contemplating shorting. The ugly cyber truck will be a flash in the pan for the moment, but 2-5 year outlook in my opinion is awful if the batteries actually last 10 years. Who is going to buy it? You can get cheaper cars with better utility. Most people are not that into speed and car shit. They just want what is cheapest for the utility they'll use it for.

0-60 times don't matter to me. I know how to drive and NOT get pulled over for driving recklessly.
722   Maga_Chaos_Monkey   2024 Apr 28, 11:55am  

RWSGFY says

12K miles allowance.


Per year?
723   Maga_Chaos_Monkey   2024 Apr 28, 11:58am  

RWSGFY says


I only drink beer from cans while driving. Besides, how would it get UNDER the floor?


My great grandfather cut a hole in the bottom of the floor of his truck so he could dump beer cans/bottles if he got pulled over. Apparently back in the day Iowans worked their butts off during the growing / harvest season and they sat around drinking their asses off in the winter time.
724   Booger   2024 Apr 28, 12:32pm  

WookieMan says

if the batteries actually last 10 years. Who is going to buy it?


Haven't plenty of people already bought knowing in 10 years the battery is going to need to be replaced or the vehicle junked?
725   B.A.C.A.H.   2024 Apr 28, 12:48pm  

Booger says

Haven't plenty of people already bought knowing in 10 years the battery is going to need to be replaced or the vehicle junked?

I had an early Prius. Those batteries were freaking expensive. I traded the car before the battery needed replacement, but after the car was off warranty I always had a large accrual for the battery.

After about 100k miles I would ask the dealer service advisor for a quote for a replacement. I think it was about $5k for the battery (not including labor). I suppose that would be OK for another 100k miles, but the warranty for the replacement battery was for ONE YEAR.

If we take care of them, ICE Toyotas last freaking forever. The only major repair on my 2006 Tacoma, with 105k miles, was rebuilding the clutch master cylinder. That's it.
726   GNL   2024 Apr 28, 6:01pm  

Everyone will be forced into the EV platform. Government is the worst pox on all of humanity.
727   Blue   2024 Apr 28, 6:29pm  

B.A.C.A.H. says

I think it was about $5k for the battery (not including labor). I suppose that would be OK for another 100k miles,


$5k quote for battery + $600 labor! = $5.6k / 150k lifetime miles warranty = battery costs $.0373/mile

https://www.toyota.com/priusprime/faq/
A 13.6-kWh battery pack, an EPA-estimated all-electric driving range of up to 44 miles.
44 miles on full charge / 13.6 KHw capacity = 3.2 mi/KWh
Operating cost based on the price at different tiers around:
$0.48 /KWh / 3.2 mi = $.150/mi, for 150k*$.150=$22.5k + $5.6k=$28k
$0.42 /KWh / 3.2 mi = $.131/mi, for 150k*$.131=$19.6k + $5.6k=$25k
$0.35 /KWh / 3.2 mi = $.109/mi, for 150k*$.109=$16.4k + $5.6k=$22k

Just for fun comparison on electric drive alone with my other ICE vehicle which costs me >$4.75 / 31 mpg ~= $.153/mile
Typical operating cost for 150k miles * $0.153 ~= $23k + oil change maintenance (150k/5k)*$.1k = 3k = $26k

Of course elect and gas prices vary based on the year. But based on the the snapshot of the current prices, the overall costs of Prius are not too different from my ICE costs!
728   B.A.C.A.H.   2024 Apr 28, 7:35pm  

Blue says

$5k quote for battery + $600 labor! = $5.6k / 150k lifetime miles warranty = battery costs $.0373/mile

That's great for folks who are buying nowadays. But the warranties were not as generous on the 2001 Prius.

I think the original purchase battery warranty on my 2001 Prius was 5 years with some miles. After the five years I began an accrual for a replacement. I don't remember how many miles they had on the battery warranty but I think it was less than 100k.

The original battery was replaced in 2005 because of a recall. They replaced the battery with a new one but did not extend the warranty. The Prius got 45 - 50 mpg. I traded in that 2001 Prius at around 150,000 miles in 2017.

We also had a 2000 Camry that got about 32 mpg on the highway and 23-24 mpg in town. The only repair was replacing the radiator that began a slight leak along a seam, at around 125,000 miles. Kept that car till 2017, about 165,000 miles and the radiator was the only repair. I loved that Camry and was sorry to give it up.

Blue says

But based on the the snapshot of the current prices, the overall costs of Prius are not too different from my ICE costs!

Yup.
729   HeadSet   2024 Apr 29, 7:53am  

B.A.C.A.H. says

After about 100k miles I would ask the dealer service advisor for a quote for a replacement. I think it was about $5k for the battery (not including labor). I suppose that would be OK for another 100k miles, but the warranty for the replacement battery was for ONE YEAR.

Back in the day, a company called Discount Cab in AZ had a fleet of 200 Prius. The head manager told me that they routinely got 300,000 miles out of them on the original batteries.
730   Tenpoundbass   2024 Apr 29, 8:48am  

Hybrids keep the battery conditioned by switching from gas to electric. For all of the panning I gave the Prius over its ugly design. They are a darn sight better than fully electric cars.
731   DOGEWontAmountToShit   2024 Apr 29, 9:08am  

HeadSet says

Back in the day, a company called Discount Cab in AZ had a fleet of 200 Prius. The head manager told me that they routinely got 300,000 miles out of them on the original batteries.


They are perfect for cabs & Uber in that way. Designed to work best for short, stop & go urban trips. And cheap for the utility value.
732   WookieMan   2024 May 12, 5:24am  

Shit tube, but came across this gem this morning. https://youtu.be/HIs8zudJFzg?si=zM5NIP_KGyN-GSvH

The Cyber Truck is and will be a dud after this initial hype. Long watch, but TL:DR or watch, it can't even get 100 miles towing with a trailer that isn't insanely big. No pull through chargers so you have to unhitch and charge for 40-60 minutes to get another 85 or so miles. You kind of buy a truck to tow on trips or for work.

Everyone needs a break driving long distances, but every 85 miles is a joke and do an hour of work/waiting to charge. There's parts of the country you won't find a gas station on that stretch of road, let alone a super charger. It's a daily driver with no utility at $100k. Like all Teslas. Until Musk comes up with a full sized SUV I don't see much growth. Millennials are having kids now and sedans ain't gonna work, nor a truck that can't do what it's supposed to do.
733   Maga_Chaos_Monkey   2024 May 12, 7:27am  

WookieMan says

it can't even get 100 miles towing with a trailer that isn't insanely big.


I bet someone puts some extra batteries in the truck! This guy drove 1800 miles in a Tesla without stopping to charge:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hHhf223jGIE

In particular the part where he runs an onboard loud generator overnight in the parking lot of his hotel while he sleeps is hilarious. It runs all day too while he's driving.
734   richwicks   2024 May 12, 7:52am  

just_passing_through says

I bet someone puts some extra batteries in the truck!


That I would think is dangerous.

I've worked on high powered EV charging systems. I had to watch a safety video in which I had to see several people killed through their carelessness. I'm an EE, but I work almost entirely in software, but I wouldn't fuck around with the systems. A short is an uncontrollable release of energy, and it doesn't matter if you deprive it of oxygen, it will "burn" apparently, it's just a release of energy.

EV's are just a bad idea in general. They are super heavy cars, they cut through road barriers like butter, they are NOT road safe, several other problems, but you don't ever have to go to a gas station. That's the only advantage.
735   WookieMan   2024 May 12, 10:01am  

richwicks says

but you don't ever have to go to a gas station. That's the only advantage.

Just a charging station for 30 minutes to get 85 miles and have to unhook your trailer to access the charger... wasting at least 60 minutes. Wave of the future. Lol. No non-gay is going to buy this truck. I tow weekly for the most part. It's literally unusable besides being a fag magnet with no actual utility.

None of these EV trucks can get 100 miles with an average trailer. What the fuck was the point in buying it? You don't buy a truck to look like a gay. Elon fucked up bigly on this one the more I research it. This is a flash in the pan type thing. He'll sell them to the gays, but it won't be profitable long term.
736   GNL   2024 May 12, 10:03am  








I laughed at the guy as he drove past me…well, I laughed at his wife in the passenger seat actually.
737   GNL   2024 May 12, 10:04am  

What a stupid assed vehicle.
738   richwicks   2024 May 12, 10:25am  

WookieMan says


Just a charging station for 30 minutes to get 85 miles and have to unhook your trailer to access the charger... wasting at least 60 minutes. Wave of the future. Lol. No non-gay is going to buy this truck. I tow weekly for the most part. It's literally unusable besides being a fag magnet with no actual utility.


I'm not defending this vehicle. Most people that own trucks where I live, don't need them.

I think EVs are a disaster, and I'm probably North America's authority on DIN and 15118 DC fast charging standards. I've worked on this shit, I know it innately, and I left it in disgust. I'm probably the only asshole that knows how EXI encoding works, including the stupid asshole "architects" that mandated it as a standard. I spent 2 years going through all the bugs of the actual "example implementation" and completely reversed engineered it because the RFI was bullshit that didn't explain it. In fact the RFI was so fucking wrong, that their example was incorrect, I decoded it and implemented it using their standard coding model that was released as Javascript - totally unusable in a real work environment, too slow. Total fucking garbage gets made as standards because everybody is too pussy to admit they have no idea how the fuck it works, and if they did understand it, they would certainly reject it. It's all fraud.

I are a enginerd. I look at these disasters of design, and wonder, what the fuck am I doing? I'm not solving a problem. I'm helping create one. Electric vehicles are not a solution, at least not yet. I know this is a boondoggle. Sure, we can make them, but it doesn't solve a problem. The problem exists because the governments have mandated "this is a problem", it's not an actual problem. CO2 is not destroying the planet, and even if it was, electric vehicles do NOTHING to solve this problem, if anything, they consume MORE fossil fuels.

Keep it stupid simple, or keep it simple, stupid - that's still my motto. Logic and thinking is tough enough without adding stupidity into the equation.

I can be a CTO, but I can't be a fraud, that's a limiting factor for me. I'm not stupid enough to lie through ignorance, and I'm not evil enough to lie intentionally. Imagine, competence is a limiting factor now. A doctor that properly recognized that the mRNA "vaccines" didn't work, or ventilators didn't work, or that possibly steroids or Ivermectin DID work, they got fired. That's my position. I still have a duty to all you fuckers to tell the truth, much to my detriment.

There is no reward for being right, but... I can't be wrong either. I mean, I can't lie, and if I determine everybody else is wrong, I will call them out on it, and the weight of the world drops down on me. There's no support for that! There's a thread here how our society won't survive incompetency, and I see it everywhere, and if I spot it too soon, oh, well, I'm not a team player in the fraud. "Oh, your company is all bullshit, this is why" "Shhhhhhh - we're making money from the government, shut the fuck up!". Hahahaha.

I just can't do the Asch Conformity test and agree. I can't. I'm in the 10%. I'm in that tiny percentage that if I see the longest line, no matter how many people say it's not the longest line, I still will because I don't trust any of you, I trust my own senses and ability. You'd think this would be a strength, it absolutely is not, even when I'm right, and sometimes I'm wrong as well. I'm right more than I am wrong. I was right about the Iraq War, the Afghanistan war, the Syrian war, the bombing of Libya, the Ukraine war, the Gaza war. The last two EVENTUALLY you will realize I'm correct about, after years of you shitting on me. There will be no apologies. There never are.

You might properly see this as rambling and far off subject, but I see an ENTIRE industry in a dead end, and it's obvious to me it is. I might as well talk to a brick wall as to try to convince people they are barking up the wrong tree. I just thought people didn't know, I just didn't realize propaganda reached this far and this wide. Even into science and technology it reaches. Independent thinkers are hated even when they are right, can save billions of wasted dollars, they are despised and I'm one of them.
739   socal2   2024 May 15, 5:54pm  

I finally got my free 1 month trial of Tesla's "Full Self Driving" this past weekend.

I had some pretty high expectations going in - and they were greatly exceeded. I've been driving around all week running my normal errands and haven't had a single intervention for safety. Just a couple for navigation where it wasn't taking my preferred route. It drives so smooth and natural. It also accelerates very nicely and aggressively. My only complaint is that Biden's Commies running NHTSA forced Tesla nerf the FSD to come to complete stops at stop signs. Easy enough to push through with a tap on the gas.

From a busy Costco parking lot with cars and pedestrians everywhere, I just tell it to drive home and it figures its way out of the parking lot and drives me all the way home and parks in front of the house.

This shit is the real deal.

Can't wait to take it up to the LA office tomorrow. Will see if it can make it door to door without any interventions.
741   Eric Holder   2024 May 30, 9:35am  

socal2 says

Can't wait to take it up to the LA office tomorrow. Will see if it can make it door to door without any interventions.


It's been two weeks. We're starting to worry.
742   WookieMan   2024 May 30, 9:59am  

socal2 says

Can't wait to take it up to the LA office tomorrow. Will see if it can make it door to door without any interventions.

That shouldn't be a thought when driving a vehicle. Time is money. Upfront cost of the vehicle is money. I get gas is expensive in CA, but it's not in most of the country in line with inflation. 5 year time span a ICE hybrid will save more money. I just want you EV guys to admit they're just fun to drive.

This isn't meant as a dig. I prefer to drive my golf cart around town. 0-25 is about 2 seconds and that's the max speed limit in town. It's fun. But it was fucking expensive to toss a Lipo battery in there for cruising around town. Looking to upgrade motor, controller and lift it. I'll be the first to admit electric is not practical having a mini version. It's expensive. I don't care about self driving as I don't trust other drivers. I'm a geezer driver. Only accident I've been in would have been unavoidable t-bone crash. Bitch just pulled out with 20' to spare at best. Tesla ain't stopping that crash.

From then on I became an extremely aware active driver. It's not about self driving and other sensors that can and will fail. You need to actively drive. That goes for ICE drivers as well. Computers and electronics fail all the time. I know what I can see and do driving a car.
743   RWSGFY   2024 May 30, 10:09am  

Gas is expensive in CA, you say? Wait till you learn how much a kWh of electricity costs.
744   Blue   2024 May 30, 10:45am  

Eric Holder says


socal2 says


Can't wait to take it up to the LA office tomorrow. Will see if it can make it door to door without any interventions.


It's been two weeks. We're starting to worry.


Upgraded with latest version of self driving sw. It still does few silly mistakes. It did two mistakes while going to the nearby park. On a two lanes street it should have been on the left to go straight. But it was on the right only, oops it was too late then it went straight after the stop sign instead of taking right!!
At the park, it pulled over and saw trash can on the street, when I decided not to go to the crowded park, I have added my next stop. Instead of pulling back to avoid trash can, it went forward and hit the trash can just before I applied breaks and pulled in reverse.
The point is, it’s still evolving and needs some time to get better like an other technology. Meanwhile drivers must watch out all the time.
745   WookieMan   2024 Jun 3, 6:55am  

https://youtu.be/bfGn2korYXU?si=UETcrvmbeU4Sdob1

Just dropping this here. I've been warning you guys. It's not my line of work but my wife's. We talk about it daily and I know many, many, many engineers and government employees. The government is going to tax the living shit out of you EV drivers. It already takes 5 years to not pay for gas because of the high price of the vehicle itself. You still pay for electric or if you double down on stupid put in solar panels.

At some point people eventually figure out their grade school math and realize this is not possible. Or they'll have to suffer with shitty roads. I'd bet 80% of EV drivers don't even know what MFT is. This is going to get funny.
746   GNL   2024 Jun 3, 7:14am  

How many “silly mistakes” does it take to cost 1 life? Have the Tesla savants done the math on that?
747   HeadSet   2024 Jun 3, 8:11am  

WookieMan says

This is going to get funny.

No one will be laughing. While everyone is distracted by debating the economics of ICE versus EV, they miss that the goal of the rulers is to eliminate private cars completely by 2035 or so. Mandates on kill switches, self-drive, and taxes will lower the utility and raise the cost of ownership to unaffordable levels.
748   socal2   2024 Jun 3, 8:17am  

Eric Holder says

socal2 says


Can't wait to take it up to the LA office tomorrow. Will see if it can make it door to door without any interventions.


It's been two weeks. We're starting to worry.


Oh - it worked like a charm. Have taken 2 more longish road trips since without any disengagements for safety reasons. The only issue for me is it is still a bit timid at stop signs (thanks to NHTSA forcing complete stops on it) and it sometimes does not navigate my preferred routes.

Lane changing on freeways is awesome.

My trial expires this weekend and I plan on paying $99/month to extend it at least through the Summer as I have more family trips planned and some out of town guests coming to visit.
749   socal2   2024 Jun 3, 8:26am  

GNL says

How many “silly mistakes” does it take to cost 1 life? Have the Tesla savants done the math on that?


FSD will undoubtedly cause some accidents and will probably get some people killed along the way. The Financial garbage media and Leftists who hate Musk will trumpet every accident to the moon.

Meanwhile, Tesla continues to add BILLIONS and BILLIONS of safe miles every few months on FSD - already showing that "Supervised" FSD is 11X safer than the average human driver.

FSD is already 99% there, it is the additional .999 (march of 9's) that is most tricky to train for all the edge cases.

The data collection is already impressive, but by the end of this year - it will be very difficult of regulators and insurance companies to deny how much more safety FSD adds to the average driver.

FSD will become as mainstream as basic cruise control and airbags in every car within 10 years IMO.
750   WookieMan   2024 Jun 3, 11:19am  

socal2 says

FSD is 11X safer than the average human driver.

We're talking math on this. I've driven over 1M miles in my lifetime with one accident. One that a Tesla could NOT have avoided and I veered in the opposite direction of what a computer would think so as not to hit the passenger side. Because I could see the passenger in the front. Tesla or any FSD can't do that.

Maybe I'm special. I knew there was no avoiding the collision. I don't care what vehicle you're in. The Tesla would have just applied brakes. It's not about Tesla owners, it's about the people that are in other cars that get killed. We all know airbags are so safe... said no one.

I made the decision when the bitch pulled out in front of me to hit her truck and tore it off. Hindsight is 20/20, but time slows down when you're in that situation if you're not on a phone or messing with the radio. I don't do either in a car ever. All that shit can wait. I hit her going 40mph. No airbag deployment. Everyone walked away. I actually was able to get one of those old school bras for the front bumper and the car looked totally fine for $200. For my age I got $4k for medical (not hurt at all) and my parents got $4k for repairs that cost $200. Not happening that way with an EV. Both cars would have been totaled.
751   stereotomy   2024 Jun 3, 11:27am  

I had an experience similar to Wookie - this crazy woman backs out into traffic with a full load of children in a minivan. I'm about to go around her, but she panics and steps on the gas so that she's about to have me broadside the minivan. I had to jump the curb, mow down road signs just to avoid her enough to not kill the kids in back. For my efforts, my insurance company tried to frame me, but witness and police statements cleared my ass of liability.
752   WookieMan   2024 Jun 3, 11:33am  

HeadSet says

Mandates on kill switches, self-drive, and taxes will lower the utility and raise the cost of ownership to unaffordable levels.

That's why I keep and maintain my ICE cars as well as I can. I have an EV in the form of a golf cart. EV owners have zero fucking clue what taxes and maintenance expenses are coming their way. That's besides getting raped out the gate with prices of them. We're barely aging out of generation 1 for EV cars. Hell a hybrid Prius isn't event that old.

Hoping to push 500k miles with the Armada. I do need suspension work, but any car with 232k miles will need that EV or not. Hands down the most solid car longevity wise I or anyone in my family has ever owned. Tires, brakes and oil changes. Assuming someone made an EV of that size at the time it would have been $120k easy. $35k is what I got it for. Tows 9k. 400 miles a tank. 7 passengers comfortably. I literally saved a lifetime of gas buying that over some over priced EV.

I don't want a "fun to drive" car. I need multiple utility for my vehicle. There's not a single full EV that provides what I need. It's not even close. EV's are feel good toys.
753   B.A.C.A.H.   2024 Jun 3, 3:25pm  

RWSGFY says


Gas is expensive in CA, you say? Wait till you learn how much a kWh of electricity costs.

I track these expenses. The past month I paid an average of $4.87 per gallon in the Bay Area.

My last PGE bill the "average" rate was $0.46 per kwhr. The tier-2 usage is $0.538 per kwhr. If I charged my plug in hybrid at home, those kwhr would be on top of the other kwhr we consume, so Tier-2 at $0.538 per kwhr.

Without plugging in, at we average 55 mpg. At $4.87 per gallon it's about 11.2 center per mile. If I believe the "specs" of 8.8 kwhr/mile for the Prius, at $0.538 per kwhr it's 18.9 cents per mile. With this arithmetic the gas price ought to be more than $9 per gallon to be the same or cheaper as the cost to charge the f*cker at home.

I had checked this a few years ago, when our Tier-2 rate was 37 cents per kwhr. Back then, charging at home would have been equivalent to $6 per gallon. We approached $6 but never got there. We're back down to $4.87.

It's because like RWSGFY says, our electric rates are going up faster than the gasoline prices.

The utility (PG&E) will provide a small discount to charge overnight if we agree to pay a higher rate (66 cents per kwhr) during "peak" hours. Ha ha ha!
755   WookieMan   2024 Jun 6, 5:43am  

B.A.C.A.H. says

It's because like RWSGFY says, our electric rates are going up faster than the gasoline prices.

Isn't CA testing out taxing EV mileage currently for MFT? Pretty sure I read that somewhere. Said it was coming and I think it's here.

Funny thing is I have a Tesla sitting in my driveway currently sitting next to my Armada. It's a car for babies the Tesla that is. I don't care how fun they are to drive, at 6'3" it ain't for me. I could flop my dick on the roof of the car.... And I don't care how "safe" Tesla says their cars are, if I t-boned the car in my driveway it's toast at 45mph+, you're not living.
756   DOGEWontAmountToShit   2024 Jul 1, 6:46am  

Wow! Who here on PatNet said this was a problem?

And who here on PatNet said that was bullshit or tried to deflect with bullshit of their own?
.


Of the 211 developers surveyed by Xendee, a California-based software company, 75% said that electric grid limitations are among the biggest roadblock to building EV charging infrastructure. The total cost of the infrastructure was a problem for 63% of the respondents, and permitting delays were cited by 53% of those surveyed.

Many of Xendee’s clients, according to Utility Dive, have resorted to installing gas- or diesel- powered generators to run their charging stations.

The Biden administration has gone all in on a future of EV's, but that looks unlikely to happen, given poor planning and market forces.


https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/energy/three-out-four-ev-charging-developers-say-they-cant-get-enough-electricity

Where's all that magically supercheap solar power and windmill shit that was to make sure this would never happen?

Where the flying fuck is all this money for the 'green transition' really going?

C'mon Greentards and Teslatards! WTF happened?
757   WookieMan   2024 Jul 1, 7:24am  

DemocratsAreTotallyFucked says

Wow! Who here on PatNet said this was a problem?

You did. I did. EV's are math and I'm not even good at it. They were never viable if you factor in the cost of similar cars. And you can't do shit with them. The CT is going to be an absolute flop for Tesla.

Millennials are having kids. I don't want a truck to fit 3 kids on a bench seat. They build sedans. NO one is building a large SUV because it would be $150k for a fucking car I can get for $60k. The fact they haven't even done a minivan is hysterical. You'd get the MILF buying them and the cucked men. I don't mind Elon, but he's failed in this regard with tiny cars for baby men. Get a real fucking SUV and I'd maybe be a customer.
758   GNL   2024 Aug 14, 11:37am  

MORE RIDICULOUSNESS VIA TESLA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O-AiuQy4ALc
759   Eric Holder   2024 Aug 15, 9:01am  

WookieMan says


The fact they haven't even done a minivan is hysterical.


ModelX IS a minivan. Down to middle doors designed in a way to prevent kids from hitting cars parked next to it.

« First        Comments 720 - 759 of 779       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste