« First « Previous Comments 126 - 165 of 197 Next » Last » Search these comments
It's simple and I've mentioned it before. Voting is weighted based on your income taxes that you put back into the system. You pay $0 you get 1 vote. You pay $10 you get 2. You pay $100 you get three. On and on.
Poll taxes are a wonderful idea. Too bad the Leftoid 60s court shut it down.
So instead of elections being decided by large minority populations in big cities. You want George Soros and Bill Gates to decide our elections?
WookieMan says
It's simple and I've mentioned it before. Voting is weighted based on your income taxes that you put back into the system. You pay $0 you get 1 vote. You pay $10 you get 2. You pay $100 you get three. On and on.
So instead of elections being decided by large minority populations in big cities. You want George Soros and Bill Gates to decide our elections?
There's a better way, you can only vote if you drag your sorry ass to the polls, and you vote on paper.
After stealing the election in 2020 (and 2022), do you honestly think that there is even a remote chance that they are going to somehow allow Trump to be elected in '24? The elite that are pulling all the levers of power will NEVER allow that to happen.
There is only one way, and that is if Trump caves in and makes a deal with them. Reagan did it when he selected the internationalist, New World Order George H. W. Bush as VP, and then obediently loaded up his administration with Trilateralists and CFR members.
Voting should be in person, on paper, with secure ID, natural born citizens, nobody who has illegal alien parents, nobody who is on welfare or using government benefits under age 62.
Hugh_Mongous says
the whole covfefe he was impeached for was for the attempt to investigate his front-running opponent before the election
Biden actually did commit serious crimes though, like abusing his office to threaten withholding US loan guarantees
And the previous Trump thing was EXACTLY the same as that Biden thing - threatening to withhold the Congress-approved assistance.
Same with investigating a candidate: it's taboo this year because our guy is the challenger but it was perfectly ok when our guy was the incumbent. And vice versa. Politics do this to people.
Lol, even Bolton, who hates Trump.
The satisfying Shadenfreude of seeing Trump arrested and hauled before a kangaroo court is being countered by the paranoia that when Trump wins, they all have their informal immunities dropped by default and new precedence. That's the reason even his 'enemies' and counter stooges don't want this.
THE FIX IS IN. They timed the rotation to get this blatantly antiTrump judge:
Looks like Stormy has got to pay even more Trump legal bills:
In all, Daniels has been ordered to pay more than $600,000 in Trump’s legal fees, tweeted Harmeet Dillon, one of his attorneys in the case.
That includes some $300,000 in attorney's fees that Daniels previously was ordered to pay. After a federal appeals court upheld that award last year
(Cue "Gangsta's Paradise" instrumental as Trump gets a hooker to pay HIM!)
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/stormy-daniels-must-pay-122-000-in-trump-legal-bills/ar-AA19u1g1?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=27e921923d0848fbad00b4c4064d84e2&ei=20
President of El Salvador on Charges Against President Trump: ‘The United States’ Ability to Use “Democracy” as Foreign Policy Is Gone’
https://thelibertydaily.com/president-of-el-salvador-on-charges-against-president-trump-the-united-states-ability-to-use-democracy-as-foreign-policy-is-gone/
(Cue "Gangsta's Paradise" instrumental as Trump gets a hooker to pay HIM!)
RayAmerica says
President of El Salvador on Charges Against President Trump: ‘The United States’ Ability to Use “Democracy” as Foreign Policy Is Gone’
https://thelibertydaily.com/president-of-el-salvador-on-charges-against-president-trump-the-united-states-ability-to-use-democracy-as-foreign-policy-is-gone/
It's been gone for 30 years. Our government is criminal. Remember this?
original link
That horrible asshole was just lying about everything she stated...
Agreed. That was one of the low points back then, before the quadruple. lol
I don't know if they think we're this stupid, or if they are legitimately this stupid.
Judge Overseeing DA Bragg’s Anti-Trump Case Is a Biden Donor
Judge Merchan suggested but did not order President Trump to stop tweeting or talking about the case. The judge set the next court hearing in the case for December, because he’s so very busy with other, more important cases or something. That means the circus resumes right before the primaries begin. ...
🔥 Bragg’s indictment has 34 counts of the same exact “crime,” alleging 34 separate violations of the exact same New York Penal Code §175.10, for “falsifying business records in the first degree.” All 34 counts are based on one single transaction, the one single payment of $130K to Stormy Daniels. Bragg boosted the charges to a whopping 34 by counting every microscopic stage of the transaction as a separate crime. ...
I could not find a single case in New York’s legal history where a defendant was charged separately for all the parts of the same transaction under § 175.10.
To pump the mis-accounting charge up to a felony, Bragg also must prove that Trump’s INTENT in paying Cohen’s legal retainer was not just to cover up his sordid relationship with the sex worker, but to cover up another CRIME, which presumably would be the campaign finance violation.
But so far, DA Bragg has refused to identify what the other crime is, even when directly asked by reporters. It’s goofy, and that’s a tell. ...
Penal Code § 175.10 is one sentence long, and itself requires proof of a lesser crime, misdemeanor falsifying business records, under the immediately previous statute, § 175.05. That statute describes the crime:
So, Bragg must prove two “elements”: (1) that Trump had an “intent to defraud” somebody when the accountant miscoded the expenses, and (2) Trump personally directed the false entry to be made in the “business records.”
The whole case revolves around Trump’s bookkeeper entering Cohen’s invoices into the accounting system and calling them “legal expenses” instead of … what? Buying story rights? Donations to Trump’s campaign? Bragg doesn’t say what they should’ve been called instead.
What would YOU call payments to your lawyer?
Under the New York law, to qualify as a crime, the false record can’t be just any old business record. It has to be something that would cause other people to be defrauded, like investors, or an insurance company. ...
As far as I can tell, Trump’s legal expense entries didn’t create any financial advantage for the “enterprise,” and nobody depended on them that was or could have been defrauded. So it’s not clear to me that the Cohen invoices and payments were the type of business records that could be subject to the statute.
🔥 But Bragg’s biggest problem is proving intent. He doesn’t just have to prove intent, he must prove TWO separate intents: an “intent to defraud” related to the Cohen payments, PLUS an intent to cover up a second crime, the campaign finance violation. That’s the only way Bragg can reach a felony level of “falsification.”
Not only that, but Bragg must prove both those intents “beyond a reasonable doubt” — the highest standard of proof under the law. OJ Simpson walked because they couldn’t prove murder beyond a reasonable doubt. “If the glove don’t fit, you must acquit.”
In other words, it doesn’t matter whether the coding for “legal fees” was actually incorrect, or whether a campaign reporting violation actually occurred. Bragg has to prove that Trump — in his own mind — both intended to deceive people to get a financial advantage, and also intended avoid reporting legitimate campaign expenses in a criminal way.
« First « Previous Comments 126 - 165 of 197 Next » Last » Search these comments
Link to NYT Article:
https://archive.is/IsPTb