« First « Previous Comments 17 - 56 of 110 Next » Last » Search these comments
Back in the 70s, he supported the EU and said Der Juden were against the EU since Jews were suspicious of a "Master Race" arising from a united Europe. Decades later, "Corbyn is a very fine man" in reaction to his anti-Israel stances. He was anti-semitic long before he began his "Holocaust Research"
That's why I hate whenever these guys are deplatformed. Their bullshit is usually exterminated faster than a Polish Village after an Einsatzgruppen Death Squad
It's important to listen to extremes, but it's also important to realize they aren't correct just because they oppose the general census, either.
It's pretty simple - if you're not allowed to discuss it, it's because you're over the target
My experience is that only lies are protected with censorship, not the truth. Truth doesn't need any protection.
richwicks says
My experience is that only lies are protected with censorship, not the truth. Truth doesn't need any protection.
Many cranks claim to be totally censored - and they might be in some places and some times, but not all of them - the real reason is they get their clock cleaned when their claims are held up to scrutiny. So they pretend to be truth martyrs. Seen this over my life for decades on many subjects.
Again, you claimed Irving was "anti-Semitic" - can you show this not by what people CLAIM he has said, but by what he's said?
That's exactly what GIYUS and Zionists in general are like. They are complete bullies, they will try to intimidate you, they will even physically attack you. They want to shut you up, they don't even want to entertain MAYBE what they are doing is gravely immoral.
What's diesel exhaust?
2.16: Fumes from a diesel engine are not toxic enough to kill people.
(This claim is made with regard to the death camp of Treblinka – see file with ruling of German courts on this. In other death camps, gasoline engines were used. The method of killing was simple – people were crammed into the gas chambers, and the exhaust of powerful engines was pumped into them).
Nonsense. In a closed chamber, of course diesel fumes will kill. There was actually a study on this, and its results are reported in “The Toxicity of Fumes from a Diesel Engine Under Four Different Running Conditions”, by Pattle et al., British Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1957, Vol 14, p. 47-55. These researchers ran a few experiments in which various animals were exposed to diesel fumes, and studied the results.
In the experiments, the exhaust of a small diesel engine (568 cc, 6 BHP) was connected to a chamber 10 cubic meters (340 cubic feet) in volume, and the animals were put inside it. In all cases, the animals died. Death was swifter when the intake of air to the engine was restricted, as this causes a large increase in the amount of carbon monoxide (CO) that is emitted. (See, for instance, “diesel Engine Reference Book”, by Lilly, 1985, p. 18/8, where it is stated that at a high air/fuel ratio the concentration of CO is only a few parts per million but for lower ratios (25:1) the concentration of CO can rise up to 3,000 ppm. It is very easy to restrict the air intake; the British researchers did so by partially covering the air intake opening with a piece of metal.)
Even in cases where the CO output was low, the animals still died from other toxic components – mainly irritants and nitrogen dioxide.
Now, the diesel engines used in Treblinka were much larger – they belonged to captured Soviet T-34 tanks. These tanks weighed 26-31 tons (depending on the model) and had a 500 BHP engine (compared to a mere 6 BHP in the British experiments). The volume of the extermination chambers in Treblinka is, of course, a factor. But the chambers’ volume was about 60 cubic meters (2040 cubic feet); this is 6 times more than those in the British experiments, but the difference in the size of the engines is much larger than a factor of 6.
It should be remembered that what matters in CO poisoning is not the concentration of CO, but the ratio of CO to oxygen. In a small room, crammed full of people, oxygen levels drop quickly, thus making death by CO poisoning faster. As noted, other toxic components in the fumes further accelerate mortality.
The SS was aware of the fact that cramming as many people as possible into the gas chamber, thus leaving no empty spaces, would accelerate mortality. This is evident, for instance, from a letter regarding “gassing vans” (used in the Chelmno extermination camp and other locations) sent to SS-Obersturmbannfuehrer Walter Rauff, 5 June 1942. The letter is quite long (more of it is reproduced in the file of original Nazi documents), but here is the relevant part (Nazism, document 913).
“2) The vans are normally loaded with 9-10 people per square meter. With the large Saurer special vans this is not possible because although they do not become overloaded their maneuverability is much impaired. A reduction in the load area appears desirable. It can be achieved by reducing the size of the van by c. 1 meter. The difficulty referred to cannot be overcome by reducing the size of the load. For a reduction in the numbers will necessitate longer period of operation because the free spaces will have to be filled with CO. By contrast, a smaller load area which is completely full requires a much shorter period of operation since there are no free spaces.”
Another gruesome testimony to the “science of gassing” developed by the SS is the letter from Dr August Becker to SS-Obersturmbannfuehrer Rauff, 16 May 1942 (Nazi Conspiracy, 418)
“The application of the gas is not undertaken correctly. In order to come to an end as fast as possible, the driver presses the accelerator to the fullest extent. By doing that the persons to be executed suffer death from suffocation and not death by dozing off as was planned. My directions have now proved that by correct adjustment of the levers death comes faster and the prisoners fall asleep peacefully. Distorted faces and excretions, such as could be seen before, are no longer noticed”.
If you can show extraordinary evidence that Irving isn't a lifelong Hitler Apologist and Anti-Semite, I'd be happy to listen.
Irving is free to publish, sell, debate, etc. in the USA and elsewhere.
All Liberation Groups behave that way.
You know as well as I do you can't prove a negative.
Happy USS Liberty day - by the way, it was yesterday.
They do this ALL THE TIME. GIYUS is nothing more than an Israeli government program to prevent ANY criticism of Israel, no matter WHAT they do.
Like when Rachael Corrie
Yes, but I need to be arsed to discover more.
The old "Muh Hitler dindu nuffin wrong" has been debunked countless times.
For example, the badge removal during the Beer Hall Pusch Days; Irving completely twisted the original sources to be what it wasn't - Hitler WANTED party members to wear their badges when socialistically terrorizing private property. Irving makes it sound like Hitler punished somebody for behaving like an Antifa rioter.
Let me know when you have evidence, not utterly unbacked speculation of a non-accidental motive.
The USS Liberty was more than a half-century ago, before Disco, before Nixon, before the VCR.
What college did Rachel Corrie attend?
Was she standing up or lying down?
Was Rachel Corie a humanitarian, or a useful idiot Socialist, the same kind who claim Maduro was duly elected?
Don't make a claim you cannot support.
OK, source?
The motive has beengivenasserted or speculated upon several times, to draw the US into a war against Egypt by framing Egypt for the attack.
Yeah. So what. The Holocaust was more than 75 years ago, before Israel existd, before Rock and Roll, before Eisenhower, before Civil Rights, before desegregation, before Elvis, before Count Folke Bernadotte was murdered by order of Yitzhak Shamir when he was one of the triumvirate of Lehi. I guess we can just forget about then. Finally!
Who cares? Was she purposely killed or not? Again, we couldn't find out because of GIYUS twats. You aren't allowed to discuss anything Israel does, unless you do it in secret. I'm not kidding either.
It's to protect...
(FILL IN THE BLANK)
The most absurd thing is the Presidential Records Act has no crimnal penalty in it..
There's no way they can charge Trump with violating the Espionage Act, which is entirely different.
This is really a dumb move by Biden/DOJ to slow down political opponent while having similar documents with Biden (perhaps Obama/Bush/Clinton etc).
It's to protect...
(FILL IN THE BLANK)
Let's do that : with suspicions of USS Liberty motives, and assertions that Epstein worked for Mossad.
Is anyone else just getting numb to this shit?
There are legit incriminating things from past presidents and others.
at this point I think the witch hunt is just a waste of time.
Fact is the Dems need to find an actual candidate
Covid is over. I don't think mail in ballots will be as much this time around.
The Dems don’t need a candidate, As long as they have a RINO/Trojan horse globalist schill like DeSantis or Chris Christie they win even if they lose.
Here you go: The content creator compares Irving's claims to the Primary Source Material, and finds Irving added and distorted what was reported, per Evans, who testified for the Defense at Irving vs. Penguin Books. Irving lost, by the way, with the Court deciding it was reasonable to call him a Holocaust Denier.
https://youtu.be/VsLW7VrOpA8?t=39
Walks viewer right through it, and asks the viewer to note the claims being made by Irving, and then compares them to the quotes made by participant of the event in question.
Fact is the Dems need to find an actual candidate.
WookieMan says
Fact is the Dems need to find an actual candidate.
I had high hopes that Kennedy could be that candidate, but then he comes out and supports the ridiculously corrupt US-instigated war in Ukraine, proving he's just another puppet after all.
The witch hunt is to discredit Trump enough with the swing voters that they can push through some milquetoast globalist schill in either the primary or general election.
There will still be enough ballot harvesting in swing districts to change the outcome of the election. Democrats counting votes, or worse yet, “computers” counting votes, guarantees fraud.
The Dems don’t need a candidate, As long as they have a RINO/Trojan horse globalist schill like DeSantis or Chris Christie they win even if they lose.
Trump might actually be able to end it.
Donald Trump Widens Lead Over Primary Field Post Indictment
The indictment of Donald Trump is making him even stronger.
According to a post-indictment CBS Poll, Donald Trump continues to dominate the GOP primary.
He has his biggest lead yet.
Twitter:
Trump — 61% (+38)
DeSantis — 23%
T. Scott — 4%
Pence — 4%
Haley — 3%
Ramaswamy — 1%
Hutchinson — 1%
Burgum — 1%
Elder — 1%
Christie — 1%
Breitbart reported:
A poll indicates that former President Donald Trump has widened his lead in the GOP primary following the Department of Justice’s indictment of him for allegedly mishandling classified documents at his Florida home.
Surveying 1,798 potential voters between June 9-10 with a margin of error ±3.3 points, the CBS News poll showed the former president had 61 percent support in the Republican primary, leading his opponent, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis by a full 38 points – 61 percent to 23 percent. Republican Sen. Tim Scott (SC) stands in third place with just 4 percent of support, just one point ahead of former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley.
The poll had more great news for Donald Trump.
PeopleUnited says
Trump might actually be able to end it.
It would end as soon as Trump won the election.
I don't think Trump will be allowed to run, and even if he's allowed to run and even he's made president, he won't be allowed to end the war.
It will be less of a chance of a Soviet Show Trial.
real evidence and ACTIONS supporting the lame and retarded claim that DeSantis is some sort of "Globalist Schill
« First « Previous Comments 17 - 56 of 110 Next » Last » Search these comments
The Wall Street Journal reported that the grand jury is part of the investigation conducted by special counsel Jack Smith. It's separate from a Washington, D.C. grand jury that's been hearing testimony in the documents case.
People close to the investigation said Smith was trying to tie up loose ends before a possible indictment.
NBC News confirmed that a grand jury was meeting in Florida.
"Why prosecutors are using multiple grand juries, and whether they are ready to seek an indictment in either jurisdiction is unknown," the NBC News report noted. "The Justice Department declined to comment on the investigation."
On Monday, attorneys for Trump met with officials at the Department of Justice to argue he should not be indicted.
https://www.rawstory.com/donald-trump-florida-grand-jury/