patrick.net

HeadSet says

Misc says

Also, simply collecting rent.

How does one "simply collect rent?" To collect rent, I had to first buy the property (using money saved from a job plus a bank loan), then fix it up, market it, insure it, and pay taxes. Can one also "simply collect dividends" without having to buy stocks? How about "simply collect interest" without saving and buying CDs or an account like an MMA?

If you want to claim the 10% of the rent that would be charged by a property manager as "working for it" instead of "free Money", go ahead if it makes you feel better.

... there is also more "work" in applying for social benefits than it takes to click a mouse to buy stocks, CDs or mutual funds.

The work is getting the money for the investments. The money the investments make takes no effort and is the same as the "free money" those being derided get from social spending.

Misc says

The money the investments make takes no effort

To say that renting property takes no effort is absurd. Also risk. Do not confuse being a landlord with buying into a REIT.

HeadSet says

Misc says

The money the investments make takes no effort

To say that renting property takes no effort is absurd. Also risk. Do not confuse being a landlord with buying into a REIT.

A property manager only charges 10% of the rent for his services. If your time value is higher than that, you should hire one (or more depending on how many properties you have). Sorry, the rest is free money.

HeadSet says

To say that renting property takes no effort is absurd.

This guy doesn't know what the fuck he is talking about. I got a rotator cuff injury fixing up a rental 6 months ago (~3 months of labor, weekends and nights) that still hasn't healed.

No 10% property manager is going to do that. BTW it's 30% in Maui that's why I managed it myself and flew out there every year for 10 days of death march slave labor to keep it in shape.

Boo hoo. Getting a business tax write off for a Hawaiian vacation must suck.

Misc says

Boo hoo. Getting a business tax write off for a Hawaiian vacation must suck.

Stop watching youtube videos about passive income. They are lying to you. You not only come across as very ignorant but bitter too.

Maga_Chaos_Monkey says

No 10% property manager is going to do that.

You are correct. All a property manager will do is milk the landlord for maintenance jobs thrown to his pals. I used a property manager for an Oklahoma house since I moved out of state, and I got bills like $100 to replace a toilet flapper or $200 to fix a single slat in a fence. Also, not just 10% of rents, it is usually 50% of the monthly rent to find a tenant, then that 10% each month.

The people who talk about easy landlord life do not own rentals and sound like those old "no money down" late night TV infomercials.

I am about as bitter from you getting free money as I am a welfare Ho getting free money.

Trump creating a few billion of crypto and being able to sell off $500 million of it to people on the eve of his inauguration ... well puts the Biden crime family grift in a much better light.

personal

HeadSet says

You are correct. All a property manager will do is milk the landlord for maintenance jobs thrown to his pals.

Indeed. They only make sense if you own a fuck ton of real estate and then they'd primarily work for you and nobody else. I did manage to find a LOT of honest, hardworking, talented contractors in Maui. A bit in the slow side because people work on island-time there but very reasonable rates for stuff. I trusted several to go in to do work when I was here on the mainland unable to inspect.

After the Lahaina fire though very few left of anyone to help out. Glad I sold...

Maga_Chaos_Monkey says

Nice strawman deflection dude.

The thread is Trump's sellout. What you buy some Trump token trying to get more free money ????

Misc says

The thread is Trump's sellout. What you buy some Trump token trying to get more free money ????

Get
A
Life

Shady tokens has nothing to do with Pharma.

Maga_Chaos_Monkey says

Misc says

The thread is Trump's sellout. What you buy some Trump token trying to get more free money ????

Get
A
Life

Shady tokens has nothing to do with Pharma.

Has more to do with the difference between a small time grifter looking to the appreciation fairies and a master taking down a $500 million score.

https://eccentrik.substack.com/p/trump-introduces-500-billion-ai-infrastructure

Trump Introduces $500 Billion AI Infrastructure Investment, Touts mRNA "Cancer Vaccines"

I call balls and strikes, I’m no Trump sycophant.

So when I heard about this “Stargate” project, I knew immediately what it was. More mRNA? More AI control? More conglomerates gaining access to all your biometric data, a la Internet of Bodies?

I’ ve written a lot about Transhumanism and the intersection of AI, mRNA, Climate Change, and Identity Perversion.

We’re seeing two of the four right here…

Oh, and what did Trump recently talk to Bill Gates about? What kind of “vaccines,” again?

Yea…

Patrick says

mRNA "Cancer Vaccines"

Oh, they are cancer vaccines all right, just not cancer prevention vaccines.

Patrick says

Trump Introduces $500 Billion AI Infrastructure Investment, Touts mRNA "Cancer Vaccines"

I call balls and strikes, I’m no Trump sycophant.

So when I heard about this “Stargate” project, I knew immediately what it was. More mRNA? More AI control? More conglomerates gaining access to all your biometric data, a la Internet of Bodies?

I’ ve written a lot about Transhumanism and the intersection of AI, mRNA, Climate Change, and Identity Perversion.

We’re seeing two of the four right here…

Oh, and what did Trump recently talk to Bill Gates about? What kind of “vaccines,” again?

Yea…

I saw this today and remembered this thread. @Patrick I think you should give the guy a break and wait to see where the chips fall. I totally agree with you about 'vaccines', but I have a strong background in this.

The goal (for this at least) is to cure cancer and it might work. I'm okay with gene therapy in this instance. They want to:

1. Mature liquid biopsy. I wrote some of the 1st algorithms for this working closely with our molecular biology lab over a decade ago. Solid tumor biopsies are weak because tumors are usually >1 type of cancer. And some 'expert', is usually just looking at thin slices of the tumor visually to determine what single type of cancer it is. For the lucky ones, there may be a therapeutic already available to kill it if diagnosed correctly. Sadly though, often the other cancers (other mutants) start growing up after that and the cancer 'comes back' and there is no treatment for the newer tumors. You dead!

We have a lot of tech for this and liquid biopsy does a great job detecting the actual multiple cancers that compose the tumor. Probably the best most well funded company doing this is Grail and Grail was getting heavy discounts on dna reading chemistry from the 800lb gorilla in the DNA reading space, Illumina.

So you have a tech that can zero in on the exact cancer types an individual has. Also DNA alignments etc., that an AI might be able to decipher better than a human. Very specific accurate diagnostics.

2. So what do you do after that? There are cancer drugs out there already but not for everything and not for complex cases like that so much. My aunt just died of an aggressive brain cancer 2 months ago. She lasted less than a month after it was detected. For that you need personalized medicine and you aren't getting personalized medicine without genetics and gene therapies. Personally I prefer antibodies but for now lets focus on mRNAs. mRNAs themselves are not inherently bad. Your body is full of them. If you program them to make toxins like spike proteins then yeah, that is bad juju. However in this case it may be the only way to save peoples lives and you aren't making your normal cells look like giant viruses to your immune system. It could very well be a home run.

This 100% isn't anything like you propose above. Imagine you go get your regular physical and one of the things they do with your blood draw is screen for cancer (or urine like what we used). You catch them at stage-1 or even stage-0, no or way less chemo, no or way less cancer specific antibodies (expensive), no or way less surgery. Just an mRNA injection and go home. You never even knew you had it and within a month it's completely gone.

Lets see how this all plays out. He's barely been in office for 24hrs. If he gets involved with mRNAs for infections then I'll be on your side for that, but not this. Personally after covid I've sworn off all vaccines unless I know the vector is not mRNA but I would do this in a pinch no problem.

Maga_Chaos_Monkey says

personal
edit this comment to get it re-moderated

@wookieman was this you?

Misc says

a small time grifter

Much TDS. I suspect you are one of those, "California Conservatives"

Maga_Chaos_Monkey says

mRNAs themselves are not inherently bad.

@Maga_Chaos_Monkey

I'm pretty sure the mRNA tech itself is inherently bad:

https://x.com/BretWeinstein/status/1879299863663571252

If this result holds up, then I will have been precisely right about how the mRNA covid shots damage the heart.

This means a few important things:

1. The mRNA platform is at fault. The spike protein may make matters worse, but all mRNA/LNP shots are expected to trigger immune-mediated heart and circulatory damage, irrespective of what protein is encoded in the mRNA payload. This damage does not require spike protein and has nothing to do with Covid/SARS-CoV2

2. Accidental IV injection likely increases damage, but is not required to injure the heart

3. The shots should never have been allowed to be injected into humans and should be immediately pulled from the market.

4. mRNA gene therapies are not suitable for use in medicine or food production.

5. No mRNA gene therapy will be safe enough to contemplate using until and unless a precise cellular targeting mechanism is created and the entire package PROPERLY tested against TRUE placebo controls.

Not to mention the SV40 problem and many others. But even if mRNA tech were not inherently bad, the bigger problem is that trust in the medical establishment has been burned to the ground and used as a latrine for years after that. They lied over and over and millions died as a result of those lies. And Pfizer alone got $100 billion by murdering all those people. With exemption from liability for those murders written into law.

And now Fauci gets a pardon for orchestrating the murders, first via virus, then via mandated mRNA and hospital death protocols which paid large bonuses.

I'll trust doctors after I've seen the hangings for the worst crime against humanity ever.

You don't need SV40 in these and I think he's completely incorrect with: but all mRNA/LNP shots are expected to trigger immune-mediated heart and circulatory damage, irrespective of what protein is encoded in the mRNA payload

Maybe in the context of 'vaccine' which I tend to agree with.

The "precise cellular targeting mechanism" is the cancer cell themselves that are not like any normal human cells.

Personally I'd rather see personalized antibodies but I don't think that tech is mature enough - getting there though with some of those new DNA writing companies. There are some cancer cures that are antibodies though, just not personalized which is a bitch. My dad's lymphoma was cured with antibodies.

He's being dramatic. Personally I don't like them in food either, pork etc., but there is zero evidence that this is a problem. Your natural enzymes chew them up before they get inside you after you eat for the most part. Every time you eat or breath you are taking in mRNA (and DNA and other types of RNA)

Lungs and Gut are not 'inside' you. We're basically donut shaped.

Maaaybe use some other tech vs. LNP. Definitely use normal mRNA. One of the BS things they did was not not use natural nucleic acids AUGC so they don't get eaten up. Instead some synthetic more stable crap. That is a bad idea too.

Patrick says

But even if mRNA tech were not inherently bad, the bigger problem is that trust in the medical establishment has been burned to the ground and used as a latrine for years after that.

Same. And I work in biotech. I argue this shit with my sister who's a nurse. Family takes her side.

Maga_Chaos_Monkey says

One of the BS things they did was not not use natural nucleic acids AUGC so they don't get eaten up. Instead some synthetic more stable crap. That is a bad idea too.

Right, the pseudouridine is also a huge problem. Then there's frame-shifting, generating nonsense proteins, maybe prions.

All of it was pooh-poohed even while people were and are dying.

Patrick says

Right, the pseudouridine is also a huge problem.

Checkout LNAs and BNAs. Linked nucleic acids and bridged nucleic acids. We used them for RND PCR tests when we want to distinguish a fraction of a degree Celsius melting temp of mutant vs. wild type. That particular company came close to using PCR for liquid biopsy cancer diagnostics which would have been dirt cheap.

https://substack.com/home/post/p-155123033

There must be a million people that want to see Trump. There must be a million things he has to do. This is probably the biggest day of his life.

But then he sees Gates to talk about polio and HIV vaccines.

For three hours.

What does that tell you?

To me, this is obvious.

This is Gates showing the world who is the boss here. This is the Globalist power mafia putting Trump in his place right before the inauguration to remind him: You live at our mercy, and you do what we tell you to do.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/board-flippers-wednesday-january

... not many details were supplied about Stargate, except that Larry Ellison tried way too hard to sell AI as a medical miracle. Quite unfortunately, Larry picked mRNA cancer drugs to use as his example, bragging that AI could help speed up detecting cancer particles floating around in patients’ blood (particles=bad), and then “within 48 hours” could help make a personalized cancer “vaccine” that would force folk’s cells into making even more cancer particles that will float around in their blood (particles=good!).

The more I’ve learned about mRNA technology, the more it seems like the dumbest idea science has ever had, a wormhole of stupidity. The basic idea is to genetically engineer a shot forcing your cells to create some kind of protein, so that your natural immune system then mounts a response, killing all the transfected cells (which used to be healthy) as well as the targeted cancer itself.

That’s the idea anyhow.

But … if the goal is spurring the immune system with cancer proteins, why do we need the whole mRNA process in the first place? Why not just inject the protein that spurs the immune response, and leave the risky transfection process out of it? After all, that’s how traditional vaccines work. And in Ellison’s scenario, if detectable cancer proteins are already present in the blood, it’s not completely clear how forcing cells to produce more of the same proteins could solve the problem instead of making it worse.

Sadly, I think the answer to “why mRNA” has more to do with things like patents and profit potentials rather than the mRNA platform supporting any stargate to a health paradise. We’ll see. But unfortunately for the mRNA scientists, we are all onto them now. We know too much.

If we have anything to do with it, a whole parallel dimension of fierce mRNA criticism is preparing to flood through the Stargate. ...

This time, I think he just picked a horrible example of how this Stargate AI project might help people. He’d hoped to open a portal to a new dimension of AI hype based on his poor understanding of mRNA cancer vaccines, which he probably acquired by reading corporate media. The truth is, they’ve been trying to develop “personalized” mRNA cancer vaccines for 20+ years now without success.

OK, along with reinstating the military members who were expelled because of refusing the death jabs, Trump has also eliminated the death jab requirement for immigrants:

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/breaking-covid-19-vaccine-mandates

COVID-19 'Vaccine' Mandates for Legal Immigrants Eliminated
One of the last remaining tools for the Biopharmaceutical Complex to increase genetic injection uptake has been removed.

Ah, Trump is so close to telling the truth: the mRNA jabs are very dangerous and worse than ineffective.

And now the bad news:

https://armageddonprose.substack.com/p/bioterror-roundup-anti-vaxxer-rfk

Trump transition team sacks two ‘anti-vaxxers’ specifically over vaxx views
If true, not welcome news at all.

Via Wall Street Journal (emphasis added):

“Two vaccine skeptics who had been advising Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. as he prepares to become health secretary have been sidelined by Trump transition officials, people familiar with the matter said, underscoring a split over immunizations in the “Make America Healthy Again” movement.

Adviser Stefanie Spear and lawyer Aaron Siri had asked prospective administration hires about their beliefs around vaccines even if they were interviewing for posts that had little to do with immunizations, people familiar with the interviews said. Kennedy, whose hearings to lead the Department of Health and Human Services could start on Capitol Hill as early as next week, also lobbed questions related to inoculation, the people said.

The questions were different from those asked in separate meetings with President-elect Donald Trump’s staff, according to some of the people. Trump’s team asked about topics traditionally important to conservatives, such as the size of government and deregulation.

Siri is no longer advising the presidential transition, a transition spokeswoman confirmed, and people familiar with the matter said his vaccine stances played a role. Spear, who had told others she would be Kennedy’s chief of staff, was passed over for that post in favor of a veteran of the first Trump administration—in part because of her vaccine priorities and in part because of her lack of experience, according to people familiar with the matter.”

Patrick says

Siri is no longer advising the presidential transition

That is really bad news. Hobbles Kennedy. And Stephan Spear cited for lack of experience, is a ridiculous lie.

Pharma, always in control. Wonder if Pfizer bought the Epstein files.

Patrick says

But … if the goal is spurring the immune system with cancer proteins,

Okay this is interesting. I wonder if that guy knows what he's talking about. If it's really just to get cells to excrete cancer proteins then that's just retarded.

I don't work on that stuff but what I was considering was fixing intracellular signaling pathways not extra cellular protein export. The idea is that when a cell gets damaged it kills itself by way of apoptosis. There is a signaling pathway for that. In cancer though even that is damaged. So if you could restore the pathway (not activate it for god sakes) then the cancer cells could kill themselves.

Thought a little more about this project, mRNAs and 'vaccines' aside they are going to spend a half trillion dollars on this? That's enough for somewhere around 250 to 750 biotech companies maybe more. I seriously doubt that AI is just going to be doing healthcare shit which is a bit spooky.

Off topic for this thread though.

Oh! @Ceffer if you divide half a trillion dollars by 750 biotech companies the result is: 666,666,666.666666

Okay definitely more than 750.

@Maga_Chaos_Monkey

Have you heard the idea that the critical factor in cancer is the defeat of the telomere mechanism which limits the number of cell divisions? So cancer cells, which no longer have a Hayflick limit on cell division, all their descendants, become "immortal" until their uncontrolled reproduction kills the host. And this is why Henrietta Lacks' cancer cells are still growing nicely in labs around the world something like 75 years after her death.

Maybe this all has to do with some billionaires wanting to be immortal and experimenting with using mRNA for both killing off cancers and at the same time defeating the telomere mechanism.

Just speculating.

Patrick says

Have you heard the idea that the critical factor in cancer is the defeat of the telomere mechanism which limits the number of cell divisions? So cancer cells, which no longer have a Hayflick limit on cell division, all their descendants, become "immortal" until their uncontrolled reproduction kills the host. And this is why Henrietta Lacks' cancer cells are still growing nicely in labs around the world something like 75 years after her death.

No I have not; sounds interesting. Back in my wet lab days I worked with her cells (HELA cells) for tissue culture. We were screening angiogenesis inhibitors in the 90s which was supposed to be THE! CURE! for cancer. Every decade we think we have some new tech that's a cure all. Polygenic Risk Scores is a recent one that flopped too. Mostly we fail and I'm thinking this stargate thing will too at least in large part but maybe that's not really what it's for.

The upcoming decade or so is going to be all about synthetic biology though. FWIW, mRNAs are a teeny tiny subsection of that. Hopefully that brings great things and won't be forced on people.

Patrick says

Maybe this all has to do with some billionaires wanting to be immortal

It absolutely 100% is. I worked for one of their companies before I understood what the WEF etc., was. Our goal was definitely life extension in general. We even had a clinic but only billionaires and high net worth millionaires showed up. Gates, top echelon of China etc., and people like that were in our parking lot going to the clinic. I worked upstairs analyzing genomes and I never knew who's was who's. That's when I learned about transhumanism and that BS. Ray Kurzweil was touting us. He's pumping fountainlife.com lately.

Maga_Chaos_Monkey says

Back in my wet lab days I worked with her cells (HELA cells) for tissue culture. We were screening angiogenesis inhibitors in the 90s which was supposed to be THE! CURE! for cancer.

I remember that. Judah Folkman was working on it. I was pre-med and had a lab tech job at Harvard Medical School after undergrad. His name came up there. I never did go to medical school though.

Maga_Chaos_Monkey says

It absolutely 100% is.

OK, maybe we're getting closer. Maybe Bill Gates is willing to kill whomever it takes to do research about living forever.

Patrick says

I never did go to medical school though.

Smart move. I made the same choice.

Patrick says

Judah Folkman was working on it.

I was at Sugen:

Judah Folkman collaborated with Sugen, a biotechnology company, on research aimed at developing anti-angiogenic therapies. Sugen, which was later acquired by Pharmacia & Upjohn for $650 million, was working on a molecule called SU6668.

After that I quit because I didn't want to work for pharma.

https://jennasside.rocks/p/is-trump-tricking-us-or-trolling

Is Trump Tricking Us or Trolling Them?
With more mRNA vaccines on the menu, what is POTUS’s position, anyway?

Imagine my nausea dismay when on Trump’s first full day of his second official term, he invited not the world’s most renowned medical researchers or cancer surgeons or even that one fellow who graduated at the top of his class from the Royal College but a trio of tech bros to speak at a press conference on… the future of medicine.

If you had to guess what the future of medicine is in this context—as in, according to some computer geeks summoned by the same guy who won’t backpedal a single inch on the deadly, unmitigated disaster that was Operation Warp Speed—in a single phrase, what would it be?

Surely you already know the answer absent of my little poll, and the gist is this: These Doctors of Technocracy (Oracle CTO Larry Ellison, OpenAI co-founder Sam Altman, and Softbank CEO Masayoshi Son) believe that AI is going to revolutionize healthcare by—wait for it—being able to analyze a blood sample to detect cancer and then within 48 hours [Operation Ultra Mega Quantum Mach Speed Plus!] creating a personalized mRNA vaccine for that unique individual that will obliterate only the harmful cells. ...

People are rightfully pissed about that mRNA vaccine part of “The Stargate Project,” as this proposed AI infrastructure is known. After all, ICYMI, published, peer-reviewed studies have shown that Covid mRNA “vaccines” have killed millions [*not a typo] of people—and harmed or incapacitated countless more. The best analogy I can come up with is if Apple suddenly (and proudly!) announced they were going to start outfitting their smartphones with the exact same battery that was recalled after hundreds of models spontaneously caught fire or exploded. ...

“Who’s excited about getting their warp-speeded AI generated MRNA vaccines?? #MAHA” and “Yes. We definitely need more vax warp-speeding because apparently nobody has had the balls to tell [Trump] how badly it worked out the first time around [SMH emoji].” ...

The believers out here desperately wanted our new-old Commander in Chief to call a Day One press conference—ideally with Bobby glued to his side and a few feisty folks like Doc Malik, Peter McCullough, Aseem Malhotra, and Del Bigtree fielding questions—to highlight the dangers of the Covid death jabs and announce their plans to a) promptly prosecute the perpetrators and b) prevent a similar democide from ever happening again. We don’t want to hear Bobby insist, for the eleventy billionth time, that he’s not anti-vaccine, he just wants to make sure vaccines are appropriately tested for safety and efficacy. We want him to shout from the rooftops—while waving the receipts we know he has, if it’s not too much trouble—that no vaccines have ever been appropriately tested for safety and efficacy. We want Peter Doocy to ask the panel point-blank if Operation Warp Speed was a grave mistake, and then we want POTUS himself to step forward and admit that yes, it most certainly and tragically was—and that he’s going to swiftly and mercilessly punish every last party involved (after explaining how his own participation and lack of groveling until this point is in fact guiltless, of course).

I find it creepy that Ellison funded the Lawrence J. Ellison Institute for Transformative Medicine:

https://www.biospace.com/lawrence-j-ellison-institute-for-transformative-medicine-of-usc-announces-new-home-in-west-l-a

The original site is gone, but archived:

https://web.archive.org/web/20210125011223/https://ellison.usc.edu/