« First « Previous Comments 680 - 718 of 718 Search these comments
All tilting at the windmills, because the problem ain't rates which are postwar average, it's the price.
There's also the promulgation of new rules to disallow WS from investing in SFH
There's also the promulgation of new rules to disallow WS from investing in SFH
The builders bought the lots when the price was high because of the low rates. They are not going to build and show a loss. Therefore, building will be anemic until enough time has passed for inflation to do away with nominal loss figures on the price of the lots, or rates drop to where builders can show a profit because of a higher price that lhomeloaners can pay.
Wall Street is no longer acquiring SFHs to rent out. There's just no profit. Also, Wall Street only owns about 4% of the housing stock. They're mostly rented by Mom and Pop types. About 41% of people renting are in SFHs, so its a big market.
Down 30% from COVID Peak (~2M) but still almost 1.4M/year, well over a million.
1-2 adult households making $50-60k each can't and shouldn't buy $420k houses, whether the rate is 3.5% or 7%
TheAntiPanicanLearingCenter says
1-2 adult households making $50-60k each can't and shouldn't buy $420k houses, whether the rate is 3.5% or 7%
Correct.
With a 20% down, it pencils out at 5% with a combined income of $110k.
Misc says
With a 20% down, it pencils out at 5% with a combined income of $110k.
True, but it seems he was implying a house with a $420k mortgage.
All tilting at the windmills, because the problem ain't rates which are postwar average, it's the price.
Wall Street is no longer acquiring SFHs to rent out.

When you are putting 10-12 adults to a house, they don't have to be rich.
True, but it seems he was implying a house with a $420k mortgage.
Not really $428k is the median US home price. I think he was shooting for that.
Still over $20k if you want a car that isn't about a decade old and not driven for Uber or a long commute for many years.
Just looked at some used cars for fun, they are definitely better than 6 months ago when I last browsed, a good 20% cheaper. Still over $20k if you want a car that isn't about a decade old and not driven for Uber or a long commute for many years.
I'm also seeing some Greatest (Silent?) Ranches that need some upgrades but not half-burned husks from a crack fire under $200k.
Nature is healing slowly.
the trade-in value for a 2018 loaded Pathfinder with 100k miles is about $4k
https://x.com/BoringBiz_/status/2014540092891701680
Sorry Housing Doomers. Case/Shiller came out today and was up .4 basis points. That put it at a new all time high; taking out the high that was reached last summer.
Still the year over year increase was less than the CPI. Fannie/Freddie, Wells Fargo etc. are all forecasting an increase of about 1.5-2% for 2026 housing on a nationwide basis.
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CSUSHPISA
Sorry Housing Doomers. Case/Shiller came out today and was up .4 basis points. That put it at a new all time high; taking out the high that was reached last summer.
Still the year over year increase was less than the CPI. Fannie/Freddie, Wells Fargo etc. are all forecasting an increase of about 1.5-2% for 2026 housing on a nationwide basis.
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CSUSHPISA
It's what I said, Trump will keep on bailing out the prices (Tulips of our generation). I want some credit for being right.
Demographics rules all.
MolotovCocktail says
Demographics rules all.
Wolfman at Wolf Street website has a great article today on population and demographics.
Panama City and Bay County is adjusting its economy especially housing market for this, such as it adjusting for an end of baby boomer migration to Florida and it is diversifying the economy away from tourism.
My guess is some towns and cities will become more ghost towns as old real estate will not be refurbished and will be abandoned due to lack of demand.
FortWayneHatesRealtors says
It's what I said, Trump will keep on bailing out the prices (Tulips of our generation). I want some credit for being right.
Nope.
Government cannot keep propping it up. Just extend & pretend as much as possible.
All they can do 100% for certain is print money to bail put RE owner losses. That's it.
Demographics rules all.
https://patrick.net/comment?comment_id=2242651
Same with America. I don't think we will get out of our sin unless we hit rock bottom and won't have a choice but to pivot.
FortWayneHatesRealtors says
Same with America. I don't think we will get out of our sin unless we hit rock bottom and won't have a choice but to pivot.
And never underestimate how long it can take for someone to reach rock bottom. Sadly many die before realizing and repenting of their sin.
Wolfman at Wolf Street website has a great article today on population and demographics.
Demographics? Ha! They'll mass import Nigerians if they have to.
FortWayneHatesRealtors says
Demographics? Ha! They'll mass import Nigerians if they have to.
Nope. There's a limit to how much they have to do that. See Canada.
All you are doing is engaging in hopium.
« First « Previous Comments 680 - 718 of 718 Search these comments
So the only way to decrease real prices is to decrease demand, and the only way to do that is to kick out all illegal immigrants and anchor babies. Will Trump do this? Almost certainly not. Even with control over all three branches of the government, the Republicans are not going to get rid of all the illegals who are driving up housing prices and social welfare costs. I wish that I was wrong about this, but I'm not.
The United States population reached 200 million on November 20, 1967. If there was no net migration, then the U.S. population have stabilized to about 220 million. Instead, the population is 335 million. This is why housing is so expensive. This is why rent is so damn high. This is why the younger generations cannot afford to have children. This is why the only way to keep the population from falling is to import massive numbers of unskilled, uneducated, and often criminal immigrants. Both parties are responsible for this: democrats for importing voters and republicans for importing farm laborers. Both parties want cheap labor.
When you import massive numbers of low-iq, low-skill workers, your per capital GDP declines relative to where it would have been otherwise. Yes, technological advancements mask this because technology increases GDP faster than low-skill immigration decreases it, but most of those gains don't get seen by the middle class.
Since both parties, and their corporate overlords, are benefiting from the current system, immigration will continue and housing prices will also continue to rise. I suppose I shouldn't care since I own and have a 2.25% mortgage that is being eaten away by inflation, but anyone young enough that they having bought already is fucked.