by Al_Sharpton_for_President follow (6)
« First « Previous Comments 278 - 317 of 633 Next » Last » Search these comments
AD says
Too late as you have a more honest FBI (not a Biden Regime FBI) who interviewed first hand witnesses who said this guy was severely radicalized and made threatening statements about Charlie Kirk.
That's not SM, tho.
Better believe his Bluesky shit has been scrubbed.
But I hope I am proven wrong.
Charlie Kirk had publicly called for the release of the Epstein files. In a video posted on September 8, 2025, just two days before his death, Kirk stated:
“The DOJ should immediately move to unseal all the Epstein… Every file should be released to the public”
Q: My condolences on the loss of your friend Charlie Kirk. How are you holding up?
TRUMP: I think very good. And by the way, right there you see all the trucks. They just started construction of the new ballroom for the White House, which is something they've been trying to get for about 150 years. And it's gonna be a beauty. It'll be an absolutely magnificent structure.


"Another liberal lost his job over this:..."

Heartbreak to Heartbreak
When Americans openly celebrate the death of a man engaged in debate and discourse, we are in danger of losing our way.
Disagree with a man's views. Even abhor them.
But have no doubt: he would've fought to the end for your right to hold those views and to declare them as loud as you wanted. He even provided microphones for those who disagreed with him, so that they could publicly challenge him.
When Americans openly celebrate the death of a man engaged in debate and discourse, we are in danger of losing our way.
It adds heartbreak to heartbreak.
Even the founding fathers had vicious disagreements, but they battled with words and, in the end, even pledged to each other their lives, fortunes, and honor to establish a country where freedom of expression was possible.
The act of a lunatic can't break us. But openly celebrating the murder of someone because of divergent views can, as it threatens to tear apart the sacred bond that we are many and different, but united in moving forward through debate and discourse. Not through violence.
Booger says
"Another liberal lost his job over this:..."
Booger, what did I just watch? Can you summarize it in plain English for me?
he could debate politics with a rabid psycho Liberal lunatic and not lose his shit
Tenpoundbass says
he could debate politics with a rabid psycho Liberal lunatic and not lose his shit
I think this is exactly why he was murdered. At some level, the left knows that they are wrong. One only has to have an open sincere debate with them to clearly show it.
They will do anything to avoid that open sincere debate, including murder.
This is also why so many leftists ostracize relatives who aren't buying the leftist line. They do not want to hear any rational argument, out of fear that they could themselves be converted away from leftism.
He was only at college for one semester and dropped out. Top 5% Test Scores

ABC News said he had a 34 composite score for ACT.
AD says
ABC News said he had a 34 composite score for ACT.
That's excellent, Ivy League level, less than 1.5% get that.
Most parents have little clue what their teen/adult kids are doing on the inner tubes.
Apparently, he had a roommate and was living elsewhere.
So you think Tyler Robinson was dialed in like MK Ultra or influenced ?
Yes he was not living with his Republican parents, as he was studying as an electrician apprentice.
But he had to associate with others, like classmates, people at his part time job, etc. So he was that coy as far as the plan even if the plan was to be a patsy ?




The New York Times issued a correction on Thursday after falsely accusing Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk of making an antisemitic claim on his podcast.
The New York Times falsely accused Kirk of stating on his podcast in 2023 that Jewish communities are “pushing the exact kind of hatred against whites” that they want people to stop using against them. However, Kirk cited a tweet making that claim and critiqued it, causing The New York Times’ correction to be made.
“An earlier version of this article described incorrectly an antisemitic statement that Charlie Kirk had made on an episode of his podcast. He was quoting a statement from a post on social media and went on to critique it. It was not his own statement,” the correction reads.
In actuality, Kirk clarified that not all Jews are pushing hatred onto white people. He stated that certain communities have pushed it by supporting left-wing causes such as Black Lives Matter.
Shooter was living tranny boyfriend. Anyone verified this?
Wow. Dad turned him in!
« First « Previous Comments 278 - 317 of 633 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,349,876 comments by 15,721 users - AD, Al_Sharpton_for_President online now