by Patrick ➕follow (59) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 105,717 - 105,756 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
After age 65, you can spend it on anything
The problem is that when the poor are handed money, they fritter it away
have sex with men in the neighborhood, then ask for some money to pay bills
Is Trump a Little Bit Like Jim Jones - or Exactly Like Jim Jones And Is Going Guyana Any Day Now?
Patrick saysTrump's actions are giving more money to poor US citizens by bringing back manufacturing from China and slowing the influx of illegals from Mexico who drive down wages.I agree with your economic analysis but I do not see real growth of jobs to the poor.
Too many Walmart and temp jobs and gig economy jobs enriching only Silicon Valley headquartered operations. The economy is a fairy tale to promote status quo of optimal extraction. Murdock bought the WSJ for a reason.
Starbucks and Costco are two bright spot exceptions, good for them, but they do not represent the economy.
In other words I am not at all convinced that these jobs you say are happening are really truly happening.
We have a president who regularly disparages and blames the media, calling it “fake,” “false,” and “phony,”
I'll stop engaging in politically motivated bribery, influence, corruption and collusion for a while if you elect my Dad!
are you sure it is not in reverse: I will engage in corruption again only if my dad is elected because then I will have "get out of jail free" card?
That is very much debateable. Let us have the same ethics rules for everyone.
@ arm hk now
After age 65 you can use the HSA money for anything you wish. It is taxed like a regular IRA.
After age 65 you can no longer contribute to the HSA. At age 65 you go onto Medicare.
HSA is a fantastic investment; I ran into a Fidelity store and put the max in last April ($4450) I think it was. Fidelity allows you to invest the HSA in anything so I bought Fidelity Contrafund.
The reason I bought the HSA was primarily for tax avoidance; if you are on Obamacare and you have just a bit too much income, you pay your premiums back 100%.
The trigger for this is having an AGI that is 401% of the poverty level.
The HSA reduces you AGI no matter what your situation is; my primary goal was to get my AGI down so I owed less for my Obamacare (I still got screwed=$8000+)
Luckily in 2019 you are 1. not required to have health insurance 2. there is no penalty for not having health insurance.
You may decide to drop your health insur...
Next thing you will complain about "no Trump kids have the name Hunter"Crap argument.Straw man
No video is needed for the same ethics. You are after Biden because Hunter had a job which gave the impression that he was using his father's influence. Let be the same rule for Trump kids.
No, he is after Biden because we have HARD PROOF that is what was going on, no 'impression' necessary. You are just trying to frame it otherwise in order to nullify the video and it is impact as said HARD PROOF.
There is no proof that Hunter Biden did anything wrong either. It is just an ethics question. Do not deal with any foreign entity.
You are after Biden because Hunter had a jobwhich gave the impression that he wasusing his father's influence.
I wonder why R's are suddenly so successful? Population tired of GLOBOHOMO OPPRESSION circus? Jobs in fracking/oil industry lead to understanding that green deal D's will kill the (considerable) prosperity that goes with oil? People tired of ORANGEMAN IS WORSE THAN HITLER nonsense?
One can crib how the British corrupted the whole world by destroying very wealthy countries such as China and India. Or how America destroyed Vietnam or how whites killed the American Indians or how the blacks kill more whites than whites kill blacks. Or how the Asians cannot get into Harvard since they are discriminated against. Or how the capitalist pigs suck blood from poor communists.
That is just hearsay and right wing acquisitions. On the other hand Trump kids are doling out favors for money
Looks like you didn't even read the article.
Gaining a super-majority isn't 'keeping the status quo'. Winning seats with 60% - 80% majorities isn't to sneeze at either.
Perhaps you are confusing the Soft Dictatorship in Cali with the far more competitive political environment in Gumboland for some reason?
« First « Previous Comments 105,717 - 105,756 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,266,035 comments by 15,134 users - Ceffer online now