patrick.net

jazz_music says

DOES DONALD TRUMP WANT TO BE DICTATOR?

Why, has he been taking lessons from Nancy Pelosi?

"The word is coming to an end with your fantasies of limitless economic growth! Put the Oligarch Technocrats in control! All of their predictions came true! Don't you remember the 80s-90s famine when 1/3 of the world died like Dr. Paul Ehrlich and ZPG promised it would, along with the coming Ice Age?!"

jazz_music says

While none of the lawmakers sit on the committees leading the impeachment inquiry — House Intelligence, Foreign Affairs, and Oversight and Reform — they argued the process has lacked transparency and all members should have access to the information.

Jazz, which committee has historically been a part of Impeachment?

The Judiciary committee. On every impeachment that ever has been. Why isn't the Judiciary Committee involved?

Because this isn't an impeachment. Their exclusion confirms this.

He doesn't even look like he wants to be presedent much less a dictator.

What's fun about these Absurd Agitprop LibbyFuck Repeating Stations is that if you take the baggy, contrived ill fitting suits they are trying to hang on Trump and conservatives, turn around and put them on Progressives and Dems, suddenly they fit like custom couture.

THE GREAT FLIP! SCREAM THE OPPOSITE OF FACT LOUD ENOUGH AND PROJECT YOUR OWN SINS, YOU CAN MAKE IT FACT FOR THE IDIOCRACY!

The Minority get's subpoena powers, and Trump gets to call witnesses.
Schiff is right, they have to do this in secret or the GOP will cut their sham case apart.
You're cheering them on for a dangerous game. Thankfully Trump will beat back the Coup and they will get theirs.
You wont have to see the what for, and all else.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2006/4/3/199079/-

For the OP:

jazz_music says

The judiciary committee chair retains this authority in the current Congress; its rules stipulate that “a subpoena may be authorized and issued by the Chairman … following consultation with the Ranking Minority Member.”

Hey Jazz, is the Judiciary Committee part of Pelosi's bullshit "hearings inquiry?" heh heh heh

Yeah. Just another baby mama working the system. Now I actually feel sorry for him.... What a screwed up society we have when bringing a child into the world let's you basically enslave someone. Abortion is legal in AZ, and there are 100s of contraceptives for women (one for men). But, whatever, I am sure she told him she was "protected". What a cunt.

All men should simply get cut when they are 16 and then re-attach the tube when they find a woman with whom they WANT a child.

BUSHITLER! BUSH IS A DICTATOR!

Oh wait... Trump is a Dictator?

2007: BUSHITLER! ILLEGAL WARZ!

ENDLESS WARS! END THIS WAR!

2019: TRUMP DON'T END THIS WAR! OR YOU'RE A DICTATOR!

jazz_music says

Oh come on. Show me when Trump ever actually said that.

Look, criticize the man, but if you're going to do that, don't just lie. There's lot to criticize him about, but when you lie this this, you're working for his re-election campaign. The more people lie about him, the more support he will get.

NoCoupForYou says

2007: BUSHITLER! ILLEGAL WARZ!

ENDLESS WARS! END THIS WAR!

2019: TRUMP DON'T END THIS WAR! OR YOU'RE A DICTATOR!

WaltertheoFlanders says

Where is the rule that states they must have a vote to start the inquiry? I've asked and yet no answer. This is because there is no rule. Which means they don't have to vote to start the inquiry.

That right. However... where is the rule that a judge just allow hundreds of subpoenas against Trump to go forward because a single house member wants to harass the president and impede his presidential duties? There is no rule. Therefore, if Pelosi want's to put some weight behind her subpoenas she could do that by going to the judge and arguing that hundreds of house members agree with the action.

Jazz, why isn't the Judiciary committee involved in these Hearings? Judiciary Committee always involved in real impeachments!

TrumpingTits says

krc says

All men should simply get cut when they are 16 and then re-attach the tube when they find a woman with whom they WANT a child.

...why don't you sign up to be the beta tester for that program, krc!

Haha... yes ... meant a vasectomy not castration. :) Very reversible apparently.

https://www.webmd.com/infertility-and-reproduction/guide/reversing-a-vasectomy

"The Minority get's subpoena powers, and Trump gets to call witnesses.
Schiff is right, they have to do this in secret or the GOP will cut their sham case apart."

I'm not tracking this... Wouldn't the best witnesses be the ones the WH is barring from cooperation? Are you saying that if they were allowed to testify the case would fall apart? Is the WH trying to stop the Dems from destroying themselves? 4D indeed.

NuttBoxer says

Yep!

First in drone bombings and killings!
First in imperialism!
First in national debt size!
First in murder(some call "defense") contract spending!
First in number of illegals flooding the country!
First in social services offered to illegals once they arrive!
First in prison population(% and overall)!

Way to DRAIN THAT SWAMP!!!

Yes, Obama was terrible at draining the swamp.

Would have solved me a lot of problems in my 20s. Thank gawd that damn Louisiana Fruit Fly miscarried.

Wrapping themselves in a flag...

TrumpingTits says

BTW, if Trump was a real dictator...you'd be taking a REAL dirtnap right about now, dontcha think?

clambo says

high tech will continue to complain of a shortage of "qualified candidates" for high tech.

simple solution: pay more and there will be lines of kids entering "high tech" studies, just like with med schools. But that would decrease Gates, Bezos, and Zukerberg PROFITS! by 5%. Simpler to import Indians and/or export work.

mell says

You got to have a beer with everyone first to get to know them personally and give them a chance. Except for realtors.

Trump is kinda realtor.
And while I do agree with AF that Trump is a fucking cunt, people who try to overthrow an elected PRECEDENT! just because they think someone else (CUNT SQUARED CLINTON) should have been elected, are much bigger fucking cunts than Trump has or ever will be.

jazz_music says

the process has lacked transparency and all members should have access to the information.

Agreed!
What do you suppose the Democrats are trying to hide?

WaltertheoFlanders says

OccasionalCortex says

NeverTrumpers can't meme either.

You know you got one that burns their britches when you hear this

No. The "meme" had no basis in fact and was not funny.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/10/17/gop-sen-kennedy-blocks-democrat-bill-to-import-more-indian-workers/

If anyone had any questions about why tech workers shouldn’t vote Democrat anymore... a good reason is that they want to import Chindians to do your jobs!
And yes, there are still Republicans who want to do the same thing. But we can primary them, and they can join the rest of the retired “neverTrumpers” in retirement.

jazz_music says

baron fuckface das GropenFuhrer

Shouldn't it be von gropenfuhrer?

Regardless,Trump has committed no impeachable high crime or misdemeanor.

Funny.. This coming out shortly after it was discovered Hunter was making $50k a month off of the Ukrainian company... lol

She saw a good payday - hope she gets it. LOL

4 more year. I'd pay good money to watch you after the final polls come in!

That would be too much of a TDS sticker.

Debt is Slavery is a much better sticker.

APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says

You're right.

The book clearly confirms he paid this lady to say this to prove to the world he has an interest in females, has an attention span durable enough for him to commit rape and has the dexterity required to tie a knot.

You forgot to change your accounts, if you are going to comment on your own posts better double check you shill accounts

What a piece of shit

Isn't this sticker misogynist? How about "Whack-a-Mole Trump With A Knobby Strap On!"

Woke Patnet bumper stickers only.

A BOOK!!!!! confirmed that Trump is a rapist?!!? Well then it’s GOT to be true because you can’t publish anything in a !!!BOOK!!! without it being absolutely as true as the BIBLE!!!

joshuatrio says

Funny.. This coming out shortly after it was discovered Hunter was making $50k a month off of the Ukrainian company... lol

She saw a good payday - hope she gets it. LOL

Exactly. Cunt. Feel sorry for him even if he is corrupt and had jobs he had no business taking. Of course he is the "piece of shit" but she is an innocent, naive baby-mama. Right.... LOL

OccasionalCortex says

krc says

Of course he is the "piece of shit" but she is an innocent, naive baby-mama. Right.... LOL

If it IS his baby, then what do all the smears you make about here really have to do with this? Either he pays up for supporting the kid or not.

Xactly. It's either him or we as taxpayers. I prefer it to be him. And he can afford it most def.

Time for a focus group study!

Or group therapy.

Yeah - agree - it is hard to judge peoples motivations, but the timing, etc.. of this seems very suspicious as others noted.

My problem is he has no say. It is simply the degradation of marriage. By saying that because a woman has a child, the male is "on the hook", it is basically conferring to her a marital status that she doesn't deserve. Remember, she can decide to abort. He cannot. She can decide to abandon the baby at a hospital. He cannot. Again, women "want" to say they are equal to men but don't actually really want this. If we were "equal", he should be able to say "I don't agree - if you want to keep it you are going to have to provide". I am not quite at the point where the male should be able to say that she must have an abortion... but give me time.

In marriage, the expectation is that there will be children. And at that point, he would be "on the hook". But "marriage" is that contract.

Again, these are just baby-mama whores getting what they can. Men just don't realize the biological facts: men want sex, women like sex but want children. Of course, I have been told if there were true equality then men would never get married, and would never agree to children... and our society would fade away. Perhaps... :)

Men are forced to be financially responsible for choices only women can make. Furthermore, this is NEVER a 50/50 split of responsibilities and cost - in general mother in unmarried situations is usually awarded fully custody. If the man makes more (she will take time off, make false accusations against the male, etc.), he will pay a correspondingly higher share of the support cost. In some states, the unmarried father has zero visitation rights but is on the hook to provide financial support, or even if we wants to be a father, his unmarried status prevents him from taking that roll (this is state by state legislation).

That is frankly why I am pro-life. If abortion was outlawed, then one sex would not have this much control over the other. Right now we let women have the choice to enslave a biological father. Of course - the usual response is "just don't have sex". If abortion would outlawed, I would agree: he should be paying instead of the taxpayer.

jazz_music says

There is no “court” involved at any point.

(1) A single angry house member issues hundreds of subpoenas in order to harass the president and his cabinet and to obstruct the President's agenda of doing the people's bidding.
(2) Trump and other receivers of subpoenas decline to cooperate with the subpoenas.
(3) Angry house member needs to involve the court system in order to enforce the subpoenas.
(4) Judge sees that it's a single angry house member and sides with Trump.
(5) Angry house member calls a vote to begin impeachment investigation and the vote is a "yeah" for beginning an investigation.
(6) Now judge in (4) sees that the house as a whole is investigating and is more likely to issue enforcement of at least some of the subpoenas.