by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 40,481 - 40,520 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
Clinton could not keep his Monica affair a secret. How the hell do you convince a whole town?
All it takes is one person to spill the beans and sell their story to the media for $1 million.
That's your argument? None of this could've happened because people can't keep a secret? Good thing you're not a judge or a lawyer, and I pity the fool that has you as a juror.
By the way, you never gave me a response to my earlier post.
Clinton could not keep his Monica affair a secret. How the hell do you convince a whole town?
All it takes is one person to spill the beans and sell their story to the media for $1 million.
That's your argument? None of this could've happened because people can't keep a secret? Good thing you're not a judge.
By the way, you never gave me a response to my earlier post.
People cannot keep a secret. There is always someone who will expose the facts for a few bucks. You know what they say in Washington....." If you want a friend, get a dog" when Monica pleasured Clinton in the Oval Office only two people knew about it, yet the secret was out. Events like 911, moon landing, and Sandy Hook would require thousands of people including the janitors, the spouses, friends and even the corner whore.
It's impossible to keep things under cover when all you need is one person who is willing to sell the story. When you combine that with a lack of motive on the part of the government, and a dozen other arguments, you are left with one simple conclusion...utter nonsense.
By the way I apologize for not responding to your earlier query, but the question was not clear to me.
If you spend time watching this video of Sandy Hook, you will see people, many people, wandering aimlessly around.
http://www.brasschecktv.com/videos/government-terror/going-in-circles-.html
Yeah, the fact that we have no idea what that's about sure is inciminating. MAybe those were parents and friends of family of kids that were killed, waiting for confirmation of the status of their child. And they had to keep moving because there wasn't a place for them to wait. But they couldn't be told to buzz off either, because of the dire nature of the information they were waiting for (pictures, of faces of the deceased), information that they were very much entitled to . Maybe half of them are media, and or some state or federal agents of some kind, who knows, it doesn't look all that strange to me. I don't know what that situation is supposed to look like.
We don't know what's going on with those people. But we do know you're either an idiot or else you're suffering from some psychiatric problem that distorts your perception of reality, probably both.
The fact that you think such a hoax is even possible proves a severe lack of reasoning ability on your part.
Here's some airbrushing samples. Studio photos such as those are often touched up a fair amount. It's easy for even the novice with photoshop. But that was a professional studio picture.
Maybe it's you that needs to wake up, and also be ashamed of yourself.
http://www.photoshopessentials.com/photo-editing/healing-brush/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/janelegate/7781857024/in/pool-1265238@N23/
http://cosmetic-makeovers.com/2007/05/16/using-photoshop-to-retouch-real-people
Then again, maybe we should all cut bg some slack. Maybe part of his issue is that he can't fathom what really happened. I can't either really, that is I don't really go to a place where I fully comprehend it. That is, the truth that someone walked into a school and shot a bunch of young children seems pretty impossible too. It's not something I'm going to dwell on very long. I don't want to think about it.
If it didn't actually happen, that would be nice.
Your assumptions behind your math are incorrect, not your addition.
There are no assumptions behind the math on the posting about Walmart wages. The numbers are hard facts.
A sharp jump in the minimum wage will inevitably increase teen unemployment. This in turn will lead to higher crime, especially in inner cities, followed by higher incarceration costs. How does that help the economy?
Where is the evidence for your assertions? I could just as easily assert that a sharp rise in the minimum wage would allow adults who have to support themselves to do so without resorting to violent crimes, thereby having the opposite effect that you speculate.
Also, where is the math behind your assertions that the minimum wage is either ideal or too high even though it has fallen in real dollars over the past 30 years? On what numbers are you basing that assertion?
When you resort to posting lame pictures, you've pretty much given up, huh.
I've given up trying to get you to actually take a position on this issue and stick with it, yes. With all the waffling you're doing, it doesn't look like that will ever happen.
I've given up trying to get you to actually take a position on this issue and stick with it, yes. With all the waffling you're doing, it doesn't look like that will ever happen.
lol. My position has been consistent throughout the thread. The bailout prevented demand from falling at a time when keeping demand was very important.
In that respect it was good. Unfortunately, there were many not so good results from the bailout as well. IMO, the bad probably outweighs the good.
I'm sorry that you didn't like that I illustrated a good result from the bailout. Hopefully, it opened your mind--at least just a crack.
It fun to watch a landlord be scared shitless worrying about his investments losing value...
Wow--you have kind of a warped sense of what is "fun". Taking pleasure at other's perceived misfortune? You're one of the "good" ones, huh?
You seem confused. Rooting home higher housing costs, is taking pleasure at everyones misfortune.
APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says
That's your argument? None of this could've happened because people can't keep a secret?
Not people. An entire town a priori recruited into a vast conspiracy that requires them to keep life-changing secrets forever with no payoff for them anywhere near equal or exceeding their investments.
How do you know they didn't get paid off? Look at all of the donation pages that spun up before, during and after the shooting...it's estimated that the families received over significant sums of money simply from that. If anything, that disgraces the dead children more than people trying to find out the truth of what really happened. It's not an argument to ignore tangible facts and counter it with simple conjecture.
Here's an article showing how this "tragedy" was leveraged for monetary gain.
http://www.nbcconnecticut.com/investigations/LWRD-Tracking-Sandy-Hook-Donation-Money-215774581.html
I always believe everything the state sponsored media tell me. It would be unpatriotic to question the media organizations owned by our super wealthy rich and influenced by the NSA! What are you, debyne, some kind of anarchist?
http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/0312611676/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?qid=1387467647&sr=8-1
Our perceptions aren't nearly as infallible as you may think. Our brains can be fooled using the very same systems they evolved to make sense of the world.
I saw the Facebook page for Victoria Soto RIP, saw the date, created three days before the incident.
The old dude who "took in" some kids for an hour was a member of SAG.
Too many slip ups, sloppy work on a false flag. The kids who were "killed" were taken from kids that went missing over the last five years.
People in power have noticed that when a tragedy strikes that agitates the populace enough, they can pass rights-withholding laws in response. So why wait for a tragedy? Create a fake one with wholly owned media corps and start taking away rights!
It should be noted that the primary component of the gun bill that was tendered in response to the sandy hook false flag was a creation of a national gun owners registry and other information gathering. It was all about keeping tabs on us, the law abiding citizens.
This is what Israel Shahak, translator of the Yinon Plan, a scientist in Jerusalem and a Holocaust survivalist believed. And he is accused of being anti Semitic!
Gary, you still haven't proven to me what is in it for the Zionists. I'm waiting...
You would think if they have a big game plan that they would be much better at executing it, rather than waiting around for the NRA to lobby against them, which is what they did when sensible gun legislation like background checks was proposed.
This conspiracy-theory stuff makes me miss the days of the angle trisectors and circle squarers, who only pestered mathematics professors.
The deep need to to feel (a) privy to knowledge the general population refuses to see; and (b) persecuted, is best worked out through crank mathematics, and not in public forums, where they invariably claim the right to peddle their bullshit while lamenting that nobody is listening to them.
Start a forum on viola da gamba restoration, and these guys will show up.
APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says
I take it you have some ideas for the concession stands as well?
How did you guess? Instead of executive boxes, we could lease private sniper nests along the shore line.
The yacht racers could, of course, hire defensive snipers to fire back, maybe sell spots on their boats to sponsor Celebrity Counter-Snipers in a cross-promotional play with the boat sponsor.
Whadaya say?
Good idea! I had been thinking more along the lines of the food offerings, perhaps Cannibal Anarchy branded hamburgers and hot dogs?
This conspiracy-theory stuff makes me miss the days
The Warren Report answered all your questions? The 911 Commission was an unbiased fact finding body?
The fact that some people make up fabulist stories, to fill in for facts that they know are missing, does not mean that the Govt does not conspire and lie.
In fact these stories help them get away with their lies.
The Pat Tillman story is a tale of conspiracy to lie to the American people for institutional and political gain.
The FBI had prior knowledge in OK City, 93 World Trade, and probably Boston.
And lied about it solely to cover their ineptitude.
Meanwhile rents have skyrocketed.
If I had paid attention to your kind Iwould be royally f-ed now.
@SubOink - isn't this the anniversary of your purchase? If so, I hope you post that again. I kinda like seeing how much bearish pushback you get on each anniversary...almost as a barometer of where we are in the economic cycle.
LOL -yes it is. And I will post again...when we bought I assumed the market was going to stay flat and would have been comfortable with that but it friggin took off like a rocket from there. Bearish??? Are you kidding me?? Have you checked prices lately??
EDIT: Oh you mean bearish pushback from the perm bears? yes...LOL...
Look at this massive idiot, he is bragging about having a mortgage that he was able to "refinance"! lol
When your monthly payment drops $400.-/month for handing in some tax returns then ...yes, I find that pretty awesome! It sure beats a letter from a landlord raising your rent...lol
When your monthly payment drops $400.-/month for handing in some tax returns then ...yes, I find that pretty awesome! It sure beats a letter from a landlord raising your rent...lol
lol, yeah buddy, enjoy your 30 years of payments
How the fuck are "high prices" a recovery? Would we call it a recovery if gas prices went to $5/gal? Would we call it a recovery if health care costs doubled?
A recovery is when the middle class can afford to buy houses again and have money left over to spend on other things.
We're still in the second Great Depression. Unemployment and underemployment are at historic highs not seen since the peak of this great depression and the prior one. A second bubble would be catastrophic to our economy. When it bursts, it would be far, far worse than the financial collapse of 2007 because of all the debt and the even higher concentration of wealth. Those too-big-to-fail banks are now even bigger than they were in 2007.
Rooting for higher housing prices because you already own a house is like rooting for nuclear war because you want to sell nuclear weapons.
How the fuck are "high prices" a recovery? Would we call it a recovery if gas
prices went to $5/gal? Would we call it a recovery if health care costs
doubled?
If the wealthy are getting richer and Wall Street is flying high then is must be a 'recovery', what else would you call it? How many kids in this country are hungry?
Don't realtors have standards at all? I thought their licensing required mandatory attendance at courses designed to teach them how to get away with all manner of heinous crimes and deviant acts against nature?
If he can't get away with it, he shouldn't be in the game, loser.
Interesting reaction between yesterday and today. Seems some reality may be setting in.
Oh, there's no need to "dare" me to explain why this period we're in is in fact a housing bubble: All of the classic, well-defined ingredients are all there:
A: Large levels of speculation. As seen even now, a huge percentage of real estate in the Bay Area has and is still being bought up by investors and even investment firms and REITS.
B: Cheap money. The low interest rates that primed and started the last housing bubble have also done the same for the current housing bubble. The difference this time is that interest rates have been kept lower and longer than the last time.
C: A rapid and dramatic increase in prices. Like I said- the value of our house has supposedly gone up about 30% in one year. But just like the last bubble, wages have not gone up by an amount anywhere close to making this increase at all sustainable.
Those are the primary reasons. These are the classic causes of housing bubbles. Deny it all you want. We are in a housing bubble.
I was listening to a gold guy the other day he was saying that a driver on gold is going to be that now that the yuan is going up in value that the Chinese or going to do more of what they have always done which is buy gold.
Please post evidence that ANY of the donation pages were set up before the tragedy.
Look at this:
http://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2013/01/08/sandy-hook-ripdonation-webpages-created-before-the-massacre/
How do you explain that?
When your monthly payment drops $400.-/month for handing in some tax returns then ...yes, I find that pretty awesome! It sure beats a letter from a landlord raising your rent...lol
lol, yeah buddy, enjoy your 30 years of payments
Enjoy your lifelong rent increases...
Here's an article showing how this "tragedy" was leveraged for monetary gain.
Did you read the article? It says nothing of the sort.
Please post evidence that ANY of the donation pages were set up before the tragedy.
Uuhh...did you read it?
"In Newtown, there was a significant amount of money collected within 30 days after the event,†said Department of Consumer Protection commissioner William Rubenstein.
Much of that money went into the Newtown-Sandy Hook Community Foundation, which is the largest fund for victims and survivors. Yet even as frustration grows over how and when those donations will be doled out, there are millions in other collection pots still being accounted for. The state is trying to track it all.
"We've determined that there are at least 70 or so entities that we've identified that have collected about $21 million dollars or so,†said Rubenstein.
Oh wait, by that time you will need to start worrying about rebuilding
Actually, by that time I will rent it to a sucker like yourself :)
AF says: "..participate in a hoax that requires them to repeat devastatingly cruel lies..."
Watch me work.
"Iraq has Weapons of Mass Destruction."
Hoaxing at it's best.
Cdon, about 70% of posters that were telling me how stupid is was to buy in 2011 have actually vanished from this forum (a strange way of admitting they were wrong)...or at least have taken on new screennames.
APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says
peeping with a concealed camera
If that's a crime, then why isn't everyone at the NSA in jail?
WOW! The UNtrustworthy are certainly in control of what information is apparent to the people!
Say hey! This was in the Wall Street Journal on March 30, 1999. Note "... how much it will buy."
Holy cow/interesting/compelling ...!
And where is it up to date??? Right here ... see the first chart shown in this thread.
Recent Dow day is Thursday, December 19, 2013 __ Level is 103.8
WOW! It is hideous that this is hidden! Is there any such "Homes, Inflation Adjusted"? Yes! This was in the New York Times on August 27, 2006:
And up to date (by me) is here:
http://patrick.net/?p=1219038&c=999083#comment-999083
WOW! The UNtrustworthy are certainly in control of what information is apparent to the people!
« First « Previous Comments 40,481 - 40,520 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,248,985 comments by 14,895 users - HANrongli, intrepidsoldier online now