by Patrick ➕follow (61) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 45,475 - 45,514 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
i'm sick of certain health care issues being blamed suddenly
I feel your pain, but from the opposite direction: I'm sick of holier than thou Democrats saying "the real reason you disapprove of Obamneycare is because you're racist and Obama's black." Actually, most of the lobbyists who wrote it are white, and it was based on Romneycare, and Romney is also white, and touted relentlessly by Jonathan Gruber (also white) who took undisclosed payments from the White House in connection with his supposed expert testimony, and btw Obama's mother was also white, but somehow certain people insist it's all about there being a black President, as if Clintoncare didn't get the same reaction in 1994. Clinton was actually impeached in his first term, though for other reasons; nothing like that happened to Obama.
I am for 100% socialist or 100% free market health care. We are in a slimy middle ground, and the aca only secured that position.
Yes, what we have is called lemon socialism, privatizing gains while socializing losses, but anybody who dares say out loud the word "socialism" sets off an inflammatory reaction among partisan boosters of the legislation. To quote Yogi Berra (out of context), "When you come to a fork in the road, take it." We could have either a free market or a socialized system, but instead we have schizophrenic lemon socialism, because that maximizes power (including revenue) for the authors of the legislation.
Lots of people and corporations lease land but they are not abused by the Feds because even lessors have property rights.
Interesting in the recent past people who stole cattle were hanged. Today the Feds think they can steal cattle because they're from the government.
The photo montage above it great.
WOW! The UNtrustworthy are certainly in control of what information is apparent to the people!
Say hey! This was in the Wall Street Journal on March 30, 1999. Note "... how much it will buy."
Holy cow/interesting/compelling ...!
And where is it up to date??? Right here ... see the first chart shown in this thread.
Recent Dow day is Monday, April 21, 2014 __ Level is 104.0
WOW! It is hideous that this is hidden! Is there any such "Homes, Inflation Adjusted"? Yes! This was in the New York Times on August 27, 2006:
And up to date (by me) is here:
http://patrick.net/?p=1219038&c=999083#comment-999083
WOW! The UNtrustworthy are certainly in control of what information is apparent to the people!
And "ThePublic Be Suckered"
http://patrick.net/?p=1230886
You are welcome to purchase insurance with minimal or no deductibles. But you'll have to pay for it. It's called risk management.
Let 'em eat risk management cake.
"We have the functional products that you desperately need……you just can't afford it, sucker."
i'm sick of certain health care issues being blamed suddenly on aca
ACA was the chance to fix some of these "issues", the only one that has come along in my lifetime. There is a kind of nauseating disappointment at the simulacrum of reform that was fobbed off on us.
ACA is to Health Care Reform as TPP is to Free Trade. Codifying and enshrining corporate control and cartel profits.
That's private insurance for you.
Gotta love those $5000 deductibles. They're laughing all the way to the bank, a big subsidy for minimal service.
You are welcome to purchase insurance with minimal or no deductibles. But you'll have to pay for it. It's called risk management.
Lolol.
Please explain to me how you have the nerve to refer to what some confuse as "private" "health" "insurance", as risk management.
Something similar, if we have to make a large purchase, we'll cycle it through zero percent offers and use "other people's money" for the year while gaining the card points and bonus points...
The points are nice, it's been a while since I've actually had to pay for an airline ticket...
This is exactly the kind of mentality that allowed the housing bubble, and allows credit card companies to skim billions from the economy.
Credit/debit cards will NEVER go away...
I'm not saying they will go away. I'm saying there is not enough competition to really bring down the cost to what it actually costs to manage plastic cards transactions.
Maybe if you can pay with your phone tomorrow we will see progress.
Do PCPs even "Coordinate Care" or make hospital Visits anymore? It sure seems the newly minted ones don't.
Get your ass in and out in less than 12 minutes, "You got a cough? Here's some antibiotics. Uh huh, yeah, right. Blood? Well, make another appointment if it continues. Uh-huh, Get the fuck out."
Why do you assume they are morons?
Because they are voluntarily paying extra on every purchase they make with their cards.
Not if they are taking the borrowed money, and investing it at greater returns.
Why do you assume they are morons?
Because they are voluntarily paying extra on every purchase they make with their cards.
Not if they are taking the borrowed money, and investing it at greater returns.
Lol, credit cards annual interest rates on average are double the stock market performance. That strategy is a sure path to eventual bankruptcy.
The American Healthcare system is a joke and sinking. If you have any regard for your health or finances, just avoid insurance and spend your hard-earned money on education about self-healthcare.
That only works if you can afford six or seven figures worth of care for a major injury or illness.
Here's a true scenario:
Joe has $5,000. He puts it in Bank.
Bank offers Joe a Bank credit card with a $5,000 credit limit.
Joe uses the Bank credit card, and gets charged 21% interest to use the money he put into Bank.
What Joe does from here determines if he is an idiot or not.
Tim,
Nice find. Since Feb 2009 till June 2013, I have helped my family, some siblings and pkennedy (a Patnet user that I connected with on this site) gaining over $3.5M in equity and cashflow. Wife and I tallied up this number a couple of nights ago so it's fresh off the mill.
Pkennedy has gained just shy of $400k in equity and cashflow since we teamed up in late 2011. We're currently controlling over $2M worth of real estate now with over $1M in equity. Patrick himself and several Patnet members have met and know my partner Pkennedy. They also exchanged emails off-line with my partner so they can confirm this without an issue. Unlike some bullshitters and trolls on here who do nothing but a disservice to the Patnet community.
If you post something positive, they say you're bragging. I guess they only like negative news around here. Well, Pkennedy and I are planning on cashing out in 2016. That should be some nice chunk of change. Bulls make money; bears make money; perma-bears don't make shit.
Here's a true scenario:
Joe has $5,000. He puts it in Bank.
Bank offers Joe a Bank credit card with a $5,000 credit limit.
Joe uses the Bank credit card, and gets charged 21% interest to use the money he put into Bank.
What Joe does from here determines if he is an idiot or not.
If Joe put his $5,000 in a 5 year CD we already know he is an idiot, unless he pays off the balance every month from his paycheck.
Why do you assume they are morons?
Because they are voluntarily paying extra on every purchase they make with their cards.
Not if they are taking the borrowed money, and investing it at greater returns.
Lol, credit cards annual interest rates on average are double the stock market performance. That strategy is a sure path to eventual bankruptcy.
Even worse than double..
All those paying off their balances each month and enjoying the rewards must remember the rewards are really being paid by those paying high interest rates on their balances. No wonder banks have to charge such high interest rates.
I feel your pain, but from the opposite direction: I'm sick of
There is a lot of racism among Republicans. I have lived in more racist states than I do now and it is nauseating how much it permeates thinking among all socioeconomic classes. It sounds like you have other reasons to be against aca, as do I, so I respect that.
schizophrenic lemon socialism, because that maximizes power (including revenue) for the authors of the legislation
...sadly...
Please explain to me how you have the nerve to refer to what some confuse as "private" "health" "insurance", as risk management.
I assume you are being sarcastic? It's all about risk management. The insurance company takes on risk by covering you, and you take on risk by purchasing their insurance. If you choose low-cost, high-deductible coverage, you are taking on a greater risk. High-deductible insurance is not new. It's a choice you have.
All those paying off their balances each month and enjoying the rewards must remember the rewards are really being paid by those paying high interest rates on their balances. No wonder banks have to charge such high interest rates.
Hahahahaha, those who pay off their balances each month are takers. That's a new one. You don't think every penny of those retarded interest rates is going into the executives' pockets?
Something similar, if we have to make a large purchase, we'll cycle it through zero percent offers and use "other people's money" for the year while gaining the card points and bonus points...
The points are nice, it's been a while since I've actually had to pay for an airline ticket...
This is exactly the kind of mentality that allowed the housing bubble, and allows credit card companies to skim billions from the economy.
Hahahahaha, another funny statement. How is shuffling a balance (much less one's annual income) at 0% APR even close to comparable to taking out an adjustable rate loan (10 times one's annual income) at 3-5% APR?
They charge this much because they are so over regulated. They charge this much because they are under-regulated. She's my daughter. She's my sister.
Huh??? What???? Looks like you started drinking early today....
The conservatives never get the references to classics.
All those paying off their balances each month and enjoying the rewards must remember the rewards are really being paid by those paying high interest rates on their balances. No wonder banks have to charge such high interest rates.
Hahahahaha, those who pay off their balances each month are takers. That's a new one. You don't think every penny of those retarded interest rates is going into the executives' pockets?
Not at all.
I have a $300 American Express rebate, and roughly $400 in a MasterCard.
I have never paid annual fees, and I always pay off my balances in full.
I'm constantly being hounded by the credit card companies to borrow.
How does the credit card bank make money from me? They must really hate people like me.
Not at all.
I have a $300 American Express rebate, and roughly $400 in a MasterCard.
I have never paid annual fees, and I always pay off my balances in full.
I'm constantly being hounded by the credit card companies to borrow.
How does the credit card bank make money from me? They must really hate people like me.
They get money from merchants that you buy goods/service from. The credit cards charge merchants a credit processing fee. The fee is usually between 1% to 5% of your charge amount. So the creditcard company is not losing money when giving you a rebate.
Here's a true scenario:
Joe has $5,000. He puts it in Bank.
Bank offers Joe a Bank credit card with a $5,000 credit limit.
Joe uses the Bank credit card, and gets charged 21% interest to use the money he put into Bank.
What Joe does from here determines if he is an idiot or not.
If Joe pays off the credit card bill before the end of the grace period during each billing, he is all right.
The fee is usually between 1% to 5% of your charge amount. So the creditcard company is not losing money when giving you a rebate.
Base salaries and other overhead.
The average credit card interest rate for people with fair credit has hit a shocking 21 percen
Executive bonuses!
I get them all the time.
I'll use one pay it off in 18 months, but by then another company sends me another 0percent offer, so I've never ever, had to actually use one after the 0% introductory teaser rate expires.
Doesn't that hurt your credit score changing credit cards all the time?
This is exactly the kind of mentality that allowed the housing bubble, and allows credit card companies to skim billions from the economy.
Hahahahaha, another funny statement. How is shuffling a balance (much less one's annual income) at 0% APR even close to comparable to taking out an adjustable rate loan (10 times one's annual income) at 3-5% APR?
Both encourage you to live on credit. At the individual level everyone thinks they're ok. The guy with adjustable rate mortgage thinks he will refinance when needed.
And maybe they are ok - most of the time.
At the aggregate level, this has disastrous effects on the stability of the economy, as the country borrows from the future.
You're just trained to think as a speculator.
Doesn't that hurt your credit score changing credit cards all the time?
Not if you have a really good credit score, and every card is courting you. When you don't have many options, that's when these card companies seem to screw people the most. People trying to build their finances, before they buy a house, and a more stable house. Are the very people who seem to be the most loyal to these banks. I don't know if it's really loyalty on those patrons part, who stick with them for year after years with higher interest rates, late fees, and dinging your credit score every time you break wind.
Or it's because the bank makes damn sure they don't have other options.
They really make it hard to ever get ahead in the first place. But it seems once you get past a certain credit threshold, all of those barriers seem to vanish. As long as you keep your credit current.
But then again, my wife likes to make charges on 0% interest cards, pay the very minimal for 16 to 17 months, then settle the whole balance before then. I guess the other card companies, and often the same bank with competing card offers, notice the pay off more than what's really going on with how we're using our card. So we'll get a hundred offers for 0% no fees and other perks.
I wouldn't even use credit cards, if there was a yearly fee, and we paid interest on cards, like it took to build credit to buy a house.
We're all used to CIC having little to say besides rah, rah red team and HaHaHaHaHaHa. But it's truly disappointing when someone is unaware of Chinatown. Sigh.
He's not the same as you and me. He doesn't dig poetry. He's so unhip that when you say Dylan, he thinks you're talking about Dylan Thomas, whoever he was. The man ain't got no culture.
Doesn't that hurt your credit score changing credit cards all the time?
Not if you have a really good credit score, and every card is courting you. When you don't have many options,
Mine has only increased using the carousel of cards (for rewards, not to transfer balances, although only a large balance would negatively impact your score). I open 2-3 new cards per year for rewards. I close most but keep a few long term cards. Now my score is over 800. Of course, it helps that my only late payments ever were in college and are now long gone...
I charge everything-even fast food. But all my cards are mileage and I fly a bit for work too and charge expenses too. So my vacation flights are usually free!! I pay the balance off every month though.
Both encourage you to live on credit.
I understand what you're saying. But if I have $20k cash for a car or $1k cash for a couch, and someone is offering me 0% APR for 2-5 years, then I'm going to take the 0% any day. However, a BMW is outside my price range, as is a $700k house. So I'm not going to massively go into debt to buy either that I don't belong in.
There is a systemic problem with credit in US, especially in cities like LA, sure. But if someone can learn to transfer balances and/or reap rewards without it costing a penny, then I see nothing wrong with that.
don't have $1.50 cash in their pocket to pay for it.... They swipe it on plastic...
1.5 miles, baby!
Mine has only increased using the carousel of cards
That's what happened to me as well. I don't transfer balances from card to card, I just pay off one. Then take the 0% offer card when send it. We only have one or two cards with a balance at anytime. One from my cards, and one from hers.
My wife is a stay at home Mom, and actually built her credit up before I did. So she has her own cards she keeps a few dollars on, so they close them for no activity. She does that, because rules are weirder than when she first started getting her collection of cards. If she was to let them all Close due to inactivity, She would have a hell of time getting new cards.
In the last 4 or 5 years, all of the new card offers have been addressed to me. Last decade they were courting her. But that was when they recognized people who were good at paying their bills and keeping up with their finances, they didn't deny women credit for being a stay at home mom like they do now.
He's not the same as you and me.
Thank god for that, otherwise I'd throw myself in front of a moving truck...
And he still thinks we're talking about Dylan Thomas. Yet another reference he missed.
So she has her own cards she keeps a few dollars on, so they close them for no activity.
Ah, yeah, I think that is starting to happen to us, also. Assholes! They are phishing for people who they can collect 21% on. We have tried to keep our oldest cards open for the longevity thing but I think some have been closed randomly over the past few years.
My wife is a stay at home Mom
Mine is PT mom, PT work, but I think we always apply by reporting our household income...is that possible? I think so. She is less excited about the carousel, though, so we fight about whose card gets the purchases any given month. (She does the shopping so I have to convince her to use my cards haha.)
^^^
Seems much like bragging to me. Seems like you know lot about perma-bears then yourself. :)
We did not, and do not, need insurance reform. We need to cut out the bloodsucking middlemen whose sole purpose is to profit off of people being unhealthy.
Healthcare for all, not insurance reform.
Please don't confuse people who only use emotion (or simply repeat after rush limbaugh) to relate to issues by introducing logic. It's not fair.
What if Bundy had been a deadbeat black man or native american?
Al Sharpton would still be in Nevada misusing big words.
« First « Previous Comments 45,475 - 45,514 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,251,027 comments by 14,918 users - DOGEWontAmountToShit, HeadSet, mell, Patrick, Tenpoundbass online now