by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 47,325 - 47,364 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
Yeah, I have no doubts about their intentions.
Bush felt it was necessary, for the first time in our nations history, to create a Battle Command Group in the (his ominous coinage) "Homeland".
http://www.progressive.org/rothschild0209.html
"At Brookings, Renuart acknowledged that NorthCom works actively with the FBI’s joint terrorism task force and other intelligence agencies.
“Every day our command center monitors between thirty-five and forty-five events around the United States that might require federal support,†he said. “We can monitor the pulse of our nation. . . . Monitoring that information on a routine basis is part of our daily battle rhythm.â€
"daily battle rhythm.†for fucks sake.
The Founders dreaded Standing Army is here.
And you know they are itching for action.
Security is perhaps the highest priority for government planners: security, that is, for its own power and perks.
And, it goes without saying, protection of its primary constituency, the concentrated private power in this corrupt system of Cut-Throat Capitalizm.
(I think they anticipate that the 500 American Billionaires [who control 2 trillion of wealth] and their paid political apparatchiks will eventually need protection…..when a desperate, if diabetic and obese, proletariat finally gets off the couch. Maybe when the Cheeto factory closes.)
Henry Ford was long dead when the Mustang came out. He built the model T.
No really Henry Ford built the Mustang back in 1909 in memory of that deaf dumb and blind girl Anne Frank.
No really Henry Ford built the Mustang back in 1909 in memory of that deaf dumb and blind girl Anne Frank.
Anne Frank wasn't deaf, dumb, or blind and wasn't born until 1929. WTF are you talking about?
Humor. He was balancing it with the veracity of the first half of the sentence. .
No really Henry Ford built the Mustang back in 1909 in memory of that deaf dumb and blind girl Anne Frank.
Anne Frank wasn't deaf, dumb, or blind and wasn't born until 1929. WTF are you talking about?
that's what I get for not paying attention to who is posting.
How many were injured & died on & after 9-11 & what is the monetary cost?
How many were injured & died in Afghanistan & Iraq & what is the monetary cost?
Bush & Republican FAILURES.
Damn you Obama! Why didn't you stop this?
Thousands of illegal kids flowing over the southern border...
Cause and Effect from 2 years ago...
Obama administration to stop deporting some young illegal immigrants
How many were injured & died on & after 9-11 & what is the monetary cost?
How many were injured & died in Afghanistan & Iraq & what is the monetary cost?Bush & Republican FAILURES.
Damn you Obama! Why didn't you stop this?
I guess you of all would stop many Americans who saw the attack as act of War and signed up with Military. .. or we shouldnt have gone after AQ in Afganistan or attack other terrorist groups...
how naive of you.
Nice vent for someone who just got hit with a virus while pornsurfing...
Blogging opens you to Army cyber attack.
National hero Chris Hedges (recently sued the Federal Govt to annul Indefinite Detention. Lost. http://www.truthdig.com/staff/chris_hedges) basically says resistance to the Corporate State is futile. And resistance is the only hope for personal redemption.
I quit voting this year. I am very, very tired of lesser evil options and am going to withhold my consent from this system going forward.
It's scary that our government has made enough laws to "legally" do just about anything. Too much government for my taste.
I saw that moon picture of the plane also. That solves it for most of us I think. Could be why so much interest I'm going to the moon again by several nations. The giant moth picture is obviously photoshopped. Geez, some people are so gullible!
Anne Frank wasn't deaf, dumb, or blind and wasn't born until 1929. WTF are you talking about?
http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/anne-frank
If I must explain further, it relates to previous poster absurdity "Henry Ford creating the Mustang".
If I must explain further, it relates to previous poster absurdity "Henry Ford creating the Mustang".
I forgot there are still a few patnet posters left with a sense of humor. Not many, but a few. Usually people who post absurd shit any more believe it.
Can anybody, other than AF, suggest specific tactics for regaining civil liberty and real representation?
Expatriate.
At the risk of giving away state secrets:
1. FortWayne is an actual military base. It's scheduled for decommission because there are too many guns there.
2. SoftShell is code for an 8 digit grid where several conventional warheads are targeted. Just say 'Jazz Music' on the right frequency and it's a done deal.
3. New Renter is an embedded agent deep in the heart of Canada eh. One slipped puck and it will be a frosty go time.
4. Patnet and other such extremist blogs are scheduled for 'decommissioning' in 2356, so get your comments in now.
Good to see your paying attention:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/theymadeamerica/whomade/ford_hi.html
My belief is that small increases to minimum wages will have minimal impact either negative or positive. A large increase will be damaging. Minimum wages are mostly an aid to slow the race to the bottom.
Well, if they'd been indexed to inflation and their upward progression had not been stopped in 1980, they'd be at about $17 per hour now. A gradual upward movement would have been much better, as businesses who couldn't make the grade would have weeded out more slowly - we're so far behind now that it will be a shock for small business. Large corps - who cares?
3. New Renter is an embedded agent deep in the heart of Canada eh. One slipped puck and it will be a frosty go time
Where else would you expect to find a migrating bird in summer?
If Bill Gates' income and your income both doubled next month, "income
inequality" would grow substantially. You would have a significantly smaller %
of the pie. Perhaps you would prefer to give up your increased standard of
living relative to your income doubling because it's not "fair" that someone
else with more than you also doubled their income, but regardless, the pie did
not shrink.
Why do people always talk about "fairness" when discussing income/wealth inequality?? The problem isn't fairness. The problem is that the economy doesn't work when inequality gets to levels like we see now.
It's not a moral concern--it's pragmatic.
I'm talking about the sentence "every single possible development/outcome is prescribed apriori in the rule book." The only word that could possibly used substituted (at least that would make reasonable sense) is beforehand. That is neither the definition nor the intent of a priori.
That might be the only "word" that could possibly be substituted, one-word for one-word only. But it is not the only concept that could be substituted. Another phrase could be substituted making the use of a-priori valid (or at least not quite invalid as you imply). Think out of your 1-for-1 word replacement box and perhaps you can allow yourself to discuss the actual substance of the argument rather than diverting from it via your expert pedantry.
Expatriate to where?
The south of france was my first choice, followed by austrolasia, and now working on Italy. France isn't the highest for civil liberties ( a lot better than the US at this point) or representation, but with enough postcard scenery, sunny beaches, fine food and wine you can have a certain moral flexibility.
That dumbing down of America video is filled with bs and lies. Not that there aren't any hints of partial truths a near facts.
I wonder if the guy that made the film by chance is a product of an American private schools. If he's from public schools, it is an indictment of public school education.
Some right wingers are going to believe that shit, such as Fort Wayne.
TYpical.
Instead of daring to understand his point, you question the slightly exaggerated way he made it.
National Association Of Rapists ?
(Geez .. I always thought it stood for National Association of Rodents ...).
Now I'm all confused.
cop out.
Withholding consent through vote abstention is a political strategy based on Noam Chomsky's ideas about manufacturing or engineering our consent through the false political choices we are presented.
You continuing to support the unchanging scam by making your "choice" of which candidate YOU want to work against the peoples interest and give away the national treasure to corporate interests…..now that is a cop out.
Try to vote against the interests of Goldman Sachs and the Banking Cabal or Northrup Grumman and the War Pigs, which candidate do you pick?
Chomsky and Hedges.
http://www.truthdig.com/tag/chris+hedges
Rejecting the foundation of a formula is the same as rejecting "math" in your thinking?
Are you saying that the formula inputs are not true? Are we arguing whether or not income inequality is growing? That is the foundation of the formula.
Well that ain't good enough. Go back, get real and come up with something.
We can become like Cuba.
If that is happening, by math the size of the rest of the pie is shrinking.
not my quote
It could have been worse, he could have made her listen to his old records over and over.
Engineers and MBA types would do well to seek self-awareness regarding their own limitations. When they master their discipline they get a lot of positive feedback which engenders arrogance, shallowness, contempt for humanity, and a whole slew of child-like traits, which are not accidentally dumb.
Troll much?
If you're serious, jazz music, my suggestion is to form your own community, an organized militia to combat government excesses. First off, these excesses would be martial law imposed by not national guard or anything. It would be by either homeland security types who've been thoroughly brainwashed and/or selected for obedience to authority and acceptance of official propaganda. Or it would be private mercenary forces employing soldiers from other nations like te Balkans or Eastern Europe. This is the ultimate expression of corporate force, with corporate policy influencing government to bring in corporate troops to enforce corporate law. And it will all be very "legal" under a permanently suspended Constitution.
But a large organized militia would have a good chance of fighting back. Use the Darknet to set it up and verify membership rigorously.
The south of france was my first choice
Nice choice!
I liked it, I'll be glad to get back one day.
Rick Steves has a nice series of DVDs making it easier to plan one's tourism. I got the France-Benelux disc and started planning. If you've ever experienced moving to a far corner you've never been before, even within USA, it's an odd adaptation
I don't know, still looks like if it's tuesday it must be Belgium. If I visit a country I pick a place and plant myself there. I didn't vacation in France I lived there. I have residency still. I'm going to be doing residency leading to citizenship in Italy starting in 2016 becoming my retirement.
Apologies if the remark is seen as simple "trolling," but it's a thought that should be aired more often.
You really think engineers in general are that arrogant? Do you watch a lot of TV or something?
The benefit in mentioning personal hazards of accolades we get from industry is awareness that praise tends to pull us into accepting lies and myths of meritocracy, the nobility and righteousness of the powerful, the diminished, even laughable importance of your fellows. You are motivated to want to obey, conform, produce, compete, so that you may aspire to consume conspicuously imitating your masters as seen on TV. (who have it all)
You are confusing R&D with Sales&Marketing.
I agree with you that corporations will soon have their own armed forces. They have before and they will again have them.
They already do:
https://www.princeton.edu/~achaney/tmve/wiki100k/docs/Pinkerton_National_Detective_Agency.html
« First « Previous Comments 47,325 - 47,364 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,238,409 comments by 14,803 users - Patrick, SoTex online now