patrick.net

Ironman says

Why can't the libbies answer those basic questions in the OP??

They don't want to go on the record with a description, because the issue will take up anything that could be remotely demonstrated, no matter how trifling or dated (ie RT's Occupy coverage), over time.

If they tie it down to a few things, it may go off in a direction they said wasn't an issue.

When the whole thing ceases to be useful, the Dem Leadership will drop this tactic like a hot potato.

You have to click the new "tweet" link on the comment that you want to post to https://twitter.com/patrickdotnet

And even then it will just post the first 115 characters or so of the text. Improvements can be made, but for now, that's how it works.

I want to know when America will officially express its gratitude to Russia for helping to expose corruption in the DNC.

If we're sure the Russians exposed that corruption, then they deserve at least some token of appreciation from the American people for free services rendered in support of American democracy.

The key point is that the Russians did not make up any of the shit that the DNC did. The DNC really did it.

APOCALYPSEFUCK_is_ADORABLE says

What about our initial posts?

It's just for comments for now. Most of the original posts are too long to fit on Twitter.

BTW I added a link to the patrick.net twitter feed in the footer of every page.

You can include @realDonaldTrump and see what happens.

Looks like you get 116 characters if I include the backlink to p.net which takes 24 away from the 140 Tweet limit. So count down in the edit box character counter to 1884.

Ironman says

No, a shitty and dishonest candidate in Clinton helped Trump win

I don't see why the Dems can't see through this. Clinton was a terrible candidate. Sanders would have won. The DNC screwed themselves over this year.

You guys are so sad. The point is that a foreign government illegally interfered in a US election to increase the odds of their preferred candidate winning. If you don't think that's a major issue because it's the same guy you wanted to win, then you're idiots.

I think the word "rationalization" is pretty apt.

Thank you for your success Obama, now go play golf.

Ironman says

Moore said he would be in D.C. there for the women’s march, which is expected to be the largest demonstration around Trump's inauguration.

They should all march naked for a true impact. The march of the pussies.

Hopefully there will be rubber bullets if there are any disruptions to the planned event

BayArea says

Hopefully there will be rubber bullets if there are any disruptions to the planned event

Put AF in charge, and you will have real bullets gatling guns.

Strategist says

BayArea says

Hopefully there will be rubber bullets if there are any disruptions to the planned event

Put AF in charge, and you will have real bullets gatling guns.

If it were up to me, I'd have AF front and center leading security.

Hey AF, we will pay you $5 million plus $1,000 for every sore loser you shoot and kill.
Do you want the job? Yes or no?

Hillary's negatives were almost as high as Trump PLUS she had a political track record of Ho-Hum or Ugh that Trump didn't have (since he had no prior Gov. experience).

Her Unfavorability was ahead by double digits from the fall of 2015 until Election day, save only during the initial primary season Dec15-Feb16.

After she won the nomination in Philly, her unfavorability rose yet again.

Her rallies were sparsely attended, even in Super Dem Friendly areas and audiences like in Philly or as the freakin' keynote at that NAACP Meeting.

Ironman says

Wait, I found the Russian troll:

I've narrowed it down.
It's either this guy

or this guy

Tim Aurora says

our ardent enemy

speak for yourself bozo!
We weren't "ardent enemies" until Obozo declared it so, and since we don't agree with anything Obozo says or does, we reject his proclamation as well. Russia might be "ardent enemies" with the Swift banking cartel, and that cartel might own a good chunk of America, but we are free men and not slaves of any banking house, so fuck off with your neocon bankster-blowing propaganda!

These people are desperately trying to remain relevant by keeping their names in the news. One year from now, we won't remember any of them or whatever the hell it was they were selling.

They made some entertaining YouTube videos of crying on Nov 8th.

They'll try to protest up to inauguration, and then they'll disappear (and if the Democratic Party wants any chance in 4yrs, they'll need to distance themselves).

If we start seeing substantial changes in the tax code and/or there's action on the border wall, the everyday Joes will stop paying attention to this stuff. Many of them already have.

There is no chance in four years. Try six at the earliest.

They can wait 4 years and then confirm. McDumbass from Kintucky does it.

This was not failure. It was likely done on purpose. The secret goverrnment of the US wants the US to be just like Israel. What is it about Israel that they want? They want us to impose gun control and they want us to hate Muslims.

Israel has strict gun control and hates Muslims.

Wake up Patnet.

Some of you guys are comatose.

When you watch TV, the police always, always defer to the FBI. The FBI are traitors, IMO. CIA too. Trump can't overcome this, no one can.

This is a SMOKING GUN.

Give 'em hell Democrats!
Fight them every minute for the next four years.

BOYCOTT ALL Republicans!

TROLL THREAD!

Ironman says

Since you're in the legal business, do courts of law work on "apparently", or do they need some verifiable PROOF before they convict someone?

The standard is beyond a reasonable doubt for criminal, clear and convincing evidence for civil. Not verifiable proof. Pretty sad you don't even know the basic principles of the society you live in. But you've proven that time and time again.

Ironman says

bob2356 says

The standard is beyond a reasonable doubt

So the term "apparently" fits "beyond reasonable doubt"??

This is a criminal matter? Who is prosecuting it and under what statute? Too funny.

"DWS broke the bylaws. Hence the bylaws were not followed. Hillary knew or should have known DWS was breaking them."

Even if Clinton knew DWS broke the bylaws, that's not the same as Clinton breaking them. You are wrong.

Trump is bringing back car jobs. That's what Moore's first movie was about. Moore should love Trump.
http://www.cnbc.com/2017/01/08/fiat-to-invest-1-billion-in-new-michigan-ohio-plants-create-2000-jobs.html

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0098213/?ref_=nm_flmg_prd_18

rootvg says

Many of them already have.

There is no chance in four years. Try six at the earliest.

Yeah and that is my fear. It is like the boy who cried wolf too many times. The lefties fake outrage -fake rape claims, fake racism, fake caring of the middle class, fake ivory tower condescension will actually drown out any legittimate issues Trump has. Tha party has a long hike in the desert before they wake up-if they ever will.

Repubs lost it in the 1920s and dems had a massive majority for decades after-so it may be awhile.

T L Lips says

Her rallies were sparsely attended, even in Super Dem Friendly areas and audiences like in Philly or as the freakin' keynote at that NAACP Meeting.

B-b-but the polls said differently.

joeyjojojunior says

Even if Clinton knew DWS broke the bylaws, that's not the same as Clinton breaking them. You are wrong.

If clinton had shred of integrity, the nomination would have gone to Bernie Sanders. Sanders had a better shot of beating trump than Clinton.

In any event, the bylaws were not followed, Clinton probably knew this and was the beneficiary of this malfeasance. Using your logic, I suppose that since she didn't break them, that should absolve her of any blame.

In any event, Streep is a "Clinton flunky" who lost big. If she really cared about altering status quo, she would have put her money behind Bernie Sanders and encouraged others to do the same. Speaking of 'vilified segments of hollywood, foreigners, and press' she really only cares about 2: Hollywood and press, because that's what she needs to be relevant.

Streep also referred to Mr Trump's hardline stance on immigration policy.
The actress told the audience: "Hollywood is crawling with outsiders and foreigners and if you kick them all out, you'll have nothing to watch but football and mixed martial arts, which are not the arts."

Streep mocks Donald Trump: Nice fat orange outfit with fucked up hair.

http://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-38556030

You win a Golden Globe and you use your time on stage to revisit an ugly moment during the political race to pump an overwhelmingly liberal crowd (Hollywood).

Trump's original response to the NYT reporter was in poor taste and Streep's unsolicited rehash was in equally poor taste as well.

Take your award, accept it politely, and GTFO the stage.

Well,well ,well some don't like FREEDOM OF SPEECH!

BOYCOTT ALL Republicans!

I can't believe her until she flashes bush.

No replace just kill it, over and done with. Destroy the GDP profit center that our healthcare has become.
When the House clowns all moan that we must repeal and replace quickly or the whole healthcare will fall apart.
As purely speaking in terms of their profits and not healthcare or the quality there of. And when the illegal aliens bitch and moan that their Obamacare might be interrupted and ask how in the hell will they pay for it.
I can say welcome to my world.

Healthcare is not Insurance. People not aligned with you Idiot left wing Idiot motherfuckers. Will distinguish that fact from your Leftard Lies.

This shout out is for my future brotha that reads this post and says... "Well at least that guy got it, they weren't all fucking imbecile morons."

Ha ha! Ha ha ha ha!

APOCALYPSEFUCK_is_ADORABLE says

I'm pretty sure that Trump could spell Schwarzenegger correctly. Otherwise very funny.

Because it's easier to remember that Grubercare???