Comments 1 - 9 of 9        Search these comments

1   American in Japan   2011 Jul 7, 5:02pm  

And these are recourse even in California...

2   Hysteresis   2011 Jul 7, 5:40pm  

awesome article. thanks.

3   American in Japan   2011 Aug 1, 4:35pm  

I have a feeling this will exceed 40% at some point...

4   thomas.wong1986   2011 Aug 1, 5:57pm  

LOL! just love that re-fi advertising on the right of the Y! page.

5   FortWayne   2011 Aug 2, 1:02am  

misery now, but most of these "victims" sure had fun spending the money.

6   bubblesitter   2011 Aug 2, 11:25am  

E-man says

lenders CAN'T go after homeowners for judgment deficiency

They shouldn't because they get enough from other taxpayers for their losses.

7   burritos   2011 Aug 2, 1:10pm  

I refied in 2006 and extracted 80k to pay off student loans. Not underwater yet.

8   corntrollio   2011 Aug 4, 10:05am  

E-man says

SB458 bill passed in CA a couple of months ago prohibiting junior lien holders going after homeowners after they short-sold their home.

That is true IF the mortgage holder agrees to the short sale, right? If the junior lienholder does not agree, then it doesn't matter. This reduces the incentive of the second mortgage holder to agree to a short sale -- if they get nothing out of it, they might as well have the property be foreclosed and get nothing out of it (and still have the right to a deficiency).

9   American in Japan   2011 Aug 30, 4:55pm  

>SB458 bill passed in CA a couple of months ago prohibiting junior lien holders going after homeowners after they short-sold their home.

>SB931 bill passed a while ago prohibiting 1st lien holder going after homeowners after they short-sold their home.

So why would any lien holders approve of a short sale?

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste