« First « Previous Comments 24 - 60 of 60 Search these comments
Many are paid in a piece-work system, and make less than minimum wage; nor is there the least job security or overtime.
Oh, there is overtime, just not paid.
Median Household Incomes are still lower than what they were in 1999. That's right, in almost 20 more years of neoliberalism and banks first and $20T in debt, median household incomes are lower!
They would be much lower if not for the great advancement in technology. If we got rid of paleocapitalism, the median household income would have gone up considerably. Even more so if we replaced capitalism with a system that pays everyone x% of their productivity including management and executives. The remaining (100 - x)% goes to the state to provide all the infrastructure and government services needed. x should as close to 100 as possible. 80% is quite realistic.
Yeah, we'll have to pay more for food, which is dirt cheap in America.
This !!
We spend less as a percentage of income vs many third world countries as well as 1st world countries of Western Europe
We spend less as a percentage of income vs many third world countries as well as 1st world countries of Western Europe
We spend damn little on food compared to our grandparents.
In 1930, Americans spent 25% of their disposable income on food. Today it's 10%.
I can't find a graph showing inflation adjusted food prices, but I strongly suspect that inflation adjusted food prices have also dropped dramatically over the past 100 years.
We should be spending more on food. It would let us eat better food and provide living incomes to farmers -- and I mean farmers, not farm owners.
71 percent don't know squat about economics and what puts fruits and vegetables into their stores. They are stupid. Pure ignorance.
So you're saying that without illegal immigrants we won't have any food?
As a supporter of our new patriotic president I took into consideration many of the common points that liberals make when it comes to immigration. I've accepted the fact that things will cost more without this modern day slavery. However, its such a petty increase in comparison to regaining a better standard of living. Less crime, less spent on massive entitlements, less people in prison resulting in less early releases for serious crimes such as burglary, assault, etc... You brain-dead libs can walk hand in hand with these people as we true Americans figure out how to take care of our poor and suffering Citizens that are already here.
What is insane is that we have the same political base advocating for illegal immigration for economic benefit reasons as is advocating for the continued escalation of minimum wages!! The individuals that vote these people in must be purely incapable of critical thinking!
So you're saying that without illegal immigrants we won't have any food?
They are growing so much food in LA and Santa Ana that the food should be free.
Exactly. Illegal immigration is the direct effect of capitalism. It is fundamentally a problem of capitalism, the separation of producers (labor) and owners and allowing owners to control the distribution of the wealth created by producers. This is the one and only defining characteristic of capitalism. It is literally the definition of capitalism. And it is a fundamentally flawed economic system because it creates a grossly perverse incentive for the owners do make important decisions that benefit them at the expense of the productive members of society and society at large. There is no way to patch this fundamental flaw. This is why capitalism must end.
Unfortunately every moron in our society thinks that capitalism means commerce, free markets, banking, and currency. These idiots cannot accept that capitalism has at best nothing to do with those things, and in the case of free markets, actively prevents them. The fools view economics as a religion that has unquesti...
Dear God,
Please give Dan an Econ 101 book, and the ability to understand it.
Thank You
In 1930, Americans spent 25% of their disposable income on food. Today it's 10%.
Thank You capitalism. We love you.
What happens if the agribusinesses of all sizes realize that without cheap labor and subsidies, their low margins make the whole thing not worth their time and work? Do we import all food from Mexico and Central/South America then? Does the land get reworked as a shiny white McMansion subdivision? Do we have food insecurity going forward?
So you're saying that without illegal immigrants we won't have any food?
Americans could use a food shortage.
Dear God,
Please give Dan an Econ 101 book, and the ability to understand it.
Thank You
If you knew anything about economics, you could make a real counterargument instead of a baseless assertion that the other side is wrong, giving no reason. Your response is simply intellectual laziness.
Dear God,
Please give Dan an Econ 101 book, and the ability to understand it.
Thank YouIf you knew anything about economics, you could make a real counterargument instead of a baseless assertion that the other side is wrong, giving no reason. Your response is simply intellectual laziness.
I gave you a reason. You don't understand economics. Your arguments are so off the mark, it's jaw dropping.
It's like a 10 year old telling a heart surgeon how he should be doing a heart transplant.
Exactly. Illegal immigration is the direct effect of capitalism. It is fundamentally a problem of capitalism, the separation of producers (labor) and owners and allowing owners to control the distribution of the wealth created by producers. This is the one and only defining characteristic of capitalism. It is literally the definition of capitalism. And it is a fundamentally flawed economic system because it creates a grossly perverse incentive for the owners do make important decisions that benefit them at the expense of the productive members of society and society at large. There is no way to patch this fundamental flaw. This is why capitalism must end.
Unfortunately every moron in our society thinks that capitalism means commerce, free markets, banking, and currency. These idiots cannot accept that capitalism has at best nothing to do with those things, and in the case of fr...
this sounds lost
Dear God,
Please give Dan an Econ 101 book, and the ability to understand it.
Thank YouIf you knew anything about economics, you could make a real counterargument instead of a baseless assertion that the other side is wrong, giving no reason. Your response is simply intellectual laziness.
I gave you a reason. You don't understand economics. Your arguments are so off the mark, it's jaw dropping.
It's like a 10 year old telling a heart surgeon how he should be doing a heart transplant.
haha there is no argument in that to counter. It sounds like an economics bullshit generator w no unifying theme to the words used. http://sebpearce.com/bullshit/
I gave you a reason. You don't understand economics.
I have a better reason. You don't understand economics. Since that's the bar for this conversation, I win.
If you want to have a conversation where simply asserting your opponent knows nothing isn't a sufficient argument, let me know. Otherwise I see no reason to waste time on you.
You were really expecting strawberry pickers to be mostly white???
No, red. They sunburn easily.
Castillo said he was arrested when U.S. immigration officials knocked on his door looking for one of his sons, who had been scheduled for deportation. They didn’t find his son and, after checking his ID, picked him up instead.
Do you think humanity will give up on cash? The powers that be seem to hate that little loophole.
Do you think humanity will give up on cash?
Yes, but that has nothing to do with capitalism. Money is money regardless of its form.
condoning illegal activities because they benefit you financially is backward and corrupt.
so now we know what the liberals TRULY stand for: BIGGER POCKETS at the expense of others.
RealEstateIsBetterThanStocks says
so now we know what the liberals stand for: BIGGER POCKETS at the expense of others.
I'm the most liberal person here. How exactly do I stand for bigger pockets at the expense of others? Seems like you are describing big business.
maybe Switzerland needs to import some illegals.
HOW are they going to put groceries in their supermarkets??!?
RealEstateIsBetterThanStocks says
maybe Switzerland needs to import some illegals.
HOW are they going to put groceries in their supermarkets??!?
Lol, excellent point!
How on earth does Switzerland even function without illegals?
How on earth does Switzerland even function without illegals?
They still manufacture chocolate and other low-value added goods there as well. Switzerland is very tough on citizenship; they just denied somebody citizenship for nagging her neighbors about vegetarianism too much, she had lived there since a child.
A) Armed to the Teeth
B) Most things decided at the lowest level
C) Massive participatory democracy involving referendums
D) Stingy about Citizenship, they deport people at the drop of a hat.
E) Neutral.
Bad Side:
A) Not keeping your property in supertrim shape will land you in fines or prison really fast.
B) 5 minutes early is on time, you will be fired for being 5 seconds late (Germany on steroids).
Now imagine if a 300+M sized nation imitated this.
Now imagine if a 300+M sized nation imitated this.
Sounds pretty good to me. I particularly love being exactly on time.
Btw, capitalism is control of the means of production by a small group of owners, while presenting the unrealistic possibility of joining that group to the poor, to keep them from revolting.
Dan do you have ADD?
If laws aren't enforced than we have no laws.
Another reason to prosecute torturers and cops who murder.
Fort Wayne, if you can't see the connection between "if laws aren't enforced than we have no laws" and "another reason to prosecute torturers and cops who murder", then it is you who has ADD. The connection is obvious. Torture and murder both violate the law. For those who commit such heinous crimes to not be punished would be non-enforcement of the law. I cannot dumb it down more than that.
How on earth does Switzerland even function without illegals?
You don't need to pick money or prescription drugs, which is pretty much the only real industries there, from vines and trees. The quaint little farms don't produce much, they import their food and have the bucks to pay for it.
How do many countries around the world function without illegals? Just fine. We could too, but things would cost more. Eliminate the jobs and you wouldn't need to deport illegals. They would leave if they couldn't work. When is trump going to start throwing employers in jail?
Connection?
Dude you are constantly going off topic.
Fort Wayne, if you can't see the connection between "if laws aren't enforced than we have no laws" and "another reason to prosecute torturers and cops who murder", then it is you who has ADD. The connection is obvious. Torture and murder both violate the law. For those who commit such heinous crimes to not be punished would be non-enforcement of the law. I cannot dumb it down more than that.
Connection?
Like I said, I can't dumb it down any more. You'll just have to stretch your brain to see the connection. It's obvious to everyone else.
« First « Previous Comments 24 - 60 of 60 Search these comments
The other 29% are illegal immigrants and their anchor babies.
http://www.debate.org/opinions/should-illegal-immigrants-be-deported
#poltiics