« First « Previous Comments 16 - 55 of 69 Next » Last » Search these comments
So how come his approval rating is the same as Obama's at the same time in their presidency. How much was Obama tweeting?
It's not the same.
So you acknowledge that just reporting on his behavior is by definition very often negative.
Trump media three times more negative than for Obama, just 5 percent positive
Trump is easily the best president of our lifetime. For the record, I thought he was a complete joke for the first 3 months of his campaign...until the MSM started calling him a nazi. That was when I dove in and started researching every propagandized article about him. Now I'm on board the Trump train. Trump the medicine our sick country needs
No, it starts when an investigation into extreme corruption (we're not talking a bj from an intern) is not allowed to be completed
, Or when the media is constantly questioned and called fake news, in many cases because of true reports on reality
Trump is more like the hero we deserve, rather than the hero we want.
No, it starts when an investigation into extreme corruption (we're not talking a bj from an intern) is not allowed to be completed,
Destroying democracy starts by a party losing the election and then getting all Samson in the Philistine's Temple about it. Insinuating he's a Russian Stooge, that he's mentally ill, an abuser of women, that the election itself was hacked, a Nazi Plot, etc. etc.
Many make the argument that the press was overly kind to Trump, during the campaign - giving his antics so much attention, allowing him to be elected, and then the press has been overly kind to him since he became President too.
am I safe in concluding, as most reality based folks would, that the press is about 30 times more kind to Trump than it was to Obama ?
Everything on Clinton, Podesta, Wasserman-Schultz, McCabe, Stronzky (sp?) etc. has actual factual meat to it.
No, it starts when an investigation into extreme corruption
Really?? "overly kind"?????
The media was absolutely tougher on Clinton than it was on Trump. Studies have shown this:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/09/20/is-the-media-biased-toward-clinton-or-trump-heres-some-actual-hard-data/?utm_term=.de314eb4866f
What's YOUR definition of "unfair", let's start there?
From what history and true facts have played out, usually weeks or months afterward, Trump is proven right about 95% of the time. When he first tweets or makes a public statement there’s inevitably gasps and protests, talk of his senility, derangement, and impending impeachment due to the 26th Ammendment. Then time passes and he’s proven 100% correct on the subject.
Sniper says
What's YOUR definition of "unfair", let's start there?
Are you kidding me? This should be the simplest question ever asked on pat.net.
All I'm asking is 3 examples.
You got the google, even if your memory is shit you should be able to find out for yourself.
I gave a whole list, please pick the ones yo-u like best out of the list below. This really can't be that difficult.
Is it that hard to pick 3 things? My Lord.
Nobody can step up and name 3 specific topics where the press was unfair?
HappyGilmore saysIt's not the same.
True, Nate has been 100% WRONG the complete last year. I'd suggest a better source for info.
Sniper says
Only three out of that YYUUGGEE list spewed by the Liberal media on a regular basis???
Hmmm, the choices...
So you got nothing? Not even 1?
I just gave you a bullet proof 100% data supported example. Ignore facts though?! Yeah. That's what I thought.
During the 2016 election cycle, the MSM gave white supremacists, specifically the KKK, more press coverage per member than the dallas cowboys as a strategy to smear Trump. 100% proof of MSM propaganda.
? I would have thought it to be an extremely simple exercise
If you know it’s such a simple exercise, then you already know that we are right, and Trump has been mistreated by the media a hugely disproportionate amount! I’ll give you a new example from the National Review, a very conservative magazine.
After all this back and forth, nobody can provide 3 instances of Trump being treated unfairly??
During the 2016 election cycle, the MSM gave white supremacists, specifically the KKK, more press coverage per member than the dallas cowboys as a strategy to smear Trump. 100% proof of MSM propaganda.
« First « Previous Comments 16 - 55 of 69 Next » Last » Search these comments
The media’s coverage of President Trump has been overwhelmingly negative, more than three times more critical than the initial coverage of former President Barack Obama and twice that of former Presidents George W. Bush and Bill Clinton.
The Pew Research Center said that the early coverage of Trump was 62 percent negative. By comparison, Obama’s coverage was just 20 percent negative.
“About six-in-ten stories on Trump’s early days in office had a negative assessment, about three times more than in early coverage for Obama and roughly twice that of Bush and Clinton. Coverage of Trump’s early time in office moved further away from a focus on the policy agenda and more toward character and leadership,” said Pew.
The media story reviewed the tone of coverage of Trump’s first 60 days in office and found that just 5 percent was “positive.”
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/pew-trump-media-three-times-more-negative-than-for-obama-just-5-percent-positive/article/2644448
#politics