3
0

What am I missing? N.Korea etc...


 invite response                
2018 Jun 12, 2:06pm   18,818 views  74 comments

by joshuatrio   ➕follow (4)   💰tip   ignore  

I read the comment section on various articles about Trump/N.Korea blah blah...

All the liberals/SJW's are melting down about how Trump gave everything to China/Russia. Am I missing something here?

From my understanding, the only thing Trump agreed to was stopping the twice a year joint exercises that can be restarted at a moments notice. Doesn't seem like much of a concession, AND North Korea halted nuclear and missile testing, gave us our hostages, and verbally agreed to denuclearize. While there is a massive way to go still and an official treaty still needs to be done with verifiable checks - how is this a loss? Why are all the libbies claiming Trump gave it all to China/Russia and all this other conspiracy theory bullshit?

In my opinion, this is a great step towards peace, and aversion to nuclear war.

WTF???

« First        Comments 20 - 59 of 74       Last »     Search these comments

20   Shaman   2018 Jun 12, 7:26pm  

Since I have a friend who was decently deployed to Korea, I’m glad for peace. Oh and no impending nuclear doom on our Left Coast is also good for us in California. I’m sorry if that hurts your policy wonk pride or feelings. Sure NK is still an awful place with awful human rights abuses. But if Cuba is any measure, isolation just makes the situation worse. While China, with the same horrible communist past, came out of isolation and became prosperous and much improved over the bad old days of Cultural Revolution.

Giving an opponent a measure of legitimacy is the ONLY way to resolve a conflict without a fight. Trust must go both ways, and if your position is that your enemy is completely incapable of being trusted, there can be no conflict resolution beyond total war.

Nobody but Libtards want that.
21   marcus   2018 Jun 12, 7:27pm  

Patrick says
marcus says
He also said he would pull our 28K military personal out of SK.


Woah, that's excellent if true. At least a billion dollars in savings.



I'm not qualified to know if it's a win or not. But it turns out it wasn't promised as part of this deal.
22   marcus   2018 Jun 12, 7:29pm  

Quigley says
Nobody but Libtards want that.


Funny how it takes a right wing TrumpCuck to know what the libtards want.

I would think you could just ask 10 libtards to find out what they want, but no, more fun to lie out your ass about what they want. You know, becasue of some Bill Maker meme. Isn't it great being an American ?
23   Patrick   2018 Jun 12, 7:30pm  

Quigley says
Giving an opponent a measure of legitimacy is the ONLY way to resolve a conflict without a fight.


True. You can't really win and have peace unless you give them a bit of honor as part of the deal.

America did not totally squash Germany after WWII, and also left the emperor in nominal charge of Japan, and those worked out well.

GW Bush was both an asshole and a moron and completely destroyed the Iraqi power structure and murdered Saddam, who had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11. We are still suffering the consequences. Bush should be in jail.
24   marcus   2018 Jun 12, 7:35pm  

joshuatrio says

What am I missing? N.Korea etc...


This is what relatively neutral people are saying.


The statement, which American officials negotiated intensely with the North Koreans and had hoped would be a road map to a nuclear deal, was a page and a half of diplomatic language recycled from statements negotiated by the North over the last two decades.

It made no mention of Mr. Trump’s longstanding — supposedly nonnegotiable — demand that North Korea submit to complete, verifiable, irreversible denuclearization. It made no mention of North Korea’s missiles. It did not even set a firm date for a follow-up meeting, though the president said he would invite Mr. Kim to the White House when the time was right.

“This is what North Korea has wanted from the beginning, and I cannot believe that our side allowed it,” said Joseph Y. Yun, a former State Department official who has negotiated with the North. “I am quite simply surprised that months of negotiations produced so little.”


https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/12/world/asia/north-korea-summit.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=a-lede-package-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news
25   marcus   2018 Jun 12, 7:36pm  

OH, but the Iran deal is TERRIBLE, just terrible.

Isn't it great being an American ?
26   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Jun 12, 7:37pm  

Patrick says


Woah, that's excellent if true. At least a billion dollars in savings.

Another win.


Here's another thought, @Patrick.

The fact that these meeting even happened is a slap in the face to China. They were counting on using the North Korean issue as leverage in keeping their unfair trade practices.
27   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Jun 12, 7:40pm  

Patrick says
GW Bush was both an asshole and a moron and completely destroyed the Iraqi power structure and murdered Saddam, who had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11. We are still suffering the consequences. Bush should be in jail.


The Pentagon has a constantly revised plan for occupying Iraq. One of them was keeping Baa'thists in power to administer the country, at least in parts. Instead, they dropped the plan entirely on the eve of the invasion, along with the person who was supposed to run the show and had prepped for months to do so. Then they fired ALL the Baa'thists right off the bat, and they all ended up in Sunni Militias and many eventually in ISIS.

We didn't even fire all the low level Nazi party members running the Railroads and Post Offices after WW2. It would have been stupid to do so. Hell, the founder of the EU was leader of the Lawyer's Association under the Nazis.
28   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Jun 12, 7:42pm  

marcus says


Obama said he'd meet with Kim without preconditions.

Trump established preconditions - suspension of all nuclear and ballistic missle tests, plus release of imprisoned Americans - that Kim met.

Just like Obama gave Iran all the cash and an end to sanctions upfront.
29   marcus   2018 Jun 12, 8:01pm  

joshuatrio says
What am I missing? N.Korea etc...


What are we getting ?

My guess is yes, peace. The same peace we've had with NK for many decades. The same game we've played with NK for decades (except now they have nukes). I guess now we drop sanctions and turn on the money spigots ? ALthough NK gets that from China too. Is NK going to stop being a puppet of China ? Doubtful. Are they going to get us to decrease our military presence in that part of the world ? I don't know. Maybe.

Is not testing your misslies and nukes now that you know they work, denuclearizing ? I don't know. I don't think so.

I'm basically a conservative on the issue of NK. I don't want war, but as far as I could tell, the only reason we've been worried about war with NK was provocation by Trump in response to Kim's provocative tests.

Does Kim look like a big winner here, who basically got everything he wanted out of this ? I think so, yes.
31   MrMagic   2018 Jun 12, 8:29pm  

Feux Follets says
Potus legitimized Kim on the world stage, something that will have far reaching and unintended consequences.


He certainly did..

Did you see when NK nuked Guam, like they threaten Trump that they were going to do?

Oh, wait.... Guam is still here...

Looks like Trump made Kim blink..

Next target Guam, North Korea says
Guam has long been a focal point of North Korea's anger against the US and is often a target of North Korean saber-rattling. It was threatened specifically by North Korea in 2013 and again earlier this month, following a fiery exchange of threats and insults between Trump and the North Korean regime.
https://www.cnn.com/2017/08/29/asia/north-korea-missile-launch-guam-threat/index.html

It was threatened specifically by North Korea in 2013 and again earlier this month, following a fiery exchange of threats and insults between Trump and the North Korean regime.
32   MrMagic   2018 Jun 12, 8:34pm  

marcus says
This is what relatively neutral people are saying.


Tt months of negotiations produced so little.”

<...


marcus says
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/12/world/asia/north-korea-summit.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=a-lede-package-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news


Hmmmm, when did NYT become "relatively neutral"?

Did Hell freeze over?
33   marcus   2018 Jun 12, 8:44pm  

Another very reality based analysis. It includes the positives.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/12/world/asia/trump-kim-meeting-interpreter.html
34   Patrick   2018 Jun 12, 10:06pm  

TwoScoopsOfDragonEnergy says
The fact that these meeting even happened is a slap in the face to China. They were counting on using the North Korean issue as leverage in keeping their unfair trade practices.


Good point. I wonder if that was a big part of The Donald's motive. If so, yet another level of winning. Let's count the wins:

1. North Korea agrees to de-nuclearize
2. We pull out 28,000 troops from Korea, saving at least $1B/year and doing the right thing.
3. China has less to power to keep us buying 5x more from them than they do from us.
35   bob2356   2018 Jun 13, 4:03am  

Patrick says
If so, yet another level of winning. Let's count the wins:

1. North Korea agrees to de-nuclearize
2. We pull out 28,000 troops from Korea, saving at least $1B/year and doing the right thing.
3. China has less to power to keep us buying 5x more from them than they do from us.


and the yankees have won the world series already since they say they will. winning. Oh wait, They have to play the season, playoffs, and world series first. Bugger.
36   socal2   2018 Jun 13, 5:09am  

Patrick says
America did not totally squash Germany after WWII, and also left the emperor in nominal charge of Japan, and those worked out well.

GW Bush was both an asshole and a moron and completely destroyed the Iraqi power structure and murdered Saddam, who had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11. We are still suffering the consequences. Bush should be in jail.


Oh come on Patrick! We firebombed numerous Japanese cities killing hundreds of thousands and escalated to using nukes. Germany was completely rubbled and cut in half between the West and the USSR. We had war crime trials and executed many senior leaders in Germany and Japan. Compared to Germany and Japan, we went in with a scalpel in Iraq not inflicting a fraction of the destruction (most of the destruction was done by the insurgency after).

Most importantly - we occupied both of these countries for decades, wrote new Constitutions and still have troops there 70+ years later.

If anyone should be in jail, it should be Obama for abandoning Iraq to ISIS and chaos after less than 10 years.
37   Y   2018 Jun 13, 5:33am  

Bottom line: this.
Hassan_Rouhani says
I just don't trust the fucking commie fucks. Unless these regimes are completely dismantled they will continue playing fucking games. One look at the Russian fucks is all proof you'll ever need.
38   Y   2018 Jun 13, 5:38am  

when you have two professional liars negotiating, a concession is not a concession until it is actually implemented...
I put the odds of the 28k withdrawal about 500-1...

marcus says
He also said he would pull our 28K military personal out of SK.

I'm not judging it bad, but to deny it's a big concession ?
39   Y   2018 Jun 13, 5:41am  

Never happen until NK truly denuclearizes.
Anything said otherwise is just smoke...

Patrick says
marcus says
He also said he would pull our 28K military personal out of SK.


Woah, that's excellent if true. At least a billion dollars in savings.

Another win.
40   Y   2018 Jun 13, 5:43am  

Certainly not like the olden days...
marcus says
Isn't it great being an American ?
41   Y   2018 Jun 13, 5:47am  

This is the work of a master negotiator operating in the 17th dimension...libbies will never comprehend no matter how many art degrees they accumulate...

TwoScoopsOfDragonEnergy says
The fact that these meeting even happened is a slap in the face to China. They were counting on using the North Korean issue as leverage in keeping their unfair trade practices.
42   CL   2018 Jun 13, 5:52am  

How would you imagine we’d be SAVING money? We don’t fire the soldiers and they’ll still be needed, just in case NK isn’t trustworthy.

The move would actually cost more in the shorter run and you’d have to trust congress and the pentagon longer term.
43   Y   2018 Jun 13, 5:55am  

Level 14 in play here. Pre-negotiation make it look to kim like trump can be his friend, as he disses kims enemies.

ThreeBays says
Is it leftist/SJW to point out how un-American Trump acted by giving the finger to western allies and then laying praise on a commie dictator war criminal?
44   HeadSet   2018 Jun 13, 7:32am  

CL says
How would you imagine we’d be SAVING money? We don’t fire the soldiers and they’ll still be needed, just in case NK isn’t trustworthy.

The move would actually cost more in the shorter run and you’d have to trust congress and the pentagon longer term.


Because the troops based in the US will be spending their money at home, helping local economies instead of overseas areas. Also, no rent or other payments to foreign governments for the permission to keep bases and related facilities.
45   Patrick   2018 Jun 13, 8:03am  

socal2 says
Oh come on Patrick! We firebombed numerous Japanese cities killing hundreds of thousands and escalated to using nukes. Germany was completely rubbled and cut in half between the West and the USSR.


That was the war.

After the war, both Germany and Japan were treated very well and rebuilt.

Iraq, not.
46   Shaman   2018 Jun 13, 8:16am  

Patrick says
After the war, both Germany and Japan were treated very well and rebuilt.

Iraq, not.


It’s tough to rebuild when the people of the region keep maliciously blowing up anything you build for them. Fucking Islam.

Not that it mattered. The rebuilding process was intended to benefit one constituency: the corporations which donated to W’s campaign. Remember Halliburton? Hundreds of billions in contracts in exchange for millions on the campaign trail. That’s how democracies do coalition politics!
47   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Jun 13, 10:55am  

Feux Follets says
They don't need Kim to do that.


Sorry, when you depend on hundreds of billions in exports to keep your economy going, and have no welfare system, you depend on the client, not the other way around.

Somehow people think that we didn't make most of this shit ourselves, which we did going into the 1990s.

Kind of like banking: You owe the bank some money, you have a problem. When you owe the bank a lot of money, the bank has a problem.
48   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Jun 13, 10:57am  

Tim Aurora says
Demilitarization : You mean Iran Deal. Right ? North Korea deal has no specifics.


This is the negotiation phase. BUT, unlike the Iran deal, DPRK halted all nuke and ballistic testing and released hostages prior to the negotiations.

Iran didn't give up jack shit to get the Iran Deal negotiations going.
49   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Jun 13, 11:03am  

Where is Obama, Bill Clinton, Baby Bush & Jimmy Carter?

They are pretty quiet! Maybe they haven’t heard the news about North Korea yet!

Somebody send this video to them pic.twitter.com/q3BuK3Q0gX

— Terrence K. Williams (@w_terrence) June 13, 2018

50   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Jun 13, 12:14pm  

RafiMaas says
Does the US not depend on Chinese buying billions in debt? China holds north of $1,170,000,000 of US debt. Correct me if I'm wrong. Who's the client? Who's got us by the balls, China that's who.



Nope, we do not depend on the Chinese buying our debt. US Government Debt is one of the most desirable financial assets in the World and more than two thirds of long term Treasuries are held domestically.

Debt is only a problem when you are approaching default and have few options. Currently the dollar is very strong and US Treasuries are in high demand.The rest of the world owns 5x the long-term Treasuries as China, and the domestic market is many, many times China's holdings. The Federal Reserve alone has 2x the holdings of all of China in US Treasuries.



China buys US debt primarily to control the valuation of the Yuan, and to a lesser extent because of the Trade Deficit, and their unwillingness to buy American products in return leaves them with few options other than to buy Treasuries. In 2011, China dumped $200B in US Treasuries over a few days and suddenly, nothing happened - to the US Economy. China now owns less debt that it did.

Thanks to Bretton Wood, almost all world currencies are pegged to the US Dollar and buying US Treasuries is the best mechanism to stabilize and legitimize a foreign currency.

When China shifts from buying US Debt, it will only be because they are buying or investing American, or a desperate attempt to send the Yuan into free fall which would have MASSIVE Chinese Domestic consequences. Keep in mind Chinese are huge savers, all cash or real estate, and a devalued, non-dollar pegged Yuan would cause immense domestic hardship and rage. There's no welfare state in China to soften the blow, either.
51   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Jun 13, 12:45pm  

RafiMaas says
What kind of statement is this? $100 billion less than there all time high .... BFD


They sold ~$200B in one swoop in 2011 and suddenly, nothing happened to the US Economy.

RafiMaas says

Wrong again. A little over 4x but who's counting... apparently me.

As of March 2018 China $1.19 T. Whole world $6.29 T
6.29-1.19= 5.1/1.19= 4.28x DNE 5x


Over 4x to 5x, not a big deal and minimal compared to domestic holdings in any case. Japan holds about as much, also. It's necessary for the world since the USD is the underpinning of the Global financial system with no immediate rival. There are multi-decade contracts for trillions upon trillions for everything from Oil/Gas to Corporate Bonds to Long Term Commodity Contracts that are USD denominated. If China dumps US Teasuries - which because of the varying maturity is more likely to hurt them really bad - others will benefit. And hundreds of millions of Chinese who save 25% of their income in cash and real estate will scream bloody murder as a huge chunk of their lifetime of savings is obliterated overnight - and blame their own Government.

BTW, if China does this, a proportionate tariff to at compensate for the lost value of the Yuan will beat the shit out of China, that would be rocked by massive unemployment and savings destruction on top of that. That'll teach 'em, while creating tons of new domestic jobs.
52   RWSGFY   2018 Jun 13, 2:22pm  

RafiMaas says
What if the rest of the world sides with China?


Sides to do what? To what end? Over what spat? What kind of fantasy it this anyway?
53   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Jun 13, 2:37pm  

RafiMaas says
but nobody holds as much as China. What if the rest of the world sides with China? Trump really has only one (or does he have two now) true friend in the rest of the world, Putin.


Japan holds almost as much. I believe the difference between China and Japan is a few tenths of a percent.

RafiMaas says
How much debt is Russia holding?


Miniscule, relative to either China or Japan, and certainly relative to the overall ownership rate. Be surprised if it was more than 1% at the very best.
55   Y   2018 Jun 13, 4:04pm  

Well it has always been suspected of being the case.
Of course we all have to trust that the translator does not have an agenda, or take mavis beacon's online courses and do the word associations ourselves...

Hassan_Rouhani says
Interesting document: http://freebeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/PRC-Central-Committee-document-translation-revised.pdf
56   Y   2018 Jun 13, 4:06pm  

fuck i meant rosettas stoned...
57   MisdemeanorRebel   2018 Jun 13, 8:54pm  



This response did not age well.

59   marcus   2018 Jun 13, 9:12pm  

Neither Trump nor the GOP ever make mistakes. Let's face it, it's another YUGE victory for TRump just like the tax cuts. Count your chickens people before they've hatched with Trump, every time. The guys a winner. If you question the intelligence of what he does, you're an SJW faggot. This is exactly as the founding fathers intended.

It's so easy to see through those vapid libtard morons. They act like they are analyzing reality, like they're some kind of analytical wonks but we all know the truth. That is they hate Trump. We know that everything Trump does is awesome and brilliant and beyond criticism. He never does things just for the optics, just for the "win." He's playing the long game.

All the analysts criticism is just becasue it's Trump and they hate him because they envy him. THere is no such thing as a legitimate criticism of anything Trump does. Criticism of Trump is the very definition of fake news. Actually it's treason, and if there were justice in this world all those that are critical of Trump would be tortured or worse.

« First        Comments 20 - 59 of 74       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions