patrick.net

If you have not noticed already, transportation efficiency is a topic I think is of the utmost importance and that I care deeply about. Let's not screw this up any more than we already have.

justme says

But, pretty much everything else you said is somewhere between just flawed and really, really wrong. I wish you were not so anti-science (cf. other recent thread on science).

Woah When did I say I was "Anti Science"?

Tenouncetrout says

justme says

But, pretty much everything else you said is somewhere between just flawed and really, really wrong. I wish you were not so anti-science (cf. other recent thread on science).

Woah When did I say I was “Anti Science”?

You didn't say so yourself. However you made statements on the other thread that most scientists would call anti-science.

Tenouncetrout says

“american society has become increasingly hostile towards science and technology.”

No they haven’t, Politics has grabbed hold of the Scientific community and are using them as their Papal guidance. Science has become a Zealot church of the Liberals.

I'll be happy to welcome you in the pro-science camp. Some people who are scientists may have an agenda that you disagree with. Don't let that interfere with understanding and believing basic facts of science and established laws of nature.

I'd get a Volt if I needed a car and it were available in a 2 door model, and not in it's first generation.

justme says

Pkennedy, also, compressed air cars are NOT efficient. You need to read and understand the physics. Some of the stuff you say just isn’t right, sorry.

You seem to know quite a bit about this...thank you for sharing. When you say it is inefficient, are you talking about tank->road efficiency (energy transfer to make you "go") or somewhere up the food chain (i.e. during the "compressing" stage)?

Just looked up diesel and you're correct it's only about 12% more energy. 30% was general rule of thumb for more efficiency. I think the sulfur here might cause the problems, in general diesel burns far cleaner than regular gas but produces more soot.

As far as air cars being efficient, I didn't say they were efficient, I said that to increase efficiency they injected gas, but it should have been worded as more power really. The gas injection just caused the air to expand further, thus creating more power in the actual engine. It's not the efficiency that is a concern with those, it's the fact that we can compress air with a lot of technologies/energy sources and we can store it for long periods of time and we can transfer it quickly. Much like gas, you can go to a gas station and fill up, but with electricity you need some way to recharge batteries without destroying them and you also need a massive amount of energy "ready" to put into them, storage wouldn't really be practical, so it would require real time pulling from the grid, which means higher peak loads during the day, which is what plug in cars at home are trying to avoid. So air stations would be feasible, and could be done at home or outside, while always consuming off peak energy needs.

I dont believe we have enough diesel to run that many cars off it. It's a byproduct of gas and used in major transportation. I think switching many people to it might be an issue, but I could be wrong there.

The leaf has a lot of good uses, for 99% of our yearly driving needs it hits the mark. Only when we do weekend getaway/road trips does it become an issue. Volt only gets that mileage because of the heavy weight of batteries. It would probably do well without them. Tesla is right on track I think. 300 mile ranges are good for most road trips, assuming a few charge stations are put in place. 300 miles is like 5 hours of driving, you can recharge like 80% in a few hours, so you run for 300 miles, get out and eat for 45 minutes and you've got yourself another 100-150 miles probably. Now you're at 450 miles per day of traveling, not too shabby. Charge over night and you're done. I could do the SF-LA run basically, which is pretty good I think.

The problem arises when you need to do 600 miles a day in an all electric, but that is pretty hard driving and probably not done by many people. A simple solution that I'm sure 3rd party people will come up with is extra batteries in a trailer OR a mini engine in a trailer. I've read a few places that about 20hp should sustain highway speeds. So get a 10-20hp engine and charge up your batteries while you're driving. That should give you nearly double the distance, or unlimited distance. If you stop for dinner and charge you could get another say 100 electric miles, or about 400 electric per day, but nearly unlimited driving. This is more or less what the volt does, but it's not giving you a lot of electric distance for normal trips, which is where it loses out. The tesla is pretty much perfect, other than the 100K price tag :)

justme, A bit like waiting for Godot. The good news is that companies like Mercedes are hybridizing their high end diesels (not just concept cars) so that will (eventually!) trickle down. At this point, I'd settle for a Golf BlueMotion TDI. Basic start/stop technology coupled with regenerative braking gives a nice bang for the buck. Not available in the US, of course.

pkennedy says

I think the sulfur here might cause the problems, in general diesel burns far cleaner than regular gas but produces more soot.

Ultra Law Sulfur Diesel (ULSD) has been the law in California since 2006 and since 2010 _all_ highway-sold diesel must be ULSD in all 50 states.

http://www.clean-diesel.org/highway.html

I must say, I do like how the prius is always turning off it's engine when it's stopped. I think that would be a huge bonus for congested traffic if it spread to more cars.

EightBall says

justme says

Pkennedy, also, compressed air cars are NOT efficient. You need to read and understand the physics. Some of the stuff you say just isn’t right, sorry.

You seem to know quite a bit about this…thank you for sharing. When you say it is inefficient, are you talking about tank->road efficiency (energy transfer to make you “go”) or somewhere up the food chain (i.e. during the “compressing” stage)?

Both stages are inefficient. You lose too much energy compressing the air, storing it (heat escapes), and in the engine. Altogether it is worse than an electric car with current battery technology. Wikipedia link above is an ok starting point for understanding.

pkennedy says

I must say, I do like how the prius is always turning off it’s engine when it’s stopped. I think that would be a huge bonus for congested traffic if it spread to more cars.

Yup. It's coming. Several European higher-end models now have start-stop technology even in regular and diesel cars, and some of them use Ultracapacitors to reuse some kinetic energy for the restart.

Science is like Guns, Science doesn't kill people, people using Science Kills people.
The sun is going to set and shine. That's not my problem. You wanna make a car that can change the world and make other technologies and products that has a smaller footprint, then go right ahead. That's very Noble, I would defiantly join the cause.

Wanna create cap and trade, and mandate expensive less efficient cars, and half ass develop things.
Do all of the things that yes are possible, but don't lecture me on Science when discussing politics, while we got a Washington full of Democrats, ignoring the MATH. It's hard to pay attention to the "data" and charts, while there's a Fucking Circus going on out side the window. And your Clowns are square in the middle of the Ring.

Tenouncetrout says

but don’t lecture me on Science when discussing politics, while we got a Washington full of Democrats, ignoring the MATH.

We'll just have to disagree on that one. I think it is mostly Republicans that ignore math. Not that Democrats are very good at it, either, just not as bad. Many Democrats believe in Chevy Volt, for example. Chevy Volt is not a real solution to anything, just a waste of natural resources and tax rebates. I think you and I can agree on that one, at least. Same thing goes for Tesla.

Compressing air isn't supposed to be more efficient than electric, it's way cheaper than dealing with batteries, lighter in terms of weight, works with current technology, can be filled at home, or instantly at a filling station. So worse efficiency, but gains everywhere else. That is what makes it interesting.

Tenouncetrout says

but don’t lecture me on Science when discussing politics, while we got a Washington full of Democrats, ignoring the MATH.

LOL. Want to see some math, TOT?

Total Debt to GDP

@Troy

That graph is something... but I need to remember that the bottom of the y-axis is 1.0 not 0.0.

cheers

pkennedy says

Compressing air isn’t supposed to be more efficient than electric, it’s way cheaper than dealing with batteries, lighter in terms of weight, works with current technology, can be filled at home, or instantly at a filling station. So worse efficiency, but gains everywhere else. That is what makes it interesting.

Plus it can also be recharged at night, like a battery to take advantage of lower electricity rates.

justme says

Tenouncetrout says

but don’t lecture me on Science when discussing politics, while we got a Washington full of Democrats, ignoring the MATH.

We’ll just have to disagree on that one. I think it is mostly Republicans that ignore math. Not that Democrats are very good at it, either, just not as bad. Many Democrats believe in Chevy Volt, for example. Chevy Volt is not a real solution to anything, just a waste of natural resources and tax rebates. I think you and I can agree on that one, at least. Same thing goes for Tesla.

Since when has revision 0 of anything been someone's best effort? I'm expecting cars like the Volt to be cheaper (in relative terms) and better over time. Obviously Moore's law doesn't apply here, it will be much slower. I'd think in a few years the standard in new cars could easily be what we call today "mild hybrids".

What I found kind of interesting where newer lead acid batteries that had weight far far less, or had far more power per pound. Now those batteries would make a huge difference in hybrid/all electric cars. Even if it meant 30 mile ranges, the cost difference would be massive.

There was a company working on making ultra thin lead platting, I think it meshed onto some carbon graphite mesh. I wish I had the company name for that one, I'm sure others would find that interesting here.

There we go!

http://www.fireflyenergy.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=204&Itemid=81

>From my perspective, the shift from oil based economy to a non-oil based economy is the most important economic development in my lifetime. The US consumes a ridiculous 20-25% of the 90-100 million barrel/day today when the country is less than 5% of overall population. Our economic/social/foreign problem starts and ends will oil independence.

I agree.

American in Japan says

Our economic/social/foreign problem starts and ends will oil independence.

Oh Horse Hockey!

The only problem is the manipulation of the supply through our policy on Commodities. A few companies buy and stock piles the supply, violating price fixing laws that we just now ignore to the worlds detriment.
That statement above is so backwards from the TRUTH it's a joke. Right? That was funny right?

You guys would be the first ones throwing a hissey fit, the day there's no gas in the pump.

jvolstad says

justme says

Jvolstad,

At 6′5 you may consider that even smallish German cars are designed for fairly tall people, as long as you do not need the backseat room, as you mentioned with reference to your Civic.

This car is rated 30/42 mpg, but people report as much as 50mpg (tdiforum.com), if you drive it efficiently.

I would not mind a diesel. When I was working in the UK, I saw some pretty cool diesel powered cars. Why can’t we get some of those here in the States?

I have had a 2010 VW TDI wagon for about 6 months, and love it.

At 6’2” I am only squeezed if I have a baby seat behind me, without it I have plenty of room.

I am a pretty fuel efficient driver, and I regularly get 45-50 mpg on any highway trip longer than 45 minutes or so. I have done long trips with the car packed with kids, luggage, and AC blaring – getting 48-49mpg.

Also, it will take a B5 Biodiesel mix.

For the most part I have been very disappointed in the mpg offered by most hybrids. Then even with better mpg, they don’t have the cargo room that I need.

I was reading automagazine in the hospital today, and there's an article about GM Volt. The article said that the power pack is consist of 288 Li-ion batteries stored in special vessel surrounded in water and cooling agent, computer monitored to maintain optimal temperature.

Unlike other Li-ion batteries that have typical 2 to 3 year life span, it has 8 year 100K mile warranty on it. Sounds pretty amazing, huh?

Nope. Nothing really amazing about it. It sounds like the battery pack is glorified version of laptop power pack, and the car is undercharging its battery at 80% level for longivity. I don't like the idea of wrapping Li-ion with water based liquid at all. First, it takes 10 hours to fully charge the battery pack at 120V, 4 hours at 220V. Second, cracked Li-ion battery exposed to water in case of accident means having fire right beneath your passanger seats. You guys can go for fuel economy or whatever, I don't have time to charge it and I ain't buy it.

Tenouncetrout says

American in Japan says

Our economic/social/foreign problem starts and ends will oil independence.

Oh Horse Hockey!
The only problem is the manipulation of the supply through our policy on Commodities. A few companies buy and stock piles the supply, violating price fixing laws that we just now ignore to the worlds detriment.

That statement above is so backwards from the TRUTH it’s a joke. Right? That was funny right?
You guys would be the first ones throwing a hissey fit, the day there’s no gas in the pump.

Tenouncetrout, while I agree with you that there are problems with the way we allow companies to manipulate the commodities markets, you seem to be advocating the idea that our energy(oil) dependence, in the absence of this manipulation, is good for our economic, social and foreign problems.

I would advocate the idea that any time a country is dependent on others for vital resources (food, water, energy, etc…) that is a bad thing.

While I doubt the US achieving energy independence would solve all other ills, it would be a good start particularly with the foreign problems.

Almost all batteries are charges 20% to 80%, thats the best range for most batteries, including lead acid, etc.

Charging systems on those batteries are complex, and it's one of the biggest advances that tesla has made in their cars. Charging hundreds of cells independently, taking them out when they're charged and discharging them efficiently is fairly complex.

That being said, everyone who has driven one of these electric cars has had fuel fears, but in reality they say they come home plug in and never have it not full. No big deal there.

leoj707 says

I would advocate the idea that any time a country is dependent on others for vital resources (food, water, energy, etc…) that is a bad thing.

It depends who's on the other side of the dependency, what we give up for those dependencies, and what it is we're depending on.

People certainly don't mind depending on China for electronics, and cheap microprocessors and the devices they go in, or the billions of tons of plastic goods we import from China.
I think we would be in bigger trouble if China were to quit exporting to the US, than if we were to quit exporting to China.

We're a world economy now, and every country is connected in a macro economic symbiosis.
For now, Oil is plankton in a vast connected ocean that is the world economies.
Even if we had cars that ran on a wind up mechanism that as long as the car is in motion, it uses that action to create a reaction to drive the next cycle, and it stored energy in compressed air, which propelled the car from a stop, and aided acceleration. You do realize, the world demand for Oil would still be the same?
Almost every single thing manufactured uses petroleum based products. The products from refining Oil is a lot more than Gas, and Diesel.

Just because our cars might not run on gas, what about heating oil, plastics, rubber, solvents, packing materials, hydraulic fluids...

With out Oil, you couldn't even make the nifty Dash display in a Toyota Prius. Or insulate the battery and wiring for that matter.

Tenouncetrout says

American in Japan says

Our economic/social/foreign problem starts and ends will oil independence.

Oh Horse Hockey!
The only problem is the manipulation of the supply through our policy on Commodities. A few companies buy and stock piles the supply, violating price fixing laws that we just now ignore to the worlds detriment.

That statement above is so backwards from the TRUTH it’s a joke. Right? That was funny right?
You guys would be the first ones throwing a hissey fit, the day there’s no gas in the pump.

Where exactly is all this oil stockpiled at?

There's a bunch of it in the Gulf, yours for the scooping.

Tenouncetrout says

Science is like Guns, Science doesn’t kill people, people using Science Kills people.

Wow, just wow. Guns have just one purpose: Killing and maiming. Science has many purposes, generally good ones. Yes, science can be misused to kill people. But comparing science to guns is a far stretch even for the rightest of right-wingers.

Well guns have many purposes as well. You can kill dinner, open beer cans, drill holes, hold it by the barrel and drive nails with the handle, defend your gals honor at 30 paces, yeah sure, guns can be misused to kill people too.

Par for the course, TOT.

If you guys have learned anything over the last two, three years.
The next time a Independent leaning voter, tells you they are voting for Nader, instead of the Liberal superstar.
Just say, "Good for you, hope that works out for you." and leave it at that.
I should be solid proof at this point, you wont win a convert by telling him he's wasting his Vote, and the Democrat candidate is better solely based on "Anyone is better than(insert horrible Republican here)."

Tenouncetrout says

I should be solid proof at this point, you wont win a convert by telling him he’s wasting his Vote

Tenouncetrout says

Just say, “Good for you, hope that works out for you.” and leave it at that.
I should be solid proof at this point,

I agree that when someone is being in a willfully ignorant, no amount of education will help.

Those who speak up against willful ignorance generally do so for the benefit of the ones that may be ignorant or misguided but have not yet realized what it is they do not know, and may be swayed by the propaganda of the willfully ignorant.

In other words, I'm not trying to convert you, I'm trying to prevent other people from going down your path.

justme says

Those who speak up against willful ignorance generally do so for the benefit of the ones that may be ignorant or misguided but have not yet realized what it is they do not know, and may be swayed by the propaganda of the willfully ignorant.

Yeah like people running around and spouting "Change", while the those they are placing in Charge of Change, are meeting with every money grubbing bankster and fraudster behind the scenes, to kick "The same old same old" up a notch.

justme says

In other words, I’m not trying to convert you, I’m trying to prevent other people from going down your path.

You should have been a Baptist.

Tenouncetrout says

I should be solid proof at this point, you wont win a convert by telling him he’s wasting his Vote, and the Democrat candidate is better solely based on “Anyone is better than(insert horrible Republican here).”

If Obama fucks with my social security he will have lost my vote, full stop.

So far, Obama hasn't done anything I wouldn't have done as Leader (other than appointing *two* lesbians to the SC -- one would have been enough for me)

It's really hard to overstate how shitty a position the previous administrations/congresses left him, and us.

By all rights we should be in another Great Depression now. That we're not (yet) has a lot to do with all the crappy bullshit that has been done to keep global finance operating. Much if not most of this was Hank Paulson's work, btw.

I am not entirely optimistic that this game won't blow up on us, but we committed ourselves to a Zimbabwe economy in the 2002-2007 period, and I have the chart to prove that:

http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/CMDEBT

leoj707 says
Just because our cars might not run on gas, what about heating oil, plastics, rubber, solvents, packing materials, hydraulic fluids…
With out Oil, you couldn’t even make the nifty Dash display in a Toyota Prius. Or insulate the battery and wiring for that matter.

If I were made disctator, I'd tax heating oil so high that everyone who had an oil buing furnace one would switch to something else.

Also, a lot of car plastics is now soy based, even the wiring covers (and the rats love it).

zzyzzx says

If I were made disctator, I’d tax heating oil so high that everyone who had an oil buing furnace one would switch to something else.

Not everyone. Certainly landlords like mine don't care what kind of inefficient furnace they stick the tenants with. I just found out the hard way this winter that the new rental house we are in still has it's original 1960's furnace. Hugely inefficient and expensive to run. Running around with a caulking gun, taping the windows, and wearing a sweater only went so far, still had big bill last month.

Why the hate for "heating oil" particularly? Are they worse in some way than natgas or electric?