patrick.net

Where are all these liberals everyone keeps referencing?

You have a better chance of seeing bigfoot, than a liberal, in this country

landtof says

case 1: "i'm not a freak if SCOTUS decides i can legally marry another man, don't see you see mom & dad? how normal society thinks i am?"

After what feminazis have done to marriage, I don't even know why gays want to marry-they had true freedom-unlike us staright folks who have the gubmnt in our business all the time-down to every penny. let them share in the misery of the straight man and now a small number of straight women who make more than their husbands.

Dan8267 says

The south still calls the Civil War, the War of Northern Aggression

I'm left assuming you didn't even read my comment.

If southerner had realized their mistake, do you think it would have changed any of this ?

After the civil war there were large black communities, and the poor white folk (80 0r 90% of white folk - who never owned slaves) wanted to keep them separate, even still do in many cases. If you think about it, there is a huge piece of this that's economic. After slavery was over, most of the poor white population now had new competition for jobs. So there was a collective action, not even necessarily planned, or if it was, it was planned by a small number of people (kkk types), to keep the black man down, and not competing directly with them for their labor, and too some extent relegating them to the very lowest paying work. They wanted to believe "the negro" was inferior, and this could be perpetuated in some ways due to less opportunities of all kind, especially education. Once you believe a group to somehow be inferior, then that justifies keeping them in that lower economic strata. It was easy to keep these false beliefs because of such significant differences in appearance, language and so on. Of course the very small percentage that had been slave owners, the aristocracy, benefited as well. In fact their labor cost (for cotton picking) couldn't have been very much higher than it had been with slavery.

Dan8267 says

And most white people aren't racist assholes. The white people who are racist assholes are pretty much sons of the Confederacy. They can't admit their ancestors were evil, so they have to continue being racist to justify the actions of their ancestors. It's really sad.

That's ridiculous even for you. You've never been to places like south philly, patterson, canarsie, ironbound, or manhatten beach have you? There are plenty of places in the northeast and midwest that could give advanced level being a racist lessons to anyone in the south. I lived in lily white ( I didn't know the area, I didn't do it on purpose) Kearny NJ right across the river from Newark. I've never seen such a high concentration of overt unabashed racists. The cops actually sat and watched the bridges to stop anyone dumb enough to wander onto the wrong side of the river.

I guess it's a subtle distinction. I'm not denying the southern pride or many aspects of how losing the war affected the southern perception of itself.

What I'm say though is that racism has more to do with the fact that after the war, there were all those uneducated Africans to integrate into society. Realizing sooner that slavery was wrong would not have been enough reason to overcome all of the other aspects human nature that caused prejudice and oppression of African Americans. If you want to call it evil, okay, but these are attributes all societies have always dealt with, greed, exploitation, competition among the poor, prejudice against people that look different.

And yes, it was the the evil of slavery caused the circumstances of having all those Africans to assimilate in to U.S. society in the first place.

To put it even more simply: realizing slavery was wrong, does not automatically mean that everyone agrees these black Africans are equal to whites in all ways and automatically entitled to a good education and boundless opportunities. Hell, poor white folk in the south didn't even get that kind of treatment, and they were the majority of the southern population.

Most people fuck up their definition of racist as bad as they butcher the term liberal

The well to do pasty white flamer, perpetually voting democrat, demanding they keep their schools and neighborhoods "good"(meaning mostly white, zero blacks) goes on and on about stupid southern conservatives. Knowing full well that it doesn't get more conservative than in the home of your average black or hispanic person.

Meanwhile, the dumb white trash they claim they are singling out from the non-whites, actually live and work in the same places as those blacks and hispanics, even if they do use racist words towards one another

In the past, racists used the concept that Africans were genetically inferior to justify overt racist policies that forced Africans to use separate facilities.

Now, to explain all racial disparities in society, racists use the dual concepts that (1) Africans are genetically inferior and (2) liberal policies like welfare keep Africans down.

Despite the fact that only 50 years have passed since African Americans were held down economically, the 'conservatives' on this board won't admit that there are historical reasons for much of the economic and cultural disparities. The fact that one black guy got elected president does not constitute proof that there are no longer any barriers in our society for black people. Some people simply rise through adversity unscathed. Most people don't.

The premise of this thread is that actions of this one crazy black guy can be blamed on Democrat policies. It is just as asinine as blaming the actions of Dylann Roof on Republican policies. After all, Republicans constantly point out the failures of black society, say that black people are raping and killing indiscriminately, and complain when black people get any hint of favoritism. Was Dylann Roof was just acting out on what the Republicans told him? Of course both lines of thinking are bullshit. Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar, and sometimes a nut-job is just crazy.

bob2356 says

There are plenty of places in the northeast and midwest that could give advanced level being a racist lessons to anyone in the south.

Already addressed.

No one has said otherwise. But the problem of racism is orders of magnitude greater in the south than in the north. To deny this is simply a lie. There was antisemitism in England during WWII, but so say that it was the same as that in Nazi Germany and so it's a wash is a ridiculous equivalency.

You do not get over the evils of the past by denying that they existed or that they were minor, on par with other minor slights.

Dan8267 says

You do not get over the evils of the past by denying that they existed or that they were minor, on par with other minor slights.

You keep going on about the past, but ignore the present.

Again - why do you suppose African Americans are voting with their feet and moving back South away from Democrat/Progressive/Liberal governed States and Cities?

I contend it is because the South became less racist and more prosperous as they became more Republican.

"After nearly 100 years, Great Migration begins reversal"
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2015/02/02/census-great-migration-reversal/21818127/

bob2356 says

Dan8267 says

And most white people aren't racist assholes. The white people who are racist assholes are pretty much sons of the Confederacy. They can't admit their ancestors were evil, so they have to continue being racist to justify the actions of their ancestors. It's really sad.

Dan8267 says

But the problem of racism is orders of magnitude greater in the south than in the north. To deny this is simply a lie.

No the problem of racism isn't orders of magnitude greater in the south than the north. As painful as the experience was, I really hate the south, I lived in North Carolina and did a LOT of travelling in the south for most of last year getting family/aging parents and investment stuff in order. Racism isn't a lot worse there than in the northeast where I am this year. You just haven't bothered to find out how much racism exists outside of the south.

I will agree revisionist history and history denial is rampant with southerners.

bob2356 says

Racism isn't a lot worse there than in the northeast where I am this year. You just haven't bothered to find out how much racism exists outside of the south.

Good lord what social circles do you keep where racism is just rampant everywhere.

TBH it says a lot more about you than the supposed racists.

dodgerfanjohn says

bob2356 says

Racism isn't a lot worse there than in the northeast where I am this year. You just haven't bothered to find out how much racism exists outside of the south.

Good lord what social circles do you keep where racism is just rampant everywhere.

TBH it says a lot more about you than the supposed racists.

You know, racism is like the weather these days. It's a devaluation of the term itself as anything can be construed as racist now. Take white/caucasian pride for example, unfortunately a term held captive by the few hardcore eternal racists out there (which is no reason not to use it as there are as many if not more racists in any other ethnic group). Hispanics (who are white) have pride events, blacks do, women do, gays do, so it's totally appropriate to celebrate all the things the people of European descent accomplished throughout centuries, but you cannot do so without being branded racist. So racism is just a term loosely thrown around these days, mostly to entertain (get ratings/subscribers) or character-assassinate. Furthermore it has been established that on average far more people prefer to associate with those who look like themselves (you can even see that in couples who often have similar features), so it's not a surprise that people prefer to keep their surroundings homogenous to a certain extent. Nature is somewhat racist by biology.

mell says

so it's totally appropriate to celebrate all the things the people of European descent accomplished throughout centuries, but you cannot do so without being branded racist

Well, as with many things, there are many sides. For a big chunk of time white pride generally meant KKK type events. and white superiority over all other races. Hitler carried it to an extreme, but the feeling was there. Now the Irish celebrating themselves or possibly German or Scandinavian celebrations is not going to bother anyone. It is like the whole controversy over the confederate flag-it is the slave flag. it is the flag that the southerners fought under -so that they could own human beings of another color, rape them, hang them and generally do what they fit with their property. That is what it stands for. Trying to pretend otherwise is silly.

Being proud of your race is fine, but when one starts using KKK symbols and terminology-well people will get offended. Again as with many things-things get muddled-I don't think anybody cares about white folks being proud of their race-who cares-but usually the ones who use the same slogans are the ones using the terminology of the kKK for now-perhaps there is another way to separate the two.

Dan8267 says

It's really sad.

Cry me a river Dan, you sit around and feel sorry for my slave trading ancesors will ya?
I just don't have time for it, have you tried being a repubilcan cracker lateley?
Black folk should be pittying me, that I was raised in the liberal post civil rights era to pitty all of them.
Now it's my turn, give me some damn pitty love will ya? You racist cracker!

One more thing, if people wouldn't be somewhat racist/dogmatist wrt culture(/religion), ideas and race then the concept of countries and countries themselves would not exist.

What about house and homes, should that concept exist?
Why don't I send a band of Gypsies to take root on your front lawn, with about 5 caravans, they can retrieve your mail(not give it to you just take it) drive your car, swim in your pool and invite freinds and family over, would that be alright with you?
Or should we do as Libs say and not as they do.

lostand confused says

Being proud of your race is fine, but when one starts using KKK symbols and terminology-well people will get offended. Again as with many things-things get muddled-I don't think anybody cares about white folks being proud of their race-who cares-but usually the ones who use the same slogans are the ones using the terminology of the kKK for now-perhaps there is another way to separate the two.

Agreed but I bet you that you could hold a - call it caucasian if you want to avoid 'white' - pride event without any symbols or rhetoric used by the KKK and the likes and you would still be branded racist. Turning it into "Scandinavian" pride is just a cop-out to lower the blow-back, as almost all of the things celebrated are of viking (white) tradition. Also a country that gets mass immigration forced upon, will eventually disintegrate. Clash of cultures comes to mind. Everything in moderation, including racism ;)

I don't get the pride in my ethnicity thing.

Should I take pride in the fact that my skin is white? That doesn't really make sense.

I take pride in my beliefs and values. I take pride in being American and supporting the concept of individual freedoms and liberties. The idea that one is born with the right to pursue their life as they see fit(provided it doesn't harm others).

I went to see Kid Rock Saturday night. Prior to closing his main set with "Born Free" he has a montage and spiel about how America is great due to those things and how race and political ideology don't matter as we as Americans all share those core values. And to borrow from Rush Limbaugh, that's the way things should be.

socal2 says

You keep going on about the past, but ignore the present.

Actually, I did mention the flying of the KKK / Confederate navy jack as well as the systemic poverty caused by bigotry. Do you want me to go on with pages of evidence showing the effects of modern discrimination?

Oh, and honey, the past affects the presence. It is the responsibility of the American South to fix the problems it created. That is the price of for forgiveness. If you want us to forget the American South was ever evil, it has to fix the persistent problems it caused and stop causing problems.

socal2 says

I contend it is because the South became less racist and more prosperous as they became more Republican.

The south didn't become Republican. The Republican Party became the south.

socal2 says

"After nearly 100 years, Great Migration begins reversal"

Two words: air conditioning. Remove that and everyone who moved south over the past 60 years will move back north.

bob2356 says

No the problem of racism isn't orders of magnitude greater in the south than the north.

Because people in Boston often fly the Confederate navy jack and is the headquarters of the KKK?

And let's talk about voting. Voter Suppression: How Bad? (Pretty Bad)

The last large-scale push to curb voting access was more than a century ago, after Reconstruction. Until now.

or the first time in decades, voters in nearly half the country will find it harder to cast a ballot in the upcoming elections. Voters in 22 states will face tougher rules than in the last midterms. In 15 states, 2014 is slated to be the first major election with new voting restrictions in place.

These changes are the product of a concerted push to restrict voting by legislative majorities that swept into office in 2010. They represent a sharp reversal for a country whose historical trajectory has been to expand voting rights and make the process more convenient and accessible.

What Explains This Sudden Shift?

Partisanship plays a key role. Of the 22 states with new restrictions, 18 passed them through entirely Republican-controlled bodies. A study by social scientists Keith Bentele and Erin O’Brien of the University of Massachusetts Boston found that restrictions were more likely to pass “as the proportion of Republicans in the legislature increased or when a Republican governor was elected.” After Republicans took over state houses and governorships in 2010, voting restrictions typically followed party lines.

Race has been a significant factor. In 2008, voter participation among African Americans and certain other groups surged. Then came backlash. The more a state saw increases in minority and low-income voter turnout, the more likely it was to push laws cutting back on voting rights, according to the University of Massachusetts study. The Brennan Center for Justice likewise found that of the 11 states with the highest African American turnout in 2008, seven passed laws making it harder to vote. Of the 12 states with the largest Hispanic population growth in the 2010 Census, nine have new restrictions in place. And of the 15 states that used to be monitored closely under the Voting Rights Act because of a history of racial discrimination in elections, nine passed new restrictions.

Some laws are especially egregious in targeting how minorities vote. The push to shut down Sunday early voting in states where African American churches organized successful “Souls to the Polls” drives is a glaring example. Laws restricting voter registration drives are another such tactic. African Americans and Latinos register through drives at twice the rate of white citizens, and in recent years, civic groups have used drives to help close the racial registration gap—as they have for veterans, young people, and other less registered populations. Instead of embracing these efforts, Florida and several other states passed laws that make it difficult—and, before a court stepped in, impossible—for groups to help voters register. The result was a significant drop in registrations.

Don't give me any bullshit that the voter ID laws and bills served any intended purpose other than preventing blacks and other minorities from voting. As soon as the Supreme Court relaxed the Voting Rights Act, that very afternoon, southern states starting passing voter suppression laws. Shit like that has no equivalency in the northern states. To say so is a lie.

The American South, conservatism, racism, and the post-Southern-Strategy Republican party are all the same thing. You don't get to argue that it's a wash because racism exists elsewhere. Racism is the central part of conservative culture. That's why conservatives are always so pissed off. They know America is no longer a WASP dominated country. They speak of liberals with content because to them liberal is code for non-WASPs.

A liberal is someone who believes in equality under law and government of the people, by the people, for the people. Anyone who despises that, as demonstrated on this thread, is an asshole.

Mr Happygoluckofus says

Cry me a river Dan, you sit around and feel sorry for my slave trading ancesors will ya?

Sorry, no. I pity those fools. Whatever wealth they gained from the evil of slavery, they have paid several times over in terms of lost economic opportunity and the ongoing costs of the ramifications of slavery. Today, you personally continue to pay the costs of slavery through welfare, police, prisons, emergency room care, etc. And you will continue to pay those costs until you fix the problem your slaver ancestor scum created. And until you do fix those problems and stop glorifying those ancestors and their despicable culture, you deserved to be judged just like them.

Dan8267 says

It is the responsibility of the American South to fix the problems it created.

It already did.

The South kicked out the racist Democrats and is now much more prosperous and tolerant with Republican political leadership.

socal2 says

The South [. . .] is now much more [. . .] tolerant

LOL, that's some expert trolling!

eh ha uh, Liberals! Whadduya gonna do?

The rest of the country is moving on with out them.

One thing I've learned from Patrick.net, typically when people are talking about a group, and trying to tell you they know what it is (beliefs, makeup, etc.), they aren't speaking from direct personal experience as part of that group.

Liberals are this ...
Gays are this ...
Conservatives are that ...

... it's usually overgeneralized BS, or just completely wrong.

Dan8267 says

The American South is a culture of vileness and evil. If modern southerns want the respect of the rest of the world and forgiveness for their past, they must admit their sins and change their culture. Otherwise, they deserve to be judged on the past actions of their culture. We forgave Germany because it changed. The American South still clings to that vile culture.

Has anyone read about Lease-Convict? It's not as if the vile policies of the South disappeared after emancipation; they simply found a new disposable source of free labor, one that could kill or maim with impunity.

It's no coincidence that this servitude was exclusively (as far as I can tell) to the South.

Interesting. Most people knew that before they came here.

Rew says

One thing I've learned from Patrick.net, typically when people are talking about a group, and trying to tell you they know what it is (beliefs, makeup, etc.), they aren't speaking from direct personal experience as part of that group.

I bet I not only understand more groups of people than most, but I respect them more as well.

Mr Happygoluckofus says

I bet I not only understand more groups of people than most, but I respect them more as well.

Except for the terminally ill. But, hey, they're disgusting!

No you just don't understand me, it's never a good day for a peepshow suicide.

Dan8267 says

And you will continue to pay those costs until you fix the problem your slaver ancestor scum created. And until you do fix those problems and stop glorifying those ancestors and their despicable culture, you deserved to be judged just like them.

Hyperbolic much ?

I know you will not and can not do this, but please outline a few of the most important steps that southerners need to do to address these problems, and exactly how these are any different from steps northerners or westerners need to take, and also how these steps have anything whatsoever to do with nostalgia for the confederacy or any of the complex emotions some southerners have for the war they lost and the hundreds of thousands that died in that war. Keep in mind that most of the white folk in that war were poor southerners that never owned slaves, but were manipulated by the southern plutocrats and their circumstances in much the same way that they manipulate right wing ingrates today. It was simply ignorance on the part of the majority. But it was also a phenomenon that had momentum and was not easily changed, because ending slavery brought huge questions with it. Lincoln supposedly wanted to send the slaves back to Africa. How can someone be so lacking in human compassion that you can't begin to understand any of the subtle complexities of that culture, and just boil it down to a target for your hate ?

I'm not defending slavery in the slightest, but if I was born in 1830 in certain locations in the south I probably would, and so would you.

Usually when you get on your high horse and get so hyperbolic, I at least understand what the hell it is you believe. But this makes no sense to me at all. Other than communicating that you think southerners are idiots and you hate them.

Here's some history reading, that's not biased at all, but explores the question, why was the typical non slave owning southerner willing to fight for the confederacy ?
http://www.civilwar.org/education/history/civil-war-overview/why-non-slaveholding.html?referrer=https://www.google.com/

HydroCabron says

Mr Happygoluckofus says

I bet I not only understand more groups of people than most, but I respect them more as well.

I think he was probably referring to liberals, democrats, legislators, scientists, judges, traders of oil futures, health insurance executives, college professors, African Americans (not recent immigrants) , gays that are married, Obama supporters, Hillary supporters, Huffington Post readers, people who love Starbucks, yuppies, hipsters, people that think Trump would be the worst President in the history of the U.S., people that believe that anthropogenic climate change is real, etc., etc..

People in the northeast are racist. Therefore the south has no racists.

HydroCabron says

People in the northeast are racist. Therefore the south has no racists.

No, I think the point is that southern racists are different and more evil than all the other racists, because some of them even get nostalgic about some flag, and some like to reenact certain civil war battles, so therefore they obviously wish slavery still existed.

Also it's the south's fault that African Americans are even here. Those southern scumbags ruined America. So Dan is pissed. He also hates the impact that African Americans have had on our culture, especially in the arts and sports. You won't catch Dan listening to Jazz, Blues, R& B, Rock, or Hip hop, or enjoying watching any professional sports, except perhaps soccer, hockey or figure skating. Dan's scared, because if African Americans are already so dominant in many aspects of our culture, he fears for the future. And it's all the south's fault.

In all seriousness, I'll admit that racism is more prevalent in the south. But I don't think the reasons for that are nearly as simple or one dimensional as Dan suggests. Even if it's indirectly related to the post war period of freed slaves and the fact that the south adapts a little slower than the north, to integration and to letting go of the ways of several decades ago. This is because of ignorance and also perhaps due to a higher population of very poor African Americans in the south. That's not particularly surprising. I don't see that it's all that related to southerners being butthurt about about losing the war or being unwilling to admit that slavery was wrong. The simple fact is, that at the time, slavery wasn't considered all that wrong (by many people including most of our founding fathers). Who's to say that there's not some kind of providence in all those African Americans being here in this country now, and in time we will get over the painful way in which that came to be (I know - easy for me to say).

I guess one way in which Dan is right, since the population of African Americans is so much higher in some of the southeastern states, they could do more if they wanted to, on a local state by state basis to invest in good schools and jobs in black communities. It's not reparations but at least it would be a gesture. I'm not going to hold my breath on that one.

An interesting map. http://www.indexmundi.com/facts/united-states/quick-facts/all-states/black-population-percentage#map

Why do you hate Greenlanders?

HydroCabron says

People in the northeast are racist.

Don't expect Dan to understand anything, he still has a naïve view of the world and ignores every fact that does not fit his emotional state. And don't tell him Emancipation Proclamation was signed in 1863, not 1861 when the war started. Because Dan loves to live in a bubble where he thinks war was fought over slavery after which he as some weird immigrant hates entire America.

Hell, I bet Putin hates America less than Dan.

FortWayne says

And don't tell him Emancipation Proclamation was signed in 1863, not 1861 when the war started.

Huh?

FortWayne says

Hell, I bet Putin hates America less than Dan.

You confuse hate, for deep feeling and attachment. Dan cares enough to be critical.
Dan probably also prescribes to the tenant that one of things which makes America so great, is that we can so openly, and freely, challenge established belief and governance.

Rew says

You confuse hate, for deep feeling and attachment. Dan cares enough to be critical.

Do you read the shit this guy writes?

He routinely claims that half the country is "pure evil". Particularly Republicans, Southerners or religious people.

The dude is a cartoon character. I almost think he is just trolling. No one can be so self-righteous, hyperbolic and smug.

Only you would find a way to link the behaviors and actions of a mentally ill black man to all liberals simply because of his race.

We liberals don't all know each other and you can't flush us out of the bushes with your battle cries. Unless you yell "Section 8" and "I blame Obama" and "free food" really loudly... then we'll come running.