« First « Previous Comments 9 - 48 of 87 Next » Last » Search these comments
HydroCabron is Kochel 271 says
This can't be right: all lesbians look like Victoria's Secret models, and spend all day making love, working out, or rubbing massage oil on one another.
seems 3/4 are not and your tax dollars used to find why not...
Feds Spend $1.5 Million to Study Why Lesbians Are Fat
(CNSNews.com) – The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has awarded $1.5 million to study biological and social factors for why “three-quarters†of lesbians are obese and why gay males are not, calling it an issue of “high public-health significance."
Many species actually do go through periods when males are obsolete since the female is the primary sex, and males are introduced predominately to promote genetic variation.
In most of human history with a few exceptions men have done a lot of work of one kind or another. Not just hunting/gathering, farming, building, protecting, or fighting in wars for tribe or country. It can change but men won't become obsolete, if for no other reason than that women wouldn't want them to.
APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says
Of course, they are also just angry that biologic men present them with viable competition for their sexual quarry.
This happens all the time. I walk by a lesbian bar and one of them will notice me casually part my hair with my tongue. Suddenly, the doors burst open and wanton, panting lesbians are howling for my attentions and, the most unnatural of them, are enraged that I've turned their mates heterosexual just by my awesome self.
I bet it is embarrassing when converted lesbians follow you home and stand outside licking the windows.
It must require a Gatling to keep the big bruiser ones from stomping you on a daily basis.
APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says
This happens all the time. I walk by a lesbian bar and one of them will notice me casually part my hair with my tongue. Suddenly, the doors burst open and wanton, panting lesbians are howling for my attentions and, the most unnatural of them, are enraged that I've turned their mates heterosexual just by my awesome self.
These are the ones that are howling for your attention??!!
APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says
These are the ones that are howling for your attention??!!
Yes, but these I put into a tub full of mud on the front lawn and watch them wrestle while I entertain the Victoria's Secret Lesbians.
I'll take them both. Lets really spice it up and throw in that teacher from Finland.
I'm always willing to learn new tricks from hot teachers like that. I'll even do homework.
APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says
Right on!
that must be the 1% your fond of ... actually thats not the real world we live in..
are you ready to lip lock and loaded for deep tonguing ... by real lez ?
HydroCabron is Kochel 271 says
all lesbians look like Victoria's Secret models, and spend all day making love, working out, or rubbing massage oil on one another.
I am working on a time machine, not so I can kill Hitler or anything so prosaic, but so I can go forward to the time when I'll be the LAST MAN ON EARTH!
HydroCabron is Kochel 271 says
all lesbians look like Victoria's Secret models, and spend all day making love, working out, or rubbing massage oil on one another.
I am working on a time machine, not so I can kill Hitler or anything so prosaic, but so I can go forward to the time when I'll be the LAST MAN ON EARTH!
They will kill each other just to look at you, and you will be repeatedly molested by the sexiest ones. You really want that?
APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says
are you ready to lip lock and loaded for deep tonguing ... by real lez ?
Not with biker chicks of any kind. There's a larger universe of Lesbians out there without tattoos, who need my help.
Is that olivia munn?
APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says
Not with biker chicks of any kind. There's a larger universe of Lesbians out there without tattoos, who need my help.
Don't discriminate. Dikes like bikes, too!
(CNSNews.com) – The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has awarded $1.5 million to study biological and social factors for why “three-quarters†of lesbians are obese and why gay males are not, calling it an issue of “high public-health significance."
Why do you hate science?
APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says
That may be true but Fucking is always in fashion.
I for one love it!
to study biological and social factors for why “three-quarters†of lesbians are obese and why gay males are not
Do you think anybody cares?
Do you think anybody cares?
I'd like to know. I think there's at least a corollary. But then, I love big women.
I'd like to know. I think there's at least a corollary. But then, I love big women
Well big is relative. This is just right! I don't like the stick thin, one step away from death look on models!!
I also get called to fix the crap she's always breaking or electronics she screws up....
Ha! That's funny. I'm always calling my daughter to help troubleshoot my wireless network or any PC issues I'm having.
The only reason women want men is for their throbbing penis.
I feel so used.
I wish that was the only reason...
I also get called to fix the crap she's always breaking or electronics she screws up....
Just inform her you have a marriage license, not a plumbers license.
You're talking jugsville, which is alright, too. But I'm a big man myself, and I like to feel like I've been someplace with a gal. I don't want to feel like I'm scaling a chain link fence in bed, y'know?
You're talking jugsville, which is alright, too. But I'm a big man myself, and I like to feel like I've been someplace with a gal. I don't want to feel like I'm crawling up a chain link fence in bed, y'know?
Looks like she is crawling up the chain link fence, or she is opening her jaws and getting ready to swallow him.
My only problem with her might could be that she's a little overdressed for throwing hams.
hat must be the 1% your fond of ... actually thats not the real world we live in..
are you ready to lip lock and loaded for deep tonguing ... by real lez ?
What I don't get is why so many lesbians want to look like the worst looking dudes?
If men were not needed, we'd disappear in the evolution. The only thing that was disappearing were homosexuals and other deviants... and those only survived because of bleeding heart liberals who want to socialize misery and deviancy to entire society. Fools I tell you!
If men were not needed, we'd disappear in the evolution. The only thing that was disappearing were homosexuals and other deviants... and those only survived because of bleeding heart liberals who want to socialize misery and deviancy to entire society. Fools I tell you!
Wayne! No PAT.NET when you're drinking! You're a stirrer, you...
What I don't get is why so many lesbians want to look like the worst looking dudes?
Thats why the Govt spent $1.5M to find those urgent questions.
The only thing that was disappearing were homosexuals and other deviants...
They were doing a heckuva job hanging around without the help of filthy liberals for thousands of years.
They will kill each other just to look at you, and you will be repeatedly molested by the sexiest ones. You really want that?
I'm good with it.
The only thing that was disappearing were homosexuals and other deviants... and those only survived because of bleeding heart liberals who want to socialize misery and deviancy to entire society. Fools I tell you!
You seem to be bragging about your lack of reasoning skills again.
If anything, homosexuality which has only recently become somewhat culturally acceptable is leading to gays living their gay lifestyle, and usually not having children. This may make for less gays in the future if it is an inheritable trait.
In the sexually repressed past, that you wish we still had, gays would do everything to suppress their homo tendencies, and they would marry and have children, only in some cases occasionally having (what they felt were) their perverted dalliances on the side.
Bottm line: If gay is an inheritable trait, then having gays out in the open and accepted will if anything diminish the amount of gay genes in the gene pool.
I know that you might be one of those closet homos who thinks that if being gay is acceptable then all the people who are like you (except less willing to supress those urges), will become gay.
As a true heterosexual male, I can tell you, that's not how it works. I don't care how many gays are on TV or out and about as normal people or even nice interesting people. I still have no interest in having sex with men.
Bottm line: If gay is an inheritable trait, then having gays out in the open and accepted will if anything diminish the amount of gay genes in the gene pool.
Shortsightedness as a personal example, why wouldn't that have been weeded out long ago? Many traits which you might consider killer limitations, are not even a factor worth worrying over in the vastness of time and complexity of reality. Evolution doesn't produce perfection only "good enough".
Many traits which you might consider killer limitations, are not even a factor worth worrying over in the vastness of time and complexity of reality.
Homosexuality is a little different though. A shortsighted guy still wants to find a mate and is driven to reproduce with a woman. OR a shortsighted woman may be very attractive as a mate.
Gay men in many cases have no such drive, but for many millennia have chosen to mate for a variety of reasons, most of which are now gone.
I'm not saying that it will disappear. Only that the genetic factor may actually decrease if anything, compared to having a culture which says that most people should marry and have children in spite of some men having such urges.
Only that the genetic factor may actually decrease if anything,
Why? Most people like having "little people" and they can get them. I expect the options for making new humans to only increase going forward. A lesbian triad wants a family? Fine, here we'll mix & match your genes for $999!
Okay but it seems like arguing just for sake of arguing.
I said "less" genes into the gene pool.
I'll tell you what, you let me know what percentage of gay couples don't have children or adopt if they do, and what percentage of gay men have children by using one of their own sperm with a surrogate mother, and then see if it doesn't seem like those numbers aren't significantly lower than the number of potentially gay men who were passing on their genes in conventional heterero coupling back in the days when being gay was not acceptable.
I'm busy so this is about as much research as I'm going to do right now.
https://www.census.gov/hhes/samesex/files/Krivickas-Lofquist%20PAA%202011.pdf
Children in Opposite-Sex and Same-Sex Households
We begin by discussing the past research on children in households. Data from the 2008 American Community Survey show that there are approximately 415,000 reported same-sex unmarried partner households and 150,000 reported same-sex spousal households, representing 27% of all same-sex couple households (O’Connell, Lofquist, Simmons, & Lugaila 2010). A substantial number of these same-sex households contain children. Black and colleagues (2000) used data from the 1990 Census to show that about 22% of partnered lesbians and about 5% of partnered gay men had children in their households. Recent estimates from the 2008 ACS show 13.9 percent of male-male unmarried couple and 26.5 percent of female-female unmarried couple households contain children2. A larger percentage of opposite-sex households contain children, as 43 percent of both married opposite-sex couple and unmarried opposite-sex couple households contain children.
Same-sex couples, both male and female, are also significantly more likely to have children from previous relationships and much less likely to have children from their current relationship compared with opposite-sex couples (Henehan et al. 2007). Specifically, 62 percent of lesbians had children from a previous relationship compared with only 19 percent of heterosexual women, while 78 percent of heterosexual women, while 78 percent of heterosexual women have children from their current relationship compared with only 37 percent of lesbian women (Henehan et al.). Similar results were found for gay men and heterosexual men. These findings suggest that same-sex couple householders may be more likely than opposite-sex couple householders to have a non-related child (most likely being the child of a partner) in their household
These ones are good for chiropractic adjustments...
lostand confused says
APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says
This happens all the time. I walk by a lesbian bar and one of them will notice me casually part my hair with my tongue. Suddenly, the doors burst open and wanton, panting lesbians are howling for my attentions and, the most unnatural of them, are enraged that I've turned their mates heterosexual just by my awesome self.
These are the ones that are howling for your attention??!!
If only we could force Fort Wayne to have only gay sex he couldn't pass on his mania about gays.
'you can force gay sex' yes you made his point
about destroying people and societies.
I shoulda gone gay. I just think it would've been a lot cheaper than all the women.
hey maybe you could have found a sugar daddy. Of course marrying rich women is possible too.
« First « Previous Comments 9 - 48 of 87 Next » Last » Search these comments
http://ideas.time.com/2014/01/02/men-are-obsolete/
This story is a crock of shit. Seriously, with comments such as:
"Are men literally obsolete? Of course not, and if we had to prove that we could never win. For one thing, we haven’t figured out a way to harvest sperm without them being, you know, alive. But in order to win this debate we have to prove that men, quote unquote, as we’ve historically come to define them — entitled to power, destined for leadership, arrogant, confused by anything that isn’t them. As in: “I don’t understand. Is it a guy dressed up like a girl? Or a girl dressed up like a guy?†They are obsolete.
However, choosing a headline is "sexy" and draws readers in. It's an advertisement for her book.