0
0

People will be held responsible - just not Chris Christie


 invite response                
2014 Jan 8, 6:15am   18,850 views  95 comments

by CL   ➕follow (1)   💰tip   ignore  

http://www.politico.com/story/2014/01/chris-christie-aides-bridge-emails-101897.html?hp=t1

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie said Wednesday he is “outraged” by newly released documents linking a senior member of his staff to the closure of lanes on a major bridge in September — shutdowns that caused massive traffic jams and sparked allegations that the closures were the result of political retribution. The Republican, a likely 2016 presidential candidate, denied personal knowledge of any plans to close the lanes and vowed that “people will be held responsible for their actions.

#politics

« First        Comments 69 - 95 of 95        Search these comments

69   Y   2014 Jan 11, 11:26pm  

as opposed to an old nothing??

rooemoore says

Even if Christie new nothing,

70   Y   2014 Jan 11, 11:28pm  

Finally, somebody that can win a kindergarten spelling bee...

Homeboy says

rooemoore says

Even if Christie new nothing, one still has to wonder at his complete lack of curiosity about the bridge closure. From not responding to the thousands of complaints about the closure while it was happening, to later not seeming to be interested in why two of his appointees suddenly retired due to the growing scandal.

Exactly. Finally, someone here with a bit of common sense.

71   Y   2014 Jan 11, 11:31pm  

Why shouldn't it be? Aides are hired as trusted associates.
You hire them based on their history and what you know about them.
If, after the fact, they fuck you over that is mostly out of your control.

Homeboy says

I mean, what the fuck? Did he call a couple of his aides in and say, "Hey, did youse guys have anything to do with them lanes closures?" and they said "no", and he said, "O.K., that's good enough for me"?

72   anonymous   2014 Jan 11, 11:41pm  

CL says

Straw Man says

The only possible consequences could be political and even these would be minor.

Call it Crazy says

If that's what your looking for dude, you have some HUGE targets sitting in D.C. Why not try and focus your energies there, not on a traffic jam...

Apologism runs strong. Ask yourselves if you would be as lenient, as Dan suggested, if it were a Democratic Governor in NEW JERSEY who carried himself as a thug or mobster. Why do I suspect your cavalier attitudes would evaporate?

To expound, which "scandal" that has been thrown at Obama do you think is in fact, trivial?

Whatever happened with the democrat poster child, John Corzine?

73   Homeboy   2014 Jan 12, 4:36am  

Call it Crazy says

In a state of 8 million people, how would Christie know of some traffic tie-ups...

Because it was all over the newspapers, the Port Authority executive director sent an email saying it was "abusive, a threat to public safety, and a violation of federal law", there were thousands of complaints, the mayor of Fort Lee publicly accused Christie of orchestrating the incident as political payback, Christie personally talked to reporters who told him about it, and staff members appointed by Christie resigned over the incident.

How would he know? Are you really this obtuse, or are you just pretending to be?

74   Homeboy   2014 Jan 12, 4:41am  

SoftShell says

Why shouldn't it be? Aides are hired as trusted associates.

You hire them based on their history and what you know about them.

If, after the fact, they fuck you over that is mostly out of your control.

That is the attitude a poor leader would have, not someone who has aspirations of running for president. A good leader would be proactive and not hide under a rock while his aides run amok.

75   bob2356   2014 Jan 12, 6:00am  

bob2356 says

So all you have is the supposition that he should have known this was instigated by his staff

Homeboy says

Why don't you do some research before you embarrass yourself any more? It WAS instigated by his staff.

I clearly stated is was instigated by his staff. Maybe you should learn to read. So you agree it came from his staffer Kelly, so where's the evidence Christie himself was involved?

76   bob2356   2014 Jan 12, 6:12am  

Homeboy says

What did she say to Christie that day? You honestly expect us to believe that the woman who is going to be his next chief of staff didn't bother to mention to him that she got an email from the director of the port authority complaining about the fake traffic study?

So you know that she did mention it? I'm very impressed you have such extensive unfettered access to the inner workings of Christie's administration.

77   bob2356   2014 Jan 12, 6:13am  

Homeboy says

That is the attitude a poor leader would have, not someone who has aspirations of running for president. A good leader would be proactive and not hide under a rock while his aides run amok

Well that leaves out every president since Truman.

78   bob2356   2014 Jan 12, 6:16am  

Homeboy says

bob2356 says

Nice, you finally figured out the whole point.

Um, I KNOW the point. YOU'RE the one trying to equate this with bgamal's wacky Zionist conspiracy theories. I mean, WTF, man?

No I'm trying to equate your response to this story withbgmal's response to news stories with wacky zionist theories. He doesn't have any evidence and neither do you.

79   Y   2014 Jan 12, 6:40am  

I am not talking about attitudes.
I am talking about circumstances.
You apparently have an attitude.

Homeboy says

SoftShell says

Why shouldn't it be? Aides are hired as trusted associates.

You hire them based on their history and what you know about them.

If, after the fact, they fuck you over that is mostly out of your control.

That is the attitude a poor leader would have, not someone who has aspirations of running for president. A good leader would be proactive and not hide under a rock while his aides run amok.

80   tatupu70   2014 Jan 12, 6:47am  

SoftShell says

Why shouldn't it be? Aides are hired as trusted associates.

You hire them based on their history and what you know about them.

If, after the fact, they fuck you over that is mostly out of your control.

It's out of your control to hire someone who won't fuck you over? You must not be too proficient at interviewing and background checks...

81   tatupu70   2014 Jan 12, 7:01am  

Call it Crazy says

Wow, really??? You truly know completely what an employee is going to do in the future??? Employees NEVER lie when caught??? Really??

We didn't realize you were such a great fortune teller!!!

I wouldn't say NEVER, but I wouldn't say it's out of my control either. I would say it's partially my fault...

82   tatupu70   2014 Jan 12, 7:30am  

Call it Crazy says

Question, if as you say, he lied and really ordered the closures, why hasn't Bridget Kelly, who was instantly fired, been on all the news media and talk shows telling everyone the TRUTH???

I have no idea if he knew or not, but the answer to your question is easy.

Christie may or may not be the next President of the US. It's not bad if POTUS owes you, is it? That's a pretty good reason to stay quiet

83   tatupu70   2014 Jan 12, 7:56am  

Call it Crazy says

Except, for right now, her career is in the sewer. No one will touch her and she's unemployable in gov't and business circles (well, maybe a liberal organization would hire her, they seem to like liars)... She's like 41 years old... I hope she saved her money...

And her prospects would improve if she went on TV selling out her boss?

84   tatupu70   2014 Jan 12, 8:01am  

Call it Crazy says

Probably not... In your world, truth doesn't matter....

We're talking about the real world. In the real world, job prospects aren't enhanced when you sell out your boss.

Especially political chief of staffs...

85   tatupu70   2014 Jan 12, 8:58am  

Call it Crazy says

Like I said.... in YOUR world...

lol--OK please explain how that helps in any world.

86   Homeboy   2014 Jan 12, 9:56am  

bob2356 says

I clearly stated is was instigated by his staff

bob2356 says

So all you have is the supposition that he should have known this was instigated by his staff (remember it was actually done by the port authority) based on your projection of how he should have looked into the situation when asked about it by the press.

You said it was done by the port authority. You're anything but clear. You're all over the place on this. Maybe you don't really have a cogent point but just like to argue?

87   Homeboy   2014 Jan 12, 9:59am  

bob2356 says

Well that leaves out every president since Truman.

Oh, I see. What Christie did was o.k. in your mind because you don't expect any better. Nice.

88   Homeboy   2014 Jan 12, 10:02am  

bob2356 says

No I'm trying to equate your response to this story withbgmal's response to news stories with wacky zionist theories.

I know what you're TRYING to do. You just suck at it.

bob2356 says

He doesn't have any evidence and neither do you.

That is without a doubt the dumbest comparison I have ever seen. I posted pages and pages of evidence. Lots of people find Christie's story dubious, and they are not wacko conspiracy theorists, despite what you desperately wish to believe. You are obviously in denial.

89   Y   2014 Jan 12, 10:42am  

It's not out of your control. However, there are no absolutes.
No one can predict with 100% accuracy how others will perform over the long haul.

tatupu70 says

SoftShell says

Why shouldn't it be? Aides are hired as trusted associates.


You hire them based on their history and what you know about them.


If, after the fact, they fuck you over that is mostly out of your control.

It's out of your control to hire someone who won't fuck you over? You must not be too proficient at interviewing and background checks...

90   Y   2014 Jan 12, 10:44am  

Uhhh yeah, it is bad if POTUS owes you given the varied instruments of destruction at his/her hands.

tatupu70 says

Call it Crazy says

Question, if as you say, he lied and really ordered the closures, why hasn't Bridget Kelly, who was instantly fired, been on all the news media and talk shows telling everyone the TRUTH???

I have no idea if he knew or not, but the answer to your question is easy.

Christie may or may not be the next President of the US. It's not bad if POTUS owes you, is it? That's a pretty good reason to stay quiet

91   Y   2014 Jan 12, 10:52am  

Hmmmm. Lets take a look at Monika...who fucked over her boss bill..
3/99: on the cover of TIME magazine
9/99: Handbag designer
1/2000: Spokes person for Jenny Craig
3/2002: Documentary subject
4/2003: Reality show host
12/2006: Social Psychologist

Regarding your statement bolded below: FAIL.

http://www.youtube.com/embed/RJoOhq4M1TY

tatupu70 says

Call it Crazy says

Probably not... In your world, truth doesn't matter....

We're talking about the real world. In the real world, job prospects aren't enhanced when you sell out your boss.

92   Y   2014 Jan 12, 11:09am  

Thats a lot of eatin after all that porkin...

APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says

I had no idea that Lewinsky was SO FUCKING HUGE!

93   Lam   2014 Jan 12, 12:03pm  

Krispy Kreme took the psycho test and scored 0%. That proves he had no involvement in Bridgegate whatsoever.

94   bob2356   2014 Jan 12, 12:24pm  

Homeboy says

I posted pages and pages of evidence. Lots of people find Christie's story dubious,

Lot's of people find Christies story dubious is evidence of what? Do you have any clue what the word evidence means? Obviously not.

Homeboy says

You said it was done by the port authority. You're anything but clear.

What's not clear. The port authority controls the GW bridge. The port authority workers blocked the lanes. What part don't you understand about that? Did you somehow envision Christies staffers out there with orange cones?

Do you have any idea what the port authority is or what they do? Do some research. Christie doesn't have the authority to order the PA to do anything. He gets to appoint half the PA commissioners (the governor of NY appoints the other half) and can veto his commissioners actions but that's it. So just like every news report has said, Christie staffer Kellly asked Wildstein at the PA to block lanes from Ft. Lee onto the bridge and he had it done.

95   bob2356   2014 Jan 12, 12:35pm  

Homeboy says

bob2356 says

Well that leaves out every president since Truman.

Oh, I see. What Christie did was o.k. in your mind because you don't expect any better. Nice.

I don't now what Christie did and neither do you or anyone else at this point. You believe he did something wrong because he didn't take action in the way you believe he should have.That's certainly an iron clad case. At least as conclusive as Bgmal's "evidence" of various conspiracies. This expectation of what should have been done is based on your extensive experience holding a high level public office I assume.

« First        Comments 69 - 95 of 95        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste