« First « Previous Comments 74 - 113 of 289 Next » Last » Search these comments
Let's freaking grow a pair already. Hemorrhagic fevers and religious zealots don't scare me. Bring it. The odds are so low. Awareness and reasonable precautions are fine.
This can't possibly the writing of an American. Is the IP for this account from offshore? Only three possibilities: North Korea, China or Iran.
Let's freaking grow a pair already. Hemorrhagic fevers and religious zealots don't scare me. Bring it. The odds are so low. Awareness and reasonable precautions are fine.
This can't possibly the writing of an American. Is the IP for this account from offshore? Only three possibilities: North Korea, China or Iran.
We've come to take your coca-cola big mac way of life and turn you into good citizens of the state!
It is a terrible situation. I think we should help eradicate the disease. Not sure if it's possible in face of the poverty out there.
This person flew from Africa to Texas on a jet with hundreds of other passengers, crammed closer than any other time in history.
God knows where those hundreds of other people took it from there.
Your neighbor, the person next to you right now?
And worse, that airline seat has likely seen a lot of use since then. Ebola can be contracted by contact with things the infected touched, if, say, the person eats an in-flight meal or drinks a Coke with contaminated digits.
It is a terrible situation. I think we should help eradicate the disease. Not sure if it's possible in face of the poverty out there.
I think we should seal the fucking Africa off first and only then think about next steps.
This person flew from Africa to Texas on a jet with hundreds of other passengers, crammed closer than any other time in history.
God knows where those hundreds of other people took it from there.
Your neighbor, the person next to you right now?
They didn't take it anywhere. Ebola isn't contagious until it's symptomatic. He didn't develop symptoms until the 24th. You could try reading up a little captain. Nah, that never will happen.
this is so easy to contain....21 day mandatory quarantine at DNC headquarters for anyone coming into the country who has visited africa within the past 30 days...
Case Closed.
it may have escaped your notice we brought some here for treatment.
Well, you got your wish...
CDC Confirms Patient In Dallas Has The Ebola Virus
Remaining calm, downplaying the danger, and looking on the bright side is precisely why this outbreak of Ebola is bigger than all of the others combined. This beast has really had a chance to get out and stretch its legs. It has more history over the past 90 days than the 25 years preceding.
I cannot think of a better reason for a Federal government to exist than to prevent this type of disaster from unfolding here at home. It is about time someone genuinely lost his head and panicked over this. If we just keep telling ourselves that there is nothing to worry about, one of these days we are going to hear that an infected patient has been walking amongst us freely right here in America.
Oh...wait a minute...damn...nevermind.
Of course, there are always the people who KNOW they have been exposed who come here on purpose before displaying symptoms to get better guaranteed medical care.
Our medical system makes us an Ebola magnet, the transport system the vector conveyor belt.
If you show up with Ebola, you will be treated , no insurance required, just to keep you isolated.
These cases seem to be when people from Africa suddenly decide they want to visit "relatives".
So will Ebola be the new "anchor disease?" Immigrants rush over from Africa to squat and drop a fat squalling case of hemorrhagic fever?
They didn't take it anywhere. Ebola isn't contagious until it's symptomatic. He didn't develop symptoms until the 24th. You could try reading up a little captain. Nah, that never will happen.
Then everything is fine, I guess you can fly 12 hours sitting so close to someone with developing Ebola, that you can taste that plaque globule stuck in the back of his throat in a wad of phlegm, and not worry about catching Ebola.
these are bitter people looking for payback who were denied voting rights by the black panthers in philly while Holder chortled in his cubicle...
Of course, there are always the people who KNOW they have been exposed who come here on purpose before displaying symptoms
everybody is already treated regardless of disease...preObamacare...postObamacare...nothing's really changed except the nationwide gouging of medical premiums.
If you show up with Ebola, you will be treated , no insurance required, just to keep you isolated.
Now they are saying this asshole was in contact with several kids, who are now being kept home from school under observation. Selfish prick to expose children to this monster!!!
this is so easy to contain....21 day mandatory quarantine at DNC headquarters for anyone coming into the country who has visited africa within the past 30 days...
Case Closed.
Why don't we screen every passenger flying from West Africa? Why are we waiting until the symptoms develop?
I love how the headlines were "First case diagnosed in the US"
Yeah - in a visiting Liberian.
Why don't we screen every passenger flying from West Africa? Why are we waiting until the symptoms develop?
Sure, you tell the airlines that and watch them scream bloody murder about restrictions on free market travel.
Why don't we screen every passenger flying from West Africa? Why are we waiting until the symptoms develop?
That would slow down the loading and unloading process, making travel less convenient. This would hurt the bottom lines of airlines and other business for whom tourism is the life blood. They will raise prices, and pass the costs onto the consumer, and I'm not paying more for my airline ticket just to save American lives!
Since restrictions on carbon emissions are an unacceptable encroachment on free enterprise, even though they're intended to save millions of species, I don't see how restrictions on travel can be justified just to save a few lives here and there. Think of how many jobs it already costs when we ban businesses from putting mercury in food!
It seems that conservatives' first instinct is to look to government to protect them.
Sad.
It seems that conservatives' first instinct is to look to government to protect them.
Sad.
As a conservative, interested in conserving life, liberty, and prosperity, I beg to differ. A true conservative first takes care of their own family, prepares for contingencies, and prepares emergency gear and supplies. A true conservative doesn't ultimately trust government, so relies on themselves. However, conservatives THEN hope the government can handle the problem after all, and are usually in full support of reasonable government efforts to do so.
It's the liberals who are laid back and so utterly trusting in government that they neglect to do so much as educate themselves about a crisis before becoming swept up into it. Think, the difference between New Orleans residents who evacuated on time or got to high ground vs. the po' state dependents who ended up stuck on top of houses or bridges or inside the Superdome.
The difference between conservatives and liberals is this: liberals don't think that bad stuff can happen, and trust in government to control all such situations. Conservatives KNOW that bad things can happen, expect them to happen, and try to control the situation ahead of time.
That would slow down the loading and unloading process, making travel less convenient. This would hurt the bottom lines of airlines and other business for whom tourism is the life blood. They will raise prices, and pass the costs onto the consumer, and I'm not paying more for my airline ticket just to save American lives!
This is a true national security issue, unlike your dream of bombing all over the middle east.
And, this does not need to be done by the federal government. It can be done individually at airports.
Since restrictions on carbon emissions are an unacceptable encroachment on free enterprise, even though they're intended to save millions of species, I don't see how restrictions on travel can be justified just to save a few lives here and there. Think of how many jobs it already costs when we ban businesses from putting mercury in food!
You mix way too many things. Are you always high? Stick to the topic, and start a new thread on how your breathing will kill us all.
Sure, you tell the airlines that and watch them scream bloody murder about restrictions on free market travel.
Actually, many airlines have done this already.
I was not talking about banning flights. I was talking about mandatory screening.
http://money.cnn.com/2014/08/06/news/companies/airlines-ebola-africa/
Well at least the US case is in Texas.
They are always talking about seceding. Now's a good time to quarantine the state and give them a taste of border crossings.
However, conservatives THEN hope the government can handle the problem after all
Fascinating. Are you aware that you just described a philosophy which most conservatives see as Marxist?
And who pays the taxes to fund this government activity?
I am reliably informed that throwing money at a problem never solved anything. Those who pay the taxes to care for those who can't help themselves will just raise the price of their products, and I refuse to pay higher prices for my goods.
Why don't we screen every passenger flying from West Africa? Why are we waiting until the symptoms develop?
Sure, you tell the airlines that and watch them scream bloody murder about restrictions on free market travel.
Surely a more useful government intervention than going after raw milk farmers and pot planters. You make these jokes but they actually play into the case that government over-regulates every little business posing no harm (due to crony capitalism) while they don't do jack shit on obvious health threats.
Surely a more useful government intervention than going after raw milk farmers and pot planters. You make these jokes but they actually play into the case that government over-regulates every little business posing no harm (due to crony capitalism) while they don't do jack shit on obvious health threats.
Yeah That!!!
And who pays the taxes to fund this government activity?
I am reliably informed that throwing money at a problem never solved anything. Those who pay the taxes to care for those who can't help themselves will just raise the price of their products, and I refuse to pay higher prices for my goods.
In the current system, the government has responsibilities. We can talk about how to make them more efficient by decentralizing and privatizing them. However, that does not mean those responsibilities do not exist.
I am reliably informed that throwing money at a problem never solved anything. Those who pay the taxes to care for those who can't help themselves will just raise the price of their products, and I refuse to pay higher prices for my goods.
Throwing OPM inefficiently without accountability does not solve anything.
How many people do you physically touch, enough to get a substantial portion of their body fluids on you, when you fly? How high of viral load do you think this Texan had this early in the infection?
There was some risk of transmission from this passenger, and sure, there may be one or two more cases, but this is going to stop cold in its tracks. This isn't West Africa, where we completely distrust our medical professionals and are touching dead bodies.
APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says
Guess why God is giving Texas the curse of Ebola?
Because Texas had first choice between ebola or bankers?
Clearly this is all Obama's fault! New right-wing slogan coming up: If you like your Ebola you can keep your Ebola.
Sure, you tell the airlines that and watch them scream bloody murder about restrictions on free market travel.
Actually, many airlines have done this already.
I was not talking about banning flights. I was talking about mandatory screening.
http://money.cnn.com/2014/08/06/news/companies/airlines-ebola-africa/
Screening-shmeeing: the guy was screened at the airport and passed with flying colors, because his illness was still in incubation period. The only thing which would work is proper quarantine.
Surely a more useful government intervention than going after raw milk farmers and pot planters. You make these jokes but they actually play into the case that government over-regulates every little business posing no harm (due to crony capitalism) while they don't do jack shit on obvious health threats.
Yeah That!!!
Ok it is an "obvious health threat" what tools does the government bring to bear for this 1 case in Texas? Is it black helicopters and full bio-chem warfare suit time?
Surely a more useful government intervention than going after raw milk farmers and pot planters. You make these jokes but they actually play into the case that government over-regulates every little business posing no harm (due to crony capitalism) while they don't do jack shit on obvious health threats.
Yeah That!!!
Ok it is an "obvious health threat" what tools does the government bring to bear for this 1 case in Texas? Is it black helicopters and full bio-chem warfare suit time?
They should have simply halted the direct flights from infected countries, funny enough like Trump suggested. He may be an asshole, but he was right on this one.
I thought Rick Perry was tough on immigrants. And by tough, I mean spit on them while you're deporting them.
This is sure a dark mark on the Perry record. Why can't he close the state of Texas to immigrants?
« First « Previous Comments 74 - 113 of 289 Next » Last » Search these comments
While you dorks worry about Federal Reserve or the price of milk....
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/06/20/ebola-west-africa_n_5515140.html