23
2

Islam and Violence


 invite response                
2007 Sep 11, 1:35am   612,485 views  2,893 comments

by resistance   ➕follow (0)   💰tip   ignore  

Originally from http://www.faithfreedom.org/

A Call to the Muslims of the World from a Group of Freethinkers and Humanists of Muslim Origins

Dear friends,

The tragic incidents of September 11 have shocked the world. It is unthinkable that anyone could be so full of hate as to commit such heinous acts and kill so many innocent people. We people of Muslim origin are as much shaken as the rest of the world and yet we find ourselves looked upon with suspicion and distrust by our neighbours and fellow citizens. We want to cry out and tell the world that we are not terrorists, and that those who perpetrate such despicable acts are murderers and not part of us. But, in reality, because of our Muslim origins we just cannot erase the stigma of Islamic Terrorism from our identity!

What most Muslims will say:

Islam would never support the killing of innocent people. Allah of the Holy Qur'an never advocated killings. This is all the work of a few misguided individuals at the fringes of society. The real Islam is sanctified from violence. We denounce all violence. Islam means peace. Islam means tolerance.

What knowledgeable Muslims should say:

That is what most Muslims think, but is it true? Does Islam really preach peace, tolerance and non-violence? The Muslims who perpetrate these crimes think differently. They believe that what they do is Jihad (holy war). They say that killing unbelievers is mandatory for every Muslim. They do not kill because they wish to break the laws of Islam but because they think this is what true Muslims should do. Those who blow-up their own bodies to kill more innocent people do so because they think they will be rewarded in Paradise. They hope to be blessed by Allah, eat celestial food, drink pure wine and enjoy the company of divine consorts. Are they completely misguided? Where did they get this distorted idea? How did they come to believe that killing innocent people pleases God? Or is it that we are misguided? Does really Islam preach violence? Does it call upon its believers to kill non-believers? We denounce those who commit acts of violence and call them extremists. But are they really extremists or are they following what the holy book, the Qur'an tells them to do? What does the Qur'an teach? Have we read the Qur'an? Do we know what kind of teachings are there? Let us go through some of them and take a closer look at what Allah says.

What the Qur'an Teaches Us:

We have used the most widely available English text of the Qur'an and readers are welcome to verify our quotes from the holy book. Please have an open mind and read through these verses again and again. The following quotes are taken from the most trusted Yusufali's translation of the Qur'an. The Qur'an tells us: not to make friendship with Jews and Christians (5:51), kill the disbelievers wherever we find them (2:191), murder them and treat them harshly (9:123), fight and slay the Pagans, seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (9:5). The Qur'an demands that we fight the unbelievers, and promises If there are twenty amongst you, you will vanquish two hundred: if a hundred, you will vanquish a thousand of them (8:65). Allah and his messenger want us to fight the Christians and the Jews until they pay the Jizya [a penalty tax for the non-Muslims living under Islamic rules] with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued (9:29). Allah and his messenger announce that it is acceptable to go back on our promises (treaties) and obligations with Pagans and make war on them whenever we find ourselves strong enough to do so (9:3). Our God tells us to fight the unbelievers and He will punish them by our hands, cover them with shame and help us (to victory) over them (9:14).

The Qur'an takes away the freedom of belief from all humanity and relegates those who disbelieve in Islam to hell (5:10), calls them najis (filthy, untouchable, impure) (9:28), and orders its followers to fight the unbelievers until no other religion except Islam is left (2:193). It says that the non-believers will go to hell and will drink boiling water (14:17). It asks the Muslims to slay or crucify or cut the hands and feet of the unbelievers, that they be expelled from the land with disgrace and that they shall have a great punishment in world hereafter (5:34). And tells us that for them (the unbelievers) garments of fire shall be cut and there shall be poured over their heads boiling water whereby whatever is in their bowels and skin shall be dissolved and they will be punished with hooked iron rods (22:19-22) and that they not only will have disgrace in this life, but on the Day of Judgment He shall make them taste the Penalty of burning (Fire) (22:9). The Qur'an says that those who invoke a god other than Allah not only should meet punishment in this world but the Penalty on the Day of Judgment will be doubled to them, and they will dwell therein in ignominy (25:68). For those who believe not in Allah and His Messenger, He has prepared, for those who reject Allah, a Blazing Fire! (48:13). Although we are asked to be compassionate amongst each other, we have to be harsh with unbelievers, our Christian, Jewish and Atheist neighbours and colleagues (48:29). As for him who does not believe in Islam, the Prophet announces with a stern command: Seize ye him, and bind ye him, And burn ye him in the Blazing Fire. Further, make him march in a chain, whereof the length is seventy cubits! This was he that would not believe in Allah Most High. And would not encourage the feeding of the indigent! So no friend hath he here this Day. Nor hath he any food except the corruption from the washing of wounds, Which none do eat but those in sin. (69:30-37) The Qur'an prohibits a Muslim from befriending a non-believer even if that non-believer is the father or the brother of that Muslim (9:23), (3:28). Our holy book asks us to be disobedient towards the disbelievers and their governments and strive against the unbelievers with great endeavour (25:52) and be stern with them because they belong to Hell (66:9). The holy Prophet prescribes fighting for us and tells us that it is good for us even if we dislike it (2:216). Then he advises us to strike off the heads of the disbelievers; and after making a wide slaughter among them, carefully tie up the remaining captives (47:4). Our God has promised to instil terror into the hearts of the unbelievers and has ordered us to smite above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them (8:12). He also assures us that when we kill in his name it is not us who slay them but Allah, in order that He might test the Believers by a gracious trial from Himself (8:17). He orders us to strike terror into the hearts of the enemies (8:60). He has made the Jihad mandatory and warns us that Unless we go forth, (for Jihad) He will punish us with a grievous penalty, and put others in our place (9:39). Allah speaks to our Holy Prophet and says O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites, and be stern against them. Their abode is Hell - an evil refuge indeed (9:73).

He promises us that in the fight for His cause whether we slay or are slain we return to the garden of Paradise (9:111). In Paradise he will wed us with Houris (celestial virgins) pure beautiful ones (56:54), and unite us with large-eyed beautiful ones while we recline on our thrones set in lines (56:20). There we are promised to eat and drink pleasantly for what we did (56:19). He also promises boys like hidden pearls (56:24) and youth never altering in age like scattered pearls (for those who have paedophiliac inclinations) (76:19). As you see, Allah has promised all sorts or rewards, gluttony and unlimited sex to Muslim men who kill unbelievers in his name. We will be admitted to Paradise where we shall find goodly things, beautiful ones, pure ones confined to the pavilions that man has not touched them before nor jinni (56:67-71).In the West we enjoy freedom of belief but we are not supposed to give such freedom to anyone else because it is written If anyone desires a religion other than Islam (submission to Allah), never will it be accepted of him; and in the Hereafter He will be in the ranks of those who have lost (All spiritual good) (3:85). And He orders us to fight them on until there is no more tumult and faith in Allah is practiced everywhere (8:39). As for women the book of Allah says that they are inferior to men and their husbands have the right to scourge them if they are found disobedient (4:34). It advises to take a green branch and beat your wife, because a green branch is more flexible and hurts more. (38:44). It teaches that women will go to hell if they are disobedient to their husbands (66:10). It maintains that men have an advantage over the women (2:228). It not only denies the women's equal right to their inheritance (4:11-12), it also regards them as imbeciles and decrees that their witness is not admissible in the courts of law (2:282). This means that a woman who is raped cannot accuse her rapist unless she can produce a male witness. Our Holy Prophet allows us to marry up to four wives and he licensed us to sleep with our slave maids and as many 'captive' women as we may have (4:3) even if those women are already married. He himself did just that. This is why anytime a Muslim army subdues another nation, they call them kafir and allow themselves to rape their women. Pakistani soldiers allegedly raped up to 250,000 Bengali women in 1971 after they massacred 3,000,000 unarmed civilians when their religious leader decreed that Bangladeshis are un-Islamic. This is why the prison guards in Islamic regime of Iran rape the women that in their opinion are apostates prior to killing them, as they believe a virgin will not go to Hell.

Dear fellow Muslims:Is this the Islam you believe in? Is this your Most Merciful, Most Compassionate Allah whom you worship daily? Could Allah incite you to kill other peoples? Please understand that there is no terrorist gene - but there could be a terrorist mindset. That mindset finds its most fertile ground in the tenets of Islam. Denying it, and presenting Islam to the lay public as a religion of peace similar to Buddhism, is to suppress the truth. The history of Islam between the 7th and 14th centuries is riddled with violence, fratricide and wars of aggression, starting right from the death of the Prophet and during the so-called 'pure' or orthodox caliphate. And Muhammad himself hoisted the standard of killing, looting, massacres and bloodshed. How can we deny the entire history? The behaviour of our Holy Prophet as recorded in authentic Islamic sources is quite questionable from a modern viewpoint. The Prophet was a charismatic man but he had few virtues. Imitating him in all aspects of life (following the Sunnah) is both impossible and dangerous in the 21st century. Why are we so helplessly in denial over this simple issue? When the Prophet was in Mecca and he was still not powerful enough he called for tolerance. He said To you be your religion, and to me my religion (109:6). This famous quote is often misused to prove that the general principle of Qur'an is tolerance. He advised his follower to speak good to their enemies (2: 83), exhorted them to be patient (20:103) and said that there is no compulsion in religion (2:256). But that all changed drastically when he came to power. Then killing and slaying unbelievers with harshness and without mercy was justified in innumerable verses. The verses quoted to prove Islam's tolerance ignore many other verses that bear no trace of tolerance or forgiveness. Where is tolerance in this well-known verse Alarzu Lillah, Walhukmu Lillah. (The Earth belongs to Allah and thus only Allah's rule should prevail all over the earth.).Is it normal that a book revealed by God should have so many serious contradictions? The Prophet himself set the example of unleashing violence by invading the Jewish settlements, breaking treaties he had signed with them and banishing some of them after confiscating their belongings, massacring others and taking their wives and children as slaves. He inspected the youngsters and massacred all those who had pubic hair along with the men. Those who were younger he kept as slaves. He distributed the women captured in his raids among his soldiers keeping the prettiest for himself (33:50). He made sexual advances on Safiyah, a Jewish girl on the same day he captured her town Kheibar and killed her father, her husband and many of her relatives. Reyhana was another Jewish girl of Bani Quriza whom he used as a sex slave after killing all her male relatives. In the last ten years of his life he accumulated two scores of wives, concubines and sex slaves including the 9 year old Ayesha. These are not stories but records from authentic Islamic history and the Hadiths. It can be argued that this kind of behaviour was not unknown or unusual for the conquerors and leaders of the mediaeval world but these are not the activities befitting of a peaceful saint and certainly not someone who claimed to be the Mercy of God for all creation. There were known assassinations of adversaries during the Prophet's time, which he had knowledge of and had supported. Among them there was a 120 year old man, Abu 'Afak whose only crime was to compose a lyric satirical of the Prophet. (by Ibn Sa'd Kitab al Tabaqat al Kabir, Volume 2, page 32) Then when a poetess, a mother of 5 small children 'Asma' Bint Marwan wrote a poetry cursing the Arabs for letting Muhammad assassinate an old man, our Holy Prophet ordered her to be assassinated too in the middle of the night while her youngest child was suckling from her breast. (Sirat Rasul Allah (A. Guillaume's translation The Life of Muhammad) page 675, 676).The Prophet did develop a 'Robin Hood' image that justified raiding merchant caravans attacking cities and towns, killing people and looting their belongings in the name of social justice. Usama Bin Laden is also trying to create the same image. But Robin Hood didn't claim to be a prophet or a pacifist nor did he care for apologist arguments. He did not massacre innocent people indiscriminately nor did he profit by reducing free people to slaves and then trading them. With the known and documented violent legacy of Islam, how can we suddenly rediscover it as a religion of peace in the free world in the 21st century? Isn't this the perpetuation of a lie by a few ambitious leaders in order to gain political control of the huge and ignorant Muslim population? They are creating a polished version of Islam by completely ignoring history. They are propagating the same old dogma for simple believing people in a crisp new modern package. Their aim: to gain political power in today's high-tension world. They want to use the confrontational power of the original Islam to catalyse new conflicts and control new circles of power.

Dear conscientious Muslims, please question yourselves. Isn't this compulsive following of a man who lived 1400 years ago leading us to doom in a changing world? Do the followers of any other religion follow one man in such an all-encompassing way? Who are we deceiving, them or ourselves? Dear brothers and sisters, see how our Umma (people) has sunk into poverty and how it lags behind the rest of the world. Isn't it because we are following a religion that is outdated and impractical? In this crucial moment of history, when a great catastrophe has befallen us and a much bigger one is lying ahead, should not we wake up from our 1400 years of slumber and see where things have gone wrong? Hatred has filled the air and the world is bracing itself for its doomsday. Should we not ask ourselves whether we have contributed, wittingly or unwittingly, to this tragedy and whether we can stop the great disaster from happening?Unfortunately the answer to the first question is yes. Yes we have contributed to the rise of fundamentalism by merely claiming Islam is a religion of peace, by simply being a Muslim and by saying our shahada (testimony that Allah is the only God and Muhammad is his messenger). By our shahada we have recognized Muhammad as a true messenger of God and his book as the words of God. But as you saw above those words are anything but from God. They call for killing, they are prescriptions for hate and they foment intolerance. And when the ignorant among us read those hate-laden verses, they act on them and the result is the infamous September 11, human bombs in Israel, massacres in East Timor and Bangladesh, kidnappings and killings in the Philippines, slavery in the Sudan, honour killings in Pakistan and Jordan, torture in Iran, stoning and maiming in Afghanistan and Iran, violence in Algeria, terrorism in Palestine and misery and death in every Islamic country. We are responsible because we endorse Islam and hail it as a religion of God. And we are as guilty as those who put into practice what the Qur'an preaches - and ironically we are the main victims too. If we are not terrorists, if we love peace, if we cried with the rest of the word for what happened in New York, then why are we supporting the Qur'an that preaches killing, that advocates holy war, that calls for the murder of non-Muslims? It is not the extremists who have misunderstood Islam. They do literally what the Qur'an asks them to do. It is we who misunderstand Islam. We are the ones who are confused. We are the ones who wrongly assume that Islam is the religion of peace. Islam is not a religion of peace. In its so-called pure form it can very well be interpreted as a doctrine of hate. Terrorists are doing just that and we the intellectual apologists of Islam are justifying it. We can stop this madness. Yes, we can avert the disaster that is hovering over our heads. Yes, we can denounce the doctrines that promote hate. Yes, we can embrace the rest of humanity with love. Yes, we can become part of a united world, members of one human family, flowers of one garden. We can dump the claim of infallibility of our Book, and the questionable legacy of our Prophet.Dear friends, there is no time to waste. Let us put an end to this lie. Let us not fool ourselves. Islam is not a religion of peace, of tolerance, of equality or of unity of humankind. Let us read the Qur'an. Let us face the truth even if it is painful. As long as we keep this lie alive, as long as we hide our head in the sands of Arabia we are feeding terrorism. As long as you and I keep calling Qur'an the unchangeable book of God, we cannot blame those who follow the teachings therein. As long as we pay our Khums and Zakat our money goes to promote Islamic expansionism and that means terrorism, Jihad and war. Islam divides the world in two. Darul Harb (land of war) and Darul Islam (land of Islam). Darul Harb is the land of the infidels, Muslims are required to infiltrate those lands, proselytise and procreate until their numbers increase and then start the war and fight and kill the people and impose the religion of Islam on them and convert that land into Darul Islam. In all fairness we denounce this betrayal. This is abuse of the trust. How can we make war in the countries that have sheltered us? How can we kill those who have befriended us? Yet willingly or unwillingly we have become pawns in this Islamic Imperialism. Let us see what great Islamic scholars have had to say in this respect.Dr. M. Khan the translator of Sahih Bukhari and the Qur'an into English wrote: Allah revealed in Sura Bara'at (Repentance, IX) the order to discard (all) obligations (covenants, etc), and commanded the Muslims to fight against all the Pagans as well as against the people of the Scriptures (Jews and Christians) if they do not embrace Islam, till they pay the Jizia (a tax levied on the Jews and Christians) with willing submission and feel themselves subdued (as it is revealed in 9:29). So the Muslims were not permitted to abandon the fighting against them (Pagans, Jews and Christians) and to reconcile with them and to suspend hostilities against them for an unlimited period while they are strong and have the ability to fight against them. So at first the fighting was forbidden, then it was permitted, and after that it was made obligatory [Introduction to English translation of Sahih Bukhari, p.xxiv.] Dr. Sobhy as-Saleh, a contemporary Islamic academician quoted Imam Suyuti the author of Itqan Fi 'Ulum al- Qur'an who wrote: The command to fight the infidels was delayed until the Muslims become strong, but when they were weak they were commanded to endure and be patient. [ Sobhy as_Saleh, Mabaheth Fi 'Ulum al- Qur'an, Dar al-'Ilm Lel-Malayeen, Beirut, 1983, p. 269.]Dr. Sobhy, in a footnote, commends the opinion of a scholar named Zarkashi who said: Allah the most high and wise revealed to Mohammad in his weak condition what suited the situation, because of his mercy to him and his followers. For if He gave them the command to fight while they were weak it would have been embarrassing and most difficult, but when the most high made Islam victorious He commanded him with what suited the situation, that is asking the people of the Book to become Muslims or to pay the levied tax, and the infidels to become Muslims or face death. These two options, to fight or to have peace return according to the strength or the weakness of the Muslims. [ibid p. 270]Other Islamic scholars (Ibn Hazm al-Andalusi, Ga'far ar-Razi, Rabi' Ibn 'Ons, 'Abil-'Aliyah, Abd ar-Rahman Ibn Zayd Ibn 'Aslam, etc.) agree that the verse Slay the idolaters wherever you find them (9:5) cancelled those few earlier verses that called for tolerance in the Qur'an and were revealed when Islam was weak. Can you still say that Islam is the religion of peace? We propose a solution.

We know too well that it is not easy to denounce our faith because it means denouncing a part of ourselves. We are a group of freethinkers and humanists with Islamic roots. Discovering the truth and leaving the religion of our fathers and forefathers was a painful experience. But after learning what Islam stands for we had no choice but to leave it. After becoming familiar with the Qur'an the choice became clear: It is either Islam or humanity. If Islam thrives, then humanity will die. We decided to side with humanity. Culturally we are still Muslims but we no longer believe in Islam as the true religion of God. We are humanists. We love humanity. We work for the unity of humankind. We work for equality between men and women. We strive for the secularisation of Islamic countries, for democracy and freedom of thought, belief and expression. We decided to live no longer in self-deception but to embrace humanity, and to enter into the new millennium hand in hand with people of other cultures and beliefs in amity and in peace.We denounce the violence that is eulogized in the Qur'an as holy war (Jihad). We condemn killing in the name of God. We believe in the sanctity of human life, not in the inviolability of beliefs and religions. We invite you to join us and the rest of humanity and become part of the family of humankind - in love, camaraderie and peace.

Arabic translation الترجمة العربية

See http://www.centerforinquiry.net/isis and http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/ for more.

Please copy this article, and distribute it as widely as possible, both online and physically. The future of humanity depends on it.

« First        Comments 159 - 198 of 2,893       Last »     Search these comments

159   Peter P   2014 Dec 15, 6:25am  


but what if a religion consists largely of hate speech? what then?

At the very least, people must feel free to criticize such speech.

Political correctness is a poison that corrupts our society.

Genghis Khan invented the idea of religious tolerance and women's rights. Yet he would not bother himself with crap like political correctness.

160   rooemoore   2014 Dec 15, 6:34am  


another way to put the problem:

it is politically incorrect to criticize any religion, because that is "hate speech".

but what if a religion consists largely of hate speech? what then?

The reasons for violence are always the same: power which = money or money which leads to power. Religion is used to con the believers into fighting. It also works like Hitchcock's Macguffin or the magicians decoy.

In other words, it's not about Islam but that's what the bastards want you to think it's about. Trick is old as time and we keep falling for it. Cost us $2 trillion and counting.

161   Peter P   2014 Dec 15, 6:44am  

I have respect for all religions. But the adherents of some faiths tend to do better in life than others.

Even in the context of war and power, some people are still able to maintain civility relative to their opponents.

162   Strategist   2014 Dec 15, 6:50am  

Rew says

Strategist says

time to pop this back to the top of the forum, since muslims are once again deliberately attacking unarmed civilians, as they do over and over and over... this time in australia.

We just don't know how to handle these wackos. Giving modern rights to primitive people is a recipe for disaster. We need to step back and temporarily give up some of our constitutional rights, and let the CIA, Homeland Security, FBI, Police and Armed Forces do their job.

Is this dripping in sarcasm gravy? If not ... scary!

No sarcasm, I meant it. I am 70% librul, but liberals are not perfect, they screw up just as much as the conservatives. Giving full rights to potential terrorists is sacrificing our security and well being. We need to step back, solve the problem, and then move forward again. I am with the liberals most hated by conservatives on this issue. Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, Christopher Hitchens, and Bill Maher.

163   Strategist   2014 Dec 15, 6:53am  


another way to put the problem:

it is politically incorrect to criticize any religion, because that is "hate speech".

Except Christianity. You can criticize that all day long.


but what if a religion consists largely of hate speech? what then?

As Ben Affleck said "Thats gross" "Its racist"

164   rooemoore   2014 Dec 15, 7:00am  

Strategist says

I am with the liberals most hated by conservatives on this issue. Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, Christopher Hitchens, and Bill Maher.

Yup. I'm sure Dawkins, Harris and Maher are all for "temporarily" giving up some of our constitutional rights and letting the CIA, etc. do their job.

165   Strategist   2014 Dec 15, 7:12am  

rooemoore says

Strategist says

I am with the liberals most hated by conservatives on this issue. Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, Christopher Hitchens, and Bill Maher.

Yup. I'm sure Dawkins, Harris and Maher are all for "temporarily" giving up some of our constitutional rights and letting the CIA, etc. do their job.

I think they would be willing to step back temporarily. There is a saying...."In order to leap forward, you must take a step back"
Right now some of our rights are permanently gone. The right to criticize and draw cartoons about Islam and Mohammad. I want those rights back. For that, I am willing to temporarily lose my rights to privacy. I care more for my constitutional rights than my fellow, disappointing libruls on this site.

166   Dan8267   2014 Dec 15, 7:17am  

Peter P says

I have respect for all religions.

Why? Doesn't respect have to be earned? Are you really going to respect any religion simply because it is a religion regardless of what it advocates or its followers do?

I don't respect all philosophies. For example, I don't respect the philosophy the Nazis tried to push during the 1930s and 1940s. It's not respectable to respect all things regardless of their merit.

Do you really respect all religions? Scientology, Satanism, pagan ones involving human sacrifices?

167   Dan8267   2014 Dec 15, 7:17am  

Strategist says

I care more for my constitutional rights than my fellow, disappointing libruls on this site.

Says the asshole who's pro-torture. Man, conservatives lie like bitches.

168   Strategist   2014 Dec 15, 7:23am  

Dan8267 says

Peter P says

I have respect for all religions.

Why? Doesn't respect have to be earned? Are you really going to respect any religion simply because it is a religion regardless of what it advocates or its followers do?

There is hope for you Dan. :)

Dan8267 says

Strategist says

I care more for my constitutional rights than my fellow, disappointing libruls on this site.

Says the asshole who's pro-torture. Man, conservatives lie like bitches.

There is no hope for you. :(

169   rooemoore   2014 Dec 15, 7:29am  

Strategist says

rooemoore says

Strategist says

I am with the liberals most hated by conservatives on this issue. Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, Christopher Hitchens, and Bill Maher.

Yup. I'm sure Dawkins, Harris and Maher are all for "temporarily" giving up some of our constitutional rights and letting the CIA, etc. do their job.

The right to criticize and draw cartoons about Islam and Mohammad. I want those rights back. For that, I am willing to temporarily lose my rights to privacy. I care more for my constitutional rights than my fellow, disappointing libruls on this site.

This whole thread criticizes Islam and you want the "right" to do it. Are you dim?

170   Peter P   2014 Dec 15, 7:31am  

Dan8267 says

Do you really respect all religions?

I respect all religions as in I "love" everyone. ;-)

171   ja   2014 Dec 15, 7:33am  

Peter P says

How so? Having an Asian girlfriend is almost the modern definition of a Jewish man.

It's not about what Jewish people actually do, but what their core faith is about if you read their books.

They believe are the chosen people.

172   Strategist   2014 Dec 15, 7:34am  

rooemoore says

Where would you like to be buried, rooemoore? And if they torture you, just tell them you never heard of "strategist"

173   Peter P   2014 Dec 15, 7:35am  

ja says

They believe are the chosen people.

All successful people "share" this belief.

Why would you want to believe in anything else? Why would you choose a god who does not see you as someone special?

174   rooemoore   2014 Dec 15, 8:06am  

sbh says

Sorry, wrong and wrong again. He's not a liberal and he's honestly committed to abandoning a vital moral component of what makes us Americans. As always, what modern reactionary conservatives do the minute a fight erupts is shed the burden of what previously constituted their moral superiority and standard.

Oh I see. So he's added another level of irony. It would be impressive if his writing didn't expose his simplicity.

Of fuck. His simplistic views could be yet another layer to deceive his true satirical message.

175   Peter P   2014 Dec 15, 8:13am  

The essence of satire is its undecidability.

176   Strategist   2014 Dec 15, 8:34am  

sbh says

rooemoore says

sbh says

Sorry, wrong and wrong again. He's not a liberal and he's honestly committed to abandoning a vital moral component of what makes us Americans. As always, what modern reactionary conservatives do the minute a fight erupts is shed the burden of what previously constituted their moral superiority and standard.

Oh I see. So he's added another level of irony. It would be impressive if his writing didn't expose his simplicity.

Of fuck. His simplistic views could be yet another layer to deceive his true satirical message.

You're contributing more consideration to his posts than he is. Consider his avatar. He's wounded.

Do you guys have a better way? If so, lets see it.

177   Strategist   2014 Dec 15, 12:00pm  

sbh says

Strategist says

Do you guys have a better way? If so, lets see it.

You can act obtuse and stupid, and choose to forget all that has been offered in rebuttal to your broken pseudo-position, but both we and the CIA have answered your question. Asking it again and again ad nauseum doesn't obviate it, no matter how much you hope for it.

Oh gawd....why do you give me all those big words and confuse the hell out of me? I got a "C" in English comprehension, only because I cheated.

178   Bellingham Bill   2014 Dec 15, 2:08pm  


but what if a religion consists largely of hate speech? what then?

the only thing I can't tolerate is intolerance!

179   Bellingham Bill   2014 Dec 15, 2:09pm  

sbh says

You're not defending America. You're defending your feelings. You just don't know the difference.

qft

180   Bellingham Bill   2014 Dec 15, 2:38pm  

"Here are the key ancient civilizations ... Roman, Greek, Persian, and Indian "

all crap, actually. None of these deeply flawed societies left a spittoon's worth of sociological wisdom for us today. Just studies of What Not To Do.

Western Civilization as we know it got cooking with gas with the American Revolution, which was informed by The Enlightenment and the slow development of parliamentarianism of our mother country as it gradually evolved out of the Middle Age feudalism it fell into, especially the more recent gyrations the Home Isles went through with the Tudors, Stuarts, and resulting civil wars that prompted a lot of immigration to the colonies.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed

^ we're still trying to live up to those words. Even our colonist forefathers could be right intolerant shitheads -- with the Anglican establishment highly exclusionary towards Catholics and Dissenters (sects we know as Baptists, Congregationalists, Presbyterians today).

Basically the more religious a place is, the more fucked up overall it is. That's the muslim world's problem. Ours too, since religion is the preference of idiocies over thinking, and we've still got more than our share of religious fundamentalists here, ~25% of the electorate (ironically mostly Baptist or what I call Crypto-Baptist)

181   ja   2014 Dec 15, 11:38pm  

Peter P says

All successful people "share" this belief.

No.

Jewish religion is based in that the Jewish are the chosen people or the chosen nation.

Every religion has its own belief system. Christianis or Muslims, for instance, try to expand their beliefs to people of all nations.

Of course, I don't think that most Jewish are racist. I also don't believe that most Muslims are violent.

182   ja   2014 Dec 15, 11:43pm  


All I care is that people understand that they are being lied to when Islam is presented as a "religion of peace". Islam is not at all peaceful.

Would you also agree then than Christianism is a virus that destroys societies?

i.e. turn the other cheek, Edward Gibbon, the Roman Empire, ...

183   Peter P   2014 Dec 16, 12:12am  

The best-performing economies in the world are either Christian, Jewish, secular, or atheist. Just an observation.

184   bob2356   2014 Dec 16, 12:13am  

Strategist says

I am 70% librul

Librul being an alternative spelling for neocon chicken hawk.

185   Peter P   2014 Dec 16, 12:18am  

Humanitarianism destroys societies.

186   Shaman   2014 Dec 16, 12:23am  

All religion is prideful posturing. Mankind can comprehend God as much as an ant can understand a computer. Each religion, each sect, each theology is just one windbag or another braying loudly about something which they DO NOT KNOW. Whether their reasons are pride, power, or simple well-intentioned desire to help, religious leaders are always wrong in at least some aspect of their dogma. They have to be. Any God so simple that one of these men could understand Him isn't worth worshipping.

For all that, I believe God is real and we each carry a piece of the divine. I believe that certain actions are evil, and I believe that the very free will that is conferred upon us ensures that the world will be one screwed up place. People who have free will can choose to do evil - deliberate harm against each other.
Natural forces, no matter how destructive, are not evil. They are just the rules of life on this planet, and people are wise to observe and obey them.

187   Peter P   2014 Dec 16, 1:03am  

Quigley says

Mankind can comprehend God as much as an ant can understand a computer.

The idea of "God" is purely linguistic. How could we not comprehend what we conjured?

188   Strategist   2014 Dec 16, 1:23am  

sbh says

Strategist says

Do you guys have a better way? If so, lets see it.

You can act obtuse and stupid, and choose to forget all that has been offered in rebuttal to your broken pseudo-position, but both we and the CIA have answered your question.

A ton of manure is what I got. I'm looking for something that works.

189   Strategist   2014 Dec 16, 2:16am  

The religion of Piss just slaughtered around a 150 kids in a school. All those meatheads that are soft on the terrorists are responsible. Go ahead, give them all the rights you can, I am holding every one of you responsible for the deaths of these innocent kids.

http://www.cnn.com/2014/12/16/world/asia/pakistan-peshawar-school-attack/index.html?hpt=hp_t1

190   Strategist   2014 Dec 16, 2:24am  

Dan, Lots and the rest who whine all day long calling Americans murderers for drone attacks on terrorists, just don't get it. Their lack of common sense and myopia is just stunning.
I ask you all bleeding heart dumb libruls......If you kill2 terrorists today, and 3 terrorists tomorrow, how many innocent children do you save next week? The answer....150, as you can see, but of course you are only concerned about the rights of terrorists.
You guys belong in jail. Murderers.

191   dublin hillz   2014 Dec 16, 2:32am  

Strategist says

The religion of Piss just slaughtered around a 150 kids in a school. All
those meatheads that are soft on the terrorists are responsible. Go ahead, give
them all the rights you can, I am holding every one of you responsible for the
deaths of these innocent kids.

Most americans simply cannot comprehend the depths of the pure evil that muz fanatics represent. One cannot analyze this issue from the standard american paradigm of discussing issues such as race/abortion/global warming. Just like a terminator would not "stop until you are dead", they will not stop either. A year, a decade, a century is nothing to them. They will wait as long as it takes to accomplish their deeds. Patience and persistence are a must when dealing with them. Dostoyevski knew exactly what he was talking about regarding "pestilence" coming from asia.

192   Strategist   2014 Dec 16, 2:39am  

dublin hillz says

Strategist says

The religion of Piss just slaughtered around a 150 kids in a school. All

those meatheads that are soft on the terrorists are responsible. Go ahead, give

them all the rights you can, I am holding every one of you responsible for the

deaths of these innocent kids.

Most americans simply cannot comprehend the depths of the pure evil that muz fanatics represent. One cannot analyze this issue from the standard american paradigm of discussing issues such as race/abortion/global warming. Just like a terminator would not "stop until you are dead", they will not stop either. A year, a decade, a century is nothing to them. They will wait as long as it takes to accomplish their deeds. Patience and persistence are a must when dealing with them. Dostoyevski knew exactly what he was talking about regarding "pestilence" coming from asia.

Islam is the most successful religion in todays world. It keeps expanding in numbers, its evil tentacles reach all 4 corners of the world, and we help them expand and kill by giving them rights. The terrorists are probably scratching their heads in disbelief at our stupidity.

193   Dan8267   2014 Dec 16, 2:44am  

bgamall4 says

I have tolerance for all religion.

1. I have to call B.S. on that. You couldn't even finish that thought before attacking Zionists.
2. Tolerance isn't necessarily a good thing. First, it means something pisses you off. For example, I tolerate assholes who talk during movies, but that doesn't mean I like them. In fact, it means I dislike them. Second, some things should not be tolerated, like the violence that stems from religion.

194   Dan8267   2014 Dec 16, 2:45am  

Quigley says

Mankind can comprehend God as much as an ant can understand a computer.

That's a cop out that assumes your idea of god even exists. And it's not a humble position either.

195   Dan8267   2014 Dec 16, 2:46am  

bgamall4 says

All but one.

Yep, every religious person is a hard-core atheist who stops one god short of the truth. When you understand why you reject all other gods, you'll understand why I reject yours.

196   Dan8267   2014 Dec 16, 2:48am  

Peter P says

Quigley says

Mankind can comprehend God as much as an ant can understand a computer.

The idea of "God" is purely linguistic. How could we not comprehend what we conjured?

By the principle of false humility. Quigley's statement has no rational basis, but it sounds humble and pious to some. No god worth respecting would want his creations to be that naive, ignorant, or unintelligent. A respectable god would create beings capable of understanding him and anything else.

197   Dan8267   2014 Dec 16, 2:49am  

Strategist says

Dan, Lots and the rest who whine all day long calling Americans murderers for drone attacks on terrorists, just don't get it.

I'm an American and I'm not morally responsible for murders committed by drones. I don't call Americans murderers because our military and high ranking politicians are the ones committing the murders. Once again, you resort to Straw Men. Have the balls to argue against the arguments I actually make.

198   Dan8267   2014 Dec 16, 2:52am  

sbh says

Strategist says

The religion of Piss just slaughtered around a 150 kids in a school.

Yeah, I knew that would put lead back in your pencil.

Don't you love the hypocrisy of the religious? All gods are false, except mine. All religions are wrong, except mine. Isn't it great that I was born into the right religion. I'm special. All those other religious people, the ones who ascribe to a different mythology, are fools who can't see their fairytales are obviously bullshit.

« First        Comments 159 - 198 of 2,893       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste