0
0

Thread for orphaned comments


 invite response                
2005 Apr 11, 5:00pm   153,988 views  117,730 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (60)   💰tip   ignore  

Thread for comments whose parent thread has been deleted

« First        Comments 78,164 - 78,203 of 117,730       Last »     Search these comments

78164   Blurtman   2016 Dec 15, 11:52am  

Dan8267 says

Mainstream media

But one might expect the open policy of Wikipedia to balance out all viewpoints. A corporate owner of an MSM outlet will limit the breadth of viewpoints, and so this source will have a consistent bias. As I have said, utilize multiple sources, and do your own homework.

78165   zzyzzx   2016 Dec 15, 12:03pm  

If you believe that the election was hacked by Russians, you have been reading fake news.

78166   Dan8267   2016 Dec 15, 12:06pm  

Blurtman says

But one might expect the open policy of Wikipedia to balance out all viewpoints.

Whether or not you expect that is irrelevant. Empirically, Wikipedia does not work that way. All voices are not equal and Wikipedia is not a democracy.

The well-funded organizations who create a multitude of accounts, use grunts to earn badges, and then use those seemly unrelated accounts to manipulate articles will not let your voice be heard if it goes against whatever agenda they have. And they will win. Even a single employee can use dozens of badge-heavy accounts to silent your common man account. And that employee will win every single time. He will appear to be many well-respected and unrelated contributors, whereas you will appear as the sole detractor.

There is nothing democratic, fair and balanced, or transparent about Wikipedia. Multiple viewpoints are never represented. And furthermore, viewpoints are the purpose of an encyclopedia. Facts are the purpose. And facts aren't dependent on points of view.

Blurtman says

As I have said, utilize multiple sources, and do your own homework.

People who quote Wikipedia almost never use multiple source precisely because they think Wikipedia is the only source they need. But even if they did use multiple sources, including Wikipedia at best adds nothing and at worst adds deliberate misinformation.

When talking about the health effects of smoking, you should use multiple sources, but none of those sources should come from the tobacco lobby. If they do, those sources are worse than worthless. They are misleading and counterproductive. Wikipedia is a lobbyists' wet dream.

78167   joeyjojojunior   2016 Dec 15, 12:12pm  

"If you believe that the election was hacked by Russians, you have been reading fake news."

It's really sad that I don't believe you are being sarcastic here.

78168   Blurtman   2016 Dec 15, 12:28pm  

Dan8267 says

People who quote Wikipedia almost never use multiple source precisely because they think Wikipedia is the only source they need.

That would be dangerous thinking. In the field within which I work (not political), I have found Wikipedia to be a reliable source of info. But I would not rely on it as a sole source. And people that post here can post anything, and have no responsibility to verify anything, BTW. Remember, nobody loves you but your mother, and she could be jiving you, too.

78169   Dan8267   2016 Dec 15, 12:35pm  

Blurtman says

I have found Wikipedia to be a reliable source of info.

That is most likely because you failed to detect the manipulation, not because it wasn't there.

78170   Blurtman   2016 Dec 15, 12:46pm  

Dan8267 says

That is most likely because you failed to detect the manipulation, not because it wasn't there.

Uh, no. I am an expert in certain areas, and what was posted was spot on.

78171   Dan8267   2016 Dec 15, 2:02pm  

Blurtman says

Uh, no. I am an expert in certain areas, and what was posted was spot on.

If your an expert, you don't need Wikipedia or any encyclopedia. The entire purpose of an encyclopedia is to be an introduction to a subject, not expert material.

78172   HEY YOU   2016 Dec 15, 9:06pm  

Clueless thread posters need to learn to read,
https://patrick.net/1300247/who-be-the-hackers-

78173   RealEstateIsBetterThanStocks   2016 Dec 15, 9:11pm  

"hack" works in mysterious ways...

78174   Tenpoundbass   2016 Dec 16, 6:05am  

I for one am glad that Putin is and has been in charge of this place all along. Had me worried there for a minute that a incompetent Jive ass Ghetto Crunk Boy was up in there running shit.
What a relief!!!

Some strong leader you losers picked for yourselves in 2008 and 2012. .

78175   FNWGMOBDVZXDNW   2016 Dec 16, 6:15am  

Ironman says

...How did Hillary win the popular vote??

Less than half the voters were willing to drink the hogwash.

78176   Y   2016 Dec 16, 7:15am  

So a majority of voters enjoy their bacon dirty, get sick and leech off ACA freebies...

YesYNot says

Less than half the voters were willing to drink the hogwash.

78177   Strategist   2016 Dec 16, 8:20am  

Ironman says

...How did Hillary win the popular vote??

Inquiring minds want to know????

Isn't it a complicated question for simple minds?

78178   joeyjojojunior   2016 Dec 16, 8:55am  

"You didn't answer the question, if it's true Putin hacked the election, why didn't he just add a few million votes to Trump's total to guarantee his victory?"

Maybe Putin knows how the electoral college works? And that Trump didn't have to win the popular vote to be guaranteed victory?

78179   dublin hillz   2016 Dec 16, 10:07am  

There's only one way to stop russian cyberwarfare - extraordinary rendition of the operatives followed by Kempeitai interrogation techniques. They will not learn any other way - they have been perfecting their craft on ongoing basis since 1917.

78180   RWSGFY   2016 Dec 16, 10:49am  

dublin hillz says

There's only one way to stop russian cyberwarfare - extraordinary rendition of the operatives followed by Kempeitai interrogation techniques. They will not learn any other way - they have been perfecting their craft on ongoing basis since 1917.

Nah, too complicated, too long to work. Swift retaliation by cutting off SWIFT (he-he) and oil/gas exports would stop the shenanigans much faster.

78181   MisdemeanorRebel   2016 Dec 16, 10:51am  

dublin hillz says

There's only one way to stop russian cyberwarfare - extraordinary rendition of the operatives followed by Kempeitai interrogation techniques. They will not learn any other way - they have been perfecting their craft on ongoing basis since 1917.

Long before 1917, pal. The Tsar had plenty of Siberian workcamps himself with a similar death rate, as well as secret police, and plenty of 'blame the minorities' crap via the Black Hundreds.

As for extraordinary rendition of operatives, I'm sure you realize that kidnapping Russians from Russia to torture them is a bad idea given the thousands of nuclear warheads the country possesses.

And for SWIFT, Russia's #1 Trading Partner is already building entirely new, non-Western controlled networks using their massive powers of production the US and Europe can do nothing about, unless they want to see hyperinflation of consumer goods.

78182   RWSGFY   2016 Dec 16, 11:26am  

Thunderlips is Tovbot2 says

And for SWIFT, Russia's #1 Trading Partner is already building entirely new, non-Western controlled networks

Yeah, me likes "news from the future" too. As was said before, Russians are the best in that particular genre. The one about "South Stream" couple of years ago was a real gem.

Cutting off SWIFT the next day something of value is hacked here would deal a swift kick to the Putin's balls now-now-now. Same for oil/gas embargo. Would the fucker curl up and die? No. Will he feel tons of pain? Abso-fucking-lutely. And this is the point.

Now they know for sure that all they get in response is lovely lecture on what's good and what's bad from a Nobel Peace Prize winner.

78183   Shaman   2016 Dec 16, 11:57am  

I thought the assertion is that the Russians hacked into the DNC and Clinton campaigns to get emails for Wikileaks? And if these are real emails detailing conspiracy how are they "hogwash?" Seems like the Democrats are allergic to truth.

78184   Shaman   2016 Dec 16, 1:32pm  

So they may have hacked Podesta's account and used it to release some embarrassing (but true) data. Are you saying that Americans are better off being lied to?
Russia clearly had a stake in this election.
Hillary wanted to continue baiting the bear, hurting Russia economically, and threatening to start WWIII. Trump wants to get along with russia and make America's economy great again.
Easy choice. I'd be shocked if Russia didn't interfere!
I agree with trump's approach.
If there's one thing I'm allergic to it's nuclear fallout.
But maybe that makes your feathers grow better? There has got to be some reason you support that war mongering murderous old bitch!

78185   joeyjojojunior   2016 Dec 16, 1:35pm  

Any nuclear fallout is more likely to come from a Middle Eastern bomb than a Russian one. By your logic, we should cozy up to Pakistan or Saudi then?

78186   Dan8267   2016 Dec 16, 2:21pm  

Must bite...

78187   Heraclitusstudent   2016 Dec 16, 3:36pm  

If we have to look at ex presidents, Washington wasn't a natural born citizen either.

78188   Entitlemented   2016 Dec 16, 4:06pm  

Ironman says

...How did Hillary win the popular vote??

Inquiring minds want to know????

-



-

Has anyone heard THAT explanation from the Liberal MSM??

Perhaps they only hacked it in counties that are greater than 50 km from major cities in close states? And the hacking was graded, as one draws away radially from the center of cities, the Trump support increased in the populace.

Think of another reason ...... ...... this one is fallacious, and even a first year law student would be flunked for proposing fallacious, fake, or false concepts.......

78189   mell   2016 Dec 16, 4:23pm  

It gets better by the day, the birther question is apparently in play again. If this is no hoax and it turns out the long form was doctored together and the lamestream media is not occupied too much with spreading fake news, this story could get some legs and apologies would be in order.. ;) https://market-ticker.org/post=231719

78190   Shaman   2016 Dec 16, 4:36pm  

Bbbbbbuut his birth was confirmed by the CIA! Who also confirmed that Russia stole the election! Hmm. We be suckered?

78191   mell   2016 Dec 16, 5:28pm  

Heraclitusstudent says

If we have to look at ex presidents, Washington wasn't a natural born citizen either.

That may be true, but Washington didn't present a doctored certificate, which - if confirmed - is a felony.

78192   Heraclitusstudent   2016 Dec 16, 5:58pm  

mell says

That may be true, but Washington didn't present a doctored certificate, which - if confirmed - is a felony.

A bit late to worry about that, I'd say.

78193   marcus   2016 Dec 16, 6:17pm  

APOCALYPSEFUCK_is_ADORABLE says

TRUMPLIGULA! is YOUR! ONLY! TRUTH!

I can tell by your syntax that this message is intended to be received by TPB.

78194   HEY YOU   2016 Dec 16, 6:50pm  

Heraclitusstudent says

A bit late to worry about that, I'd say.

Rep/Con/Tea/Neo-Nazis are at their wits end.They know that after the inauguration they will be held responsible for shit that happens on their watch. A 9/11 rhyming or any BLACK SWAN event could happen that will finish them when it harms their ilk. They know they are responsible for DEATH & DESTRUCTION in our great New York City. How many right wingnuts were injured & killed,including their police & firemen for bush & his slime's negligence?
The word DESPERATION seems to fit. Repeal & Replace,leaving 20 million without healthcare,will not end well especially when their constituents are left high & dry. If they don't R & R they will be,forever,know as LIARS on top of Iraq has WMD. They are also concerned that Dems will fight them every moment giving them a real taste of karma. They will also be held to account for not doing everything that they promised their supporters.
A second coming of the TEA PARTY?
Trump voters can't learn that there are consequences to voting.

78195   HEY YOU   2016 Dec 16, 6:56pm  

There are some stupid people here!
How did Hillary win the popular vote?
More people voted for her than trump.
Too COMPLEX for Republican slime to understand.

78196   Ceffer   2016 Dec 16, 7:18pm  

Being squatted out by the side of the road in a mud ditch in Kenya, shouldn't Obama's real birth certificate be recorded on a palm leaf in pidgin Arabic or something?

78197   MAGA   2016 Dec 16, 7:22pm  

Ironman says

How did Hillary win the popular vote??

Maybe the illegals?

78198   Ceffer   2016 Dec 16, 7:27pm  

KILL THE ELECTORS! KILL THEM ALL!

78199   Strategist   2016 Dec 16, 7:39pm  

Tim Aurora says

You may flaunt now but mark my words. America's leadership is done. Unless you are a Chinese or Russian Troll that is bad news for all us. Well it was good while it lasted.

This is what Obama said about Russia.
"After unleashing a string of putdowns about Russia, describing America's Cold War adversary as "a weaker country" that "doesn't produce anything anyone wants to buy except oil and gas and arms," Obama conceded the country could exploit political divisions in the United States.
"They can impact us if we lose track of who we are. They can impact us if we abandon our values," Obama said."

« First        Comments 78,164 - 78,203 of 117,730       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste