by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 80,709 - 80,748 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
~326,000,000 minus ~ 80,000,000 younger than 18.
How did they have time to poll all of these?
Trump administration seen as more truthful than news media: Poll
no need for poll. the election result showed this.
You've obviously misunderstood the situation...
An object of the invention is to provide a missile-resistant garment adapted to be draped over the shoulders and fastened in the manner of a vest, to provide virtually complete protection for the body of the wearer, from neck to waist.
Yes, because only poor people are allowed to speak about the huge inequality problem in the US.
Oh, now we know, why.... hypocritical Liberal... yes, she's all about the "little people"....
Hypocrisy correlates to unethical behavior, the hypocrisy is strong in this one.
"The Dow Jones industrial average rose about 100 points, with Goldman Sachs contributing the most gains."
Color me shocked.
"BTW, how you making out disproving how money injection (like I showed above) wasn't responsible for the market climb? Got those FACTS yet?"
I actually started a post to explain to you but realized that it was not worth the time, so I deleted it.
Sessions promised to reclusive himself if Hillary was investigated while he was AG. There must be something going on between the two.
There's also Wikileaks' Vault 7 coming out.
Some say since there were 6 dumps of Hillary's emails, and the last was claimed to be final, these are Wikileaks in possession of the "Personal" Emails she deleted, hence "Vault 7".
Bad Squaw not friend of Orange Man. Peace Pipe Dream say Massasoit Tribe may vote out Squaw. Vision of Dihensi Tribe making big mistake on hunt, to not put tribe under Chief Many Wigwams Sanders, vote in crazy Overcooked Man who believe Scroll of Violent Raiders of the Badlands instead.
If they're still any ships running around out there named Titanic, I hope you have binoculars in your crow's nest.
poor people are allowed to speak about the huge inequality problem in the US.
You mean only rich white people are allowed to speak....poor white people mostly can't say shit....
If you're white and live in Westfield, all good.
You live in Jackson (NJ)and white, not so good.
Would like to see those coloreds get their vouchers so they can send their kids to private school or public school in your neighborhood
Christie hasn't had to deal with anything. He ran for president for 6 years straight. He's rarely ever showed up for work at all. The guy has been a complete no show. All bark no bite.
"You mean only rich white people are allowed to speak....poor white people mostly can't say shit....If you're white and live in Westfield, all good. You live in Jackson (NJ)and white, not so good. Would like to see those coloreds get their vouchers so they can send their kids to private school or public school in your neighborhood"
Sounds great. Pretty sure Republicans aren't supporting that though so you'll have to vote Dem to get it done.
The trifecta of criminal US Treasury Secretaries and almost Secretaries - Rubin, Paulson, Corzine (almost).
Wasn't it Bernie who said the business of Wall Street is fraud?
I don't think the cause needs to be proven beyond reasonable doubt.
If we are wrong that it's green house gases, there will be little if any harm done trying to reduce them. On the other hand if it is human activity and we don't do anything, the cost of inaction will be catastrophic.
The action is to reduce emission of green house gasses - implement policies, incentives, and fund research on nuclear technology (fusion and secondary use of fission byproducts) and other relevant areas.
The cost of inaction, if climate change is due to human activity is coastal cities under water, extreme climate, mass extinctions,probably starvation.
She (Conway) would make a damn great scarecrow in empty fields between dublin and livermore.
What a blow to the Ivanka line. With Conway endorsing it, it must be nothing but skank apparel.
I am sure some dirt-bag Realtor will find a way to market it.
What's the listing price of 10 sq. mile iceburgs?
Of course location has a lot to do with price.
I want the worst iceberg in the best location.
Prices will only rise.
About how many cups of ice is this? I like my drinks cold.
You probably won't have to make an ice run.
No doubt man effects the environment, but when the government considers banning carbon and outlawing co2 I get skeptical.
When people think that environmental protection laws or a carbon tax is "banning CO2", I get skeptical about how informed they are.
I was told that I was gay, because I'd rather fuck hoes than waste my time ... dating wonderful, perfect, so-called spiritually amazing American women, since that's what a bunch of worthless, heterosexual/straight, pussywhipped American men would rather do.
Whenever someone says "the science is settled" I know they do not understand science.
Indeed. Lots of SJW wanna-be scientists out there whose primary degree is Propaganda-Consumption and Regurgitation.
Is any of it true? Or is it a means of disposing of the inconvenient Medieval Warm Period
You can tell a dumb-ass denier by the fact that they repeat long-debunked lies. Even a cursory search on "medieval warm period" reveals what a fucking lie that talking point is with many independent sources.
https://www.skepticalscience.com/medieval-warm-period.htm
https://insideclimatenews.org/news/04122015/medieval
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11644-climate-myths-it-was-warmer-during-the-medieval-period-with-vineyards-in-england/
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/12/151204145919.htm
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2014/may/06/top-ten-global-warming-skeptic-arguments-debunked
But for people too lazy to read, as is pretty much a requirement for being a climate change denier, here's a video that thoroughly debunks the lie.
www.youtube.com/embed/CY4Yecsx_-s
Of course that's too long for anyone with such a small attention span to become a climate change denier in the first place. So here's the short version for dumb asses.
Two unprofessional videos don't debunk anything Dan
So step up to the plate and prove they are wrong point by point.
Their "evidence" is based on CO2 dependent data, as if that was the only method by which global temperature could be raised. If in fact, CO2 concentration is NOT a significant predictor of a warmer climate, then all this evidence means nothing at all whatsoever. The only other "evidence" presented is dubious in the extreme, relying on histories from peoples with dubious ability to record histories accurately, who may or may not have noticed and remarked about a warming trend. There is little to no hard evidence either way, and these videos seem to be just various people with PhDs bashing each other's credibility to say something true.
Whenever someone says "the science is settled" I know they do not understand science.
Complete bullshit. Don't believe me, then jump off a tall cliff. See how unsettled the science of gravity is.
We literally sentence people to death on the basis of evidence orders of magnitude less certain than the evidence for climate change. We also bomb nations and individuals on the basis of evidence of terrorism that isn't nearly as certain as the evidence of climate change.
How about we call climate change "thermo-terrorism" and then all you dumb ass conservatives will get aboard with stopping it. You're cave man mentality can't understand any threats that don't happen suddenly and don't involve neighboring tribes clubbing you over the head.
« First « Previous Comments 80,709 - 80,748 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,237,990 comments by 14,799 users - Al_Sharpton_for_President online now