by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 80,726 - 80,765 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
I don't think the cause needs to be proven beyond reasonable doubt.
If we are wrong that it's green house gases, there will be little if any harm done trying to reduce them. On the other hand if it is human activity and we don't do anything, the cost of inaction will be catastrophic.
The action is to reduce emission of green house gasses - implement policies, incentives, and fund research on nuclear technology (fusion and secondary use of fission byproducts) and other relevant areas.
The cost of inaction, if climate change is due to human activity is coastal cities under water, extreme climate, mass extinctions,probably starvation.
She (Conway) would make a damn great scarecrow in empty fields between dublin and livermore.
What a blow to the Ivanka line. With Conway endorsing it, it must be nothing but skank apparel.
I am sure some dirt-bag Realtor will find a way to market it.
What's the listing price of 10 sq. mile iceburgs?
Of course location has a lot to do with price.
I want the worst iceberg in the best location.
Prices will only rise.
About how many cups of ice is this? I like my drinks cold.
You probably won't have to make an ice run.
No doubt man effects the environment, but when the government considers banning carbon and outlawing co2 I get skeptical.
When people think that environmental protection laws or a carbon tax is "banning CO2", I get skeptical about how informed they are.
I was told that I was gay, because I'd rather fuck hoes than waste my time ... dating wonderful, perfect, so-called spiritually amazing American women, since that's what a bunch of worthless, heterosexual/straight, pussywhipped American men would rather do.
Whenever someone says "the science is settled" I know they do not understand science.
Indeed. Lots of SJW wanna-be scientists out there whose primary degree is Propaganda-Consumption and Regurgitation.
Is any of it true? Or is it a means of disposing of the inconvenient Medieval Warm Period
You can tell a dumb-ass denier by the fact that they repeat long-debunked lies. Even a cursory search on "medieval warm period" reveals what a fucking lie that talking point is with many independent sources.
https://www.skepticalscience.com/medieval-warm-period.htm
https://insideclimatenews.org/news/04122015/medieval
https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11644-climate-myths-it-was-warmer-during-the-medieval-period-with-vineyards-in-england/
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/12/151204145919.htm
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2014/may/06/top-ten-global-warming-skeptic-arguments-debunked
But for people too lazy to read, as is pretty much a requirement for being a climate change denier, here's a video that thoroughly debunks the lie.
www.youtube.com/embed/CY4Yecsx_-s
Of course that's too long for anyone with such a small attention span to become a climate change denier in the first place. So here's the short version for dumb asses.
Two unprofessional videos don't debunk anything Dan
So step up to the plate and prove they are wrong point by point.
Their "evidence" is based on CO2 dependent data, as if that was the only method by which global temperature could be raised. If in fact, CO2 concentration is NOT a significant predictor of a warmer climate, then all this evidence means nothing at all whatsoever. The only other "evidence" presented is dubious in the extreme, relying on histories from peoples with dubious ability to record histories accurately, who may or may not have noticed and remarked about a warming trend. There is little to no hard evidence either way, and these videos seem to be just various people with PhDs bashing each other's credibility to say something true.
Whenever someone says "the science is settled" I know they do not understand science.
Complete bullshit. Don't believe me, then jump off a tall cliff. See how unsettled the science of gravity is.
We literally sentence people to death on the basis of evidence orders of magnitude less certain than the evidence for climate change. We also bomb nations and individuals on the basis of evidence of terrorism that isn't nearly as certain as the evidence of climate change.
How about we call climate change "thermo-terrorism" and then all you dumb ass conservatives will get aboard with stopping it. You're cave man mentality can't understand any threats that don't happen suddenly and don't involve neighboring tribes clubbing you over the head.
Again, cursory Google searches reveal how much the global mean temperature increased over the past 20 years and how significant that is.
To visualize it, imaging four nuclear bombs like the one dropped on Hiroshima going off every seconds of every day of every year. That's how much heat has been added to the globe.
The fact is that you don't give a shit about climate change, so you are willing to let others suffer rather than having to give up stealing from them by not polluting as much. It's like an arms dealer who sells to everyone including terrorists and then denies that terrorism is real. The answer is that people like you should get no voice at the table when the world decides what to do about climate change.
Pollution is theft, plain and simple. Those who advocate it to increase their profits should be treated as the thieves they are.
Trumpligula needs a Truman Capote vocoder to really get his message across.
actually if you watch the whole thing, you see it's a pretty reasonable comment in context:
Entire polling firms spent $millions of dollars polling.
O"hillary spent upwards of $1B of funds on the campaign.
Polls were oversampled to the democrats by roughly 2-8%.
Demos declared the polls right, said that Hillary had it in the bag.
When polls were wrong, the Dems did not know who to blame.
They are now mad that the polls were wrong, not what the people wanted.
They believed that their will was right, and when proven wrong they had to be upset at Republicans, who already suffered misleading polls.
False polls, false feelings, false blaming, and false outrage. So many false news stories, so few people people to believe whats true.
iPhone 7 didn't have that many upgrades and sales already broke record. can't imagine what the stock price will be when all 3 models are released next year.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/could-iphone-cost-1-000-023229920.html
Comment from the article (note, this is where Goatfucker Dan lives):
I see you have learned to accuse others of your own very obvious weaknesses. Trump does this with applomb. Glad to see you are learning something.
RealEstateIsBetterThanStocks says
iPhone 7 didn't have that many upgrades and sales already broke record. can't imagine what the stock price will be when all 3 models are released next year.
Or they get a tax holiday and bring home all that money and do a stock buyback.
ARM! offshore banking nations to protect the 1%s money.
FREEDOM MUST BE PROTECTED!
Climate change is a scam to separate people from their money and freedom.
bingo.
Climate change denial is a scam to separate people from their money and freedom by letting others steal and vandalize public property, the oceans, the land, and the air.
Fixed that for you.
« First « Previous Comments 80,726 - 80,765 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,237,990 comments by 14,799 users - DhammaStep online now