patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,265,090 comments by 15,127 users - ElYorsh, Misc, socal2 online now
"Explosive", "Shocking" And "Alarming" FISA Memo Set To Rock DC, "End Mueller Investigation"
invite response
2018 Jan 19, 8:50am 68,570 views 307 comments
« First « Previous Comments 100 - 139 of 307 Next » Last » Search these comments
101
MisdemeanorRebel
2018 Jan 25, 1:53pm
MisdemeanorRebel
2018 Jan 25, 1:53pm
They always knew they'd get the texts, if they weren't done with recovering them when the deletion story came out.
It's a way of waking up the Normies to Deep State Malfeasance.
Looks like some of you guys better turn State's Evidence and fess up.
It's a way of waking up the Normies to Deep State Malfeasance.
Looks like some of you guys better turn State's Evidence and fess up.
102
anonymous
2018 Jan 25, 11:05pm
anon_6c62b says
When it falls they will not be able to get out in time, that's why they were forced in there in the first place hahahaha.
Someone is STILL angry they have nothing invested in the current stock market!
When it falls they will not be able to get out in time, that's why they were forced in there in the first place hahahaha.
103
HappyGilmore
2018 Jan 26, 5:51am
I'm going to laugh my ass off when this memo finally gets released and it is another big nothingburger bag of lies. Just like Nunes supposed blockbuster evidence of the Obama Administration bugging of Trump. That sure died off in a hurry.
All the Trumpcucks have worked themselves into a frenzy, but I can almost guarantee none of them will learn their lesson. They'll be just as excited with Pepe memes, Hillary memes, etc. the next time that Trump and FOX news come up with a new made up deep state story.
Don't you guys find it funny that they haven't released it yet? Why do you think that is? Perhaps the anticipation is much greater than the reality?
All the Trumpcucks have worked themselves into a frenzy, but I can almost guarantee none of them will learn their lesson. They'll be just as excited with Pepe memes, Hillary memes, etc. the next time that Trump and FOX news come up with a new made up deep state story.
Don't you guys find it funny that they haven't released it yet? Why do you think that is? Perhaps the anticipation is much greater than the reality?
105
anonymous
2018 Jan 26, 9:03am
Anti-Trump FBI Official Identified As Leaker To WSJ, WaPo Reporter.
Newly released text messages between controversial anti-Trump FBI agents Peter Strzok and Lisa Page reveal several leaks of confidential information to Wall St. Journal reporter, Devlin Barrett, who is now with the Washington Post.
Following the release of the timestamped texts by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, Conservative Treehouse compared the timing of the messages between the agents and tied them to several instances of Barrett breaking news or confirming rumors based on "sources" within the government.
Via the Conservative Treehouse:
On October 28th, 2016 (as above), at the exact time the re-opening of the Clinton investigation hit the media news-cycle, Page and Strzok were texting. From the released messaging we see at 5:19pm Lisa Page is on the phone with “Devlin”:
Page: 5:19pm “Still on the phone with Devlin. Mike’s phone is ON FIRE.”
Strzok: 5:29pm “You might wanna tell Devlin he should turn on CNN, there’s news on.”
Page: 5:30pm “He knows. He just got handed a note.”
Strzok: 5:33pm “Ha. He asking about it now?”
Page: 5:34pm “Yeah. It was pretty funny. Coming now.”
At 5:36pm Devlin Barrett tweets:
Sources, as in Lisa Page - who Barrett was just (or still) on the phone with.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-26/anti-trump-fbi-official-identified-leaker-wsj-wapo-reporter
Newly released text messages between controversial anti-Trump FBI agents Peter Strzok and Lisa Page reveal several leaks of confidential information to Wall St. Journal reporter, Devlin Barrett, who is now with the Washington Post.
Following the release of the timestamped texts by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, Conservative Treehouse compared the timing of the messages between the agents and tied them to several instances of Barrett breaking news or confirming rumors based on "sources" within the government.
Via the Conservative Treehouse:
On October 28th, 2016 (as above), at the exact time the re-opening of the Clinton investigation hit the media news-cycle, Page and Strzok were texting. From the released messaging we see at 5:19pm Lisa Page is on the phone with “Devlin”:
Page: 5:19pm “Still on the phone with Devlin. Mike’s phone is ON FIRE.”
Strzok: 5:29pm “You might wanna tell Devlin he should turn on CNN, there’s news on.”
Page: 5:30pm “He knows. He just got handed a note.”
Strzok: 5:33pm “Ha. He asking about it now?”
Page: 5:34pm “Yeah. It was pretty funny. Coming now.”
At 5:36pm Devlin Barrett tweets:
Sources, as in Lisa Page - who Barrett was just (or still) on the phone with.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-26/anti-trump-fbi-official-identified-leaker-wsj-wapo-reporter
106
anonymous
2018 Jan 26, 11:03am
Looks like there's another leaker:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/ethics-complaint-alleges-rep-devin-120823661.html
Color me shocked. Nunes is leaking confidential information to the press. Did he include that in his secret memo?
https://www.yahoo.com/news/ethics-complaint-alleges-rep-devin-120823661.html
Color me shocked. Nunes is leaking confidential information to the press. Did he include that in his secret memo?
107
MisdemeanorRebel
2018 Jan 26, 11:03am
MisdemeanorRebel
2018 Jan 26, 11:03am
anon_8f378 says
Only a little to match Schiff.
Nunes is leaking confidential information to the press
Only a little to match Schiff.
108
UsualOven
2018 Jan 26, 11:06am
Has anybody noticed that Devin Nunes looks like Scott Walkers retarded brother, acts like it also.
109
anonymous
2018 Jan 26, 11:54am
110
MisdemeanorRebel
2018 Jan 26, 12:12pm
MisdemeanorRebel
2018 Jan 26, 12:12pm
anon_8f378 says
It apparently was okay to be the first leaker, so why not? Good for the Goose... Turnabout is fair play.
Grassley openly released a new batch of texts, apparently Page and the Deputy FBI Counter-Intel Director have nothing better to do all day than talk to WaPo Reporter Barrett.
So, it's OK to leak if you're the 2nd leaker?
It apparently was okay to be the first leaker, so why not? Good for the Goose... Turnabout is fair play.
Grassley openly released a new batch of texts, apparently Page and the Deputy FBI Counter-Intel Director have nothing better to do all day than talk to WaPo Reporter Barrett.
111
anonymous
2018 Jan 26, 12:47pm
The FBI leak is way more serious. Nunes is a Republican, if he leaks to help is party, it may be unethical, it may be illegal, but he's ultimately doing his job as a Republican politician. There is no conflict of interest in him doing that.
The agents investigating Hillary leaking to the press in order to help the subject of their investigation is not only unethical and possibly illegal, but it also fundamentally conflicts with what their job as an FBI agent investigating someone should be. The entire Hillary investigation now is called into question. In addition, you have to ask who was responsible for appointing these agents? Was it Comey? If so was he aware of their political bias? Was he pressured from higher up (Obama admin?) to appoint them? Trump shouldn't have fired Comey because if this had come to light beforehand, Comey would have resigned... Of course it might never have come up if Comey was still there...
Anyone defending this shit is purely partisan.
The agents investigating Hillary leaking to the press in order to help the subject of their investigation is not only unethical and possibly illegal, but it also fundamentally conflicts with what their job as an FBI agent investigating someone should be. The entire Hillary investigation now is called into question. In addition, you have to ask who was responsible for appointing these agents? Was it Comey? If so was he aware of their political bias? Was he pressured from higher up (Obama admin?) to appoint them? Trump shouldn't have fired Comey because if this had come to light beforehand, Comey would have resigned... Of course it might never have come up if Comey was still there...
Anyone defending this shit is purely partisan.
112
anonymous
2018 Jan 26, 12:48pm
TwoScoopsPlissken says
Oh, by the way, you have evidence of Schiff leaking classified info? That you can provide?
It apparently was okay to be the first leaker, so why not? Good for the Goose... Turnabout is fair play.
Grassley openly released a new batch of texts, apparently Page and the Deputy FBI Counter-Intel Director have nothing better to do all day than talk to WaPo Reporter Barrett.
Oh, by the way, you have evidence of Schiff leaking classified info? That you can provide?
113
anonymous
2018 Jan 26, 2:18pm
anon_4e80d says
It's OK for Congressmen to leak classified information? When did that become law?
The FBI leak is way more serious. Nunes is a Republican, if he leaks to help is party, it may be unethical, it may be illegal, but he's ultimately doing his job as a Republican politician.
It's OK for Congressmen to leak classified information? When did that become law?
114
anonymous
2018 Jan 26, 2:18pm
anon_4e80d says
There isn't? When did it become OK for Senators to leak classified information?
The FBI leak is way more serious. Nunes is a Republican, if he leaks to help is party, it may be unethical, it may be illegal, but he's ultimately doing his job as a Republican politician. There is no conflict of interest in him doing that.
There isn't? When did it become OK for Senators to leak classified information?
115
MisdemeanorRebel
2018 Jan 26, 2:58pm
MisdemeanorRebel
2018 Jan 26, 2:58pm
anon_8f378 says
He had means, motive and opportunity. There should be an investigation.
Oh, by the way, you have evidence of Schiff leaking classified info? That you can provide?
He had means, motive and opportunity. There should be an investigation.
116
anonymous
2018 Jan 26, 3:10pm
anon_8f378 says
When did it become OK for Secretary of State to have classified information on a personal computer?
Double standard?
When did it become OK for Senators to leak classified information?
When did it become OK for Secretary of State to have classified information on a personal computer?
Double standard?
117
anonymous
2018 Jan 26, 4:16pm
anon_c8666 says
What, they can only have it on an Apple computer?
When did it become OK for Secretary of State to have classified information on a personal computer?
What, they can only have it on an Apple computer?
118
Patrick
2018 Jan 26, 5:46pm
Patrick
2018 Jan 26, 5:46pm
deleted a few personal attacks
will continue to delete them on sight
please write p@patrick.net or use the "personal" link (if you have it) to report personal attacks
merci
will continue to delete them on sight
please write p@patrick.net or use the "personal" link (if you have it) to report personal attacks
merci
119
anonymous
2018 Jan 26, 5:47pm
anon_3b28c says
By that standard, the Russian Collusion is beyond fantasy, and a complete hallucination. Since there isn't a shred of evidence.
So, no evidence then. Typical Trumpcuck fantasy.
By that standard, the Russian Collusion is beyond fantasy, and a complete hallucination. Since there isn't a shred of evidence.
120
anonymous
2018 Jan 26, 7:04pm
anon_5ae11 says
Since when have the Liberals ever needed facts and evidence? They just post their Fake news on WaPo or NYT and let their lemmings and Kool-Aid drinking crowd run with the false story.
anon_3b28c saysSo, no evidence then. Typical Trumpcuck fantasy.
By that standard, the Russian Collusion is beyond fantasy, and a complete hallucination. Since there isn't a shred of evidence.
Since when have the Liberals ever needed facts and evidence? They just post their Fake news on WaPo or NYT and let their lemmings and Kool-Aid drinking crowd run with the false story.
121
anonymous
2018 Jan 26, 7:05pm
Patrick says
Can you please explain the personal attacks? I'm having a hard time understanding how my posts were deleted but others weren't.
gracias.
deleted a few personal attacks
will continue to delete them on sight
please write p@patrick.net or use the "personal" link (if you have it) to report personal attacks
merci
Can you please explain the personal attacks? I'm having a hard time understanding how my posts were deleted but others weren't.
gracias.
122
Patrick
2018 Jan 26, 7:06pm
Patrick
2018 Jan 26, 7:06pm
Sure, using "trumpcuck" or "libtard" to refer to another user is a personal attack.
124
anonymous
2018 Jan 27, 9:17am
This is now day 8 of this post dominating Patnet. The memo - if it is ever released will be neither "explosive" nor "alarming" nor "shocking". It will not "rock" Washington in the slightest.
You are wasting your lives here folks listening to questionably sourced BS. It's time to move on.
You are wasting your lives here folks listening to questionably sourced BS. It's time to move on.
127
anonymous
2018 Jan 27, 7:29pm
anon_0578a says
So are you trying to tell us MULTIPLE (as in dozens) congressman have lied AFTER reading the memo, and it's really only a Chinese menu without any incriminating details?
Who are your sources (and don't say WaPo)?
anon_0578a says
You mean the one written by the House Intelligence Committee chairman? I'm sure he just made the "questionable information" up, right?
The memo - if it is ever released will be neither "explosive" nor "alarming" nor "shocking". It will not "rock" Washington in the slightest.
You are wasting your lives here folks listening to questionably sourced BS.
So are you trying to tell us MULTIPLE (as in dozens) congressman have lied AFTER reading the memo, and it's really only a Chinese menu without any incriminating details?
Who are your sources (and don't say WaPo)?
anon_0578a says
You are wasting your lives here folks listening to questionably sourced BS.
You mean the one written by the House Intelligence Committee chairman? I'm sure he just made the "questionable information" up, right?
128
anonymous
2018 Jan 27, 7:38pm
anon_433ba says
Well, he does have a history--remember his secret evidence of Obama wiretapping Trump.
You mean the one written by the House Intelligence Committee chairman? I'm sure he just made the "questionable information" up, right?
Well, he does have a history--remember his secret evidence of Obama wiretapping Trump.
129
anonymous
2018 Jan 28, 7:53am
"You mean the one written by the House Intelligence Committee chairman? I'm sure he just made the "questionable information" up, right?"
No I mean questionable as in ZH & company telling us this is gonna be SHOCKING or EXPLOSIVE!!!
The 2009 mortgage meltdown was EXPLOSIVE. The 1998 revelation of a semen stained blue dress was SHOCKING. Other than these, what else has truly moved the needle more than a little wiggle to qualify as "rocking Washington?"
It's now day 9 since we were told this wasn't gonna be typical insider Washington BS but something "shocking" and "explosive".
No I mean questionable as in ZH & company telling us this is gonna be SHOCKING or EXPLOSIVE!!!
The 2009 mortgage meltdown was EXPLOSIVE. The 1998 revelation of a semen stained blue dress was SHOCKING. Other than these, what else has truly moved the needle more than a little wiggle to qualify as "rocking Washington?"
It's now day 9 since we were told this wasn't gonna be typical insider Washington BS but something "shocking" and "explosive".
130
anonymous
2018 Jan 28, 2:37pm
Trump Ignores DOJ Warning, Notifies Sessions He Wants FISA Memo Released.
Trump "is inclined to have that released just because it will shed light... Apparently all the rumors are that it will shed light, it will help the investigators come to a conclusion."
President Trump broke with the Department of Justice last week by calling for the release of a four-page "FISA memo" purportedly summarizing widespread surveillance abuses by the FBI, DOJ and Obama Administration, reports the Washington Post.
So now the President is calling for the release of the four-page FISA memo, which will reportedly put an end to the Russia investigation while quite possibly setting the stage for the criminal prosecution of those involved in trying to frame Trump.
That said, the Washington Post article appears to be nothing more than an exercise in pearl clutching over Trump's demands for loyalty - as the paper notes that nothing the President has done is likely to lead to criminal charges.
"The president has been clear publicly and privately that he wants absolute transparency throughout this process," Gidley said in the statement. "Based on numerous news reports, top officials at the FBI have engaged in conduct that shows show bias against President Trump and bias for Hillary Clinton.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-27/trump-ignores-doj-warning-notifies-sessions-he-wants-fisa-memo-released
Trump "is inclined to have that released just because it will shed light... Apparently all the rumors are that it will shed light, it will help the investigators come to a conclusion."
President Trump broke with the Department of Justice last week by calling for the release of a four-page "FISA memo" purportedly summarizing widespread surveillance abuses by the FBI, DOJ and Obama Administration, reports the Washington Post.
So now the President is calling for the release of the four-page FISA memo, which will reportedly put an end to the Russia investigation while quite possibly setting the stage for the criminal prosecution of those involved in trying to frame Trump.
That said, the Washington Post article appears to be nothing more than an exercise in pearl clutching over Trump's demands for loyalty - as the paper notes that nothing the President has done is likely to lead to criminal charges.
"The president has been clear publicly and privately that he wants absolute transparency throughout this process," Gidley said in the statement. "Based on numerous news reports, top officials at the FBI have engaged in conduct that shows show bias against President Trump and bias for Hillary Clinton.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-27/trump-ignores-doj-warning-notifies-sessions-he-wants-fisa-memo-released
131
anonymous
2018 Jan 28, 3:13pm
anon_a0be5 says
What does the number of days it hasn't been released have ANYTHING to do with the content of the memo?
Apples and Oranges.
It's now day 9 since we were told this wasn't gonna be typical insider Washington BS but something "shocking" and "explosive".
What does the number of days it hasn't been released have ANYTHING to do with the content of the memo?
Apples and Oranges.
132
anonymous
2018 Jan 28, 3:21pm
anon_743c2 says
Because it shows that the memo isn't really that "explosive or else it would have been released already. It was just another ploy to whip Trump supporters into a frenzy.
Trump has to power to release it--why hasn't he done it?
What does the number of days it hasn't been released have ANYTHING to do with the content of the memo?
Because it shows that the memo isn't really that "explosive or else it would have been released already. It was just another ploy to whip Trump supporters into a frenzy.
Trump has to power to release it--why hasn't he done it?
133
bob2356
2018 Jan 28, 5:55pm
Let's see how this works. There is an explosive memo that will put most of the top people in the democratic party in jail. But the republican controlled congress, which can release the memo at any time, has not released the memo but is screaming the memo needs to be released. Donald "put hillary in jail" trump, who can release the memo at any time, has zero filter between his brain and the outside world has not released the memo but is screaming the memo needs to be released. Yet after almost 2 weeks nothing has happened and the only place you can read about it is still right wing echo chambers conspiracy sites like ZH.
I know the average trumptard (luckily there are no trumptards on patnet) isn't a deep thinker, but a normal person would have to believe that something was just a little bit askew with the picture when everyone that can release the memo is screaming the memo needs to be released but doesn't release it. Even more amazing is some staffer hasn't leaked it. How is that even possible? It's not.
I know the average trumptard (luckily there are no trumptards on patnet) isn't a deep thinker, but a normal person would have to believe that something was just a little bit askew with the picture when everyone that can release the memo is screaming the memo needs to be released but doesn't release it. Even more amazing is some staffer hasn't leaked it. How is that even possible? It's not.
134
anonymous
2018 Jan 28, 7:30pm
anon_3b28c says
Wait, wasn't it the Blue team that recently said it takes YEARS for a investigation to run it's course. Now you guys are all upset because a secret memo hasn't been released in 9 days?
anon_3b28c says
Come on Joey, is this the best argument that you can think of?
anon_370a8 says
Congress and the DOJ have to clear it first and make sure any classified info doesn't compromise the investigation.
anon_743c2 saysWhat does the number of days it hasn't been released have ANYTHING to do with the content of the memo?
Because it shows that the memo isn't really that "explosive or else it would have been released already.
Wait, wasn't it the Blue team that recently said it takes YEARS for a investigation to run it's course. Now you guys are all upset because a secret memo hasn't been released in 9 days?
anon_3b28c says
Trump has to power to release it--why hasn't he done it?
Come on Joey, is this the best argument that you can think of?
anon_370a8 says
President Trump broke with the Department of Justice last week by calling for the release of a four-page "FISA memo" purportedly summarizing widespread surveillance abuses by the FBI, DOJ and Obama Administration,
Congress and the DOJ have to clear it first and make sure any classified info doesn't compromise the investigation.
135
anonymous
2018 Jan 28, 7:47pm
anon_b6d0d says
If it was an investigation, you'd have a point. It's just a memo.
anon_b6d0d says
Come on now, don't forget the rules...
anon_b6d0d says
No, they don't. The President can declassify anything he wants and release it immediately. The fact that he says he wants it released but doesn't do it is actually quite funny.
Wait, wasn't it the Blue team that recently said it takes YEARS for a investigation to run it's course. Now you guys are all upset because a secret memo hasn't been released in 9 days?
If it was an investigation, you'd have a point. It's just a memo.
anon_b6d0d says
anon_3b28c saysTrump has to power to release it--why hasn't he done it?
Come on Joey, is this the best argument that you can think of?
Come on now, don't forget the rules...
anon_b6d0d says
Congress and the DOJ have to clear it first and make sure any classified info doesn't compromise the investigation.
No, they don't. The President can declassify anything he wants and release it immediately. The fact that he says he wants it released but doesn't do it is actually quite funny.
136
anonymous
2018 Jan 29, 8:29am
anon_3b28c says
Especially on a golf course shit talking with a foreign emissary.
The President can declassify anything he wants and release it immediately.
Especially on a golf course shit talking with a foreign emissary.
137
anonymous
2018 Jan 29, 10:00am
FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, frequent target of Trump's ire, steps down: NBC News
FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe, a frequent target of public attacks from President Donald Trump, is stepping down effective Monday, NBC News reported.
Trump and some Republicans in Congress have accused McCabe of political bias, citing his role at the FBI during investigations related to both Hillary Clinton and President Donald Trump. They question his role in the Clinton email probe and the investigation into Russian efforts to influence the 2016 election and whether the Trump campaign coordinated with the Kremlin.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/29/fbi-deputy-director-andrew-mccabe-frequent-target-of-trumps-ire-steps-down-nbc-news.html
Why would he be stepping down, could there be something in that memo that just might.... oh, nevermind, it's "just" a memo.
FBI deputy director Andrew McCabe, a frequent target of public attacks from President Donald Trump, is stepping down effective Monday, NBC News reported.
Trump and some Republicans in Congress have accused McCabe of political bias, citing his role at the FBI during investigations related to both Hillary Clinton and President Donald Trump. They question his role in the Clinton email probe and the investigation into Russian efforts to influence the 2016 election and whether the Trump campaign coordinated with the Kremlin.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/29/fbi-deputy-director-andrew-mccabe-frequent-target-of-trumps-ire-steps-down-nbc-news.html
Why would he be stepping down, could there be something in that memo that just might.... oh, nevermind, it's "just" a memo.
138
anonymous
2018 Jan 29, 12:24pm
So many people in jobs surrounding Trump in the last year so have decided to throw in the towel, it looks like they’re saying “fuck this shit”
« First « Previous Comments 100 - 139 of 307 Next » Last » Search these comments
Lawmakers who have seen the memo are calling for its immediate release, while the phrases "explosive," "shocking," "troubling," and "alarming" have all been used in all sincerity. One congressman even likened the report's details to KGB activity in Russia. “It is so alarming the American people have to see this,” Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan told Fox News.
“It's troubling. It is shocking,” North Carolina Rep. Mark Meadows said. “Part of me wishes that I didn't read it because I don’t want to believe that those kinds of things could be happening in this country that I call home and love so much.”
“I believe the consequence of its release will be major changes in people currently working at the FBI and the Department of Justice,” he said, referencing DOJ officials Rod Rosenstein and Bruce Ohr.
Meanwhile, Rep. Matt Gatetz (R-FL) said not only will the release of this memo result in DOJ firing, but "people will go to jail."
Of all the recent developments in the ongoing investigation(s), this one is on the cusp of turning into a genuine happening.
Who's going to be in the cross hairs?
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-18/explosive-shocking-and-alarming-fisa-memo-set-rock-dc-end-mueller-investigation