« First « Previous Comments 4 - 43 of 59 Next » Last » Search these comments
Actually there are lots of cities banning aggressive breeds of dogs:
http://www.banpitbulls.org/where/where-pit-bulls-banned/
Why wasn't the dead chick armed?
Thanks! That site links to an opposing site that lists several states that ban local bans, including California and New York. In other words, in places like SF, Diane Whipple's neighbors were allowed to keep the obviously dangerous dogs that killed her, but she was not allowed to carry a gun to defend herself. I can't help noticing a self-defeating pattern, i.e. the same people who ban guns insist on allowing dangerous dogs.
Not sure why this would be related to politics or gun control.
Don’t know much about dogs, but aren’t we humans larger and can probably take a dog out easily in hand to hand combat?
Coulda been worse. She could have been invited to have lunch with Trump at the White House.
Don’t know much about dogs, but aren’t we humans larger and can probably take a dog out easily in hand to hand combat?Satoshi_Nakamoto says
Dangerous misconception.I have new neighbors with whom I've become friends, a retired teacher and her husband who worked security for Harrah's in Las Vegas and is now employed in security at Baylor. They have a large female pit bull, Coco, who is sweet as she can be. As is typical today, she is a rescue so they presumably have no real information about her earlier life. They have me over for dinner periodically and she is relegated to the back part of the house. They're going on a five or six day trip right after the first of the year and leave her in charge of a house-sitter. From what I've read, pits are very high energy dogs which need a lot of interaction with people or other dogs to dispel the pent-up energy. They don't do well when caged or in solitary circumstances for long periods of time. My fear is that on a day, even as sweet as she seems most of the time, she may turn on either of her owners or a sitter, neither of whom will be able to defend themselves against such a large animal. Whatever happened to people owning cocker spaniels or collies whose natures seem so much more docile? I think having a rescue dog today has become kind of a virtue signal as they call it.
I think having a rescue dog today has become kind of a virtue signal as they call it
A 4-year-old boy was mauled to death by the family dogThat's why I continue to worry about my neighbors who bought a big Pit Bull as a rescue a couple of years ago. She weighs about 75-100 lbs. and is as sweet as she can be. They boarded her for a day while they took a day trip to Dallas. When they came back the kennel owner told them another dog had tried to play with her and she bit back, wouldn't let go until they forced her to--she's now banned from that kennel and they had to find another, more expensive facility. Her husband works at night and she's alone with the dog and if she ever got a notion, Lisa would never be able to defend herself. I don't understand the mania for rescues or why they can't rescue a Cocker Spaniel or Dachund or some other kind of normal dog, why a big Pit Bull. This should put them on notice.
I don't want to say bad things about dogs because so many people love them, but some dogs are really dangerous, essentially weapons. They were bred that way.
So many eugenicists on patnet these days.
For the umpteens time: the term "eugenics" is only applicable to humans. With animals it's "selective breeding".
« First « Previous Comments 4 - 43 of 59 Next » Last » Search these comments
"Virginia woman killed by her pit bulls in ‘grisly mauling’"
"Couple Guilty of All Charges In Fatal Attack by Their [Presa Canario] Dog" (see also "San Francisco fatal dog mauling conviction upheld")
"Mother shut boy in basement to protect him from pit bull / 12-year-old was killed by family dog"
#politics