by Patrick ➕follow (59) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 105,124 - 105,163 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
Democrats have proven that they have no problem ignoring the will of the American people.
And PolitiFact reported it found no evidence to "support the idea that Joe Biden advocated with his son's interests in mind."
But there's little evidence he acted to help his son
Rudy Giuliani brought receipts. pic.twitter.com/METg8eiWHb— Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) September 29, 2019
... and it is 5 years old so WTF???
Tim Aurora saysBiden's son issue is just a conspiracy theory... and it is 5 years old so WTF???
Sorry, the son of an American politician on the board of an Eastern European oil/gas company?
Right, Chinese Companies and Ukrainian Natural Gas Mafiosos just hand over $1.5B in investments and $50k/month salaries (in countries where the monthly wage is $300) to the cocaine-addled, inexperienced sons of current Vice Presidents for their expertise and wisdom.
And...…. all of them get paid $600K per year to attend meeting twice per year in foreign language!
You people really are in the panic mode. Nobody said it's the same. It's just ironic that nepotism in so icredibly rampant in the current White House. Far more than anything we've ever seen. Most of these are situations where they were directly hired by their relative in a position of power in federal government.
6rdB saysIn science at least, the simplest explanation is assumed to be correct provided that facts are not against. In this case, the simplest explanation for Biden Jr being paid 80K a month despite having no qualifications for the job is that he is US vice president's son. We can not know if Biden Sr did anything inappropriate other than not policing his offspring, but as a minimum we have an obvious conflict of interest here, which should have been taken into account by an extremely high-ranking US official.
Right. Why did Kuwait give Harken the offshore leases after Gulf War I? George W was on the board. George W wasn't on ARCO's board. News, certainly, in places like Chemical Week and the Washington Post, but not treason of the type committed by Trump threatening to leave Ukraine undefended from Russian tanks.
I'm laughing my ass off
I wonder why?
As a legal standard, we don’t even need a quid pro quo to impeach, though it is present in the notes of the call.
Zelensky’s quid: “Thank you for your great support in the area of defense. We are ready to continue to cooperate for the next steps specifically we are almost ready to buy more Javelins from the United States for defense purposes.” (Javelins are anti-tank missiles).
Trump’s Quo: “I would like you to do us a favor though….”
There’s more, of course. Trump’s mention of reciprocity; his request that Ukraine investigate Biden; and his mention that his people (Attorney General William Barr and Trump personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani) will be in touch with Ukraine all read like a classic mob shakedown.
As journalist Ryan Lizza put it: “Anyone who has ever listened to the Gotti tapes will recognize the subtlety here.” I’ve heard the tapes of the late Mafia boss and Lizza is spot on.
And by the way, why was Trump using his personal attorney rather than U.S. government officials to deal with a foreign country? This was not only highly inappropriate, but ironic, given that Giuliani made his reputation as a crusading U.S. attorney in New York City by prosecuting Mafia figures.
Right. Why did Kuwait give Harken the offshore leases after Gulf War I? George W was on the board. George W wasn't on ARCO's board. News, certainly, in places like Chemical Week and the Washington Post, but not treason of the type committed by Trump threatening to leave Ukraine undefended from Russian tanks.
Trump is using office for personal gain and putting this country at risk
« First « Previous Comments 105,124 - 105,163 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,263,645 comments by 15,098 users - Ceffer online now