0
0

Thread for orphaned comments


 invite response                
2005 Apr 11, 5:00pm   177,460 views  117,730 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (60)   💰tip   ignore  

Thread for comments whose parent thread has been deleted

« First        Comments 105,911 - 105,950 of 117,730       Last »     Search these comments

105911   mell   2019 Oct 17, 2:00pm  

krc says
Again, these are just baby-mama whores getting what they can. Men just don't realize the biological facts: men want sex, women like sex but want children. Of course, I have been told if there were true equality then men would never get married, and would never agree to children... and our society would fade away. Perhaps... :)


Actually I don't think this holds true anymore. Most men do want kids with the right woman and often these days wommyn chose not to have kids and be miserable. The thing is that men like to have kids with stable, nesting, maternal, feminine, hot and nurturing women, not attention-whoring sluts and gold-diggers. There's a severe shortage of marriage material among modern womyn, even more so than a shortage on hot ones. Now Hunter may not be the brightest tool in the shed and this is yet another episode proving it.
105912   MisdemeanorRebel   2019 Oct 17, 2:09pm  

On the first day of Bush's second term, Pelosi announced there would be no impeachment.

Keep in mind it's probably provable that Bush knowingly doctored the WMD intel, and may have violated the Geneva Convention, the ban on Cruel and Unusual punishments in the Constitution, or both.

But Leftists want to impeach Trump.

This is all about policy.
105913   Onvacation   2019 Oct 17, 2:19pm  

jazz_music says


You are obviously referring to some other presidents.
105914   MisdemeanorRebel   2019 Oct 17, 2:21pm  

1. Obstruction: Exercising constitutionally granted powers, such as to fire the FBI Chief for any or no reason, can't be obstruction.
2. Emoluments Clause: Nonsense. What titles or salaries has Trump received as President without Congressional permission?
3. Conspiring with others: Requires that some other crime was planned or committed.
4. Advocating Violence: Then Clinton, Obama, and Bush are also guilty (Yugoslavia, Libya, and Iraq). Completely farsical crime that exists only in minds of the Left.
5. Pardon Power: Exercising Constitutionally granted powers, such as to pardon anybody for any or no reason, can't be abused as there are NO LIMITS on his power (see #1)
6. Recklessly threatening Nuclear War: Show me where is this a crime. Define "Reckless"? See #4 - a crime that only exists in the mind of the Left
7. Directing Law enforcement to pursue Political Enemies: Every Administration. This was done to Nixon, and just wait until the proof of Obama's malfeasance comes out. The President is required by law to enforce the laws of the USA. Investigating Hunter and Joe Biden for corruption with Ukrainian companies is 100% the purview of POTUS. Abusing FISA, however, is expressly prohibited, as is misleading FISA Court Judges as to source/origin/purpose of warrant requests.
8. Undermining Freedom of the Press: Another Leftist fantasy. Insulting needle moving journalists is not forbidden the POTUS, who retains 1st Amendment rights himself.
9. Enforcing the Immigration Laws is the POTUS' duty. Open borders is not the law, though the Left would like a POTUS who ignores these laws. OBAMA put kids in cages.
10. After a multiyear investigation involving a team mostly consisting of Trump's Deep State enemies, this failed to produce one single recommended charge.

Conclusion: List is 110%Bullshit



105915   krc   2019 Oct 17, 2:38pm  

"ONLY if a guy is stupid to stick it into her w/o protection. Hunter Biden by now is established as clearly being a whole class of stupid that fits that bill."

Agreed. But I know a lot of horror stories as well where one party lied about protection, etc... My advice to any husband going through a divorce with very young children: get a DNA test of your kids right away. I have a friend who did this and found out his youngest child (a year old when she filed) was not his. In fact, DNA testing should be mandatory at birth. If the unknowing "father" raises the child for two years before challenging (Wait! That is not my kid! ) ... well, that is too late. Most states will see that the "married father" is on the hook for child support, not the biological father, because he "acted as the father" for a substantial period of time.

And, that is why I originally said all reproductive males should get a reversible vasectomy. What - you don't think women are conniving enough to pin hole a condom, or pull sperm from a condom and self-inject? Seriously - that is why there is marriage. In marriage only is where sex should happen. But as a society we are past that.

But, please, anyone that says women want to be equal to men is just full of crap.
105916   krc   2019 Oct 17, 2:46pm  

"ONLY if a guy is stupid to stick it into her w/o protection. Hunter Biden by now is established as clearly being a whole class of stupid that fits that bill."

Agreed. But I know a lot of horror stories as well where one party lied about protection, etc... My advice to any husband going through a divorce with very young children: get a DNA test of your kids right away. I have a friend who did this and found out his youngest child (a year old when she filed) was not his. In fact, DNA testing should be mandatory at birth. If the unknowing "father" raises the child for two years before challenging (Wait! That is not my kid! ) ... well, that is too late. Most states will see that the "married father" is on the hook for child support, not the biological father, because he "acted as the father" for a substantial period of time.

Marriage is undermined when one sex is allowed to entrap the other sex and confer "marriage-like" benefits. Men don't get the option of "the right woman".

And, that is why I originally said all reproductive males should get a reversible vasectomy. What - you don't think women are conniving enough to pin hole a condom, or pull sperm from a condom and self-inject? Seriously - that is why there is marriage. In marriage only is where sex should happen. But as a society we are past that.

But, please, anyone that says women want to be equal to men is just full of crap. That is my primary point. Ultimately, the male has the FORCED responsibility, women have the CHOICE.
105917   MisdemeanorRebel   2019 Oct 17, 3:08pm  

1. Mandatory Paternity tests protect Men
1b. And children, since they identify potential genetic disorders
2. Ban No-Fault, replace with only Fault and/or Consent. No-Fault might only be allowed in marriages lasting less than 2 years and without children, in which case the parties take out what they brought in and split the rest.
3. Replace Section 8 and AFDC with Unwed Mother's homes with curfews and mandatory birth control.
105918   SunnyvaleCA   2019 Oct 17, 4:04pm  

6rdB says
simple solution: pay more and there will be lines of kids entering "high tech" studies, just like with med schools.

Or don't even pay more. Just move to a lower-cost part of the country. Heck, programmers in silicon valley already make more than most doctors (non-specialists) in most of the rest of the country.
105919   krc   2019 Oct 17, 4:30pm  

"This also dissuades men from having children out of wedlock."

In this case, it doesn't. Women make that decision. Will read the link... thanks.
105920   Ceffer   2019 Oct 17, 4:38pm  

Will there be orders for the Secret Service to pepper Melania's Cuban Gardner Lotharios with Uzi spray on sight?
105921   Ceffer   2019 Oct 17, 4:40pm  

They might think Trump Cunt Punch is a drink.
105922   truthhurts   2019 Oct 17, 5:40pm  

krc says
That is frankly why I am pro-life. If abortion was outlawed, then one sex would not have this much control over the other. Right now we let women have the choice to enslave a biological father. Of course - the usual response is "just don't have sex". If abortion would outlawed, I would agree: he should be paying instead of the taxpayer.


So under your logic, a woman who is strongly pro-life must choose to either abort her child or have the child but not get any help from the man who helped put her in that position? Makes no sense.

There's a kid and the kid needs to be taken care of. If the guy doesn't pay child support then the mom goes on welfare and how's that fair the the taxpayer? We certainly had nothing to do with the problem.

Half the people in this thread sound like bitter dads tired of having to pony up for child support. I get that there are some issues with the system, like that custody always defaults to the woman, but boo hoo, take care of your fucking kids.
105923   Bd6r   2019 Oct 17, 6:52pm  

Quigley says
If anyone had any questions about why tech workers shouldn’t vote Democrat anymore... a good reason is that they want to import Chindians to do your jobs!

Tech workers coming from CA have turned Austin bright blue.
105924   RWSGFY   2019 Oct 17, 7:07pm  

6rdB says
Quigley says
If anyone had any questions about why tech workers shouldn’t vote Democrat anymore... a good reason is that they want to import Chindians to do your jobs!

Tech workers coming from CA have turned Austin bright blue.


#fuckingmorons
105925   SoTex   2019 Oct 17, 9:30pm  

truthhurts says
some issues


"Some issues"

hahahahahahahaha

He said "Some issues!"...

blahahahahahahahahahahaha...

I recall a recent under statement from somebody else recently: "Some people did something"
105926   krc   2019 Oct 18, 12:13am  

"If the guy doesn't pay child support then the mom goes on welfare and how's that fair the the taxpayer?"

Yes. And that is a big part of the problem. That state is serving as the lender of last resort, essentially. What if there was not this welfare backstop? I bet the illegitimacy rate would decrease - substantially! And lets make no bones about it. Women now are perfectly aware of their power here: the actual abortion rate has dropped dramatically because women have various forms of birth control and they are deciding when to have the child - regardless of "who" it is with. Look at the abortion rates for the past 20 years - massive decline. Illegitimate children are the way that baby mamas can make it in this world when they see that their own independent future looks bleak. Why should a man support a child that he had no interest in having?
105927   truthhurts   2019 Oct 18, 5:37am  

krc says
Why should a man support a child that he had no interest in having?


Because it's the moral thing to do.

krc says
Illegitimate children are the way that baby mamas can make it in this world when they see that their own independent future looks bleak.


Maybe so, but this is even more reason why you should be careful where you are sticking it.

I don't know why I need to explain biology to you, but there's no such thing as an illegitimate child. You stuck your penis voluntarily into a vagina and made a baby, it really happened, it's legit. Now it needs to be taken care of. In a perfect world, you wouldn't need court mandated child support because both parents would work together and figure out a way to pay for it all. But some don't, and so there is a system in place to enforce it and some people are taking advantage of that system and men get screwed.

But just because it's a bad system doesn't take away your responsibility. You can't just say "Oh, well the child support system is unfair so I'm not going to be a responsible adult and pay for my kid".
105928   Tenpoundbass   2019 Oct 18, 8:02am  

The Best part will be when he invites Putin.

The Rotten son's of bitches Global Punks invited Iran to the last G7 after kicking Russia out. And if you all remember, and don't have your heads shoved so far up Jeff Bezos and Zucker's Ass, will remember Trump vowed to invite Putin to the next one, since the Globalist saw fit to invite Iran. Who at the time during that week was threatening America and our President.

It's going to be glorious, the crying will hurt our ears.
105929   Bd6r   2019 Oct 18, 9:11am  

AF, why do you hate CAPITALISM! and ENTREPRENEURSHIP???
105930   krc   2019 Oct 18, 10:21am  

"Oh, well the child support system is unfair so I'm not going to be a responsible adult and pay for my kid".

Well, even if a biological father wanted to walk away, they can't. So not sure of the argument here. The state is definitely enforcing child support even with jail time, which also makes zero sense. And, when it is convenient the state will also repudiates a biological father's right as well. For example, if a married wife has a child from an affair, if the married father accepts that child, then most states will terminate the biological father's rights.

I am not questioning the morality here. Yes - you fathered a child, I think you should support it. But, to your point, that is a moral question only. If you look at this from a constitutional protection issue, then this is completely unfair. If you believe it is fair that a woman who "decides" to have a child should be entitled to entrap an unmarried father, then we disagree. Hopefully, you would then agree that the most logical course would be to outlaw abortion so that one sex doesn't have this power over the other. Then, yes, you engage in sex you run a risk with a known consequence and BOTH parties bear that responsibility.

I guess if it is a "bad system" you just put up with it.... Illegitimate children are children born out of wedlock. So - there are "illegitimate" children though it is not a popular word to use anymore as it stigmatizes the biological parents. And we can't have that can we? Only the man needs to bear the social condemnation - as we see by most responses to the original post. No one seems to even question her integrity/ responsibility for birth control / etc... I know if my daughter "got pregnant" without being married, I would tell her it is her decision and she is responsible. If the "boyfriend" wants to chip in, GREAT! But if not, she should deal with it herself and be prepared to support the child on her own.
105931   krc   2019 Oct 18, 10:26am  

Found this interesting article. I guess I am interested in this subject since it seems that only the man bears the ridicule when a baby mama pops out of the woodwork. Whether it is Biden's son, a famous football player, actor, etc... there is never social condemnation against the woman! I always find that interesting and just another manifestation of the matriarchy at work. :)

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-12-04/financial-abortion-men-opt-out-parenthood/8049576
105932   Ceffer   2019 Oct 18, 2:00pm  

Cool.

"State Department Concludes Clinton Email Review Says It Found Nearly 600 Security Violations"

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread1248894/pg1

Double Triple Agent IHLLary pleaded ignorance! Hilarious.
105933   mell   2019 Oct 18, 2:37pm  

APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says
I don't! I was just hoping that Trump would turn the golf course into a hunting range filled with RAPEFUGEE! children whom he'd encourage the G7 delegates to shoot with high powered rifles at a premium for their entertainment!


Why not, hire this man! Pretty much every day a rapefugee humiliates an autochthonous resident, like recently in the Netherlands where they made a white dutch guy strip at gunpoint. Of course this video was censored on twatter shortly after it was posted. Many rapefugees behave utterly atrocious and shouldn't be admitted into a civilized country in the first place.
105934   mell   2019 Oct 18, 2:43pm  

Love those cajones! I hope she doesn't get suicided - at least she knows how to defend herself with a weapon as well.
105935   Ceffer   2019 Oct 18, 2:50pm  

Using the usual 180 degree flip LibbyFuck propaganda ploy, this means that IHLlary is admitting to being a Russian agent.
105936   Ceffer   2019 Oct 18, 2:51pm  

If I pretend to have State secrets that the Russians want, can I fool Tulsi into honey trapping me?
105937   RC2006   2019 Oct 18, 2:54pm  

Hillary has to be the worse candidate in the last 100+ years.
105939   SunnyvaleCA   2019 Oct 18, 3:09pm  

discovered nearly 600 security incidents that violated agency policy

What is left unsaid is how many emails imply a ton of other potential violations. It's not like Hillary wanted to operate private server because she intended to commit security violations; that was just a byproduct of a much larger agenda.

How many emails imply:
• non-profit organization fraud
• campaign finance
• meddling in elections (foreign and domestic)
• racketeering
• quid pro Joe quo violations
• tax fraud
• lobbying fraud
• all sorts of process violations (Podesta acting as foreign lobbyist when not being registered as a foreign lobbyist, for example)
105940   Chiromancer   2019 Oct 18, 3:12pm  

OccasionalCortex says


How can it violate the emoluments clause if he isn't charging for profit?


Ha ha, the emoluments clause says nothing about profit, this is a clear violation. But for the sake of conversation if the hotel normally is about 40 % occupied (according to their records) in June, and it suddenly is 100% occupied even at a steep discount Trump is better off. And there won't be a steep discount. But really at this point who cares. The cult will make excuses and everybody else knows he is grifter.
105941   SunnyvaleCA   2019 Oct 18, 3:14pm  

I live in California, so my presidential vote doesn't really count anyway. So... join me in a write-in campaign for Tulsi next November 3rd!
105942   clambo   2019 Oct 18, 3:17pm  

I believe we have open primaries in California so everyone can vote for her probably.
105943   RC2006   2019 Oct 18, 3:30pm  

Checked a few of the political forums that I use to check out before they turned full libtard. I can't even believe they are jumping on the npc meme bs Hilary is right crap. This is all about the industrial military complex and there cronies not liking her antiwar stance.
105944   FortWayneAsNancyPelosiHaircut   2019 Oct 18, 3:33pm  

And just like that Democrats went from Trump Derangement Syndrome to Tulsi Derangment Syndrome lol. I guess we can keep the acronym still.
105945   RC2006   2019 Oct 18, 3:35pm  

I don't like her for her domestic stance but to come out against her for being anti war is disgusting and calling her a Russian tool is insane. Fuck the democrats.
105946   Ceffer   2019 Oct 18, 4:08pm  

Does this mean Tulsi will commit suicide by being impaled in the back by a knobby strap on?
105947   Ceffer   2019 Oct 18, 4:10pm  

So, IHLlary was just too lazy to stagger to her dead drops.
105948   Bd6r   2019 Oct 18, 4:33pm  

Ceffer says
Does this mean Tulsi will commit suicide by being impaled in the back by a knobby strap on?

I hate to admit, but provided that your prediction omits the usual knobby strap on mentions, you might be right. Remember how Patnet predicted Epstein suicide...
As a bare minimum, Tulsi will have trouble being re-elected, or she will be redistricted out of her seat. Remember how the R's retired Ron Paul...
105949   CBOEtrader   2019 Oct 18, 4:37pm  

Lol, that's me asking for tulsi's hand :)
105950   Patrick   2019 Oct 18, 5:28pm  

Holy shit, I think I am in love with Tulsi once again.

« First        Comments 105,911 - 105,950 of 117,730       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste