: That has to be the best one I've ever heard. Trump, he's all about the rule of law.
What a rich fantasy world you people live in. Wow !
Really? When the facts are distilled, you are overlooking the obvious quid-pro-quo of Biden and son along with the Crowdstrike affair, and looking for a way to criminalize Trump for a worst, pointing those crimes out.
There is no equivalency between Joe Biden threatening Ukraine with a holdup of aid unless they fired the investigator investigating his son and Trump's asking Ukraine to investigate the former VP who bragged about holding up aid if the Ukrainian's didn't fire the investigator investigating his son.
Did Trump or did he not hold up financial aid that had been appropriated by congress as military aide for Ukraine based on requests of announcement he wanted from Ukraine leaders that they were investigating Biden ?
It's a simple question. Yes or no ? I don't see that republicans are seeking the answer to this question.
Did Trump or did he not hold up financial aid that had been appropriated by congress as military aide for Ukraine based on requests of announcement he wanted from Ukraine leaders that they were investigating Biden ?
It's a simple question. Yes or no ?
That would be a "no," Marcus. Although Trump did temporarily hold up money, he never requested an announcement. And, in fact, he released the money before such announcement was made; and, in fact, there has never been an announcement.
That would be a "no," Marcus. Although Trump did temporarily hold up money, he never requested an announcement. And, in fact, he released the money before such announcement was made; and, in fact, there has never been an announcement.
The whole thing is silly.
The US always uses aid leverage and always has.
This is just a red herring.
One would have to prove that POTUS received "something of personal value" from the Ukraine in return for aid.
If Trump is guilty, then Jimmy Carter is guilty of bribery because he withheld cooperation and aid with Iran until they released the hostages, which would have given him an advantage over Ronald Reagan.
You mean like, for example, an announcement of an investigation by a foreign government in to the political rival Trump thought had the greatest chance to beat him in 2020 ?
So if I commit a potential crime, as long as I run for President I'm safe from Prosecution?
Maybe we need an investigation into Obama ordering audits into Trump's IRS records
Nothing in the Constitution about those running for, but not holding Federal Offices being immune from investigation and prosecution.
How much money did Hillary get from the Ukrainians? And what did the Ukrainians get for that large donation to the Clinton foundation? Do you think that war mongering bitch would have been a better president than Trump?
Not expecting answers.
Politicians are so corrupt. They claim to serve the people but in reality we serve them.
« First « Previous Comments 3,481 - 3,520 of 41,377 Next » Last » Search these comments
Trump did not own the Taj Mahal when it closed.
More likely restore the rule of law. That is what the folks who used the FBI to spy on a campaign and sold influence like Biden did in Ukraine fear.
Sorry, where is the bribery? Where is the personal gain?
The only person gain is Hunter Biden and RBS LLC continuing to receive wire transfers to their Morgan Stanley Account via Burisma's Latvian Banks.
Really? When the facts are distilled, you are overlooking the obvious quid-pro-quo of Biden and son along with the Crowdstrike affair, and looking for a way to criminalize Trump for a worst, pointing those crimes out.
Unwise but not criminal?
marcus says
Criminal but not unwise?
zzyzzx says
no
We voted against Hilary. The fact that Trump actually delivered on his promises is a bonus.
That would be a "no," Marcus. Although Trump did temporarily hold up money, he never requested an announcement. And, in fact, he released the money before such announcement was made; and, in fact, there has never been an announcement.
Here's a writeup in — of all places — the WoPo...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/10/08/joe-biden-is-hypocrite-ukraine/
The whole thing is silly.
The US always uses aid leverage and always has.
This is just a red herring.
One would have to prove that POTUS received "something of personal value" from the Ukraine in return for aid.
If Trump is guilty, then Jimmy Carter is guilty of bribery because he withheld cooperation and aid with Iran until they released the hostages, which would have given him an advantage over Ronald Reagan.
Had. Before his corruption was uncovered.
Who, now, has the greatest chance of beating Trump?
www.youtube.com/embed/mnbS0f4dSA8
So if I commit a potential crime, as long as I run for President I'm safe from Prosecution?
Maybe we need an investigation into Obama ordering audits into Trump's IRS records
Nothing in the Constitution about those running for, but not holding Federal Offices being immune from investigation and prosecution.
Only proves left is autistic.
marcus says
The ACLU folks. Did you know that you can shed the lining of your uterus, even if you don't have one?
How much money did Hillary get from the Ukrainians? And what did the Ukrainians get for that large donation to the Clinton foundation? Do you think that war mongering bitch would have been a better president than Trump?
Not expecting answers.
Politicians are so corrupt. They claim to serve the people but in reality we serve them.
« First « Previous Comments 3,481 - 3,520 of 41,377 Next » Last » Search these comments