27
1

National Political Incorrectness Day


 invite response                
2015 Sep 19, 9:40am   323,028 views  3,726 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (60)   💰tip   ignore  

How about a national day where everyone is encouraged to say politically incorrect things?

What would you say? You don't have to actually believe what you say, it just has to be provoctive.

"Barefoot and pregnant is the way I like 'em."

"Good lord you are FAT!"

"I have a lawnmower. His name is Jose."

"Speak English"
#politics

« First        Comments 1,946 - 1,985 of 3,726       Last »     Search these comments

1946   Patrick   2021 Sep 28, 5:24pm  

HeadSet says
I would not be surprised if the above "email" was authored by a Black guy as yet another hoax.


It would be one of many many such hoaxes intended to stir up controversy and therefore donations and funding for BLM etc.
1947   Patrick   2021 Sep 28, 10:36pm  

That guy has a fantastic attitude.
1948   Ceffer   2021 Sep 29, 6:49pm  

"Last week a Richard Barris (@peoplespundit) conducted & Creative Destruction media-funded poll was released showing that 60% of voters in GA want a full forensic audit & even more believe there was funny business in the 2020 election in GA.

Yet GA Gov Kemp & SOS Raffensberger are making no movement to represent the will of their constituents & voters.

Why?

Part of it could be the revelation that both Kemp & Raffensberger are repped by an ATL firm that specializes in running Progressives as Republicans, but that's not all of it.

They know that as long as the vote is rigged, they owe nothing more than lipservice, if even that, to their constituents as they can just use the magic fraud machines & leftist army to rig the next election.

So what are the ramifications of that?

Firstly, it shows that our representative constitutional Republic is gone, as the representatives no longer have to care about the consent of the governed.

One indicator that this fraud machine had been in place long before 2020 is the hallmark of Dem / leftist policies- open borders - that the vast majority of Americans have long been opposed to, shown even in the most left-leaning polls conducted for decades.

Yet since the Obama administration they've worked very hard to go against the #1 issue for both their own base and the US voting public at large.

But it's the other factor that worries me the most.

Any honest broker (so not the MSM) looking into the 2016 election understood that it was the result of a populace who were extremely unhappy with their elites, governing and "ruling" classes.

It was a rebuke by a majority of Americans to the direction they saw he country going in.

4 years of President Trump showed them just how different it COULD be: a secure border, not paying the bills of the world i.e. NATO, the WHO and a large number of consortiums that the US foots the bill for yet offer us little to nothing in return.

Most importantly, Americans across all classes and races saw their wages rise and taxes decline.

Now add on top of that a near majority of the electorate having serious questions about the 2020 election, leaders in states where the populace want full forensic audits pushing back against them with everything they have, and an implosion in approval numbers for Biden as "normies" and non-MAGA realize the people they were told would be the "adults back in charge" if they voted for Biden are actually corrupticrats and imbeciles who've been allowed to "fail upward" their entire lives because they go to the right parties and say the correct woke slogans in public (despite often getting caught living the opposite of those woke values).

So what happens in 2022 when we see these same elected reps who've won the ire and hatred of their electorate win their races, much like CA just watched with Newsome, who immediately made mail in voting permanent so he never has to worry about losing power?

You see, even though the machines are PART of the problem, they are only part.

Even if we get rid of them, we still have armies of leftist ideologues who've spent decades inculcating themselves into the voting process to enact the manual fraud for elections.

Remember SharpieGate in AZ? I haven't seen anyone really dive into those numbers, even in the audit hearing last week.

But rest assured, anywhere you have abnormally high ballot adjudication rates, it's because you have an army of ideologues in place to ensure they get all the votes their preferred corrupticrat needs, regardless of what the ballots actually say.

So in this place where we currently are, where an unhappy electorate put an outsider in charge in 2016, saw just how good it could be without swamp creatures in the POTUS position but then had their votes stolen in 2020 to put the ultimate swamp creature (and Dementia patient) in charge - what happens when those people see their widely hated representative who went strictly against their will, win their elections in 2022 and 2024?

I fear that will be a bridge too far for the American people.

I have a lot of respe..." https://t.me/FirstAmendmentPraetorian/5593
1951   Booger   2021 Oct 8, 4:54pm  

https://archive.is/sCpG5

Rachele Mussolini wins most votes in Rome city council election
1961   richwicks   2021 Oct 12, 2:39pm  

Booger says


Probably from the FBI graphic's department's.
1963   HeadSet   2021 Oct 13, 3:35pm  

Please explain? What is that device?
1964   richwicks   2021 Oct 13, 3:37pm  

HeadSet says
Please explain? What is that device?



I don't know, but I'm betting it's a table for performing circumcision on a baby.
1965   HeadSet   2021 Oct 13, 3:41pm  

richwicks says
I don't know, but I'm betting it's a table for performing circumcision on a baby.

I thought that too, but the comic has a much older child. Circumcision is done about 8 days from birth.
1966   richwicks   2021 Oct 13, 3:52pm  

HeadSet says
richwicks says
I don't know, but I'm betting it's a table for performing circumcision on a baby.

I thought that too, but the comic has a much older child. Circumcision is done about 8 days from birth.


Let me explain what the original comic was. A character ask a gay man "why did you chose to be gay" and then it's HEAVILY implied that as a CHILD the gay man was molested by an adult, and the punchline is "I didn't (chose to be gay).

Well, which group started ritual male genital mutilation? It's implied that forced circumcision is causing anti-Antisemitism. It's said people lose up to 75% of sexual gratification after being circumcised, but I wouldn't know, since I was circumcised for "my health" when I was a baby.

I don't think children should be circumcised.
1967   Ceffer   2021 Oct 13, 4:42pm  

richwicks says
It's said people lose up to 75% of sexual gratification after being circumcised

Good excuse for having four times as much sex.
1968   HeadSet   2021 Oct 13, 5:52pm  

richwicks says
It's said people lose up to 75% of sexual gratification after being circumcised

The man or the woman? I saw a documentary in England where a panel of women claimed they got better sensations from uncircumcised men.
1969   Ceffer   2021 Oct 13, 6:10pm  

HeadSet says
I saw a documentary in England where a panel of women claimed they got better sensations from uncircumcised men.

Ratings from 1 to 10:
1. Big bowl of chocolate ice cream with sprinkles: rated 9

2. Sex with uncircumcised men: rated 1.5

3. Sex with circumcised men: rated 1.25

4. Sex with very rich, very powerful famous man who can be sexually extorted: rated 10
1970   AmericanKulak   2021 Oct 13, 8:33pm  

Circumcision does not reduce pleasure, the only reports of it doing so are in a tiny minority of the adult circumcised, and those usually because they had a medical disease like when smegma makes it so you can't pull back the foreskin and gets all infected.

In WW2, all the combatants, from the UK to US, to Italy and Germany, performed thousands of emergency circumcisions due to filthy dirt getting trapped under the foreskin, causing abrasions, and the lack of regular bathing contributed to a large infection rate. Probably the reason the Egyptians did it. The US, being the most circumcised, had the lowest rate of emergency circumcisions.

I believe the only case of Penile Cancer in the US among circumcised males between the 1950s and 1990s was found in a man who was circumcised in his 20s due to continual infections due to shit getting trapped inside the foreskin. Wet and Dark vs. Airy and Dry...

The Religion excuse doesn't fly, since Pagan Arabs and Egyptians, along with Pagan indigenous tribes in SE Asia and South America and Africa, with no sex hangups, also circumcised.

It's just a medieval superstition with no science behind it, it's like anti-vaping, some people just want to believe that vaping is almost as harmful as smoking so seek to ban it, despite hundreds of millions of dollars over the decade thrown at it by Tobacco and Nicotine Patch growers and makers (ie Big Pharma). In Portugal, they think Circumcised Men rape more. In the USA, the most circ'd groups are the LEAST likely to rape, however.

The San Fran Freakos who want to ban circumcision also pierce the ears of infants, sometimes even tattoo them. Many are gay men who simply prefer the uncircumcised penis and if they are circumcised, have lost the ability to feel pleasure due to aggressive masturbation or continuous rough sex, which dulls the nerves. Same reason they Gillum out on poppers and blood pressure meds and hypnotics. Like everything else, these Urban Sad Sacks blame it on their parents.

Another reason Gay Men like to be uncircumcised is that the foreskin rolls back and forth over the glans during anal sex; statistically insignificant differences have been found in the average time to orgasm between circ'd and uncirc'd men during vaginal penetration or masturbation. It's possible that circumcision was an anti-Anal measure? Unlikely though.

A lot of anti-circ in the USA goes back to the Hippy Naturalistic Fallacies of the 70s.

The number of infections in the very small population of pierced infants and toddlers greatly exceeds any problems, no matter how minor, in the majority of infants that are still circumcised, which carries great health benefits Europeans, who have no culture of circumcision, grasp at straws to deny. Whereas the rate of European penis problems, esp. among pre-teens who aren't known for their enthusiastic self-hygiene, is exponentially higher than the USA.

Look at the population of the Middle East and several African societies where they circumcise, men still want to fuck and enjoy it.

Finally, it's a myth that many cultures don't circumcise. From New Guinea to Arabia to South America, circumcision of some kind was as common than not and typically related to passage into manhood.
1971   Ceffer   2021 Oct 13, 10:13pm  

Foreskins are an excellent donor tissue for skin grafts, and they cover enormous territory because they can be webbed and stretch so much. "I know you are happy to see me because your skin graft is pulsing." LOL! I don't know that that is a great reason to keep them, aside from the doggy dick drama of their appearance.
1973   FortWayneAsNancyPelosiHaircut   2021 Oct 14, 12:26pm  

HeadSet says
richwicks says
It's said people lose up to 75% of sexual gratification after being circumcised

The man or the woman? I saw a documentary in England where a panel of women claimed they got better sensations from uncircumcised men.


if less skin on penis was a good thing, it would happen evolutionary. but it didn't.

that's my point from evolutionary perspective
1974   Patrick   2021 Oct 14, 1:21pm  

Yes, it probably has some protective function.
1975   HeadSet   2021 Oct 14, 3:47pm  

FortWayneAsNancyPelosiHaircut says
that's my point from evolutionary perspective

Could be, but evolution can leave a few no longer needed relics like pubic hair and musk glands.
1976   mell   2021 Oct 15, 1:43pm  

HeadSet says
FortWayneAsNancyPelosiHaircut says
that's my point from evolutionary perspective

Could be, but evolution can leave a few no longer needed relics like pubic hair and musk glands.


It depends on the situation, but there is likely no organ or feature which is totally useless, not the appendix (microbiome), not pubic hair (prevents chafing), and not foreskin. IMO it should be removed when there is too much foreskin which happens in quite a few, otherwise left alone. Either way it's not a significant procedure, neither early nor later on. It's become so routine that it's not dangerous and there are pros and cons to both sides. Not worth fighting over IMO, it's def not the same as mutilating females.
1977   Patrick   2021 Oct 15, 4:05pm  

mell says
pubic hair (prevents chafing)


I've read that the evolutionary purpose for pubic hair may be to help with the evaporation of certain pheromones to advertise sexual availability.

But yes, I agree that there is likely no organ or feature which is totally useless. Evolution doesn't keep what you don't need. For example, fish which evolve in perfectly dark caves for millions of years completely lose their eyes. The reason is that eyes occasionally get infected, so they become a net loss in total darkness, leading to selection against eyes.
1978   Booger   2021 Oct 15, 5:05pm  

https://archive.fo/At2rz

Texas school district official tell teachers to offer books with ‘opposing’ Holocaust views
1979   richwicks   2021 Oct 15, 5:26pm  

Booger says
https://archive.fo/At2rz

Texas school district official tell teachers to offer books with ‘opposing’ Holocaust views


It won't be actually opposing viewpoints. It will be strawman arguments.

Don't you think it's odd the Nazis went through all that trouble during a time of war and chronic energy shortages to cremate the bodies to hide the crime, but they kept the shoes around for the Holocaust museums?

There's a LOT of propaganda around the Holocaust and WWII.



And it's still being produced today.
1980   AmericanKulak   2021 Oct 15, 5:40pm  

richwicks says
Don't you think it's odd the Nazis went through all that trouble during a time of war and chronic energy shortages to cremate the bodies to hide the crime, but they kept the shoes around for the Holocaust museums?


They kept the shoes to reuse, just like they kept the gold tooth filings.

And never underestimate the German's love of Red Tape. So many hundreds of thousands of pages. Supply Chains must be tracked or Gotdammt Kaos!!!


Nazis made great use of the Weimar Anti-Extremist law that Registered Guns between 34-38. They were able to individually disarm any likely opponents, including all Jews of course. Obviously, the gun registration, like the anti-hate speech laws, failed to prevent any extremism, Communist or Nazi.

Of course, denying a Genocide is the final phase of one, as the Turks-Kurds can tell you about Armenians, or many Soviet Apologists about the Holodmor.

The same reason the Elite wants the Vax Passports.
https://freedomwire.com/ibm-vaccine-passports/
1981   AmericanKulak   2021 Oct 15, 5:54pm  

Patrick says

Another example: far more Russians died in WWII than Jews did, about 27 million Russians. But we are not taught that in school.


Yep, The very first mass killings by the Nazis weren't Jews, but current and retired Polish local leaders, from Professors to former Police Chiefs and Mayors, to School Deans and popular Priests and Pastors. The mass executions began before the fall of Warsaw and were in the tens of thousands by the end of 1939.

The ultimate goal of the Nazi Regime was lebensraum, which you can't get if the Slavs are still around in large numbers in Poland and Russia. The Jews were the test run, and as the most despised by all parties would face the least resistance. Himmler already had maps renaming South Ukraine and Crimea "Gotenau", after the old Gothic Kingdom there and estimated Aryanization under Ahnenerbe ("Ancestral Heritage") policies would take about 20 years after their defeat of the USSR.

Select details about Generalplan Ost was a great book called "POLAND UNDER NAZI OCCUPATION" by two non-Jewish Polish authors,

https://web.archive.org/web/20110409034704/http://www.dac.neu.edu/holocaust/Hitlers_Plans.htm

Interestingly, the Germans felt the Poles could not be totally exterminated, because they were too fiercely patriotic and too aggressive AND the rest of the world would see their extermination as a threat (whereas Jews and Russians wouldn't piss many off), therefore they would be slowly deported over the Urals, but in small numbers and greatly dispersed, lest they intermingle with the native Siberians and create a future Polish Threat.
1983   Booger   2021 Oct 16, 3:32pm  

https://www.tampafp.com/california-school-district-bans-political-flags-after-two-students-use-a-teachers-pride-flag-for-toilet-paper/

California School District Bans Political Flags After Two Students Use A Teacher’s Pride Flag For Toilet Paper
1984   Booger   2021 Oct 17, 4:21am  

I only want to date white people:

« First        Comments 1,946 - 1,985 of 3,726       Last »     Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste