« First « Previous Comments 22 - 61 of 91 Next » Last » Search these comments
Please explain what I am supposed to "get" from this video.
komputodo saysWhat is really telling is that the media knows that lots of people will believe any outlandish story they make up, supported by Unnamed US officials.
I feel the same disappointment as when lots of people just believed that masks would do something, or that it was somehow OK to take an experimental drug which hadn't even been tested on animals, and to force others to take it on pain of being fired for refusal.
Ceffer says
Please explain what I am supposed to "get" from this video.
Russians use this tactic of flooding the 'net with miriads of obvious crude fakes to make you think that everything else is fake too.
Russians use this tactic of flooding the 'net with miriads of obvious crude fakes to make you think that everything else is fake too. They employed the same tactic with MH-17 crash: fabricated at least 5 different "versions" from "it was Ukie missile" to "look at this sattelite picture of Ukie Mig-29 shooting a rocket at MH-17" where the Mig is literally 3 miles long.
Eric Holder saysRussians use this tactic of flooding the 'net with miriads of obvious crude fakes to make you think that everything else is fake too. They employed the same tactic with MH-17 crash: fabricated at least 5 different "versions" from "it was Ukie missile" to "look at this sattelite picture of Ukie Mig-29 shooting a rocket at MH-17" where the Mig is literally 3 miles long.
I doubt Russia does this.
Well, bless your heart.
WineHorror1 saysPlease explain what I am supposed to "get" from this video.
That many videos are fakes. Like the famous pic of the bloody faced blonde middle aged chick that ran on the cover of several UK Newspapers was from a Chemical Explosion years back, nothing to do with Ukraine.
Russia lost 4 generals alreadyYesterday, they destroyed the command post of the 35th Army of the Eastern Military District. It's a cluster of high-rank officers. I'd expect that the number is going to jump once the final (pun intended) book-counting is done but we'll see, it'd require confirmation from the Russians.
Booger saysTo be clear: 4 is the number that Russian sources (not the Kremlin) confirmed.Russia lost 4 generals alreadyYesterday, they destroyed the command post of the 35th Army of the Eastern Military District. It's a cluster of high-rank officers. I'd expect that number 4 is going to jump once the final (pun intended) book-counting is done but we'll see, it'd require confirmation from the Russians.
AmericanKulak saysWineHorror1 saysPlease explain what I am supposed to "get" from this video.
That many videos are fakes. Like the famous pic of the bloody faced blonde middle aged chick that ran on the cover of several UK Newspapers was from a Chemical Explosion years back, nothing to do with Ukraine.
It just shows the same video side by side. I don't get it.
I’m probably rude, but I think it’s lame to post other people’s shit.
clambo saysI’m probably rude, but I think it’s lame to post other people’s shit.
yeah especially when it goes against the narrative and makes too much sense.
They are only able to see and hear Putin approved “news.”
They "debunk" an obviously fake video they themselves planted. The goal is to imply and make you believe that all video evidence of destruction of civilian infrastructure in Ukraine is fake. Propaganda 101.
Ukraine is enticing some Russian soldiers to desert; they are sending texts to them to surrender and get cash rewards and application for citizenship.
Japan has seized Russian assets, claimed disputed territory with Russia, and has sanctioned Russian civilians.
Russian Missile Command: The game where 60 percent of your missiles don’t work.
I have to tell you man, the weirdest part is how this same fucking guy is taking a selfie of the same fucking rocket in 4 different places. Every time. I kind of doubt this is a real thing even.
What is interesting is now Ukraine has more tanks than a month ago, from Russian guys deserting or surrendering, while Russia is down 500 tanks in a month.
« First « Previous Comments 22 - 61 of 91 Next » Last » Search these comments
The month Putin chose to invade was wrong, but maybe intended to freeze Germany by cutting off the natural gas? He should have invaded in good weather.
The columns you saw of both attack and supply equipment have to travel on roads, or get stuck in the mud.
Ukraine fighters ambush the supply trucks, then no fuel and no food for the soldiers.
The long column you saw was vehicles that had no fuel, and soldiers spent nights with no warmth and no food in 10F nights. The column actually could neither advance nor retreat.
Nobody wants to drive a supply truck since he knows he’s a target, more so than a tank.
The communications of Russian guys isn’t secure; for some reason they cannot use the secure comms they developed. So, Russian soldiers are using iPhones and walkie talkies.
Ukraine guys use “find my iPhone” or similar technology to “reach out and touch someone” with artillery or drone, etc.
This is how they could kill some Russian generals and commanders who were not on the front lines.
The Russians did not have enough precision bombs and have low training time, and air and ground forces are not coordinated, so Russia has no air superiority to protect the sitting ducks in the columns in the road.
Kiev is so large that the Russians are not numerous enough to encircle it.
Putin is not able to call up all of the Russian army without admitting the “special operation” is in fact a war.
So, he’s trying to get Belarus to send cannon fodder, along with Syrian sacrificial soldiers.
(Belarus is not enthusiastic about the idea).
Meanwhile, the Russian conscripts are being hunted down by Ukraine forces and the dead are estimated at 5000 to 15,000
Edit: US Pentagon says 7000 deadskis.
Wounded are likely 3x the number of dead.
It’s too many dead and wounded too soon.
Just recently videos of Russian atrocities against civilians are embarrassing Putin.
There is a tank swerving to run over and crush a civilian car, cars with people inside blown up, people massacred waiting for bread, an old guy shot for walking down the street.
The lie about NATO “provoked” Russia is easily debunked by the Feb 14 meeting in Kiev of chancellor Scholz and Zelensky.
Germany Chancellor Scholz : It was strange Russia would raise this issue (Ukraine in NATO) given it is not on the agenda.
Putin knew that Germany, therefore NATO, had no plans to bring Ukraine into the alliance, however much Ukraine desired it.
Evidently Ukraine doesn’t need NATO; they are going to be armed to the teeth after this is over.