Political Humor Thread
invite response
2019 Feb 17, 4:30pm 3,121,385 views 42,083 comments
by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 14,944 - 14,983 of 42,083 Next » Last » Search these comments
14954
Ceffer
2022 Mar 22, 8:00pm
Ceffer
2022 Mar 22, 8:00pm
LOL! A Reptilian perched on the Masonic Eye.
"A reminder as Joe admits we are to usher in the NEW WORLD ORDER."
"A reminder as Joe admits we are to usher in the NEW WORLD ORDER."
14958
Patrick
2022 Mar 23, 10:58am
Patrick
2022 Mar 23, 10:58am
https://www.bmj.com/content/363/bmj.k5094?source=patrick.net
Abstract
Objective To determine if using a parachute prevents death or major traumatic injury when jumping from an aircraft.
Design Randomized controlled trial.
Setting Private or commercial aircraft between September 2017 and August 2018.
Participants 92 aircraft passengers aged 18 and over were screened for participation. 23 agreed to be enrolled and were randomized.
Intervention Jumping from an aircraft (airplane or helicopter) with a parachute versus an empty backpack (unblinded).
Main outcome measures Composite of death or major traumatic injury (defined by an Injury Severity Score over 15) upon impact with the ground measured immediately after landing.
Results Parachute use did not significantly reduce death or major injury (0% for parachute v 0% for control; P>0.9). This finding was consistent across multiple subgroups. Compared with individuals screened but not enrolled, participants included in the study were on aircraft at significantly lower altitude (mean of 0.6 m for participants v mean of 9146 m for non-participants; P<0.001) and lower velocity (mean of 0 km/h v mean of 800 km/h; P<0.001).
Conclusions Parachute use did not reduce death or major traumatic injury when jumping from aircraft in the first randomized evaluation of this intervention. However, the trial was only able to enroll participants on small stationary aircraft on the ground, suggesting cautious extrapolation to high altitude jumps. When beliefs regarding the effectiveness of an intervention exist in the community, randomized trials might selectively enroll individuals with a lower perceived likelihood of benefit, thus diminishing the applicability of the results to clinical practice.
14959
richwicks
2022 Mar 23, 11:25am
richwicks
2022 Mar 23, 11:25am
Patrick says
"The study also has several limitations. First and most importantly, our findings might not be generalizable to the use of parachutes in aircraft traveling at a higher altitude or velocity."
:)
https://www.bmj.com/content/363/bmj.k5094?source=patrick.net
"The study also has several limitations. First and most importantly, our findings might not be generalizable to the use of parachutes in aircraft traveling at a higher altitude or velocity."
:)
14962
Ceffer
2022 Mar 23, 6:25pm
Ceffer
2022 Mar 23, 6:25pm
Supreme Socialist Actor Biden in another fake embarkment from cgi White House?. Will Poland assassination of Biden be the false flag event designed to kick off WWIII for the failing Globalists?
14966
Ceffer
2022 Mar 23, 10:17pm
Ceffer
2022 Mar 23, 10:17pm
Klaus Barbie Schwab has an erection every time he hears of a vaccine assassination. "It iss better than viagra, and I grab the nearest living useless eater and fuck them in the ass!"
14970
Ceffer
2022 Mar 24, 1:53am
Ceffer
2022 Mar 24, 1:53am
With the Vatican losing its extortion edge and having financial problems. the Pope auditions for an anchor spot at CNN:
https://t.me/mel_gibsonchannel/1011?source=patrick.net
https://t.me/mel_gibsonchannel/1011?source=patrick.net
14972
Patrick
2022 Mar 24, 9:10am
Patrick
2022 Mar 24, 9:10am
"Anytime there's a single narrative broadcast with no room for dissent, you know it's gotta be true."
Lol.
Lol.
14975
Ceffer
2022 Mar 24, 5:01pm
Ceffer
2022 Mar 24, 5:01pm
Democrats now concerned that vile, unconstitutional behavior, rampant lies, insincere campaign promises, blaming opponents for their own failures, and captured propaganda MSM will be insufficient to help them cheat their way to victory in the midterms:
"Dems ‘Shaken’ By Early Polling From Suburbs: ‘A Scared-Straight Incident’"
https://conservativebrief.com/new-2-61336/?source=patrick.net
"Dems ‘Shaken’ By Early Polling From Suburbs: ‘A Scared-Straight Incident’"
https://conservativebrief.com/new-2-61336/?source=patrick.net
14976
richwicks
2022 Mar 24, 7:05pm
richwicks
2022 Mar 24, 7:05pm
Ceffer says
Haha, the intelligence agencies run the nation. There isn't a problem.
Let's say the Republicans SWEEP the next election, they'll be 95% puppets, just like they are now.
There will be a lot of fuckery thought to make it seem "if we only elected more Republicans, we'd get some positive change!"
Well, the intelligence agencies aren't going to allow that.
Democrats now concerned that vile, unconstitutional behavior, rampant lies, insincere campaign promises, blaming opponents for their own failures, and captured propaganda MSM will be insufficient to help them cheat their way to victory in the midterms
Haha, the intelligence agencies run the nation. There isn't a problem.
Let's say the Republicans SWEEP the next election, they'll be 95% puppets, just like they are now.
There will be a lot of fuckery thought to make it seem "if we only elected more Republicans, we'd get some positive change!"
Well, the intelligence agencies aren't going to allow that.
14977
Patrick
2022 Mar 24, 7:12pm
Patrick
2022 Mar 24, 7:12pm
@richwicks After you mentioned Charles de Gaulle sending a warship to pick up France's gold from America, I read a bit about him.
Aside from that act of audacity, I liked that he quickly learned to hate all politicians after becoming leader of France. He was convinced they were all just out for themselves, which sounds correct. Then he quit. He got drawn back into being leader of France later, but never changed his views.
Aside from that act of audacity, I liked that he quickly learned to hate all politicians after becoming leader of France. He was convinced they were all just out for themselves, which sounds correct. Then he quit. He got drawn back into being leader of France later, but never changed his views.
14979
richwicks
2022 Mar 25, 3:57am
richwicks
2022 Mar 25, 3:57am
Patrick says
I had to laugh about it when I found out. Charles de Gaulle had realized that the Fed was doing some funny accounting, and was like "fuck this" and went to NY with a WARSHIP - and this during the Vietnam war, that the French had started.
Vietnam is interesting. The Allies said "if you fight on our side, we'll grant you freedom from FRANCE" when this over. Ho Chi Minh took them up on the offer, and the Allies didn't hold up the bargain in the end. All Vietnam wanted was freedom from France, because France did things like export rice while the indigenous population was starving.
Why did the Allies refuse to uphold their agreement? France, who really didn't care about WWII, said, that if they lost Vietnam, they wouldn't join NATO.
That's the story anyhow.
The West should be willing to give up colonies. Colonialism isn't ALL bad, except at the end, that's when it gets bad - it gets bad at the end because the population feels like it's getting screwed over, and when they feel like they are getting screwed over, it's because they are. That's why colonialism has a bad rap - they ALL have a bad divorce in the end, but the matrimony years are mostly good.
I'd argue the colonial period of the British was largely beneficial. Imagine if India, China, and the Americas were left untouched for the last 400 years but Europe and Russia developed. Imagine that conflict.
@richwicks After you mentioned Charles de Gaulle sending a warship to pick up France's gold from America, I read a bit about him.
Aside from that act of audacity, I liked that he quickly learned to hate all politicians after becoming leader of France. He was convinced they were all just out for themselves, which sounds correct. Then he quit. He got drawn back into being leader of France later, but never changed his views.
I had to laugh about it when I found out. Charles de Gaulle had realized that the Fed was doing some funny accounting, and was like "fuck this" and went to NY with a WARSHIP - and this during the Vietnam war, that the French had started.
Vietnam is interesting. The Allies said "if you fight on our side, we'll grant you freedom from FRANCE" when this over. Ho Chi Minh took them up on the offer, and the Allies didn't hold up the bargain in the end. All Vietnam wanted was freedom from France, because France did things like export rice while the indigenous population was starving.
Why did the Allies refuse to uphold their agreement? France, who really didn't care about WWII, said, that if they lost Vietnam, they wouldn't join NATO.
That's the story anyhow.
The West should be willing to give up colonies. Colonialism isn't ALL bad, except at the end, that's when it gets bad - it gets bad at the end because the population feels like it's getting screwed over, and when they feel like they are getting screwed over, it's because they are. That's why colonialism has a bad rap - they ALL have a bad divorce in the end, but the matrimony years are mostly good.
I'd argue the colonial period of the British was largely beneficial. Imagine if India, China, and the Americas were left untouched for the last 400 years but Europe and Russia developed. Imagine that conflict.
« First « Previous Comments 14,944 - 14,983 of 42,083 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,258,656 comments by 15,019 users - 6DOF online now