« First « Previous Comments 362 - 391 of 391 Search these comments
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/myocarditis-covid-vaccine-research-long-term-effects-rcna55666
The article is not at all objective of course, but at least the DANGER of the toxxine is now slowly seeping into corporate media.
NEW - CDC is investigating a potential link between COVID mRNA injections and ischemic strokes.
Jan 13, 2023
CDC & FDA Identify Preliminary COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Signal for Persons Aged 65 Years and Older
Transparency and vaccine safety are top priorities for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). U.S. government agencies use multiple, complementary safety monitoring systems to help detect possible safety signals for vaccines and other medical countermeasures as early as possible and to facilitate further investigation, as appropriate. Often these safety systems detect signals that could be due to factors other than the vaccine itself.
Weber Shandwick Provides PR for Moderna and Pfizer, While Staffing the CDC’s Vaccine Office
A potential $50 million contract allows PR firm to be “embedded at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta as part of the Division of Viral Diseases team.”
Early last month, CDC Director Rochelle P. Walensky endorsed recommendations by the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for updated COVID-19 boosters from Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna.
“This recommendation followed a comprehensive scientific evaluation and robust scientific discussion,” Dr. Walensky said in a statement. “If you are eligible, there is no bad time to get your COVID-19 booster and I strongly encourage you to receive it.”
I have just received a very interesting MHRA reply to an FOI request about whether the Healthy Secretary delegated Covid vaccine decisions to the MHRA.
The MHRA said: “All the Covid vaccines and therapeutics authorisation decisions were taken by the Licensing Minister and were not delegated.”
What makes this so interesting is the wider context. Under the Human Medicines Regulations, the Licensing Authority is the Secretary of State for Health. He or she delegates to MHRA all the work associated with that – licensing of medicines, pharmacovigilance, inspection of manufacturers, enforcement and so on.
But for the Covid vaccines, MHRA is saying that the Secretary of State personally took all the decisions.
I read that as the blame game having started. I’ll explain why.
Wall Street Journal editorial board member Allysia Finley has taken a flamethrower to vaccine makers over their "deceptive" campaign for bivalent Covid boosters, and slams several federal agencies for taking "the unprecedented step of ordering vaccine makers to produce them and recommending them without data supporting their safety or efficacy." ...
For those who took (or were forced to take) the original vaccine, our memory B-cells were trained to produce antibodies against the original Wuhan strain. And as a New England Journal of Medicine article notes, people who have taken said original vaccine were "primed" to respond to the Wuhan strain, and 'mounted an inferior antibody response to other variants.'
The studies directly contradict marketing information from Pfizer and Moderna, which asserted that the bivalent boosters produced a response to the new strains (BA.4 and BA.5) that's 4-6x that of the original boosters - which the WSJ says is "misleading." ...
Here's the moneyshot: "The vaccine makers designed their studies to get the results they wanted. Public-health authorities didn’t raise an eyebrow, but why would they? They have a vested interest in promoting the bivalents."
Wall Street Journal's (WSJ) Allysia Finley is on the money again & thus I had to share: "The Deceptive Campaign for Bivalent Covid Boosters Studies show they fail to live up to their promise, but vaccine makers and experts keep pushing them."
In Washington politics & media, to do what she has done here, is career ending and very risky as to safety; she has SEEDS most seem to lack in media
In summary, the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) advises that healthy people, aged under 50 should no longer be “offered” (whatever that term really means) the COVID “vaccine”.
Universal Covid jabs to be wound down as under-50s given just weeks to get boosters
JCVI bosses issued the fresh guidance as they revealed that the universal Covid vaccine programme would end this year - and urged healthy Brits who haven't had their booster to get jabbed while they have a chance
25 Jan 2023
UK Statistics Regulator Admits that the Claims Made About COVID "Vaccine" Effectiveness are Unfounded
Universal Covid jabs to be wound down as under-50s given just weeks to get boosters
Dr Aseem Malhotra
@DrAseemMalhotra
BREAKING:
‘Covid - 19 booster jab offer set to end in the U.K.’
WE made this happen 🔥
But this alone is not good enough. We must help the vaccine injured & make the government, the regulator & Pharma fully accountable so this NEVER happens again
Lauterbach in 2020: "Schools drive the pandemic, the research is clear."
Lauterbach in 2023: The belief that many infections occur in schools and day-care centres “did not prove to be correct"
I guess the research wasn't so clear then. The pandemicists will now begin to say many stupid things, as they beat a hasty retreat from policies that are more and more universally repudiated.
One of the last remaining questions was what would happen to the state's vaccine mandate for schoolchildren, a policy that came from the California Department of Public Health and was not impacted by the lifting of the emergency declaration.
Friday, the Department of Public Health confirmed it was backing off its original plan.
“CDPH is not currently exploring emergency rulemaking to add COVID-19 to the list of required school vaccinations, but we continue to strongly recommend COVID-19 immunization for students and staff to keep everyone safer in the classroom,” the department said in a statement. “Any changes to required K-12 immunizations are properly addressed through the legislative process.”
Major German Newspaper Reports Pfizer-BioNTech Fraud
First major sign that Germany is awakening to reality of "Corona Fascism"
Covid-19 : la primovaccination pour la population générale n’est plus recommandée par la HAS
« Presque toute la population qui n’est pas à risque de forme grave a déjà été en contact au moins une fois avec le virus », justifie la Haute Autorité de santé, qui préconise une campagne de vaccination à l’automne pour les personnes les plus à risque.
Par Delphine Roucaute
Publié le 24 février 2023
Covid-19: Primary vaccination for the general population is no longer recommended by the HAS
"Almost the entire population who is not at risk of severe form has already been in contact with the virus at least once," justifies the High Health Authority, which recommends a vaccination campaign in the fall for those most at risk.
By Delphine Roucaute
Published on February 24, 2023
Now, now after he forced the COVID gene shot on Germans, the German minister Karl Lauterbach acknowledges serious risks of corona vaccines; so what do you as Germans do? Do you jail him?
1 in 500 vaccinees experience significant side effects; 1 in 3,500 vaccinees suffer from fatal or life-threatening side effects; Karl Lauterbach admitted last night that he was aware of serious risks
Today, we are announcing that the Administration will end the COVID-19 vaccine requirements for Federal employees, Federal contractors, and international air travelers at the end of the day on May 11, the same day that the COVID-19 public health emergency ends. Additionally, HHS and DHS announced today that they will start the process to end their vaccination requirements for Head Start educators, CMS-certified healthcare facilities, and certain noncitizens at the land border. In the coming days, further details related to ending these requirements will be provided.
« First « Previous Comments 362 - 391 of 391 Search these comments
Why CDC doesn't require testing at end of isolation: Director
The newly updated CDC guidelines don't require testing at the end of isolation because PCR tests can stay positive for up to 12 weeks, CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky told "Good Morning America" Wednesday.
"So we would have people in isolation for a very long time if we were relying on PCRs," Walensky said.
https://abcnews.go.com/Health/live-updates/coronavirus/?id=81952698&cid=social_twitter_abcn&source=patrick.net#81984630
"This means that for the past 21 months, people sat home for extra days and weeks because their test came back with an irrelevant positive. We didn’t know this 6, 12, 18 months ago? Really?"
https://twitter.com/YossiGestetner/status/1476207664837320713?ref_srtwsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1476207664837320713%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.zerohedge.com%2Fcovid-19%2Fbombshell-admission-cdc-drops-post-isolation-pcr-test-because-they-can-remain-positive-12&source=patrick.net