« First « Previous Comments 342 - 381 of 391 Next » Last » Search these comments
first off, masking. it was known not to work, never worked, and never should have been imposed. it was a literally wubbie, a superstitious talisman sold as a low cost way of looking like officials we “doing something” about the rampant fear they had generated. most potent in this armamentarium was the shockingly well turned phrase “your mask protects me.” this is one of the greatest propagandistic pabulums of all time. if they gave out marketing awards for public health diktat, it would win everything.
it’s so simple and so cunning. it inverts the choice and the ethics. it’s not about you. it’s about protecting others. it’s not your choice. it’s your obligation. potent stuff.
it’s also complete and utter codswallop and always was. read the piece above for reams of detail on the topic including actual RCT’s of masks as source control when worn by trained physicians in controlled settings (like the OR).
they show plainly that mask wear by surgeons is associated with more, not less post op infection in patients. guess how it probably works in restaurant kitchens with untrained wearers…
fake sneeze mannequin studies that fail to measure what happens around the edges of the mask or that fact that sarscov-2 virus takes ~2 weeks to fall 5 feet to the floor are the real game, the rest is just made up science fair stunts masquerading as clinical outcomes data.
The worldwide flight from mRNA shots continues
Australia has quietly stopped recommending more Covid vaccines for almost everyone under 50, and Norway under 65.
Only a few months ago, Australia had one of the world’s most aggressive coercion programs to force Covid vaccines on its people.
Now Australia has essentially ended its Covid vaccination program for healthy adults under 50 - and effectively banned the shots for people under 30, unless they have severe chronic illnesses.
With the change, Australia joins Denmark in curtailing its vaccine program for adults under 50.
October 07, 2022
Tallahassee, Fla. — Today, State Surgeon General Dr. Joseph A. Ladapo has announced new guidance regarding mRNA vaccines. The Florida Department of Health (Department) conducted an analysis through a self-controlled case series, which is a technique originally developed to evaluate vaccine safety.
This analysis found that there is an 84% increase in the relative incidence of cardiac-related death among males 18-39 years old within 28 days following mRNA vaccination. With a high level of global immunity to COVID-19, the benefit of vaccination is likely outweighed by this abnormally high risk of cardiac-related death among men in this age group. Non-mRNA vaccines were not found to have these increased risks.
As such, the State Surgeon General recommends against males aged 18 to 39 from receiving mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Those with preexisting cardiac conditions, such as myocarditis and pericarditis, should take particular caution when making this decision.
Alex Berenson
@AlexBerenson
2h
For anyone who does not believe that Australia has stopped recommending second Covid boosters for healthy adults under 50 (and effectively ended them for anyone under 30 who isn’t seriously ill), the guidance is here
Given how unbelievably badly the “Omicron specific” boosters are performing, and the ongoing, umm, issue with all-cause mortality in the mRNA countries…
Is it possible that Pfizer plans to price their mRNA shots at $110 or more a jab going forward to DISCOURAGE widespread use?
Insurers might suck up paying $20 a shot for a zero-efficacy vaccine for 150 million people. In the American medical system, $3 billion is barely a rounding error.
But at $120, the cost would be $18 billion, more than insurers spent on any other drug in 2021. At that spending level, insurers will start to fight; they may well balk at paying without (currently non-existent) evidence that the boosters are useful.
In other words, is the pricing a backdoor way to withdraw the shots?
You don't even know who Qaddafi or Saddam Hussein were.
If you're a 18 year old kid today
Is it possible that Pfizer plans to price their mRNA shots at $110 or more a jab going forward to DISCOURAGE widespread use?
@MarinaMedvin
1h
🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨
NY State Supreme Court reinstates all fired unvaccinated employees, orders backpay, says the state violated rights, acted arbitrary & capricious, notes:“Being vaccinated does not prevent an individual from contracting or transmitting Covid-19.”
https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/fbem/DocumentDisplayServlet?documentId=JK5E3gx5XV1%2Fku37jnWR_PLUS_w%3D%3D&system=prod
@rwmalonemd
·
1h
Precisely what I said on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial during the DC “stop the mandates” rally. And for which the Washington Post called me a liar.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/new-york-supreme-court-reinstates-all-employees-fired-being-unvaccinated-orders-backpay
ERECTION INTENSIFYING!!!
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/myocarditis-covid-vaccine-research-long-term-effects-rcna55666
The article is not at all objective of course, but at least the DANGER of the toxxine is now slowly seeping into corporate media.
NEW - CDC is investigating a potential link between COVID mRNA injections and ischemic strokes.
Jan 13, 2023
CDC & FDA Identify Preliminary COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Signal for Persons Aged 65 Years and Older
Transparency and vaccine safety are top priorities for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). U.S. government agencies use multiple, complementary safety monitoring systems to help detect possible safety signals for vaccines and other medical countermeasures as early as possible and to facilitate further investigation, as appropriate. Often these safety systems detect signals that could be due to factors other than the vaccine itself.
Weber Shandwick Provides PR for Moderna and Pfizer, While Staffing the CDC’s Vaccine Office
A potential $50 million contract allows PR firm to be “embedded at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta as part of the Division of Viral Diseases team.”
Early last month, CDC Director Rochelle P. Walensky endorsed recommendations by the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for updated COVID-19 boosters from Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna.
“This recommendation followed a comprehensive scientific evaluation and robust scientific discussion,” Dr. Walensky said in a statement. “If you are eligible, there is no bad time to get your COVID-19 booster and I strongly encourage you to receive it.”
I have just received a very interesting MHRA reply to an FOI request about whether the Healthy Secretary delegated Covid vaccine decisions to the MHRA.
The MHRA said: “All the Covid vaccines and therapeutics authorisation decisions were taken by the Licensing Minister and were not delegated.”
What makes this so interesting is the wider context. Under the Human Medicines Regulations, the Licensing Authority is the Secretary of State for Health. He or she delegates to MHRA all the work associated with that – licensing of medicines, pharmacovigilance, inspection of manufacturers, enforcement and so on.
But for the Covid vaccines, MHRA is saying that the Secretary of State personally took all the decisions.
I read that as the blame game having started. I’ll explain why.
Wall Street Journal editorial board member Allysia Finley has taken a flamethrower to vaccine makers over their "deceptive" campaign for bivalent Covid boosters, and slams several federal agencies for taking "the unprecedented step of ordering vaccine makers to produce them and recommending them without data supporting their safety or efficacy." ...
For those who took (or were forced to take) the original vaccine, our memory B-cells were trained to produce antibodies against the original Wuhan strain. And as a New England Journal of Medicine article notes, people who have taken said original vaccine were "primed" to respond to the Wuhan strain, and 'mounted an inferior antibody response to other variants.'
The studies directly contradict marketing information from Pfizer and Moderna, which asserted that the bivalent boosters produced a response to the new strains (BA.4 and BA.5) that's 4-6x that of the original boosters - which the WSJ says is "misleading." ...
Here's the moneyshot: "The vaccine makers designed their studies to get the results they wanted. Public-health authorities didn’t raise an eyebrow, but why would they? They have a vested interest in promoting the bivalents."
Wall Street Journal's (WSJ) Allysia Finley is on the money again & thus I had to share: "The Deceptive Campaign for Bivalent Covid Boosters Studies show they fail to live up to their promise, but vaccine makers and experts keep pushing them."
In Washington politics & media, to do what she has done here, is career ending and very risky as to safety; she has SEEDS most seem to lack in media
In summary, the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) advises that healthy people, aged under 50 should no longer be “offered” (whatever that term really means) the COVID “vaccine”.
Universal Covid jabs to be wound down as under-50s given just weeks to get boosters
JCVI bosses issued the fresh guidance as they revealed that the universal Covid vaccine programme would end this year - and urged healthy Brits who haven't had their booster to get jabbed while they have a chance
25 Jan 2023
UK Statistics Regulator Admits that the Claims Made About COVID "Vaccine" Effectiveness are Unfounded
Universal Covid jabs to be wound down as under-50s given just weeks to get boosters
Dr Aseem Malhotra
@DrAseemMalhotra
BREAKING:
‘Covid - 19 booster jab offer set to end in the U.K.’
WE made this happen 🔥
But this alone is not good enough. We must help the vaccine injured & make the government, the regulator & Pharma fully accountable so this NEVER happens again
« First « Previous Comments 342 - 381 of 391 Next » Last » Search these comments
Why CDC doesn't require testing at end of isolation: Director
The newly updated CDC guidelines don't require testing at the end of isolation because PCR tests can stay positive for up to 12 weeks, CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky told "Good Morning America" Wednesday.
"So we would have people in isolation for a very long time if we were relying on PCRs," Walensky said.
https://abcnews.go.com/Health/live-updates/coronavirus/?id=81952698&cid=social_twitter_abcn&source=patrick.net#81984630
"This means that for the past 21 months, people sat home for extra days and weeks because their test came back with an irrelevant positive. We didn’t know this 6, 12, 18 months ago? Really?"
https://twitter.com/YossiGestetner/status/1476207664837320713?ref_srtwsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1476207664837320713%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.zerohedge.com%2Fcovid-19%2Fbombshell-admission-cdc-drops-post-isolation-pcr-test-because-they-can-remain-positive-12&source=patrick.net