patrick.net

https://www.floridahealth.gov/newsroom/2022/10/20220512-guidance-mrna-covid19-vaccine.pr.html

October 07, 2022

Tallahassee, Fla. — Today, State Surgeon General Dr. Joseph A. Ladapo has announced new guidance regarding mRNA vaccines. The Florida Department of Health (Department) conducted an analysis through a self-controlled case series, which is a technique originally developed to evaluate vaccine safety.

This analysis found that there is an 84% increase in the relative incidence of cardiac-related death among males 18-39 years old within 28 days following mRNA vaccination. With a high level of global immunity to COVID-19, the benefit of vaccination is likely outweighed by this abnormally high risk of cardiac-related death among men in this age group. Non-mRNA vaccines were not found to have these increased risks.

As such, the State Surgeon General recommends against males aged 18 to 39 from receiving mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Those with preexisting cardiac conditions, such as myocarditis and pericarditis, should take particular caution when making this decision.

Yes, there’s always Novavax, but all boosters are mRNA-based. So the Florida Surgeon General is saying a large demographic should not get COVID-19 boosters at all.

C'mon...with this declaration from the Florida Surgeon General...the Florida Attorney General should open an investigation concerning conspiracy to commit murder.

Any institution that mandated the toxines should be sued. To keep your job, you have to be injected with this substance that can destroy your cardiac tissue and perhaps even kill you. Can you imagine?

Alex Berenson
@AlexBerenson
2h
For anyone who does not believe that Australia has stopped recommending second Covid boosters for healthy adults under 50 (and effectively ended them for anyone under 30 who isn’t seriously ill), the guidance is here

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/the-best-conspiracy-theory-youll/comments

Given how unbelievably badly the “Omicron specific” boosters are performing, and the ongoing, umm, issue with all-cause mortality in the mRNA countries…

Is it possible that Pfizer plans to price their mRNA shots at $110 or more a jab going forward to DISCOURAGE widespread use?

Insurers might suck up paying $20 a shot for a zero-efficacy vaccine for 150 million people. In the American medical system, $3 billion is barely a rounding error.

But at $120, the cost would be $18 billion, more than insurers spent on any other drug in 2021. At that spending level, insurers will start to fight; they may well balk at paying without (currently non-existent) evidence that the boosters are useful.

In other words, is the pricing a backdoor way to withdraw the shots?

richwicks says

If you're a 18 year old kid today

You don't even know who Qaddafi or Saddam Hussein were.

Undoctored says

Is it possible that Pfizer plans to price their mRNA shots at $110 or more a jab going forward to DISCOURAGE widespread use?

Probably not. They know that insurance largely pays for this.

https://nitter.pussthecat.org/MarinaMedvin/status/1584930051166208000#m

@MarinaMedvin
1h
🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨
NY State Supreme Court reinstates all fired unvaccinated employees, orders backpay, says the state violated rights, acted arbitrary & capricious, notes:“Being vaccinated does not prevent an individual from contracting or transmitting Covid-19.”

https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/fbem/DocumentDisplayServlet?documentId=JK5E3gx5XV1%2Fku37jnWR_PLUS_w%3D%3D&system=prod

@rwmalonemd
·
1h
Precisely what I said on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial during the DC “stop the mandates” rally. And for which the Washington Post called me a liar.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/new-york-supreme-court-reinstates-all-employees-fired-being-unvaccinated-orders-backpay

ERECTION INTENSIFYING!!!

zzyzzx says

https://www.foxnews.com/us/new-york-supreme-court-reinstates-all-employees-fired-being-unvaccinated-orders-backpay

ERECTION INTENSIFYING!!!

All, as in every private sector worker as well? This is not clear.

Let the lawsuits spread like fire.

https://youtu.be/__U0xAUvmac

This guy retired in lieu of being fired, so the ruling doesn't help him. Plus he says that it will be appealed.

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/myocarditis-covid-vaccine-research-long-term-effects-rcna55666

The article is not at all objective of course, but at least the DANGER of the toxxine is now slowly seeping into corporate media.

Patrick says

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/myocarditis-covid-vaccine-research-long-term-effects-rcna55666

The article is not at all objective of course, but at least the DANGER of the toxxine is now slowly seeping into corporate media.

"Of the hundreds of millions of Covid vaccine doses given in the U.S. since late 2020, there have been around 1,000 reports of vaccine-related myocarditis or pericarditis in children under age 18..."
What?

FDA Says Telling People Not To Take Ivermectin For Covid Was Just A Recommendation.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) telling people to “stop” taking ivermectin for COVID-19 was informal and just a recommendation, government lawyers argued during a recent hearing.

“The cited statements were not directives. They were not mandatory. They were recommendations. They said what parties should do. They said, for example, why you should not take ivermectin to treat COVID-19. They did not say you may not do it, you must not do it. They did not say it’s prohibited or it’s unlawful. They also did not say that doctors may not prescribe ivermectin,” Isaac Belfer, one of the lawyers, told the court during the Nov. 1 hearing in federal court in Texas.

“They use informal language, that is true,” he also said, adding that, “it’s conversational but not mandatory.”

The hearing was held in a case brought by three doctors who say the FDA illegally interfered with their ability to prescribe medicine to their patients when it issued statements on ivermectin, an anti-parasitic that has shown positive results in some trials against COVID-19.

Ivermectin is approved by the FDA but not for COVID-19. Drugs are commonly used for non-approved purposes in the United States; the practice is known as off-label treatment.

The FDA created a webpage in 2021 titled “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19” and later posted a link to the page on Twitter while writing: “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.” A second post stated: “Hold your horses, y’all. Ivermectin may be trending, but it still isn’t authorized or approved to treat COVID-19.”

In a separate page, the FDA said: “Q: Should I take ivermectin to prevent or treat COVID-19? A: No.”

Those actions interfered with the doctors’ practice of medicine, violating the laws including the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the lawsuit alleges.

It asked the court to rule the actions unlawful and bar the FDA from directing or opining as to whether ivermectin should be used to treat COVID-19.

Jared Kelson, an attorney representing the plaintiffs, told the court during the hearing that that informal claim “doesn’t explain the language they actually used: ‘Stop it. Stop it with the ivermectin.’”

The FDA’s actions “clearly convey that this is not an acceptable way to treat these patients,” he argued.

Plaintiffs in the case include Dr. Paul Marik, who began utilizing ivermectin in his COVID-19 treatment protocol in 2020 while he was chief of pulmonary and critical care medicine at Eastern Virginia Medical School and director of the intensive care unit at Sentara Norfolk General Hospital.

After the FDA’s statements, Marik was told to remove the protocol from the school’s servers while Sentara issued a memorandum to hospitals telling them to stop using ivermectin against COVID-19, with a citation to the FDA.

Marik was forced to resign from his positions because he couldn’t prescribe ivermectin due to the FDA’s statements, the suit alleges.

The government has moved to dismiss the complaint, asserting plaintiffs lack standing because the injuries cannot be traced back to the FDA.

https://truthpress.com/news/fda-says-telling-people-not-to-take-ivermectin-for-covid-was-just-a-recommendation/

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11490847/Anti-vaxxer-nurse-injected-8-600-patients-saline-instead-Covid-vaccine-walks-free.html

https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1614010954915762192?ref_src=patrick.net

NEW - CDC is investigating a potential link between COVID mRNA injections and ischemic strokes.

Jan 13, 2023

Oh, now they're going to "investigate" their own corruption and mass murder?

The top people at the CDC should hang.

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/bivalent-boosters.html

CDC & FDA Identify Preliminary COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Signal for Persons Aged 65 Years and Older

Transparency and vaccine safety are top priorities for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). U.S. government agencies use multiple, complementary safety monitoring systems to help detect possible safety signals for vaccines and other medical countermeasures as early as possible and to facilitate further investigation, as appropriate. Often these safety systems detect signals that could be due to factors other than the vaccine itself.

All of the top people at the CDC should be hanged by the neck until dead for their corruption and mass murder for Pfizer profits.

https://disinformationchronicle.substack.com/p/weber-shandwick-provides-pr-for-moderna

Weber Shandwick Provides PR for Moderna and Pfizer, While Staffing the CDC’s Vaccine Office
A potential $50 million contract allows PR firm to be “embedded at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta as part of the Division of Viral Diseases team.”

Early last month, CDC Director Rochelle P. Walensky endorsed recommendations by the CDC Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for updated COVID-19 boosters from Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna.

“This recommendation followed a comprehensive scientific evaluation and robust scientific discussion,” Dr. Walensky said in a statement. “If you are eligible, there is no bad time to get your COVID-19 booster and I strongly encourage you to receive it.”

Walensky should hang next to Gottlieb, Fauci, Collins, Bourla - all of the corrupt scum who worked for Pfizer to kill Americans for profit. Not just Americans - they murdered people around the world for Pfizer's profits.

https://notthebee.com/article/covid-experts-are-continuing-to-figure-out-the-stuff-the-rest-of-us-have-been-saying-for-the-last-3-years

You can fully expect many of the bribed whores, upon no longer being sufficiently bribed, will suddenly start virtue signaling like dervishes that they are on the vanguard of exposing Covid failures. Of course, examinations of timelines, proclamations and fundings won't disappear because of a bit of virtue signaling.

https://dailysceptic.org/2023/01/19/blame-game-begins-as-mhra-passes-the-buck-all-the-covid-vaccine-authorisation-decisions-were-taken-by-the-government-minister/

I have just received a very interesting MHRA reply to an FOI request about whether the Healthy Secretary delegated Covid vaccine decisions to the MHRA.

The MHRA said: “All the Covid vaccines and therapeutics authorisation decisions were taken by the Licensing Minister and were not delegated.”

What makes this so interesting is the wider context. Under the Human Medicines Regulations, the Licensing Authority is the Secretary of State for Health. He or she delegates to MHRA all the work associated with that – licensing of medicines, pharmacovigilance, inspection of manufacturers, enforcement and so on.

But for the Covid vaccines, MHRA is saying that the Secretary of State personally took all the decisions.

I read that as the blame game having started. I’ll explain why.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/wsj-shreds-vaccine-makers-biden-admin-over-deceptive-booster-campaign

Wall Street Journal editorial board member Allysia Finley has taken a flamethrower to vaccine makers over their "deceptive" campaign for bivalent Covid boosters, and slams several federal agencies for taking "the unprecedented step of ordering vaccine makers to produce them and recommending them without data supporting their safety or efficacy." ...

For those who took (or were forced to take) the original vaccine, our memory B-cells were trained to produce antibodies against the original Wuhan strain. And as a New England Journal of Medicine article notes, people who have taken said original vaccine were "primed" to respond to the Wuhan strain, and 'mounted an inferior antibody response to other variants.'

The studies directly contradict marketing information from Pfizer and Moderna, which asserted that the bivalent boosters produced a response to the new strains (BA.4 and BA.5) that's 4-6x that of the original boosters - which the WSJ says is "misleading." ...

Here's the moneyshot: "The vaccine makers designed their studies to get the results they wanted. Public-health authorities didn’t raise an eyebrow, but why would they? They have a vested interest in promoting the bivalents."

https://palexander.substack.com/p/wall-street-journals-wsj-allysia

Wall Street Journal's (WSJ) Allysia Finley is on the money again & thus I had to share: "The Deceptive Campaign for Bivalent Covid Boosters Studies show they fail to live up to their promise, but vaccine makers and experts keep pushing them."

In Washington politics & media, to do what she has done here, is career ending and very risky as to safety; she has SEEDS most seem to lack in media

https://metatron.substack.com/p/the-cat-is-out-of-the-bag

In summary, the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) advises that healthy people, aged under 50 should no longer be “offered” (whatever that term really means) the COVID “vaccine”.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/universal-covid-jabs-wound-down-29048976

Universal Covid jabs to be wound down as under-50s given just weeks to get boosters
JCVI bosses issued the fresh guidance as they revealed that the universal Covid vaccine programme would end this year - and urged healthy Brits who haven't had their booster to get jabbed while they have a chance

25 Jan 2023

https://metatron.substack.com/p/uk-statistics-regulator-admits-that

UK Statistics Regulator Admits that the Claims Made About COVID "Vaccine" Effectiveness are Unfounded

Patrick says

Universal Covid jabs to be wound down as under-50s given just weeks to get boosters

https://twitter.com/DrAseemMalhotra/status/1618334961194663936?t=WHxcnDGm6-haoUmyAxsf5g&ref_src=patrick.net

Dr Aseem Malhotra
@DrAseemMalhotra
BREAKING:

‘Covid - 19 booster jab offer set to end in the U.K.’

WE made this happen 🔥

But this alone is not good enough. We must help the vaccine injured & make the government, the regulator & Pharma fully accountable so this NEVER happens again

https://www.eugyppius.com/p/lauterbach-in-2020-schools-drive?publication_id=268621&post_id=99826460&isFreemail=true

Lauterbach in 2020: "Schools drive the pandemic, the research is clear."

Lauterbach in 2023: The belief that many infections occur in schools and day-care centres “did not prove to be correct"

I guess the research wasn't so clear then. The pandemicists will now begin to say many stupid things, as they beat a hasty retreat from policies that are more and more universally repudiated.

Plan to require COVID-19 vaccines for California schoolchildren is dead!

https://www.pressdemocrat.com/article/news/california-wont-require-covid-vaccine-to-attend-schools/

One of the last remaining questions was what would happen to the state's vaccine mandate for schoolchildren, a policy that came from the California Department of Public Health and was not impacted by the lifting of the emergency declaration.

Friday, the Department of Public Health confirmed it was backing off its original plan.

“CDPH is not currently exploring emergency rulemaking to add COVID-19 to the list of required school vaccinations, but we continue to strongly recommend COVID-19 immunization for students and staff to keep everyone safer in the classroom,” the department said in a statement. “Any changes to required K-12 immunizations are properly addressed through the legislative process.”