« First « Previous Comments 16 - 55 of 74 Next » Last » Search these comments
LOL
The best proof it was Pukin who dunnit is that they still have not started any repair work
The best proof it was Pukin who dunnit is that they still have not started any repair work. They wanted it down to "freeze Europe" and not pay for non-fullfillment of their contracts.
It’s now all but confirmed that Biden gave the order to blow it up using explosives planted in June 2022.
https://www.newsweek.com/did-joe-biden-attack-russias-nord-stream-pipelines-1779948
Biden: “We will end Nordstream 2”
Nordstream 2: gets blown up
DailyMail: “we have exclusive report showing Biden blew up Nordstream”
People: Pretty sure Biden blew up Nordstream
Media: “Putin puppets saying Biden blew up Nordstream”
A sane person in a sane world would call sabotaging the Nord Stream pipelines an act-of-war against a friendly nation, since the result was to virtually destroy the basis of Germany’s industry, not to mention the domestic comfort of German citizens. Now, thanks to 85-year-old Seymour Hersh, the independent investigator who uncovered the My Lai Massacre in 1969 and reported on the depraved antics of American jailers at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq in 2004, we have a pretty good idea how the Nord Stream caper went down.
For a year before the op, “Joe Biden” and Undersecretary of State Victoria Nuland — architect of the 2014 Maidan Coup in Ukraine, which kicked-off the present fiasco there — blabbed about “ending” the Nord Streams. Curiously, the Germans said nothing. Meanwhile, the US made a deal to beef up military bases in Norway, an original NATO signatory (1949), for staging the Nord Stream sabotage op. Of course, Norway, being Western Europe’s remaining sole oil-and-gas exporter, had an interest in eliminating its competition.
In June of 2022, under cover of an annual NATO naval exercise in the Baltic Sea, US Navy divers attached mines to the Nord Stream pipelines. The mines had triggers that could be activated remotely at any time of choosing, and that moment came on September 26… kaboom. Ms. Nuland and Secretary of State Antony Blinken gloated publicly. Naturally, the US blamed Russia. America’s news media — catamite of the Intel Community — amplified the charge, despite the absurdity of Russia blowing up its most lucrative source of export revenue. The New York Times has so far made no mention of Mr. Hersh’s recent update of the Nord Stream sabotage.
Germany, too, hardly made a peep, nor did the rest of Western Europe, which now faces a future that looks, energy-wise, like a return to the Fourteenth Century. Maybe they’re all jaded with modern life, all that tiresome bathing and malingering in the brightly-lit cafes. Under the sagacious guidance of the WEF they were all going “green,” anyway — but was that green like the heart-shaped leaves of the linden tree or green like the moldy veins in Roquefort cheese? I guess they’ll find out.
Luckily, America had the Chinese balloon to distract them, and then “Joe B’s” State-of-the-Union extravaganza where the nation learned that we are living in the most extraordinary economic boom since the days of Babe Ruth and Charlie Chaplin.
Russia is outraged over the report, with one top Russian official declaring that Democrat President Joe Biden “is a terrorist who must be brought to justice.”
China has responded that demanding that the United States “explain itself to the world” if the revelations in Hersh’s report are true.
The Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative journalist published an article this week in which he asserted that the pipelines were destroyed by the US as part of a covert operation.
According to Hersh’s sources, the explosives were planted in June 2022 by US Navy divers under the guise of the BALTOPS 22 NATO exercise.
He alleges that the explosives were detonated three months later with a remote signal sent by a sonar buoy.
Meanwhile, in Germany, the Alternative for Germany (AfD) party is also calling for a full inquiry.
“The Pulitzer Prize winner’s suspicions must be investigated,” wrote co-chairman of the AfD parliamentary group, Tino Chrupalla.
“Has NATO’s leading power carried out an attack on our country’s vital critical infrastructure in European waters?
“Then one would have to question whether the alliance guarantees security in Europe or rather endangers it.
“The consequence would be the withdrawal of all U.S. troops.”
That would be wonderful. The US should not have troops in Europe at all. Europe should defend Europe.
But of course you already knew that. The idea that Russia did it was laughable; not just because ‘Russia did it!’ is the default setting of any American official being caught doing anything at all, like an adolescent blaming every naughty move on his younger brother, but because the maths didn’t add up. Why would Russia blow up a pipeline that they’d spent 15 years and $20 billion building, when they could just turn it off? ‘Russia did it’ was always a stupid answer. ...
Meanwhile, while blowing up Nord Stream may have been an effective way to stop Germany from going soft on Russian sanctions, it’s also likely to make it impossible for the Germans to keep their lights on long term, which can only foment unrest within Europe; an outcome that Biden didn’t consider because he simply didn’t care about anything other than his own objectives.
When first reading through Hersh’s account of the events, the level of detail he provides could add credence to his story. Unfortunately for Hersh’s story, the high level of detail is also where the entire story begins to unravel and fall apart. It is often stated that people who lie have a tendency to add too much superfluous detail to their accounts. This attempt to “cover all bases” is in many cases what trips these people up. Extra details add extra points of reference that can be crosschecked and examined. In Hersh’s case, this is exactly what appears to have happened. On the surface level, the level of detail checks out to laymen or people without more niche knowledge of the subject matter mentioned. When you look closer though, the entire story begins to show massive glaring holes and specific details can be debunked.
https://oalexanderdk.substack.com/p/blowing-holes-in-seymour-hershs-pipe
When first reading through Hersh’s account of the events, the level of detail he provides could add credence to his story. Unfortunately for Hersh’s story, the high level of detail is also where the entire story begins to unravel and fall apart. It is often stated that people who lie have a tendency to add too much superfluous detail to their accounts. This attempt to “cover all bases” is in many cases what trips these people up. Extra details add extra points of reference that can be crosschecked and examined. In Hersh’s case, this is exactly what appears to have happened. On the surface level, the level of detail checks out to laymen or people without more niche knowledge of the subject matter mentioned. When you look closer though, the entire story begins to...
Edward Snowden: UFO Hysteria an ‘Engineered’ Distraction from Nord Stream Pipeline Bombshell
Exiled NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden has accused Democrat President Joe Biden’s administration of orchestrating “engineered panic” by using recent reports of UFOs as a distraction.
Snowden was responding to the U.S. military shooting down four “unidentified objects” from the skies above North America in recent days.
According to Snowden, however, the hysteria surrounding the UFOs was “engineered” as a distraction from the recent bombshell report from renowned investigative journalist Seymour Hersh on the destruction of Nord Stream pipelines last fall.
According to Hersh’s bombshell report, the Biden admin orders the U.S. Navy to destroy the pipelines with underwater explosives.
Amid the backlash over the report, many have argued that the move, if true, would be an “act of war.”
https://doomberg.substack.com/p/lets-see-more
this is what it was and still is : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COINTELPRO
COINTELPRO (syllabic abbreviation derived from Counter Intelligence Program; 1956–1971) was a series of covert and illegal[1][2] projects actively conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) aimed at surveilling, infiltrating, discrediting, and disrupting domestic American political organizations.[3][4] FBI records show COINTELPRO resources targeted groups and individuals the FBI deemed subversive,[5] including feminist organizations,[6][7] the Communist Party USA,[8] anti–Vietnam War organizers, activists of the civil rights and Black power movements (e.g. Martin Luther King Jr., the Nation of Islam, and the Black Panther Party), environmentalist and animal rights organizations, the American Indian Movement (AIM)...
One of the most objective people I get news from Ryan Cristian(thelastamericanvagabond.com)
In lengthy interview with the Berliner Zeitung, Seymour Hersh offers more intriguing details about his source's account of the attack ...
The biggest development is an interview that Hersh gave to the Berliner Zeitung. It was published yesterday and contains many new details. For example, Hersh tells his interviewer that the plan was to detonate “eight bombs … near the island of Bornholm in the Baltic sea,” of which only “six…went off.” This is the first confirmation we’ve had anywhere of an obvious point, namely that the operation wasn’t fully successful, and that this is the only reason that Pipe B of Nord Stream 2 escaped intact. He’s also more explicit on the involvement of Denmark and Sweden, saying “I was told that they did what they did [to facilitate the planting of explosives] and they knew what they were doing and they understood what was going on, but maybe nobody ever said ‘yes.’” ...
Joe Biden decided not to blow them up back in June, it was five months into the war. But in September he ordered it done. The operational staff, the people who do “kinetic” things for the United States, they do what the president says, and they initially thought this was a useful weapon he could use in negotiations. But at some point, after the Russians invaded and then when the operation was completed, the whole thing became increasingly repugnant to the people who were doing it. These were people who worked in top positions in the intelligence services and were well trained. They turned against the project, they thought it was crazy.
Shortly after the attack, after they had done what they were ordered to do, there was a lot of anger about the operation and repudiation among those involved. That’s one of the reasons I learned so much. And I’ll tell you something else. The people in America and Europe who build pipelines know what happened. I’ll tell you something important. The people who own companies that build pipelines all know the story. I didn’t get the story from them, but I quickly learned that they know.
EU Parliament Member DEMANDS 'Terrorist' Biden must be Held Accountable for Attacking the Nord Stream Pipeline
Irish MEP Mick Wallace has accused the European Union (EU) of ignoring the United States' involvement in the explosions on the Nord Stream pipeline. In an interview with RTÉ Radio One, Wallace stated that "there is a great deal of hypocrisy in the EU's response to the Nord Stream explosions," and that the EU had "totally ignored the fact that the United States had a role in the explosions." He went on to criticize the EU for its lack of transparency, saying that "the EU is not a transparent organization, and it does not act in the interests of the people." Wallace also expressed his disappointment with the EU's handling of the situation, stating that "the EU's response to the Nord Stream explosions has been woefully inadequate, and they have failed to take any meaningful action." He called on the EU to "take responsibility for its actions and stop ignoring the involvement of the United States in the explosions." Wallace also expressed his concern over the potential environmental impact of the explosions, stating that "the Nord Stream pipeline is a major source of energy for Europe, and any damage to it could have serious environmental consequences." He called on the EU to "take urgent action to ensure the safety of the pipeline and to investigate the role of the United States in the explosions."
catamite of the Intel Community
Eisenhower decided not to shoot down Sputnik
stereotomy says
Eisenhower decided not to shoot down Sputnik
How would anyone shoot down a satellite with the technology of circa 1960?
Sy Hersh: "Biden Admin Blew Up Nord Stream"
Pulitzer Prize winner insists U.S. destroyed Germany's primary energy supply.
On February 8 of this year, Hersh reported on his Substack that the sabotage of the Nord Stream 1 and Nord Stream 2 pipelines on September 26, 2022 was ordered by the Biden Administration and carried out by Navy divers. At first glance, Hersh’s report simply confirmed what President Biden unequivocally stated at a Feb. 8, 2022 press conference—that is, “If Russia invades … there will no longer be a Nord Stream 2; we will bring an end to it.”
Nevertheless, the Biden Administration vehemently denied Mr. Hersh’s report. Last week, in response to these denials, Mr. Hersh gave a long interview in which he reaffirmed his claim that the Biden Administration is responsible for destroying Russia’s gas pipeline, which supplied Germany with a vast source of affordable, clean-burning energy. ...
How do the German people feel about an American presidential administration wrecking their industry, high standard of living, and consigning them to paying 400% more to heat their homes?
How do the German people feel about an American presidential administration wrecking their industry, high standard of living, and consigning them to paying 400% more to heat their homes?
THE COVER-UP
The Biden Administration continues to conceal its responsibility for the destruction of the Nord Stream pipelines
I'd guess the same as they felt when Merkel was fucking them with illegals, and her woke agendas.
NuttBoxer says
I'd guess the same as they felt when Merkel was fucking them with illegals, and her woke agendas.
Merkel was a Stazi/KGB asset her whole life.
Merkel was a Stazi/KGB asset her whole life.
« First « Previous Comments 16 - 55 of 74 Next » Last » Search these comments
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/white-house-says-blog-post-nord-stream-explosion-is-utterly-false-2023-02-08/
I seem to remember a loud mouthed NYer lambasting Europe for not spending enough on defense and going ahead with Nordstream 2, and he was mocked in Europe and by US Media and ex-Deep Staters