patrick.net

NuttBoxer says

You seem to be selectively filtering facts again to meet your narrative. We lived there for a year, owner never raised the rent. They did raise it for the new tenant, but only to $1,650. They would have had to raise it over a hundred a year ever year, and our experience says that didn't happen.

Also, you again ignore the rentals for under $2,000 I linked you to in that area.

Maybe this rent amount was a few years ago, and rent has gone up since? In general, you can get cheaper rents from landlords vs. professionally managed rentals.

I still have a handful of rentals that are $500-$700/month below market rents. These tenants have been with me for a decade or more so I leave them alone and just increase minimal each year. If any rental gets turnover now, I’ll turn them over to my PM and let them deal with new tenants. They charge me 6% flat rate for SFH and condos. 5% flat for apartments. Sweet deal.

Bitcoiner says

Pretty sure NuttBoxer does not agree with anything I send him. I own rentals in the west valley of phoenix but he knows better. If I send him a Zillow screenshot he will come up with a reason why it’s not true. Those rental rates he is referencing are PRE-Covid. House prices nearly doubled in Phoenix over the last 4 years and rents have exploded too. But don’t take my word for it. Do you own research or just believe what you want :)

It’s alright. Let it go. I consider my tenants as partners without shared equity. My cost basis is practically fixed while inflation will allow the rents to rise overtime while the tenants will buy me the assets by paying them off. It’s a great deal.

The rental market has been hot. We listed a 1/1 for $1,995, and it was gone in a day.

https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/550-S-4th-St-APT-B-San-Jose-CA-95112/2101203414_zpid/

The 2/1 was listed for $2,495 and it was gone immediately the moment we showed the unit to the first applicant. Zillow guesstimates $2,250/month rent.

https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/544-S-7th-St-8-San-Jose-CA-95112/2057550055_zpid/

This small house sold for $1.7MM in my neighborhood a few months ago. Crazy - even for Carlsbad IMO.
https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/6432-Cayenne-Ln-Carlsbad-CA-92009/16657407_zpid/

I know the original owner (old widower who has lots of lady friends) who sold for $1MM. I was surprised when flippers bought it last July and spent half a year upgrading it. I figured they were going to lose their shirt in this market but they got over asking!

Until more people list homes for sale, this isn't changing. Interest rates only slow growth. It's not intended to cause a crash. Existing loans are solid and 90% are probably under 5% or paid off.

I swear people want to just bitch out about something. There's no evidence a housing crash is coming. We knew interest rates would stall the market on purpose. Fact is between 2010-2020 people got cheaper homes at bare bones interest rates. They ain't moving. They keep them and rent them or just simply live in them. Investors just keep them as the rents rise, especially now as rates go up. More demand from renters.

This isn't rocket science. It's basic math.

Personally, I believe the "new normal" is perpetually low inventory.

Personally, I believe the "new normal" is perpetually low inventory.

According to the Oracle of California real estate, Bruce Norris, we need distressed sales for prices to crater.

The housing market always has death, divorce and investor sales. What would cause distressed sales? Massive job layoffs where people don’t have a choice but to sell their house or lose it to foreclosure. Housing prices are very sticky with equity sales.

This thread has so many echos of '06. But what's scary is the same people keep lining up to lose half their "equity", like they've been lobotomized. Every boom has a bust, every bubble pops.

You over-charge people, but you don't force them to pay it right? They make the choice. So why feel bad if some charge less, and savvy renters like myself take advantage rather than pay more than we should?

Renters who choose to live in over-priced markets dig their own graves. Our biggest advantage is our mobility, use it, or spend your life working for your house.

GNL says

I have a commercial realtor client and he says commercial real estate is doing very well. He/we are in northern Virginia.

It is also still a strong seller's market in the Williamsburg area, at least for residential real estate. I am pricing homes around cental VA's Smith Moutain Lake, hoping they will come down soon.

Bitcoiner says

You need 70k for a 20% downpayment in phoenix. You get a brand new house and the builder buys down your rate.

Then you're stuck in Phoenix.

Onvacation says

Bitcoiner says

You need 70k for a 20% downpayment in phoenix. You get a brand new house and the builder buys down your rate.

Then you're stuck in Phoenix.

🤣

Onvacation says

Bitcoiner says

You need 70k for a 20% downpayment in phoenix. You get a brand new house and the builder buys down your rate.

Then you're stuck in Phoenix.

And slowly dry out.
Phoenix stops issue building permits due to lack of water.

Just Californicates Metro-Phoenix.

They can't build anymore, but the swarms of illegals need housing. Illegals can go 3-4 families per dwelling/ Even on or below minimum wage, if you cram enough people in, it will raise rental rates,

Those who can't follow suit get the joys of being homeless in 115 degree summers.

NuttBoxer says

Our biggest advantage is our mobility, use it, or spend your life working for your house.

The house I'm living in is the longest I've ever lived in any home. Adult or as a child. It's awesome. I don't know how you can move frequently. I did it and it sucked and wasn't a benefit at all. At minimum you're getting a Uhaul and moving yourself and that is utter misery and still money, gas, dinged up furniture and exhausting. Or you're hiring movers for $$. You have to pack everything up costing you time and potentially income or needing to take vacation or sick days to do it even if you can work remotely. All that has to be factored into the rental cost.

The beauty of owning is that you don't HAVE to sell to move. Become a landlord and rent your old home out. I also have a feeling that's a factor in keeping inventory low as well. With youtube if you watch one real estate guru video you get bombarded with them, so the younger people that buy tend to just keep the property and rent it out and buy something else. My buddy did this for years.

If you owned the rentals you had and moved every 3-4 years, rented them out you could have a solid property collection. Or you could sell 2-3 years after moving out and not pay capital gains while a tenant paid down your principle bit more. Even if a bubble popped you're likely to be up after 6-7 years. Or keep it and get 5-7 houses over your adult life and you've got a nice cash flow machine for retirement as they get paid off.

Basically the mobility point is kind of invalid. It just sounds like you don't like debt. That's fine. I just don't know of any multimillionaires that DIDN'T use debt to get wealthy. Remember this as well, a paid off primary home when you're 60 will be exponentially cheaper than renting during years you'll be thinking of retiring. Unless you have a government job with health benefits after retirement, most people don't realize medical costs/insurance skyrocket. Or you use government health and see how that works out.

Not lecturing and I respect your right to do what you want. Just pointing out that even if you invested all the savings from renting it still won't beat owning. You can invest 100% of the cashflow in my above scenario and you still have the asset in the house or condo.

Off the subject, therefore ignore me at your will.
At my friend's place I was channel surfing and saw a show which sucked me in about seeking a "bargain beach house" on HGV, a strange channel.
I was amazed and a bit apalled at the places and prices; they were a little bit absurd.
One was a young couple from New Jersey relocating to Florida; they were looking around the Fort Meyers area.
They bought a dump for megabucks.
For the reader not familiar, that area of Florida is on the Gulf of Mexico; in the warm months the Gulf is a disgusting soup like the dinosaurs maybe swam in.
The ocean there is gross and watch out for the flesh eating bacteria and random red tides which actually burn your lungs.
The summer weather would be described as the Devil pissing on a hot rock and the steam rising.
Another clueless couple spent megabucks on a beach in Belize in Ambergris Cay.
Never mind it's going to get blown away someday, or that the infrastructure and healthcare in Belize probably suck.
It's all more proof that people like houses and can't resist buying them, it's amazing to see.
The females always hate the kitchen for some reason and another bathroom or fix the old one.
End of rant.

clambo says

"bargain beach house" on HGV

It’s completely staged. It’s bascially promotional videos masquerading as “entertainment.” The sheeple drool and consume.

Bitcoiner says

FortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden says

i got me one rental btw. was really inspired by your story. its sfh. so will leave it for kids after i hit the bucket. cashflow is nice, although today bank interest pays similar or better rate. might get 2 more, all the cash i got left now just collecting about 4.8% should be enough for the 2 rentals.

Congrats fortwayeAsFuckJoeBiden!
Do you mind sharing a bit more about it? How much did you put down and in what city did you buy your rental? What’s the Sqft?
Thanks!

1200 sqft, boise, 325,000. no mortgage, just cash buy.

Al_Sharpton_for_President says

clambo says

"bargain beach house" on HGV

It’s completely staged. It’s bascially promotional videos masquerading as “entertainment.” The sheeple drool and consume.

It is. We did one for one of our listings for HGTV. It's unpaid and it's for the listing and selling broker to get recognition. Any of the Chicago ones from 2007 to 2017, I personally know them or have met them. The "buyers" that looked at our listing didn't buy ours. It's not just 3 listing either for the format of the show.

It's fun to see other houses in other markets, but it's 1,000% not reality.

Bitcoiner says

That’s a bit of Sensationalizing. AZ paused new approvals on subdivision developments in suburban areas like Buckeye, west Maricopa county and high growth areas like queen creek. Those areas rely on groundwater usage and it’s projected there will be a 4% shortfall over the next 100 years. Subdivisions already approved for new developments are not affected. Also not affected by this new law are the city of phoenix itself and more than a dozen of the largest cities in the metropolitan area because they already have the certification of a 100 year water supply.

A New Business of delivering potable water to residents with underground water tanks is worry some.

Al_Sharpton_for_President says

clambo says

"bargain beach house" on HGV

It’s completely staged. It’s bascially promotional videos masquerading as “entertainment.” The sheeple drool and consume.

I watched that show, but always considered it to be for entertainment value.

Bitcoiner says

71% of owners in CA have a locked in 30y rate of below 4%. Where am I going to live if I sell my house?

Current trends suggest someplace outside of California..

Bitcoiner says

And people don’t sell their house to rent and time the market to buy back in.

Yes, I would assume this is true but, image selling in 08 and buying back into the market in 2010/2011. Also, ask Wookie (I think he will agree), the best position when buying, imo, is when you do not currently own or need to sell.

During the GFC, the distressed sales were due to buyers who bought with NINJA loans. It'll be interesting to see where the distressed inventory comes from in the next downturn.

GNL says

Also, ask Wookie (I think he will agree), the best position when buying, imo, is when you do not currently own or need to sell.

That's the problem with renting. It's actually worse than owning mobility wise now that you brought it up. Best rates renting wise are 12 months or longer. Life happens. You can keep the house if you own and sell later and move NOW. You can't do that unless you have a mo/mo lease. Owning is probably more flexible the more and more I think about it. Just never have had to articulate it because I never think about renting.

I know I'll do snow bird rentals in retirement years. Maybe own and see what I can get for rent in the off season in the Caribbean (hurricane season). It's simply illogical to be renting in retirement years. At minimum my goal by 45 is to own my primary and a retirement/vacation condo on St. John or St. Thomas. Once we get the house done here in IL I give no fucks about credit. I'll own in the Caribbean. If I lose it, who gives a shit. My bank? Fuck them. If it works out, vacationers pay it off and at 60 I do winter in USVI and Summer by family in IL. We'll have a 4/4 here in IL and was thinking 2/2 down there.

Beauty of USVI is we don't compete with CA people. NY people go to FL. FL people go to the Bahamas. It's expensive, but you can still get a reasonably priced condo for the location. I wouldn't need 3 beds, but this for example: https://www.usvirealestate.com/search/homes-for-sale/613-&-614-nazareth-rh-st-thomas-00802-23-789-75109/ When available a 2/2 is $500k I believe. On the beach and minutes to Red Hook to get over to St. John.

And yes, USVI is rough around the edges being an island. Or Puerto Rico. This is easy to rent for $2k/wk. https://www.realtor.com/realestateandhomes-detail/Calle-Higuero_Rio-Grande_PR_00745_M97917-10954 More affordable. Not as sexy, but there are decent beaches nearby. Tax incentives if you're still working. Water storage and back up electric are a must. But it's still an amazing country/territory (maybe state eventually) with all it's flaws.

Bitcoiner says

Brand new condo 2b/2b for 320k sounds cheap to Californians…..Which city is that?

Brevard county. The Condo isn't $320, it's a brand new SFH for $380k, builder pays closing costs.

socal2 says

This small house sold for $1.7MM in my neighborhood a few months ago. Crazy - even for Carlsbad IMO.
https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/6432-Cayenne-Ln-Carlsbad-CA-92009/16657407_zpid/

I know the original owner (old widower who has lots of lady friends) who sold for $1MM. I was surprised when flippers bought it last July and spent half a year upgrading it. I figured they were going to lose their shirt in this market but they got over asking!

@socal2,

The flipper took the risk and got awarded. Buyers likely thought it was the start of a downturn, which was reasonable, stayed on the sidelines, only to see inventory gradually dwindled and the housing market recovered. Simply crazy with high price real estate and high mortgage interest if we think about it.

Why isn't my house selling?
https://www.reddit.com/r/REBubble/comments/140ggf5/why_isnt_my_house_selling/
https://www.reddit.com/r/RealEstate/comments/13zxzhb/why_isnt_my_house_selling/

Homes in northern Virginia sell fast. So fast that more and more agents don't even bother with photography.

Bitcoiner says

People also need to understand that what happened in the 2000’s is not going to repeat. No NINJA loans, no stated income, no arm loans, no foreclosure tsunami etc. there is a reason why you had 4M active listings right before 08.

Never say never, at least within a 60-year time frame, enough for those who learned the bitter speculation lesson to retire/die off so a new generation of politicians and financial grifters can re-invent the scam. Case in point - the reforms issuing from the Pecora Commission in the 1930's that did away with many of the financial scams contributing to the great depression (incidental, but not causal - that was the Fed first having banks call in margin loans and then decreasing the money supply by 30% between 1929 and 1933 - see The Money Masters) were undone in the early naughties by Greenspan and gang. Brooksley Born, who identified derivatives (CDO's CDO^2) as a ticking time bomb akin to bucket shops common in the 1920's was ridden out of town on a rail. A few years later - voila, meltdown.

Santayana said it most eloquently - those ignorant of history are doomed to repeat it. "The Big Short" should be mandatory viewing for all young adults, especially because it has a pre-wall Margot Robie naked in a bubble bath.

https://www.reddit.com/r/RealEstate/comments/13zem7a/house_closes_on_629_my_job_is_rescinding_my/

House closes on 6/29. My job is rescinding my remote work agreement. Am I legally obligated to continue with the sale of my house?

zzyzzx says

https://www.reddit.com/r/RealEstate/comments/13zem7a/house_closes_on_629_my_job_is_rescinding_my/

House closes on 6/29. My job is rescinding my remote work agreement. Am I legally obligated to continue with the sale of my house?

What is the purpose of this story?

zzyzzx says

House closes on 6/29. My job is rescinding my remote work agreement. Am I legally obligated to continue with the sale of my house?

Didn't read everything. Contracts can be broken. This sounds like a seller that didn't have his house in order. I've been at closings that went to shit sitting there. Guess what, you can get out of any contract there just might be fees. I've been at closings where there's verbal altercations between all the parties. Pleasant.

Guy sounds like a dip shit because he didn't ask his employer about WFH over the long term and that he was selling his house. Other thing is don't move if you're not willing to lose your job if it's too far away. Always have back up employment at the new location if it's out of state. If he was an asset to the company they would have made it work. He clearly wasn't. So again, dip shit.

Bitcoiner says

Scottsdale is the Beverly Hills of Az.

A bit of an exaggeration. Been there many times, and while there are many nice gated communities, there are also unremarkable houses as well.

WookieMan says

Guy sounds like a dip shit because he didn't ask his employer about WFH over the long term and that he was selling his house.

I'm witnessing an employer flat-out rescinding on the promise of "WFH forever if you want it" as we speak, while also closing offices in several locations. Anybody who asked back then got the above quoted answer which sounded pretty long-term.

Al_Sharpton_for_President says

A bit of an exaggeration. Been there many times, and while there are many nice gated communities

Scottsdale is a conundrum in the Phoenix regional area. I actually think Bitcoiner is right on this though. It's a large area, so of course there will be cheaper houses within municipal boundaries. There is no ghetto or nasty area though.

You're not getting in under $500k in Scottsdale for a 3/3. Gain access to the gated communities. Desert Mountain. You aren't coming out without a million dollar loan or cash out of pocket. I don't even know what HOA dues are either. My uncles home is probably $17M if he sold today. He owns two of my cousins houses in Phoenix.

Beverly Hills is kind of a valid comparison. No there aren't 9 figure houses, but it's flipping expensive as hell to get in. 7-8 figures in the best spots.

WookieMan says

Guess what, you can get out of any contract there just might be fees.

Please explain this further.

Scottsdale, AZ Zillow search.

Up to $500,000 - 2 homes

$500,000 - $600,000 - 6 homes

$600,000 - $700,000 - 32 homes

4 bed, 2 bath, 2,331 sq. ft. $539,000: https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/16638-E-Creosote-Dr-Scottsdale-AZ-85262/59264407_zpid/

gabbar says

WookieMan says

Guess what, you can get out of any contract there just might be fees.

Please explain this further.

Could be no fees or you might get sued. I've seen it happen a dozen of times at closing a buyer is all a sudden like "I want x, y, z." You just walk away. That wasn't agreed to, it's not in the contract. There are so many scenarios.

Remember that Realtor contracts are written by attorneys. They want work. A new series of contract paperwork came out for CAR (Chicago Association of Realtors). It's been 6 years, but it was something like "if permits were not pulled the seller is held liable for work performed...." blah blah. These are 10-12 page contracts with 8 point font. Sooooooo much shit can be thrown in there. We'd cross that line out and initial before sending back to the buyer. Protects the seller if a previous own did shit. The attorneys WANT problems so they get more money.

The way it was phrased was ALL previous owners. So if someone before you did some hack job wiring, it's now on you. No proof, but I'm pretty sure I was the first one to catch it when it came out. The attorneys all knew it. They knew brokers were lazy and can barely do basic math. Let alone understand a contract beside the blanks they "let" you fill in that they get paid to review. 90% of our contracts we crossed out tons of shit on the standard contract. It honestly was a pain in the ass. Had to make sure both parties initial any and all changes. Attorneys didn't like us.

Disclosures are the worst enemy for a seller. There's nothing stopping a seller from cancelling because their mom got cancer and they need to stay put and help her live. Return the earnest money. They "might" sue, but they're not going to get much if anything. There has to be a reason, but RE contracts are broken all the time. Disclosures are what you'll get sued for. Not breaking the contract. We only almost got sued once and that was because my moron boss advising the client to lie about water issues. House flooded the first week, they talked to the neighbor and they said it always flooded and so does there. Settled out of court for $15k and seller paid $15k to have a proper sump and french drain system installed.

That should be your biggest concern. Be upfront. Like I mention with the permit terms. If a guy from the 90's did un-permitted work on the house, why is that my problem. Scratch it out and explain why. You just don't know on any 30-150 year old house. I do think they updated the contract after that.