Anti-gravity would break all our physics. It would mean Relativity is wrong or at very least, extremely flawed.
And what exactly is wrong with that? It means that it is falsifiable. That's a good thing.
Many observes believe that an arcane advanced physics exists, for the secret few, to hold it back from the teeming masses (as usual) and we are given the archaic and stagnant physics of Einstein and Newton as if they are the final inquiries. The masses are supposed to gnaw on these forever as flawed bones, while the elites, as usual, keep the good stuff for their own utilitarian, secretive academians.
And what exactly is wrong with that? It means that it is falsifiable. That's a good thing.
What I mean by that is that it's highly unlikely. The thing about physics is that it's self reliant. Take for example the OceanGate Titan submersible. You can calculate the energy of the implosion a few ways. Many people did it based on pressure, but another way to do it is how much water was displaced by the submersible, and how far that water had to fall down. You get the same energy release. You can calculate energy, mass, power, in multiple ways, and come up with the same solution.
It's internally consistent, and it's kind of remarkable in a way. That's how you know it's correct, there are no internal inconsistencies, but it does break between QM and Relativity. When you try to use relativity along with QM you end up with zeros and infinities. We definitely have an error somewhere, but they are entirely different domains of comprehension. We probably really end up with something NEAR zero and NEAR infinity with the equations, something is missing, but I doubt gravity is entirely different than what we thought.
But maybe?
It's like Newtonian mechanics, there's a bunch of stuff left out because it's NEAR zero for most cases. F=ma doesn't take into account relativistic effects, because they are so small, it's near zero. Newton didn't have the precision to measure it, and we didn't either, until recently.
If there's an error in how we understand gravity it will be entirely consistent with our known physics, it will just take into account some other thing, just like Newtonian mechanics. We do really weird stuff, we've had things near absolute zero, and it's very strange, but it's consistent with our math still, no new math came out of it. When helium is near absolute zero, it does odd things like drains out of an open container. It becomes a single molecule. We understand it.
Many observes believe that an arcane advanced physics exists, for the secret few, to hold it back from the teeming masses (as usual) and we are given the archaic and stagnant physics of Einstein and Newton as if they are the final inquiries. The masses are supposed to gnaw on these forever as flawed bones, while the elites, as usual, keep the good stuff for their own utilitarian, secretive academians.
Nah.
I'm an engineer, I've seen stuff invented and created based on physics. I've seen stuff invented that FAILED in the marketplace because when it came out, something better than it already existed.
We wouldn't have gone through all this waste if it wasn't necessary. Why create a VCR when a computer and a SD Card could replace it?
There may be a 6th force, there is some unstable evidence for it. A being at the QM level would never recognize gravity existed. We may be the same. There might be a force that is only detectable across interstellar distances. Who knows?
If there was some "secret science", it would have been used 300 years ago. We'd have seen flying saucers then. We'd be living under the rule of what we think are gods now. If I had the technology of today and could go back to 1700, I'd easily be able to take over the world, and they'd be eager that I do it. If I was a sociopath, and I'm not, I'd keep the knowledge secret and create an godlike group to keep the knowledge secret. It would be trivial.
What do you think a 1700's KING would think of a computer, or even a television or a radio? A flush toilet, an electric stove, or an airplane? This would be magic to them. There's no "secret science". They claim that the military is ahead by 20 years, I rather doubt it. Military specification is just the least likely to fail part in bad conditions. The public gets the leftovers, which work plenty well.
Just a falling star I think, a meteorite. That one just got low in the atmosphere before it disintegrated. It may have even made it out of the atmosphere, and back into space as well just grazing the planet.
Being confounded by the increasingly limited dictionary of your web-browser?
Here's my personal list of words that the web browsers mark as incorrect spellings - probably one or two are actually wrong, if you can point them out, I would appreciate it:
I saw one, too, a few years ago. Apparently it was an old satellite burning up on re-entry (or so they said). It looked close, but I guess it wasn't, they saw it all the way to Colorado.
One would hope their ever more shrill, loud and undisguised psychosis is a symptom of their impending failure. The inner autist lunatic has unfolded itself to become the outer manifest lunatic.
CIA hasn't manufactured a masked body double for him, so guess he is on the way out to nestle in Satan's eternal embrace. Problem is, they have somebody in the wings even worse one would imagine. Did he get the vax with da real sheeyat in it, was he rubber hosed by CCP for non-compliance, has he been EMP'd to put him under? Only the Woo knows.
To be fair, it's pretty easy to make a car nearly impossible to steal at this point.
Not saying I agree with suing anybody over it, but it's pretty trivial to stop this.
An RFID card would replace the key, and constantly getting challenges and returning responses. Of course, this can be bypassed by somebody knowledgeable about the vehicle. It all works out to be security through obscurity in the end though.
I'll certainly believe the Satanist part. Remember, it's not what I believe, it's what they believe and act on aka Satanism, Moloch, Baphomet, druidism, humans sacrifice, various critical gematrias and astrologies, the requirement to act by deception. The bigger the lie, the greater the power. Even now, we refer to a guy wearing a mask pretending to be a dead guy playing President, and we all refer to a fake pandemic by its fake name with fake test and a murder vaccine as if it is a real thing. Obama is a fag 'married' to a trannie masquerading as a heterosexual couple with two fake daughters. These things are all regarded as empowering deceptions that also show ritualized contempt and hatred for the population.
To be fair, it's pretty easy to make a car nearly impossible to steal at this point.
Oh, the French would love for you to teach them. When I was in France, car theft was commonplace despite having a separate specialized circuit board that had to be placed in a special socket for the car to start. Even Rolls Royce build a rolling code system that some high-tech thieves managed to circumvent.
To be fair, it's pretty easy to make a car nearly impossible to steal at this point.
Oh, the French would love for you to teach them. When I was in France, car theft was commonplace despite having a separate specialized circuit board that had to be placed in a special socket for the car to start. Even Rolls Royce build a rolling code system that some high-tech thieves managed to circumvent.
It's security through obscurity. I know the difficulty, but tracking the vehicle is trivial if the tracking device cannot be removed and it can be.
I understand the difficulty. Basically you are depending on the thieves not being able to circumvent it.
Security is hard. I'm well aware. All of our security is based on "people can't solve this problem", even RSA and ECC. These depend on our lack of knowledge of math, but they may have solutions. Nobody - apparently - can solve these equations, but there may be solutions.
The Great Orange One going on the offensive more aggressively. The press ought to heel back instead of licking the assholes of their Satanic masters. I think I even heard Trump mention the 'Globalists' in another one of his Truth segments. I am seriously beginning to wonder if 2024 will take place. The Globalist fiends can't allow it, so there is going to be a pressure point where military actually might come in, hopefully short of civil war. Trump has mentioned on several occasions that whoever that is, it isn't the Joe Biden who he knew and remembers.
« First « Previous Comments 27,850 - 27,889 of 41,439 Next » Last » Search these comments
And what exactly is wrong with that? It means that it is falsifiable. That's a good thing.
Many observes believe that an arcane advanced physics exists, for the secret few, to hold it back from the teeming masses (as usual) and we are given the archaic and stagnant physics of Einstein and Newton as if they are the final inquiries. The masses are supposed to gnaw on these forever as flawed bones, while the elites, as usual, keep the good stuff for their own utilitarian, secretive academians.
What I mean by that is that it's highly unlikely. The thing about physics is that it's self reliant. Take for example the OceanGate Titan submersible. You can calculate the energy of the implosion a few ways. Many people did it based on pressure, but another way to do it is how much water was displaced by the submersible, and how far that water had to fall down. You get the same energy release. You can calculate energy, mass, power, in multiple ways, and come up with the same solution.
It's internally consistent, and it's kind of remarkable in a way. That's how you know it's correct, there are no internal inconsistencies, but it does break between QM and Relativity. When you try to use relativity along with QM you end up with zeros and infinities. We definitely have an error somewhere, but they are entirely different domains of comprehension. We probably really end up with something NEAR zero and NEAR infinity with the equations, something is missing, but I doubt gravity is entirely different than what we thought.
But maybe?
It's like Newtonian mechanics, there's a bunch of stuff left out because it's NEAR zero for most cases. F=ma doesn't take into account relativistic effects, because they are so small, it's near zero. Newton didn't have the precision to measure it, and we didn't either, until recently.
If there's an error in how we understand gravity it will be entirely consistent with our known physics, it will just take into account some other thing, just like Newtonian mechanics. We do really weird stuff, we've had things near absolute zero, and it's very strange, but it's consistent with our math still, no new math came out of it. When helium is near absolute zero, it does odd things like drains out of an open container. It becomes a single molecule. We understand it.
Ceffer says
Nah.
I'm an engineer, I've seen stuff invented and created based on physics. I've seen stuff invented that FAILED in the marketplace because when it came out, something better than it already existed.
We wouldn't have gone through all this waste if it wasn't necessary. Why create a VCR when a computer and a SD Card could replace it?
There may be a 6th force, there is some unstable evidence for it. A being at the QM level would never recognize gravity existed. We may be the same. There might be a force that is only detectable across interstellar distances. Who knows?
If there was some "secret science", it would have been used 300 years ago. We'd have seen flying saucers then. We'd be living under the rule of what we think are gods now. If I had the technology of today and could go back to 1700, I'd easily be able to take over the world, and they'd be eager that I do it. If I was a sociopath, and I'm not, I'd keep the knowledge secret and create an godlike group to keep the knowledge secret. It would be trivial.
What do you think a 1700's KING would think of a computer, or even a television or a radio? A flush toilet, an electric stove, or an airplane? This would be magic to them. There's no "secret science". They claim that the military is ahead by 20 years, I rather doubt it. Military specification is just the least likely to fail part in bad conditions. The public gets the leftovers, which work plenty well.
If an object is massless, it travels at the speed of light.
I saw one of these myself:
https://patrick.net/post/1328018/2019-10-20-patrick-saw-a-green-fireball-last-night
Just a falling star I think, a meteorite. That one just got low in the atmosphere before it disintegrated. It may have even made it out of the atmosphere, and back into space as well just grazing the planet.
dis integrated?
Yes.
Being confounded by the increasingly limited dictionary of your web-browser?
Here's my personal list of words that the web browsers mark as incorrect spellings - probably one or two are actually wrong, if you can point them out, I would appreciate it:
Abiogenesis
Ashkenazi
Douma
Ghislaine
Holodomor
Impactful
Ivermectin
Mossad
Mujahideen
Ossetia
Protease
Reichstag
Sarin
Shekhar
Shikh
Shyamalan
Taleban
Telomeres
Transgendered
Widowmaker
abiogenesis
abiogenic
ableism
abolishment
absentia
absorbtion
accuracies
addictiveness
adjuvant
adjuvent
aerosolized
aerosolizing
algorithmically
antiparasitic
antiparasitical
antisemite
astroturf
biodeisel
biome
capita
capybaras
centripedal
chickenhawks
chroma
colluder
colluders
colorectal
commenters
comorbidities
cormorbidities
customizable
deboard
decrypted
delusionally
democide
deplatforming
dimorphic
dimorphism
discludes
discoverable
disproven
dumbed
embedable
empathic
enjoyability
entendres
ethnicities
exchanger
expatriots
favorability
fentanyl
funder
gasliting
genotype
genotypes
geostrategic
graphene
grifter
grifters
heartworm
hominem
hominems
homophobe
hydroxychloroquine
hypermasculanized
ideation
immunities
immunosuppressant
immunosuppression
incentivize
inclusivity
incongruent
indebt
infantilism
injectable
intelligences
intentioned
intercontinentally
intermit
interpretable
iteratively
literalism
literalist
looniness
malinvestment
masculanized
massless
megalomaniacal
melatonin
mindnumbing
minorly
misallocate
misallocated
misallocation
misattributed
misattributes
miscategorizing
mischaracterize
mischaracterized
miseducation
mistranslating
mucosal
myocarditis
natively
neuroscientist
normie
obvert
opioid
opioids
outgass
parasitize
photodetector
predation
presstitutes
proctologist
propagandistic
puppeteered
pyrophoric
quizzling
researchable
robotically
sakes
sociopathic
sociopathy
stereotypically
stovetops
stupefyingly
subsampling
survivability
telomere
telomeres
themself
thermite
tradeable
transgendered
transmissibility
unburned
uncaptured
uncensorable
uncreative
undirected
unelected
unencrypted
unendingly
unenjoyable
unexamined
unfixable
unindicted
unironically
unprovable
unresolvable
unsalvageable
unsaveable
untestable
untradeable
untrainable
unvaccinated
vaginoplasty
vanishingly
victimizers
warcrimes
whistleblower
whistleblowers
wirelessly
I saw one, too, a few years ago. Apparently it was an old satellite burning up on re-entry (or so they said). It looked close, but I guess it wasn't, they saw it all the way to Colorado.
Look at the author's name...
EVERY SINGLE TIME!!!
https://t.me/SGTnewsNetwork/51594
https://t.me/SGTnewsNetwork/51611
To be fair, it's pretty easy to make a car nearly impossible to steal at this point.
Not saying I agree with suing anybody over it, but it's pretty trivial to stop this.
An RFID card would replace the key, and constantly getting challenges and returning responses. Of course, this can be bypassed by somebody knowledgeable about the vehicle. It all works out to be security through obscurity in the end though.
https://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=228445
Oh, the French would love for you to teach them. When I was in France, car theft was commonplace despite having a separate specialized circuit board that had to be placed in a special socket for the car to start. Even Rolls Royce build a rolling code system that some high-tech thieves managed to circumvent.
It's security through obscurity. I know the difficulty, but tracking the vehicle is trivial if the tracking device cannot be removed and it can be.
I understand the difficulty. Basically you are depending on the thieves not being able to circumvent it.
Security is hard. I'm well aware. All of our security is based on "people can't solve this problem", even RSA and ECC. These depend on our lack of knowledge of math, but they may have solutions. Nobody - apparently - can solve these equations, but there may be solutions.
https://t.me/BenjaminFulfordWDSGroup/116728
https://t.me/davidavocadowolfe/105652
« First « Previous Comments 27,850 - 27,889 of 41,439 Next » Last » Search these comments