« First « Previous Comments 109 - 148 of 778 Next » Last » Search these comments
zzyzzx says
Still paying the electric and you're not going to a super charger station every time unless you don't value your time. Or you hire an electrician to install a proper charger. There goes another $2k at least.
WookieMan says
Still paying the electric and you're not going to a super charger station every time unless you don't value your time. Or you hire an electrician to install a proper charger. There goes another $2k at least.
And I just got a letter from PG&E showing the new rate plans based upon what I paid in electricity last year. $300 more projected for EV charging plan.
Less demand for oil makes ICE vehicle cheaper.
Toyota is doing an end run around the 'designed to fail Green Electric Vehicle' by investing in production lines of hydrogen vehicles. I gather hydrogen may be a technology that works, to the consternation of the energy heroin dealers.
Bloomberg) -- Hertz Global Holdings Inc. plans to sell a third of its US electric vehicle fleet and reinvest in gas-powered cars due to weak demand and high repair costs for its battery-powered options.
The sales of 20,000 EVs began last month and will continue over the course of 2024, the rental giant said Thursday in a regulatory filing. Hertz will record a non-cash charge in its fourth-quarter results of about $245 million related to incremental net depreciation expense.
The dramatic about-face, after Hertz announced plans in 2021 to buy 100,000 Tesla Inc. vehicles, underscores the waning demand for all-electric cars in the US. EV sales growth slowed sharply over the course of 2023, rising just 1.3% in the final quarter as consumers were put off by high costs and interest rates.
“The elevated costs associated with EVs persisted,” Hertz Chief Executive Officer Stephen Scherr said in an interview. “Efforts to wrestle it down proved to be more challenging.”
Hertz plans to use some of the money raised by selling off EVs to buy gas-powered vehicles. “The company expects this action to better balance supply against expected demand of EVs,” it said in the filing.
The shift back to more conventional cars marks a reversal of a strategy centered on EVs, which the company hoped would fetch higher prices at the counter and hold their value.
Tesla’s price cuts raised his company’s depreciation costs, Scherr said. EVs also come with higher repair costs compared to the rest of its cars, which has hurt its bottom line and played a big role in missing third-quarter earnings estimates.
Higher repair costs? You mean like having to replace an entire $26,000 battery pack if the car gets in an accident that otherwise would be a minor fender bender?
I think you should try to test drive some of those cars from the 60s and 70s. I had a friend who recently paid quite a bit of money for a well-restored Mustang V8 from that era (sadly, an automatic). He soon realized that, although our current cars are mostly soulless and have entirely too many electronic "features," they are miles easier to live with on a daily basis. He sold it pretty quickly.
That rarely happens. At least not with Teslas.
This whole story is a nothing burger for Tesla. Tesla still can't build cars fast enough to meet their astronomical demand.
80% of Hertz' EV fleet they are complaining about the repairs being costly are Teslas.
And yet Hertz is taking a bath in selling these off.
But it has nothing to do with the battery as you were alluding to.
Who wants to buy a beat-up rental Model 3 when you can get a brand new Tesla for a few thousand more?
Doesn't change the fact that EVs are shit.
How do you know?
Honest question. Have you ever owned an EV? If yes, which one(s) were they? When you say EVs are 💩. Is that based on your personal experience?
Eman says
Honest question. Have you ever owned an EV? If yes, which one(s) were they? When you say EVs are 💩. Is that based on your personal experience?
They've driven golf carts - so they know what it is all about!
Toyota guy at the dealership says Tesla is just a fancy golf cart. No difference!
Because our moron media would be screaming it to the rooftops if there was any hint of Tesla battery failures.
Honest question. Have you ever owned an EV? If yes, which one(s) were they? When you say EVs are 💩. Is that based on your personal experience?
UkraineIsFucked says
Doesn't change the fact that EVs are shit.
Honest question. Have you ever owned an EV? If yes, which one(s) were they? When you say EVs are 💩. Is that based on your personal experience?
EV's need batteries that aren't proprietary and DIY replaceable, an
Sure they work fine in Cali, but don't try that shit where it gets cold.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/news/chicago-area-tesla-charging-stations-lined-with-dead-cars-in-freezing-cold-a-bunch-of-dead-robots-out-here/ar-AA1n1Q5i?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=d0d06ef048f24c9284b3d7922557d2c4&ei=60
Eman says
Honest question. Have you ever owned an EV? If yes, which one(s) were they? When you say EVs are 💩. Is that based on your personal experience?
It's based on market data. Personal experience is only something EV Fluffers resort to.
zzyzzx says
EV's need batteries that aren't proprietary and DIY replaceable, an
They need battery packs that aren't comprised of 2,000 distinct parts nor mineral content we can't mine enough of.
The EV Fluffers here don't seem to grasp that the rest of us are looking towards the future and scalability. They think things will scale as they have done so far.
The Tesla Sub-fluffers are even worse. 80% of EVs in the world are made in China. With cobalt. Yet Tesla fluffers see the EV world as being Tesla!
It's based on market data. Personal experience is only something EV Fluffers resort to.
Ha ha!
"I don't need to use my own personal experience. Jim Cramer from CNBC told me....
Our point is if anyone is going to buy an EV, buy a Tesla,
Eman says
Our point is if anyone is going to buy an EV, buy a Tesla,
Tesla Fluffing Example #2.
Herst is taking a bath because of the Teslas in their EV fleet. Didn't you even READ that article?
Oh, and the scaling problems with the industry don't magically exclude Tesla. But hey! Tesla Fluffers are gonna fluff. They can't admit they bought into the wrong side of history.
seems like you have never owned a Tesla, or even an EV for that matter. The issue with Hertz taking a loss is not what you understand it to be. It’s alright. Time to move on.
You can't argue on the facts/data.
Let us know when you provide some "facts/data".
I (nor Eman?) are advocating for forced government adoption of EV's or even incentives
What we are arguing is that Tesla is a superior product and continues to be one of the most profitable and fastest growing car companies in the world.
Enjoy driving your primitive ICE cars, owning a Tesla allows me to enjoy the benefits of driving a luxury sports car like a Porsche at half the price!
Our point is if anyone is going to buy an EV, buy a Tesla, not other brands
I am sure all the horse carriage companies were saying the same thing about Ford.
« First « Previous Comments 109 - 148 of 778 Next » Last » Search these comments
https://archive.vn/pcjK3