by Patrick ➕follow (58) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 5,908 - 5,947 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
Good observations MarkInSF. Redfin was showing spikes that weren't really there on all those graphs.
Suffice to say, there's a good chance the spikes shown now will also be corrected, but some suckers will be fooled to "buy now before it's too late!".
This video explains some of the charts.
http://boombustblog.com/reggie-middleton/2011/02/24/further-proof-of-the-worsening-of-the-real-estate-depression/
Check around 12 minutes in.
He is using total sales (volume * price) as a leading indicator for case shiller. I don't get the US / Japan comparison though. His chart shows the US bubble as much bigger than Japans. IIRC, Japans was bigger than the US's based on an article by Reinhart & ? on property bubbles over the last century or so.
I'd say that is considered high combined income by any standard, but individually may be a bit low, depending on your responsibilities, education and the size of the company. Additionally, if you are management, the number of the staff you oversee and the industry you work in.
Have you been to salary.com?
10-15 years in mgmt $110-115K is about right. The same is true for other functional positions, marketing, sales, finance. But you have to be at the right place at the right time.
Dual income families have been around for some time in SV. Nothing new about that, but
not the factor some say was the driver of the current bubble or that will keep prices inflated.
Overall today, high salaries may be considered more of liability since we as a local BA employees starting to compete with other lower cost regions. Our $115K per year vs. 75-80K theres in other states.
A good research aid is the Bradford Salary Guide which many HR departments use as guide in setting salaries.
"high salaries may be considered more of liability since we as a local BA employees starting to compete with other lower cost regions. Our $115K per year vs. 75-80K theres in other states. "
Competiting with other states? No. Try competing with other COUNTIRES. You are competing with $15,000 a year software engineers in India. Your also competing against all of the H1-Bs.
Competing with India wages in IT didn't work, we need live awake able bodies at 2PM Eastern, when it's 2AM in India during meetings. It was a rough year, in '02 where virtually every position in my part of town anyway, was outsourced to India. Now there's always positions available and I'm always busy.
Now if Mexico were to ever get their kids to study hard and learn computer science, then we would be in big trouble.
Competiting with other states? No. Try competing with other COUNTIRES. You are competing with $15,000 a year software engineers in India. Your also competing against all of the H1-Bs.
That is also so true. Recently PolyCom is moving from East Bay down to San Jose. Oddly they are moving and consolidating only 350 people locally out of 3200 global. And this is typical.
Symantec has 1400 people in SV out of 17,000 global, and so on and so on. Today is much different than back in the 80s-90s.
Now if Mexico were to ever get their kids to study hard and learn computer science, then we would be in big trouble.
Believe it or not! Both Equador and Argentina have been building out large IT/IS over the past several years now. Historically both Chile and Agentina way back in the day were heavy users of past tech products (Mainframes) in many of their industries, natural resources, banking, and government. Today they are growing and spending much faster.
Anything is good as long as your employer has not thought of hiring 5 guys in India to replace you.
The best way to find out is to go interview at a few companies and pick the highest paying job. Whatever job you can land with the highest package gives you a good salary that is unique to your skill sets and circumstances.
OO, How is Perth treating you? Have you unloaded any of your position?
I have a brother-in-law that runs a small gaming company and everything techy is done in Argentina.
I wonder how much longer NBC's morning news show will be able to sit next to Barbara Corchoran (sp?) with a straight face, as she talks about the "bargains" available around the country? Of course all the networks probably have their resident shills, but that's the one that pops into mind.
Hey guys, Tim Ellis from Redfin (and also Seattle Bubble) here.
Thanks for catching this.
We've dug into the jobs that generate these charts and figured out that the way we are calculating the list price per square foot has an error that affects the price we display on the chart for past dates. The current point is accurate, but the past points are being incorrectly adjusted downward, resulting in the upward tilt toward the end of all the charts.
We're working on a fix, but at this point I can't say for sure when it will be live.
If you are not getting $100k+ from the stock option or bonus, then you are at the bottom of the company food chain.
How else people buy these $2 million house with the $60k average household income.
We’ve dug into the jobs that generate these charts and figured out that the way we are calculating the list price per square foot has an error that affects the price we display on the chart for past dates. The current point is accurate, but the past points are being incorrectly adjusted downward, resulting in the upward tilt toward the end of all the charts.
Any chance that the current list price per square foot is ALSO in error? Just curious as the 'up-tilt' glitch has been in the system for a while (at least since November of 2010).
Better to use DQnew data ...been doing for 20 years, long before the web upstarts and their
"mythical algorithm". The public puts too much faith into Zillow's zestimates and Redfin Charts.
Better to use DQnew data …been doing for 20 years, long before the web upstarts and their
“mythical algorithmâ€. The public puts too much faith into Zillow’s zestimates and Redfin Charts.
Right. I never liked those Redfin charts too much. If you look at the small graph that comes up when you first enter the area you're looking at, and then go to the detail page and look at the large graph, the two graphs don't even agree with each other. Although I wouldn't equate Redfin and Zillow. Zillow is utter bullshit. It's in a league of its own.
Zillow is utter bullshit. It’s in a league of its own.
In my area, its spot on with rent price estimates. And it does show the exact price a house sold at. Not sure what's utter BS about that. Do you mean the Zestimates? Those are sometimes good and sometimes off, because they don't know if a house is updated inside, or mold infested. Our house got appraised by the bank within $1k of the zillow zestimate. I thought it was pretty interesting.
zillow is pure BS. I had my house appraised for a re-fi to lower rate/terms... zillow was "off" by $200k.
I'm an agent and this is getting embarrassing to hear NAR open its mouth. They are on the wrong side of the debate. Worse, they want a dues increase to "lobby" congress.
Great, more money to the pimps & whores in Washington.
Folks, please stay on NAR to correct the skyed up sales figures. Still no correction of a + 20-40% overstatement. All I get is,"we're working on it".
I was browsing Detroit area (upscale NW suburbs) houses and "zestimate" for many houses was TWICE the asking price. I.e. DOUBLE. Like, asking $325,000 (and not sold), Zestimate $650,000.
Zestimate is utter BS.
I was browsing Detroit area (upscale NW suburbs) houses and “zestimate†for many houses was TWICE the asking price. I.e. DOUBLE. Like, asking $325,000 (and not sold), Zestimate $650,000.
Zestimate is utter BS.
Zillow is not bullshit. As long as you know that it shows "Wishful thinking" prices, not actual selling prices. In Detroit the "Wishful" prices are 2x of the actual selling prices. In the Bay Area, the buyers don't seem to be as bright as the ones in Detroit, so the "Wishful" prices closer approximate the selling prices.
In the beginning down here, when the market was on the way down, most of the best listings said no FHA loans. It didn't matter to me, because the market wasn't where it was headed, or where I bought at for that matter. Otherwise I would have gotten more vocal and active, than bitching about it on Patnet.
I think the biggest problem with FHA loans, are the Buyer may be led to believe with a 100% certainty that they have financing. While as much as an hour before closing, the rug may pulled from under the whole deal.
"Bang up job, on Mortgage reform GUYS!"
OH! And thanks for the price fixed inflation in every commodity sector too! BOY did we ever get change?
At this rate, armed robbery will be legal by December. Provided you're a College grad, and have a million dollars in the bank. For the rest of us pissants, it's Pay UP Sucka!
« First « Previous Comments 5,908 - 5,947 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,267,553 comments by 15,159 users - The_Deplorable online now