patrick.net

Philistine says

dodgerfanjohn says

FWIW, this is the web page of the Alexandria:

http://www.thealexandria.net/renovation.html

Not only is the above lifestyle a very good one, its very far from poverty.

It may or may not be better than poverty, but from what I have seen, this building is a den of blackguards and rogues, filthy and falling apart even after the "renovation." Wussy hipsters for some reason always compare it to the hotel in 'The Shining.' Walking just one block from the parking garage to this place is a true gauntlet of homeless crazies and skid row thuggery. We eat at The Gorbals with some regularity, and the last two times I had to bring a stack of dollars to throw at them to keep my person protected, draped as it was in furs and jewels.

I'm a pleasantly plump 40 year old white dude from a middle class suburban background.

I walk by there every single weekday and weeknight. Often on weekends. While definitely an urban environment filled with a few too many street hustlers, you're not gonna get killed robbed shot or stabbed there unless you do stupid things.

If you have always been poor, and if your friends and family have been, it is difficult to believe that you are special enough to be different. Poverty and a lack education are linked.

Why aren't the middle class folks revolting?

lostand confused says

Well, when such a huge chunk of the country is on some sort of welfare -it is tough to rise up and bite the hand that feeds them.

That's the way the rentier class wants it. Give the peons just enough to keep them from rising up and taking back the ill-gotten gains the oligarchy has stolen.

Blurtman says

Poverty and a lack education are linked.

More elitist crap.

Poverty and lack of enlightenment go hand in hand. But you certainly don't have to get a classic education to be enlightened to the point where you want better in life, and recognize your strengths and skills, and how to market them.

The Brightest richest men in America are all either High school or College drop outs.

CaptainShuddup says

Blurtman says

Poverty and a lack education are linked.

More elitist crap.

Poverty and lack of enlightenment go hand in hand. But you certainly don't have to get a classic education to be enlightened to the point where you want better in life, and recognize your strengths and skills, and how to market them.

The Brightest richest men in America are all either High school or College drop outs.

Many from well off, educated families.

Blurtman says

Many from well off, educated families.

Now you're just moving the narrative to suit you're illusion.
So which is it, is it Education or Environment, that is responsible for people's outcome?
Since people's free will, ambition and drive, are so damn frivolous and mean nothing.

CaptainShuddup says

Blurtman says

Many from well off, educated families.

Now you're just moving the narrative to suit you're illusion.
So which is it, is it Education or Environment, that is responsible for people's outcome?
Since people's free will, ambition and drive, are so damn frivolous and mean nothing.

Both nature and nurture. Genes and environment. No surprise there. Drive without the capability to chart a practical path forward due to either innate intelligence, education, or direct help from your family, or indirect help, by virtue of being in an environment where folks do achieve what you desire, only goes so far.

Personal example: My father did not attend high school. Being the oldest of 12 siblings, with a father disabled in an industrial accident. he had to become the breadwinner. My parents mandated that my brother and I attend college. I was always the smart kid. A lot of that is nature. The nucleic acids recombined to award me with intelleigence. I am a millionaire+ now. My brother worked for the post office for a considerable period of his career. Yes, with a college degree. Not a great student.

Also, I had to contend with a government that tried to hold me back by raising the bar on admission criteria to graduate schools versus the low bar for wealthier minority classmates of mine.

Without innate intelligence, I would not be where I am now. Without drive, also. And without parents who mandated education. It is a combination of factors. My peers that I grew up with are in a similar economic group as my brother. It is hard to make it out of your class, in general. Not impossible.

I could speculate as to why I ended up doing as well as I have.
Being one of the premier software writers for the convoluted Accreditation Outcome effectiveness. So complex and convoluted that if you read what Universities around the country have to say about it. They just repeat and rehash a few undetailed paragraphs about Rubric grading systems.

I certainly didn't get it from environment a dysfunctional family with a Father who was retired from the Merchant marines by time I was 6. He lived for the 3rd of every month, at which point he would buy a bottle of V.O. and proceed to work him self into a wicked abusive stupor. I dropped out in the tenth grade and worked a trade from the time I was 18 though out all of my twenties.

My kids were born and I decided, I wasn't going to raise them, in the hand to mouth, feast or famine manor that a life in a trade industry provides in South Florida. So I decided to teach my self how to be a computer programmer. It was a Greek to me as if it was all written in Chinese Characters.

I was not even the kind of person who was savvy at programming the VCR or retrieving Voice messages from the answering machine. To this day I refuse to fiddle with a complex office phone. And if anyone in the company want's to communicate with my by phone, then they know they can call my cell phone, I don't' even answer my desk phone.

But I was determined to learn all I could about computer technologies.
For the most part Windows from client to server and all in between technologies, then Internet technologies various scripting and client and server side processing, and SQL server technologies.

I wont dare to speculate how I managed to do what I did. I just know why I did.
I got tired of every time a special event rolled around like a holiday or kids birthday, as luck would have it, I didn't work one single day that week doing a carpet or tile job.
I was driven to make damn sure I provided my family with more than that.

Right. But a lot of folks will settle, and will not dare to believe, and not dare to try, and will not dare to continue through adversity. Rich and poor folks both. So why do some?

Why aren't the 50% proesting in the streets? Well to answer your question lets take a looks at what happened when the 99% did just that.

A big fat NOTHING.

If the 99% can be sucessfully put on ignore the 50% have even less chance of success. Hell a protest might even be used as justification to repeal the Posse Comitatus Act. A lot of Americans would welcome the elimination of "troublemakers" especially when its pointed out that's would leave more money in the pot for medicare.

Blurtman says

Why aren't the middle class folks revolting?

Because they have just enough of a buffer between themselves and the next gradient or two down.

Blurtman says

I am a millionaire+ now.

Me too, but I'm a dumbfuck.

There is an overemphasis on the money/success framework in the West. I sincerely believe that most people - no matter how enlightened they fancy themselves - cannot accept the premise that anyone can be really truly bright if they aren't also truly wealthy.

CaptainShuddup says

But I was determined to learn all I could about computer technologies.

It's one of the last vestiges of a dying American middle class. Your gig in tech today was yesterday's job in the John Deere foundry; just a good-paying blue collar job...baby blue, but blue nevertheless.

That's probably true. People tend to identify with their perceived peer group and their relative position in it.

A study once asked a group of Harvard graduates if they would accept a certain amount (let's say 100,000 dollars a year for life) as long as their peer graduates got (let's say130,000 for life), or would they rather have (let's say 80,000 for life) as long a their peer graduates got only (let's say 50,000 for life, I don't have the exact figures). The majority chose to get less as long as their peers got even less than they did.

Status and wealthy perception are often relative within groups. If you think you are doing all right compared to your friends/relatives, you probably will not be that unhappy with what you have.

Class warfare is usually more about your own class and your attempt to do better than about a pie in the sky class you don't identify with.

There were actually people in poor communities during the Great Depression who thought they had happy childhoods, because everybody they knew was poor but they had a positive sense of community. They didn't even know they were poor until they went to cities to see that there were actually very wealthy people, and the poor there were treated badly.

Ceffer says

The majority chose to get less as long as their peers got even less than they did.

I'm familiar with that study. There's a correlating Russian proverb that goes something like: a magic genie agrees to grant an abject pauper any one wish he chooses, on the condition that the pauper's neighbor gets twice the amount; the pauper then wishes for the genie to gouge out one of his eyes.

JodyChunder says

Blurtman says

I am a millionaire+ now.

Me too, but I'm a dumbfuck.

There is an overemphasis on the money/success framework in the West. I sincerely believe that most people - no matter how enlightened they fancy themselves - cannot accept the premise that anyone can be really truly bright if they aren't also truly wealthy.

I agree with you on all counts.

JodyChunder says

Blurtman says

I am a millionaire+ now.

Me too, but I'm a dumbfuck.

There is an overemphasis on the money/success framework in the West. I sincerely believe that most people - no matter how enlightened they fancy themselves - cannot accept the premise that anyone can be really truly bright if they aren't also truly wealthy.

Except this - having a couple of million is not being wealthy. Recall that Mr. Drysdale from the Beverly Hillbillies was a millionaire in the 60's when that meant something. If they did the show today, he'd be a billionaire.

Being a millionaire today is being middle class, or what middle class should be. Except people have been pissed down on so long they don't know it.

Blurtman says

having a couple of million is not being wealthy.

sure it is. wealth is being well, and having no unmet needs.

Blurtman says

Being a millionaire today is being middle class, or what middle class should be.

middle class is having to actually work -- personally create goods or services -- for a living, while upper class is having your assets work for you.

$1M in assets throws off $20,000 in income if put into 10 year treasuries.

$1M distributed in say 25 $200,000 rental properties throws off a lot more than that.

$1M in cash is 25 years of middle-class income essentially. Halfway to the upper class lifestyle of not having to work at all.

Ceffer says

A study once asked a group of Harvard graduates if they would accept a certain amount (let's say 100,000 dollars a year for life) as long as their peer graduates got (let's say130,000 for life), or would they rather have (let's say 80,000 for life) as long a their peer graduates got only (let's say 50,000 for life, I don't have the exact figures). The majority chose to get less as long as their peers got even less than they did.

this is actually rational since so much of life's scarce essentials and luxuries is sold on the bid.

We find this in housing. Double area salaries and area home prices will skyrocket, too.

Life is a treadmill, as structured, thanks to all the rent-seeking going on.

finehoe says

That's the way the rentier class wants it. Give the peons just enough to keep them from rising up and taking back the ill-gotten gains the oligarchy has stolen.

The 1% collect all the welfare in the end. Just follow the money!

JodyChunder says

I actually think most Americans simply suffer from low expectations. I don't know why that is...complacency? Mass sedation? Impoverished imaginations? What is it?

We're all monkeys, and imprisoned by monkey-see monkey-do thinking.

This is a pretty good nation for getting ahead still, but you've got to see an angle and be able to capitalize on it.

All this takes figuring out how the world actually works, something that is not taught in public schools all that well.

But there are millions of people in the underground economy with the can-do attitude you speak of.

Hell, a rented meth house blew up not too far from me last year. The immigrant mexican stirring the batch got messed up pretty bad, but he did show the initiative it takes to be a productive citizen here -- find a need and fulfill it.

But it all comes down to capital wealth. Capital is that which assists in the production of end goods and services. The wealthier you are the more access to business capital you have, more connections to people who know WTF they're doing, and the more chances you can mess up before succeeding.

Major problem though is simply the masses are running out of money. No paying customers no business! Too much money is flowing up the pyramid and out of the paycheck economy, via housing rents, high healthcare costs, our $500B/yr trade deficit, and our corporatocratic economy.

http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/CP

Like I say, the wealthy have a million ways to beat money out of the poors. The poors only have two, and one is a felony.

The housing boom/bubble of 2002-2007 was an immense stealth stimulus that distributed $7T or so of spending money into the paycheck economy. It was why things recovered from the dotcom recession, and papered over the bigger problems in the economy -- said trade deficit and collapse of local economies due to the rise of big box retailing.

Bellingham Bill says

Blurtman says

having a couple of million is not being wealthy.

sure it is. wealth is being well, and having no unmet needs.

Blurtman says

Being a millionaire today is being middle class, or what middle class should be.

middle class is having to actually work -- personally create goods or services -- for a living, while upper class is having your assets work for you.

$1M in assets throws off $20,000 in income if put into 10 year treasuries.

$1M distributed in say 25 $200,000 rental properties throws off a lot more than that.

$1M in cash is 25 years of middle-class income essentially. Halfway to the upper class lifestyle of not having to work at all.

$20,000 a year is poverty level income.

Blurtman says

$20,000 a year is poverty level income.

172% of poverty level for a single person.

Poverty is having unmet needs.

$20,000/yr -- $1600/mo -- with ObamaCare is workable I think.

PPACA exchange subsidies will reduce my health insurance premiums to $80/mo, 1/4 what they are now.

So health is taken care of.

Food? $200/mo tops.

Shelter? $100/mo prop tax, $100/mo insurance, $200/mo utilities, $200/mo maintenance set-aside.

Up to $900/mo, leaving $700/mo for other stuff.

Lease a Nissan Leaf for $200/mo, +$50/mo insurance.

Down to around $500/mo for everything else.

Not poverty.

Bellingham Bill says

Blurtman says

$20,000 a year is poverty level income.

172% of poverty level for a single person.

Poverty is having unmet needs.

$20,000/yr -- $1600/mo -- with ObamaCare is workable I think.

PPACA exchange subsidies will reduce my health insurance premiums to $80/mo, 1/4 what they are now.

So health is taken care of.

Food? $200/mo tops.

Shelter? $100/mo prop tax, $100/mo insurance, $200/mo utilities, $200/mo maintenance set-aside.

Up to $900/mo, leaving $700/mo for other stuff.

Lease a Nissan Leaf for $200/mo, +$50/mo insurance.

Down to around $500/mo for everything else.

Not poverty.

Your housing expenses are only workable if you have a paid off mortgage. Which means that you will need to have assets other than $1 million that's generating bond income.

for those of you that don't believe how good folks are living on govt benefits, keep working even harder with your head in the sand too busy slaving away to notice that those on the dole have it better than most working people. How do you think maury povich fills his audience seats every day with hooters and hollers. oh, i forgot, your too busy working to watch daytime tv.

JodyChunder says

Your gig in tech today was yesterday's job in the John Deere foundry; just a good-paying blue collar job...baby blue, but blue nevertheless.

100% Agreed!
Just 10 to 15 years ago, the wages I make now would have been enough to consider my self upper upper middle class. I could have considered Waterfront property near the beach.

To day it's just barely enough to keep afloat with a Ranchero Brubdale house, with lower middle class wants and needs.

Today my wife(who has never worked a day in the 20 years we've been married) would have to get a job and make what I make. For us to realize the same finances, that just my income alone would have made 10 years ago.

I'm making almost double now, but it seemed we had more disposable income when I only made 60K year, that was just before the bubble kicked in last decade.

CaptainShuddup says

To day it's just barely enough to keep afloat with a Ranchero Brubdale house, with lower middle class wants and needs.

What part of California are you in? You'd be sitting pretty with your salary out this way whereabouts I am.

Bellingham Bill says

PPACA exchange subsidies will reduce my health insurance premiums to $80/mo, 1/4 what they are now.

So health is taken care of.

You're going to make a Damn fine Republican, I guaran-fuckin'-TEE!

JodyChunder says

What part of California are you in? You'd be sitting pretty with your salary out this way whereabouts I am.

Florida, but I forgot to include, I have two daughters 18 and 17 who have it in mind, that my income is their income.

CaptainShuddup says

JodyChunder says

What part of California are you in? You'd be sitting pretty with your salary out this way whereabouts I am.

Florida, but I forgot to include, I have two daughters 18 and 17 who have it in mind, that my income is their income.

Might be time to wean them off.

New Renter says

Might be time to wean them off.

I have, but their Liberal education, expects me to support their every whim from that nice outfit at Wet Seal, to Monday through Sunday hang out money, lest they call me Captain Meany Pants.

Get this, one even has a Job. But that's her money to piss away in the same night of payday.

CaptainShuddup says

I have, but their Liberal education, expects me to support their every whim from that nice outfit at Wet Seal, to Monday through Sunday hang out money, lest they call me Captain Meany Pants.

So? Their "liberal education" is trumped by your "conservative purse strings". Wet Seal be damned, TJ Maxx, Ross, and yes even Goodwill have some plenty fine clothes. If they don't like it tell them fine, you'll buy the clothes yourself.

I'm sure they'll love what you pick out for them.

Given what people here call you I'm sure you can tolerate "Captain Meanie Pants"

This is main problem with anchor babies. It creates risks of a cycle of dependency.

http://news.yahoo.com/nations-breadbasket-latinos-stuck-poverty-120309988.html

adarmiento says

It creates risks of a cycle of dependency.

anyone serious on the cycle of dependency would work towards freeing the renting masses from their indentured servitude to landlords.

And we can't do this via Section 8, that's just rent supports.

We need to construct millions of quality homes in thousands of communities, to break the scarcity of livable neighborhoods and thus drive housing rents down to the actual cost of the capital -- sticks and concrete -- instead of the massive economic rents -- a trillion or so -- housing is pulling from the paycheck economy now.

A $200,000 capital investment can create a pretty damn fine housing unit, and 100 of those together is a good-sized multifamily complex.

That's a $20M capital investment. The Fed is buying $85B/month in bonds, we'd be better off if the Fed deployed that e-capital such that we could build 400,000 new mfh units a month!

That would push construction employment to the max:

http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/USCONS

easily adding 5M+ jobs to the paycheck economy.

5M new housing units a year would mean a community the size of Fresno would receive 8,000 new apartment/condo units in a single year -- and that level of construction would be all across the nation!

That would crush housing rents everywhere, allowing the paycheck economy to use that money towards other wants and needs beside housing, and push landlords to find more useful investments for their capital.

Bellingham Bill says

anyone serious on the cycle of dependency would work towards freeing the renting masses from their indentured servitude to landlords.

if you dont like where your at.. move! Rent too expensive in SFBA.. move to Fresno.

Bellingham Bill says

That's a $20M capital investment. The Fed is buying $85B/month in bonds, we'd be better off if the Fed deployed that e-capital such that we could build 400,000 new mfh units a month!

See the great public housing programs that went belly up decades ago. What went wrong ?

CaptainShuddup says

Get this, one even has a Job. But that's her money to piss away in the same night of payday.

I don't get it...what's the problem, here?

Sounds like the all-American spirit.

adarmiento says

This is main problem with anchor babies. It creates risks of a cycle of dependency.

http://news.yahoo.com/nations-breadbasket-latinos-stuck-poverty-120309988.html

On balance, does mom's vegetable picking and resultant low food prices balance out the costs of schooling and medical care for her seven kids and herself?

Blurtman says

adarmiento says

This is main problem with anchor babies. It creates risks of a cycle of dependency.

http://news.yahoo.com/nations-breadbasket-latinos-stuck-poverty-120309988.html

On balance, does mom's vegetable picking and resultant low food prices balance out the costs of schooling and medical care for her seven kids and herself?

Women who care about their children's future, use birth control, and so do their sons.

It's because people in "poverty" in the US have a pretty high standard of living by world standards.