patrick.net

Funny, a 12 year old would have a hard time recognizing controversy and scandal....what's your excuse?

omgbacon says

Or should we spend more time manufacturing controversy and scandal by acting like 12 year old?

CL says

omgbacon says

It's because they're kinda whiny. I had no idea that small business owners had egos so fragile they could be easily shattered by a quote taken out of context that doesn't mean what they think it means.

And even if it meant what they thought it meant, it would be true anyway.

All of society is built on our past, and is a product of our current collective effort.

That's where the distribution of income comes in too. Why do the workers who produce the goods get so little of the benefit?

Actually, the workers who produce the goods get exactly what they agreed to when they hired on. If they didn't like the wages, then don't take the job.

Meanwhile, the fellow who started the company reaps good money when his product/service if selling well and loses his shirt when his product/service doesn't sell well.

If the company does well, the worker gets paid the agreed upon sum and continues to work. If the company doesn't do well, the worker looks for another job while the owner loses a butt-load of money and has a real bleak near-term future. When you run a business you take some huge risks, if the risks pay off you do well, if they don't you lose big. And the worker? He rides the winds of the wages that he agrees to and the ability to go from company to company looking for someone who wants to pay more for his services.

Abe, fox news says you're wrong:

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/07/17/obama-right-americans-cant-succeed-without-government/?intcmp=obinsite

Is this the part of the story where your head blows up?

Here's a partial quote from the article:

" A lot has been made over comments made by the president last Friday to this effect.  In many cases, President Obama was deliberately quoted out of context.  Here is what the president actually said:

"If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help.  There was a great teacher somewhere in your life.  Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive.  Somebody invested in roads and bridges.  If you’ve got a business. you didn’t build that.  Somebody else made that happen.  The Internet didn’t get invented on its own.  Government research created the Internet so that all the companies could make money off the Internet.  The point is, is that when we succeed, we succeed because of our individual initiative, but also because we do things together."
 

It’s not either/or.  The president was clear:  We succeed because of our individual initiative but also because of the public investments that help springboard that success.  Don’t believe me?  Then go start a business in Pakistan or Russia.  American entrepreneurs succeed in part because they’re in America.  And in America, we don’t get ours and then yank away the ladder of opportunity for the next generation.  "

xrpb11a says

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ampad

and yes, it is "just you"....

I find it interesting you link to a wikipedia page on Ampad. I find it even more interesting that there is a wikipedia page on Ampad. I notice the wikipedia page was last updated on June 7, 2012. Interesting because nothing significant occurred involving Ampad for over two years.

Also interesting the they quote a 53 percent annual compound growth rate, but in the same sentence mention $8.8 MM in 2002 to $200.5MM. Those two numbers dont add up...53% compound growth rate from $8.8MM in four years is $48.2MM. $8.8MM to $200.5MM in four years is about a 118.5% compound annual growth rate. Hmm...

So I dig a little more...and the "facts" on the wikipedia page are almost verbatim from this page:

http://americaneedsmitt.com/2012/05/american-pad-and-paper-ampad-one-of-bains-great-failures/

So yeah, the wikipedia numbers are suspect at best and outright biased at worst.

Then I notice at the top of that page it mentions $583.86MM in sales for 1996. Hmm..which is it, $200.5MM or $583.86MM? The only possible difference between sales and net sales is returns and discounts, so unless Ampad was getting returns and discounts of over 60% of its sales, these numbers dont gybe.

david1 says

Also interesting the they quote a 53 percent annual compound growth rate, but in the same sentence mention $8.8 MM in 2002 to $200.5MM. Those two numbers dont add up...53% compound growth rate from $8.8MM in four years is $48.2MM. $8.8MM to $200.5MM in four years is about a 118.5% compound annual growth rate. Hmm...

The "growth" was all borrowing and purchasing other companies. I notice bain, or wiki, doesn't talk about the growth in debt. Ampad borrowed 400 million to buy enough companies to pump up revenue to 200 million. Bain took huge fees on each aquisition. Once the revenue was pumped high enough Bain took Ampad public, again taking huge fees, then dumped their ampad stock leaving the suckers, sorry stock holders, of bains's pump and dump scheme screwed, blewed, and tattoed.

So bain put in 5 million, took out 12 million in fees and sold 50 million in stock. Hell of a return in 8 years, 60 million plus on 5 million. Not such a great deal for all the people who worked there and lost everything or the creditors who took a 200+ million dollar bath.

This is not capitalism as I learned it.

Well, that pretty much explains it.

Now, lets elect him and take that nasty bastard's nasty talent and turn it against Russia/China/Iran.

bob2356 says

So bain put in 5 million, took out 12 million in fees and sold 50 million in stock. Hell of a return in 8 years, 60 million plus on 5 million. Not such a great deal for all the people who worked there and lost everything or the creditors who took a 200+ million dollar bath.

jhall says

But I want to be clear. You moved your goods to market on the roads the rest of us paid for. You hired workers the rest of us paid to educate. You were safe in your factory because of police forces and fire forces that the rest of us paid for. You didn’t have to worry that maurauding bands would come and seize everything at your factory, and hire someone to protect against this, because of the work the rest of us did. Now look, you built a factory and it turned into something terrific, or a great idea — God bless. Keep a big hunk of it.

So true.

Without a socialist taxpayer funded highway system, businesses wouldn't be in business. Damn Socialist Sympathizers.

If you built a business after 2008, there is one damn thing for sure...
Obama did NOT make that happen.

Scumbag dimwits like Obama and his supporters are just envious of success and people who can do it. I have frequently been around dilettantes like Obama, in addition to being around truly successful people.
The dilettantes want to diminish the success, the brains and balls of their betters. This is very common.
For example, the semi-smart guys in my prep school became lawyers. This was also because at the time jobs were scarce so many guys just went back to school after finishing college.
These lawyer types are always complaining about or dissing their betters, doctors.
As far as Obama goes, we know what he said to Joe the plumber when he was running wild "off teleprompter". He said that Joe should spread his wealth or the fruits of his labor and success.
Why should anyone share any of their money or labor by force by the government?
We are not talking about roads. They are pay as you go by gas and other taxes.
We are not talking about air travel. This is pay as you go by taxes and fees on tickets.
We are not talking about police. They are paid locally by property taxes and sales taxes.
What is Obama then talking about? He is simply trying to rationalize stealing from the successful to redistribute their money to those who have done nothing to deserve it.

Honest Abe says

Did the president of the United States REALLY say that?

In case no one directly answered your question yet. NO he did NOT really say that. Anyone with more than a 6th grade education would have clearly understood that "That" was referring to the bridges and infrastructure in his prior sentence (conspicuously absent from all right wing media).

Listen to Faux news, become a real boob...

Honest Abe says

If you got a business you didn't build that, someone else made that happen.

Yep, someone else made your business prosper:

Your Customers.

The vast majority of whom are wage-earners. So, do you want your customers to get paid more, or paid less?

I love the hypocrisy of the red diaper doper baby left....demonizing Romney for his taken out of context sentence "I like to be able to fire people"....
then turning around and pissing their collective pants over Ob's "you didn't build that...."

same situation....same results.

Heh, between Ruki's graphic and xrpb11a not being able to recognize when he has lost an argument, this place is quite entertaining.

So which facts did you ignore to come to that conclusion?

gbenson says

Heh, between Ruki's graphic and xrpb11a not being able to recognize when he has lost an argument, this place is quite entertaining.

xrpb11a says

The majority owner makes a public statement that he is FOR marriage between a man/woman. Now Chick a Fil will suffer for it as they lose the LBGT customers.

It's more than one man's opinion. They donate their corporate dollars to anti-gay causes.

mmmarvel says

Actually, the workers who produce the goods get exactly what they agreed to when they hired on. If they didn't like the wages, then don't take the job.

But when the system is rigged to cause downward pressure on the worker, that whole system of entrepreneurship gets stifled. You can't collect enough wages to start that business, you can't negotiate higher wages.

Wages can go down, because you are competing with indentured servants in China now. The monopoly analogy rings true.

Picture one player with a million dollars, his inheritance. He's also friends with the bank.

You get your turn...you're in debt about a quarter million. Roll your dice!

How do you think it really works out? How fair is the playing field? And aren't some of our best and brightest the ones who start the game by losing?

We believe we live in a meritocracy. But it is largely piffle.

Honest Abe says

OMG. What a totally offensive, devisive statement.

It's like this Abraham: you build you a business from your own idea. Butt you are able to do this thanks to the blood that was shed by freedom fighters and liberty lovers who died in the fields of battle so that you had that right. Also there are facilities what are in place that make your biz possible starting with you public school education, you publicly funded libary the public interstate system the federal government giveing you the internet to do research on your biz. you d0 not build any biz alone you build it on the backs of the people

Ruki says

ass-raping the 'rich'.

Ruki be nice, man. this kinda nasty imagery does not belong in this kind of ADULT descussion.

CL says

Now Chick a Fil will suffer for it as they lose the LBGT customers.

The joke is on Chik fil A cause I kept chickens all ,my life and have seen many examples of cockerels being gay with another cockerel.

which misses the point completely.
the point being, an owner of a corporation who makes his political views public risks alienation of the affected groups in his statement.

Chick a Fil's contributions were not publicized, front and center. 90%+ of the people who would care were not aware of their contributions....that is until the owner opened his trap...

CL says

xrpb11a says

The majority owner makes a public statement that he is FOR marriage between a man/woman. Now Chick a Fil will suffer for it as they lose the LBGT customers.

It's more than one man's opinion. They donate their corporate dollars to anti-gay causes.

Sorry, but that shit don't float. ( hows that for imagery?)
Everything you listed below was funded by taxpayer's dollars.
In other words, the business owner paid his fair share of the funds necessary to build the roads/bridges, all taxpayers did.
So that stuff does not count towards determining who is responsible for "building a business", as all taxpayers paid for the facilities, and have the same opportunity to take advantage of them.

JodyChunder says

Honest Abe says

OMG. What a totally offensive, devisive statement.

It's like this Abraham: you build you a business from your own idea. Butt you are able to do this thanks to the blood that was shed by freedom fighters and liberty lovers who died in the fields of battle so that you had that right. Also there are facilities what are in place that make your biz possible starting with you public school education, you publicly funded libary the public interstate system the federal government giveing you the internet to do research on your biz. you d0 not build any biz alone you build it on the backs of the people

and it's not surprising that they get bitter in public forums. they cling to fabrications or willful ignorance or antipathy to people who aren't like them...

Ruki says

xrpb11a says

So which facts did you ignore to come to that conclusion?

They don't dwell in reality like we do. Their 'facts' are really fantasies to us in the real world, hence why they keep believing in Keynes' bullshit too.

Give HRHMedia access to patrick.net...and he'll masturbate with it.

xrpb11a says

n other words, the business owner paid his fair share of the funds necessary to build the roads/bridges, all taxpayers did.

No sir. Other long dead or old and wasted people are what paid. besides It ain't like JC dying on the cross sos you can have a blank check in the future. It is not a one time deal. They need to be supported and upgraded. Come on MAN! All life from begining to end you pay your monthly enstallments. Get over it.

It's like me saying, I MADE my head liner replacement biz all by myself! No sir. I stood on the shoulders of GIANTS and that shit ain't free.

Bottom line, regardless of how many bridges/roads/phonelines/electrical grid/ etc etc etc....guess what?
The business does not exist if the original business owner decided not to start it.
Without the roads, everything is brought in on the beaten path the owner made.
Without the bridges, ferries are employed that were built by the business owner...
without the electric grid, windmills are installed ( home made, of course)
Phone lines?? use smoke signals...
JodyChunder says

No sir. Other long dead or old and wasted people are what paid. besides It ain't like JC dying on the cross sos you can have a blank check in the future. It is not a one time deal.

xrpb11a says

The business does not exist if the original business owner decided not to start it.

But that is just the concept. I'll grant you that; but realizing it is a whole other level and that takes much much more than just the concept man/venture capital/risk to make happen. That takes people power and that isn't free. Maybe someday when we can all just get along.

http://www.youtube.com/embed/_l_lPhUcBR8

xrpb11a says

and it's not surprising that they get bitter in public forums. they cling to fabrications or willful ignorance or antipathy to people who aren't like them...

Am I in the twilight zone? Am I being punk'd? Where's Ashton?

Notwithstanding how much fun it would be to debate economics with someone who gets excited about what Ron Paul says, reads a few bog posts on Austrian Economics, then deems that sufficient to award himself a PhD in the subject from the John Baptist College of SW Texas, I won't. This of course also qualifies you to ridicule a man who graduated from Yale then did his PhD studies at MIT, has dedicated his life to the study of macroeconomic models, and also oh-by-the-way was awarded the Nobel Prize for his work, without, I would mention, a co-author. Which means a vast majority of the very best minds in the field value his work with enough significance to award him that honor AND they also recognize that those ideas were so original to him that no one else deserved significant credit.

Yeah buddy, the knowledge you got from that blog and your "less than $500k in annual sales" small business experience stacks up against that. Oh and I forgot the wikipedia page on Austrian Economics you skimmed.

The only equivalent I could think of would be if the Dream Team (yes the original, quit fucking asking) played a pickup game against the Roseville Girls' School for the Handicapped 6th grade team, if Roseville decided to rest its starters.

Here is a hard reality for you to swallow: Most small business owners claim to be something special, but in actuality they can't compete for those jobs working at a large corporation that are well compensated. You probably don't stack up in a competitive environment. No one looked short in Munchkin land until Dorothy showed up.

You are your own boss. Congratulations. Wanna know what you've won? The ability to bid on mowing my grass, cleaning up my dogs shit, or pouring my cup of coffee. Best case you win the bid and get to manage the people whose ability maxes out at performing the aforementioned tasks. Worst case you're strapping on the rubber gloves yourself.

Small business owners: face it - you are average. You have always been average and you will always be average. Nothing wrong with being average, most people are. The reason why your business is stuck doing half a million in sales and you are stuck with a net income of seventy five grand isn't because of Obama and his health care act, and it's not because Pelosi passed all of those regulations. You are stuck because you have reached your potential, similarly to how you scored 1100 on your SAT and got third at the all-county track meet.

Get your ego out of the way and listen to what the smart people are saying to you. You aren't rich, and are never going to be rich. So when we say that you and everyone you know, including your children, would be better off if the richest .1% paid a bit more in taxes, just believe us. When someone shows you that economic prosperity was higher in the 1950s, 60s & 70s by every measure, when taxes on everyone (but especially the rich) were higher, look it up for yourself and when the data is confirmed it don't formulate crazy explanations for how the data is manipulated or made up.

And stop insulting the Macroeconomic commentary of a Nobel Laureate. It makes you look stupid.

david1 says

xrpb11a says

and it's not surprising that they get bitter in public forums. they cling to fabrications or willful ignorance or antipathy to people who aren't like them...

Am I in the twilight zone?It's become painfully apparent.

Am I being punk'd? depends on who you believe.

Where's Ashton?Leave me out of your personal life.

I see you have the attention span of a gnat. Sorry about that.

david1 says

Yeah buddy, the knowledge you got from that blog and your "less than $500k in annual sales"> small business experience stacks up against that.

There is nothing hard about economics - everybody who fails science grade math (such as electrical engineering or physics etc.) can fallback to becoming an "economist", which is just above realtor ;) A grandmother who saves more than she spends knows more about economics than twits like Krugman and his ilk - problem is only she is getting fucked over by team bernanke/geithner// who are really run by team banksta, fucked so hard that her 0.1 % savings turn negative after adjusting for cheap money inflation. So she has to worship the Keynesian monkeys and riverboat all in with her savings, maybe in Vegas, perhaps in the stock market, or buy "prime" real estate in hope she hits the jackpot. But thanks for the laugh about the "Macroeconomic commentary of a Nobel Laureate".

xrpb11a said: " they cling to fabrications"
Thanks for proving my point...

david1 says

Most small business owners claim to be something special

well, if you would sit down and STFU maybe we could hear from some 'smart people'...

david1 says

Get your ego out of the way and listen to what the smart people are saying to you.

http://www.youtube.com/embed/GXcLVDhS8fM&feature=player_embedded

all you need to know about [current] economics.

xrpb11a said:"and it's not surprising that they get bitter in public forums."
You sound like someone who has tried, failed, and given up.
Thanks for proving my point.
david1 says

You aren't rich, and are never going to be rich.

The small business owner is the backbone of the American economy. Ninety-nine percent of all employers are small business owners. They provide 75% of the new jobs created every year, and they are responsible for 96% of all exported goods. Small business owners work out of garages, small stores on Main Streets, and huge corporate campuses. "Princeton Review"

Small business owners don't think they are special. The Princeton Review, however, implies just that.

xrpb11a said:"and it's not surprising that they get bitter in public forums."
Thanks for proving my point.

david1 says

You are your own boss. Congratulations. Wanna know what you've won? The ability to bid on mowing my grass, cleaning up my dogs shit, or pouring my cup of coffee. Best case you win the bid and get to manage the people whose ability maxes out at performing the aforementioned tasks. Worst case you're strapping on the rubber gloves yourself.

xrpb11a says

bottom line, regardless of how many bridges/roads/phonelines/electrical grid/ etc etc etc....guess what?
The business does not exist if the original business owner decided not to start it.
Without the roads, everything is brought in on the beaten path the owner made.
Without the bridges, ferries are employed that were built by the business owner...
without the electric grid, windmills are installed ( home made, of course)
Phone lines?? use smoke signals...

Obama's "you didnt built that" is a pip dream! Must be the drugs from his youth still swimming in his warped mind!

http://www.governor.ny.gov/press/092711chiptechnologyinvestment/

Governor Cuomo Announces $4.4 Billion Investment by International TechnologyGroup Led by Intel and IBM to Develop Next Generation Computer Chip Technology in New York

Thousands of Jobs Will be Created or Retained in Albany, Canandaigua, Utica, East Fishkill, and Yorktown Heights; New York State Wins Investment Over Countries in Europe, Asia and the Middle East

Albany, NY (September 27, 2011)

Governor Andrew M. Cuomo today announced that New York State has entered into agreements providing for investments valued at a total of $4.4 billion over the next five years from five leading international companies to create the next generation of computer chip technology.

The five companies involved are Intel, IBM, GLOBALFOUNDRIES, TSMC and Samsung. New York State secured the investments in competition with countries in Europe, Asia and the Middle East.

The agreements mark an historic level of private investment in the nanotechnology sector in New York. Research and development facilities will be located in Albany, Canandaigua, Utica, East Fishkill and Yorktown Heights. In addition, Intel separately agreed to establish its 450mm East Coast Headquarters to support the overall project management in Albany.

"This unprecedented private investment in New York's economy will create thousands of jobs and make the state the epicenter for the next generation of computer chip technology," Governor Cuomo said. "IBM, which is celebrating 100 years in New York, Intel, which is making its most significant investment in New York, as well as TSMC, Global Foundries and Samsung now recognize that the state is on its way to becoming a premier location for jobs, which is why these companies are making this major investment. In the last nine months, my administration has worked to create a more confident environment for doing business in New York, and major deals like this one prove that the state is truly open for business."

The investment in these two efforts will result in the creation and retention of approximately 6,900 jobs. That number includes 2,500 additional high-technology positions comprising of:

800 at CNSE Albany NanoTech Complex
950 at IBM - Yorktown Heights and IBM - East Fishkill
450 at SUNY Institute of Technology (SUNYIT) in Utica
300 at CNSE's Smart System Technology & Commercialization Center in Canandaigua

In addition, approximately 1,500 construction jobs will be created in Albany and 400 in Utica. As a result of the investment 2,500 existing jobs in Albany, Canandaigua and East Fishkill will be retained.

CL says

But when the system is rigged to cause downward pressure on the worker, that whole system of entrepreneurship gets stifled. You can't collect enough wages to start that business, you can't negotiate higher wages.

Wages can go down, because you are competing with indentured servants in China now. The monopoly analogy rings true.

We also compete with the Japanese, Brits, Germans and other nations... none are indentured servants.

xrpb11a says

Bottom line, regardless of how many bridges/roads/phonelines/electrical grid/ etc etc etc....guess what?
The business does not exist if the original business owner decided not to start it.
Without the roads, everything is brought in on the beaten path the owner made.
Without the bridges, ferries are employed that were built by the business owner...
without the electric grid, windmills are installed ( home made, of course)
Phone lines?? use smoke signals...

Wtf ?

We all know what Obama was talking about. There was a time when Americans were willing to pay for their government.

Everyone has objections to some part of what government spends money on, and everyone also benefits A LOT from at least some of the things that government spends money on.

But we run huge deficits while federal taxes are close to the lowest they've been in the last 50 years. Some taxes need to go up,...period.

david1 says

When someone shows you that economic prosperity was higher in the 1950s, 60s & 70s by every measure, when taxes on everyone (but especially the rich) were higher, look it up for yourself and when the data is confirmed it don't formulate crazy explanations for how the data is manipulated or made up.

Well said, and the type of statement that won't even get an intelligible response from dim bulbs such as xrp.

Agreed.
So what the fuck does that have to do with what you quoted?

marcus says

xrpb11a says

Bottom line, regardless of how many bridges/roads/phonelines/electrical grid/ etc etc etc....guess what?
The business does not exist if the original business owner decided not to start it.
Without the roads, everything is brought in on the beaten path the owner made.
Without the bridges, ferries are employed that were built by the business owner...
without the electric grid, windmills are installed ( home made, of course)
Phone lines?? use smoke signals...

Wtf ?

We all know what Obama was talking about. There was a time when Americans were willing to pay for their government.

Everyone has objections to some part of what government spends money on, and everyone also benefits A LOT from at least some of the things that government spends money on.

But we run huge deficits while federal taxes are close to the lowest they've been in the last 50 years. Some taxes need to go up,...period

marcus says

We all know what Obama was talking about.

We do? Obama has been referred to a myriad of highly intelligent people.
From Greek philosophers to American founding fathers, to America's closest thing we've ever known as Royalty, that is John F. Kennedy.

How in the hell does a man that spends so much of his time explaining what he meant, get compared to brilliant critical thinkers, communicators and philosophers? Let's be clear here, we're not talking about Donny Dum Dum here. If his words can't stand on their own, then we don't need cut rate pundits telling me, "What he meant".

I mean which is it? You can't have it both ways. One minute he's this incredible wordsmith winning unjust awards and accolades then the next his context needs adjusting. Enough with it already, I think whether you agree or not, if he weren't such a grandstanding show-bag then we would be debating the Chicken or the Egg paradox as pertains to business and the roads.

There was a time when Americans were willing to pay for their government.

We still are, we just have a hard time swallowing...
"GSA's Lavish Federal Vegas Retreat "
"Solyndra"
"Light bulbs that are expensive and you can't see dick all"
"Soap products that the cost increases weekly that produces no suds, has less cleaning power than dirt"
"Temp Census workers counted as part of the unemployment gap. "

Sin taxes on every thing, that never gets accounted for their intended purpose.

i.e. Sugar taxes on soada ect... Alcohol... Tobacco...

Then these items are a hyperbole villainized as the number one ill-health contributors, in context to defrauding American's out of high premiums in lieu of an honest proper health care system. While never ever once accounting where the 300% price increases due to lofty taxes levied against those very same items since Obama took office, are going, or what they doing for that matter.

We don't need a first lady "SHAMING" Americans into shoping at Whole Foods and paying a hefty premium for Fresh fruits and produce that at this very damn moment the Liberal press are touting the virtues of gouging the American consumers preemptively over speculating the Corn crop dying and drying up in the drought. Which DAMN it while I'm here, if we've been subsidizing the Corn industry for Decades then where is the GODDAMN stock piles of the stuff? Come on, we've been paying this GOVERNMENT(that you love to tax us to death so much) to give the Corn industry crap loads of money to off set any losses they may incur. Which they've had a good two decade run, with out incident. Now the first HINT of adversity and every thing from Beef, Clothing, Gas, Groceries in general are slated to hyper inflate this summer, because a crop of corn is drying up in a mid western state?

Shirley You Jest!