by CL ➕follow (1) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 69 - 95 of 95 Search these comments
Finally, somebody that can win a kindergarten spelling bee...
Even if Christie new nothing, one still has to wonder at his complete lack of curiosity about the bridge closure. From not responding to the thousands of complaints about the closure while it was happening, to later not seeming to be interested in why two of his appointees suddenly retired due to the growing scandal.
Exactly. Finally, someone here with a bit of common sense.
Why shouldn't it be? Aides are hired as trusted associates.
You hire them based on their history and what you know about them.
If, after the fact, they fuck you over that is mostly out of your control.
I mean, what the fuck? Did he call a couple of his aides in and say, "Hey, did youse guys have anything to do with them lanes closures?" and they said "no", and he said, "O.K., that's good enough for me"?
The only possible consequences could be political and even these would be minor.
If that's what your looking for dude, you have some HUGE targets sitting in D.C. Why not try and focus your energies there, not on a traffic jam...
Apologism runs strong. Ask yourselves if you would be as lenient, as Dan suggested, if it were a Democratic Governor in NEW JERSEY who carried himself as a thug or mobster. Why do I suspect your cavalier attitudes would evaporate?
To expound, which "scandal" that has been thrown at Obama do you think is in fact, trivial?
Whatever happened with the democrat poster child, John Corzine?
In a state of 8 million people, how would Christie know of some traffic tie-ups...
Because it was all over the newspapers, the Port Authority executive director sent an email saying it was "abusive, a threat to public safety, and a violation of federal law", there were thousands of complaints, the mayor of Fort Lee publicly accused Christie of orchestrating the incident as political payback, Christie personally talked to reporters who told him about it, and staff members appointed by Christie resigned over the incident.
How would he know? Are you really this obtuse, or are you just pretending to be?
Why shouldn't it be? Aides are hired as trusted associates.
You hire them based on their history and what you know about them.
If, after the fact, they fuck you over that is mostly out of your control.
That is the attitude a poor leader would have, not someone who has aspirations of running for president. A good leader would be proactive and not hide under a rock while his aides run amok.
So all you have is the supposition that he should have known this was instigated by his staff
Why don't you do some research before you embarrass yourself any more? It WAS instigated by his staff.
I clearly stated is was instigated by his staff. Maybe you should learn to read. So you agree it came from his staffer Kelly, so where's the evidence Christie himself was involved?
What did she say to Christie that day? You honestly expect us to believe that the woman who is going to be his next chief of staff didn't bother to mention to him that she got an email from the director of the port authority complaining about the fake traffic study?
So you know that she did mention it? I'm very impressed you have such extensive unfettered access to the inner workings of Christie's administration.
That is the attitude a poor leader would have, not someone who has aspirations of running for president. A good leader would be proactive and not hide under a rock while his aides run amok
Well that leaves out every president since Truman.
Nice, you finally figured out the whole point.
Um, I KNOW the point. YOU'RE the one trying to equate this with bgamal's wacky Zionist conspiracy theories. I mean, WTF, man?
No I'm trying to equate your response to this story withbgmal's response to news stories with wacky zionist theories. He doesn't have any evidence and neither do you.
I am not talking about attitudes.
I am talking about circumstances.
You apparently have an attitude.
Why shouldn't it be? Aides are hired as trusted associates.
You hire them based on their history and what you know about them.
If, after the fact, they fuck you over that is mostly out of your control.
That is the attitude a poor leader would have, not someone who has aspirations of running for president. A good leader would be proactive and not hide under a rock while his aides run amok.
Why shouldn't it be? Aides are hired as trusted associates.
You hire them based on their history and what you know about them.
If, after the fact, they fuck you over that is mostly out of your control.
It's out of your control to hire someone who won't fuck you over? You must not be too proficient at interviewing and background checks...
Wow, really??? You truly know completely what an employee is going to do in the future??? Employees NEVER lie when caught??? Really??
We didn't realize you were such a great fortune teller!!!
I wouldn't say NEVER, but I wouldn't say it's out of my control either. I would say it's partially my fault...
Question, if as you say, he lied and really ordered the closures, why hasn't Bridget Kelly, who was instantly fired, been on all the news media and talk shows telling everyone the TRUTH???
I have no idea if he knew or not, but the answer to your question is easy.
Christie may or may not be the next President of the US. It's not bad if POTUS owes you, is it? That's a pretty good reason to stay quiet
Except, for right now, her career is in the sewer. No one will touch her and she's unemployable in gov't and business circles (well, maybe a liberal organization would hire her, they seem to like liars)... She's like 41 years old... I hope she saved her money...
And her prospects would improve if she went on TV selling out her boss?
Probably not... In your world, truth doesn't matter....
We're talking about the real world. In the real world, job prospects aren't enhanced when you sell out your boss.
Especially political chief of staffs...
Like I said.... in YOUR world...
lol--OK please explain how that helps in any world.
I clearly stated is was instigated by his staff
So all you have is the supposition that he should have known this was instigated by his staff (remember it was actually done by the port authority) based on your projection of how he should have looked into the situation when asked about it by the press.
You said it was done by the port authority. You're anything but clear. You're all over the place on this. Maybe you don't really have a cogent point but just like to argue?
Well that leaves out every president since Truman.
Oh, I see. What Christie did was o.k. in your mind because you don't expect any better. Nice.
No I'm trying to equate your response to this story withbgmal's response to news stories with wacky zionist theories.
I know what you're TRYING to do. You just suck at it.
He doesn't have any evidence and neither do you.
That is without a doubt the dumbest comparison I have ever seen. I posted pages and pages of evidence. Lots of people find Christie's story dubious, and they are not wacko conspiracy theorists, despite what you desperately wish to believe. You are obviously in denial.
It's not out of your control. However, there are no absolutes.
No one can predict with 100% accuracy how others will perform over the long haul.
Why shouldn't it be? Aides are hired as trusted associates.
You hire them based on their history and what you know about them.
If, after the fact, they fuck you over that is mostly out of your control.It's out of your control to hire someone who won't fuck you over? You must not be too proficient at interviewing and background checks...
Uhhh yeah, it is bad if POTUS owes you given the varied instruments of destruction at his/her hands.
Question, if as you say, he lied and really ordered the closures, why hasn't Bridget Kelly, who was instantly fired, been on all the news media and talk shows telling everyone the TRUTH???
I have no idea if he knew or not, but the answer to your question is easy.
Christie may or may not be the next President of the US. It's not bad if POTUS owes you, is it? That's a pretty good reason to stay quiet
Hmmmm. Lets take a look at Monika...who fucked over her boss bill..
3/99: on the cover of TIME magazine
9/99: Handbag designer
1/2000: Spokes person for Jenny Craig
3/2002: Documentary subject
4/2003: Reality show host
12/2006: Social Psychologist
Regarding your statement bolded below: FAIL.
http://www.youtube.com/embed/RJoOhq4M1TY
Probably not... In your world, truth doesn't matter....
We're talking about the real world. In the real world, job prospects aren't enhanced when you sell out your boss.
Thats a lot of eatin after all that porkin...
APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says
I had no idea that Lewinsky was SO FUCKING HUGE!
Krispy Kreme took the psycho test and scored 0%. That proves he had no involvement in Bridgegate whatsoever.
I posted pages and pages of evidence. Lots of people find Christie's story dubious,
Lot's of people find Christies story dubious is evidence of what? Do you have any clue what the word evidence means? Obviously not.
You said it was done by the port authority. You're anything but clear.
What's not clear. The port authority controls the GW bridge. The port authority workers blocked the lanes. What part don't you understand about that? Did you somehow envision Christies staffers out there with orange cones?
Do you have any idea what the port authority is or what they do? Do some research. Christie doesn't have the authority to order the PA to do anything. He gets to appoint half the PA commissioners (the governor of NY appoints the other half) and can veto his commissioners actions but that's it. So just like every news report has said, Christie staffer Kellly asked Wildstein at the PA to block lanes from Ft. Lee onto the bridge and he had it done.
Well that leaves out every president since Truman.
Oh, I see. What Christie did was o.k. in your mind because you don't expect any better. Nice.
I don't now what Christie did and neither do you or anyone else at this point. You believe he did something wrong because he didn't take action in the way you believe he should have.That's certainly an iron clad case. At least as conclusive as Bgmal's "evidence" of various conspiracies. This expectation of what should have been done is based on your extensive experience holding a high level public office I assume.
« First « Previous Comments 69 - 95 of 95 Search these comments
http://www.politico.com/story/2014/01/chris-christie-aides-bridge-emails-101897.html?hp=t1
#politics