4
0

Obama has Proposed 442 Tax Hikes Since Taking Office


               
2014 Apr 14, 3:57am   2,696 views  23 comments

by zzyzzx   follow (9)  

http://www.atr.org/obama-has-proposed-442-tax-hikes-taking-office

Since taking office in 2009, President Barack Obama has formally proposed a total of 442 tax increases.

The 442 total proposed tax increases does not include the 20 tax increases Obama signed into law as part of Obamacare.

“History tells us what Obama was able to do. This list reminds us of what Obama wanted to do,” said Grover Norquist, president of Americans for Tax Reform.

The number of proposed tax increases per year is as follows:

-79 tax increases for FY 2010

-52 tax increases for FY 2011

-47 tax increases for FY 2012

-34 tax increases for FY 2013

-137 tax increases for FY 2014

-93 tax increases for FY 2015

Perhaps not coincidentally, the Obama budget with the lowest number of proposed tax increases was released during an election year: In February 2012, Obama released his FY 2013 budget, with “only” 34 proposed tax increases. Once safely re-elected, Obama came back with a vengeance, proposing 137 tax increases, a personal record high for the 44th President.

In addition to the 442 tax increases in his annual budget proposals, the 20 signed into law as part of Obamacare, and the massive tobacco tax hike signed into law on the sixteenth day of his presidency, Obama has made it clear he is open to other broad-based tax increases.

During an interview with Men's Health in 2009, when asked about the idea of national tax on soda and sugary drinks, the President said, "I actually think it's an idea that we should be exploring."

During an interview with CNBC's John Harwood in 2010, Obama said a European-style Value-Added-Tax was “something that would be novel for the United States.”

Obama's statement was consistent with a pattern of remarks made by Obama White House officials refusing to rule out a VAT.

#politics

Comments 1 - 23 of 23        Search these comments

1   justme   @   2014 Apr 14, 4:52am  

YES! Let's have a Value Added Tax on all the "job creators". As we all know, they are creating all kinds of value with their magic job-creating wands. Now we really need to tax them, and soon.

2   HydroCabron   @   2014 Apr 14, 5:15am  

Bring the VAT now.

Dump the stew of crap taxes and just do a basic VAT, conjoined with a progressive income tax and no deductions or credits.

Of course, this kills off the power of legislators to reward the wealthy with tax favors, so it'll never happen.

3   justme   @   2014 Apr 14, 5:43am  

Back to being serious: Sales taxes like VAT are too regressive. If we should have VAT, there should be VAT also on investments and capital expenditures.

Buy stock? VAT!
Buy bonds? VAT!
Buying 2nd house? VAT!

... and so on. Wall St is a value creator! Let's VAT them!

4   Tenpoundbass   @   2014 Apr 14, 5:58am  

We already have a Vat tax, it's called the Gas price manipulation for Liberal goals and agendas on top of an already present Gas tax. Then there's the Oil price rigging for the same objectives.

Face it, there isn't even a thought that moves in America, that the price of Gas and or Energy isn't factored into the price of.

5   Strategist   @   2014 Apr 14, 6:10am  

Read my lips "no new taxes"

6   Homeboy   @   2014 Apr 14, 12:56pm  

Here's the full list:

http://www.atr.org/sites/default/files/assets/Obama%20Proposed%20442%20Tax%20Hikes%20Full%20List.pdf

Tell me which one of those "proposed tax increases" you object to. Because the vast majority of them appear to be attempts to close the loopholes that allow the extremely wealthy to pay effectively less tax than the middle class. I don't see ANYTHING in there that would negatively affect the middle class. Am I supposed to feel sorry for the 1%? Because I don't.

7   bob2356   @   2014 Apr 14, 1:00pm  

Who gives a shit what he proposed. How many are law?

8   indigenous   @   2014 Apr 14, 1:21pm  

bob2356 says

Who gives a shit what he proposed. How many are law?

Come Nov they's gunna be plenty

9   Bigsby   @   2014 Apr 14, 2:10pm  

clambo says

Taxes are the way wealth is redistributed downward. This is not what they should be used for.

I have no right to someone else's property or money and neither does the government. Whether the person is the 1%, the 5%, or the 90% doesn't matter.

I know how the average liberal lefty thinks. They think someone should have his property taken from him for the greater good of society.

Yes, stop all taxation. Let's see how that works out...

10   clambo   @   2014 Apr 14, 2:22pm  

I didn't write that.

I am in favor a gasoline tax to support roads for example. I am against a tax to confiscate wealth.

There was no income tax really until 1913. Previously taxes on sprits, beer, tobacco, were suffient to run things.
Taxes were added to sales of other things to pay for the war of 1812.
In 1862 there was a first income tax, (3%) this was also needed to pay for war activities. Later it was repealed in 1895 by the supreme court.
1913 the 16th amendment was the actual beginning of income tax but much later it was expanded to tax labor.
The 60's of course had another bunch of wars to pay for; Vietnam, the Cold War, and LBJ/Democrats "War on Poverty".
The war on poverty can never be won and we will never stop paying for it.
To me it's interesting that until 1913 the U.S.A. managed to get by without taxing everyone in ever increasing amounts in ever more inventive ways.

11   marcus   @   2014 Apr 14, 2:23pm  

There's spin, there's propaganda and there's facts.

You decide.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/sep/07/barack-obama/barack-obama-said-hes-cut-taxes-middle-class-famil/

http://www.factcheck.org/2012/05/a-bogus-tax-attack-against-obama/

http://www.factcheck.org/2012/06/how-much-is-the-obamacare-tax/

MEanwhile you might want to consider facts, regarding the tax rate that Romney and other parasites on our economy, sorry, I mean "job creators" pay.

12   clambo   @   2014 Apr 19, 2:57pm  

Romney isn't a parasite, he pays taxes.

Want a parasite? Robert Rubin was paid $120 million by Citibank AFTER the US taxpayer bailed it out for stupidity of people there like Rubin.

13   indigenous   @   2014 Apr 14, 2:27pm  

marcus says

There's spin, there's propaganda and there's facts.

You decide.

Hold that thought until the end of this year...

14   bob2356   @   2014 Apr 14, 2:53pm  

indigenous says

marcus says

There's spin, there's propaganda and there's facts.

You decide.

Hold that thought until the end of this year...

You want to spell that out? You have some kind of inside information everyone else lacks?

15   indigenous   @   2014 Apr 14, 2:57pm  

bob2356 says

You want to spell that out? You have some kind of inside information everyone else lacks?

It is what happens whenever a politician is a lame duck, after the midterms are over there will be no reason to hold back on raising taxes.

16   clambo   @   2014 Apr 14, 3:09pm  

Unless the Democrats lose more power in those elections. Then it's harder to raise taxes.

17   marcus   @   2014 Apr 14, 3:16pm  

clambo says

Unless the Democrats lose more power in those elections. Then it's harder to raise taxes.

True, how can republicans get the tax increases they want, when democrats aren't in power to blame it on ?

18   Bigsby   @   2014 Apr 14, 4:02pm  

clambo says

I didn't write that.

I am in favor a gasoline tax to support roads for example. I am against a tax to confiscate wealth.

There was no income tax really until 1913. Previously taxes on sprits, beer, tobacco, were suffient to run things.

Taxes were added to sales of other things to pay for the war of 1812.

In 1862 there was a first income tax, (3%) this was also needed to pay for war activities. Later it was repealed in 1895 by the supreme court.

1913 the 16th amendment was the actual beginning of income tax but much later it was expanded to tax labor.

The 60's of course had another bunch of wars to pay for; Vietnam, the Cold War, and LBJ/Democrats "War on Poverty".

The war on poverty can never be won and we will never stop paying for it.

To me it's interesting that until 1913 the U.S.A. managed to get by without taxing everyone in ever increasing amounts in ever more inventive ways.

Why are you comparing life over a 100 years ago to now? Perhaps you'd like to travel back to the era of Dickens whilst you are at it. Or the Middle Ages. Or...

19   mell   @   2014 Apr 19, 3:59pm  

clambo says

Romney isn't a parasite, he pays taxes.

Want a parasite? Robert Rubin was paid $120 million by Citibank AFTER the US taxpayer bailed it out for stupidity of people there like Rubin.

True dat! It's logic you cannot resist when people are trying to justify the bailouts while pointing their finger at Romney the "vulture capitalist" boogeyman ;)

20   bob2356   @   2014 Apr 19, 11:34pm  

mell says

"vulture capitalist"

Vulture capitalists are parasites also. They massively enrich themselves by destroying peoples lives with the loopholes in the rules they used their power to create.

Why is it the right wingnuts believe that corporate manipulation of the government to further and further enrich themselves is a noble enterprise, while people collecting food stamps is parasitic?

21   mell   @   2014 Apr 20, 12:25am  

bob2356 says

mell says

"vulture capitalist"

Vulture capitalists are parasites also. They massively enrich themselves by destroying peoples lives with the loopholes in the rules they used their power to create.

Why is it the right wingnuts believe that corporate manipulation of the government to further and further enrich themselves is a noble enterprise, while people collecting food stamps is parasitic?

First this was not about food-stamps. While I may agree that quite a few businesses certainly would not qualify as "noble" there is a big difference in forcefully transferring money from the taxpayer for bailouts and 100 million dollar salaries/bonuses/parachutes vs picking up the remains of a failed or struggling company, transforming it and selling it for a profit. A huge, insurmountable difference.

22   Tenpoundbass   @   2014 Apr 20, 1:45am  

indigenous says

Come Nov they's gunna be plenty

Let's hope the voters grow a pair.

I'm expaitriating, if the Democrats win this year.
I wont even be here for the 2016 elections.

But I suspect it will be different, I don't know one single Senior who is going to vote Democrat ever again.

My Mother said the Seniors in her community are saying they'll never vote again. I told her we've got to vote the Democrats out the Republicans were never this bad. The Democrats have spent years, crying Wolf about the GOP, instigating unfounded fears, that never developed, but as soon as they got into power, ever single red herring fear monger they uttered in past about the GOP is coming into fruition, by the hands of the Democrats.

My mother thought for a minute, and told me I was right.
She's bored, and doesn't get out much. I told her she should talk to the other Seniors in her community and vote these bastards out before it's too late. Even if they feel they wont be around much longer, think of your grand-kids, do it for them. Please don't leave us with these Monsters.

I want to buy her a mini van, and send her money every month, so she can take the seniors to a movies every now and then, and shuttle them around. Tell them a Republican politician is helping them out.

You know I really felt good, like I made a difference. Now I can see how being a community organizer can really be rewarding.

I feel Like Obama must have felt, I'm making change my mother and her neighbors can believe in.

23   clambo   @   2014 Apr 20, 5:03am  

Bigsby, you don't have to go back in time 100 years.
You can see my no income tax TODAY, just go over to New Hampshire and see it.

While you are there, observe the standard of living and other things then report back if they are suffering from a "lack of government."

Supporting 1. huge welfare state 2. huge military 3. huge government is costing us a fortune and the 1,2,3 is the realm of the liberal lefty socialists who think they know better and can create a socialist utopia.

Obamacare is an typical example, they are ruining healthcare for many to provide some new benefit for the few. Of course, doctors and taxpayers will get screwed in the process. More regulations, new taxes, and less health care will result.

Comments 1 - 23 of 23        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste