« First « Previous Comments 41 - 80 of 172 Next » Last » Search these comments
Religion is a significant and common enough principle cause of evil, suffering, and death that its opposition in particular is merited. Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat its mistakes. Religion is one of the primary mistakes repeated throughout history.
Glad you took your medication. You finally said something that makes sense.
It's worth learning to avoid that mistake, especially in an age where mankind could destroy itself from nuclear annihilation or global ecological collapse.
Look who's talking? The mistake some of of us have learnt is terrorists like the Iranian regime will use every weapon at their disposal. They must not be allowed to have nukes. But the moment we start taking them out, Dan will be the first to yell "foul" "It's murder." " We have no right to kill them without a trial." "Who made us policeman of the world" "They are innocent"
Why don't you practice your own crap for a change.
she was 12 years old, which is 6/7 grade.
children are taught suicide is a sin in 3-4-5 grades.
http://stjohnparish.org/re_bctsANDcatbowlq.php
The evidence shows she knew but chose to ignore that part, unless you have evidence she did not know....
Actually, according to Christian mythology, one does have to know that something is a sin in order for it to be a sin.
Sounds more like a cop out. I really believe that the afterlife is bullshit, but I don't want to come right out and say that.
Well, I have fundamental respect for all religions. ;-)
I only respect religions that practice peace. So should you.
she was 12 years old, which is 6/7 grade.
children are taught suicide is a sin in 3-4-5 grades.
http://stjohnparish.org/re_bctsANDcatbowlq.phpThe evidence shows she knew but chose to ignore that part, unless you have evidence she did not know....
No matter what.....her religious beliefs were the prime cause of her wanting to join her father.
Sounds more like a cop out. I really believe that the afterlife is bullshit, but I don't want to come right out and say that.
Well, I have fundamental respect for all religions. ;-)
I only respect religions that practice peace. So should you.
Sometimes I just try to be politic...
Of course, I respect some religions a lot more than others. I find Reform Judaism most interesting.
I only respect religions that practice peace. So should you.
Sometimes I just try to be politic...
Of course, I respect some religions a lot more than others. I find Reform Judaism most interesting.
Oh God, just what we need. Another religion.
Not my argument.
No matter what.....her religious beliefs were the prime cause of her wanting to join her father.
I'm a pastafarian.
If I am a good person I will go to heaven.
There is beer and strippers in heaven.
And if I misbehave I'll go to hell.
The beer in hell is stale and the strippers have syphilis.
My holiday is called "holiday", so I'm never offended when people say "happy holidays".
My god is the FSM.
She is real because you can't prove she doesn't exist.
R'amen
so what is it called when an atheist argues the lore of a religion that he is projecting onto you, that you have no part of?
If you are going to reference lore, you had better get it right.
You finally said something that makes sense.
I always make sense. You just aren't intelligent enough to realize it.
The mistake some of of us have learnt is terrorists like the Iranian regime will use every weapon at their disposal.
We all know that. However, some people haven't learned that the so-called "good guys" on your team are often the greatest threats. Hitler was elected by the people.
They must not be allowed to have nukes. But the moment we start taking them out, Dan will be the first to yell "foul" "It's murder." " We have no right to kill them without a trial." "Who made us policeman of the world" "They are innocent"
When have I ever stated that we should allow Iran to have nukes? When have I ever said "Who made us policeman of the world"?
And how the fuck does killing allege terrorists rather than bringing them to a fair trial allow for Iran or any other state to obtain nuclear weapons? I think it's you who needs to start taking medication.
The evidence shows she knew but chose to ignore that part, unless you have evidence she did not know
Honey, you have no evidence that she chose to ignore part of a myth. The only evidence in that case is the letter she left explaining her actions. It is reasonable to consider the letter to be an accurate account of what she was thinking. And the letter clearly shows she believed she was going to go to heaven if she killed herself. Whether or not that belief adheres to the particular fiction of Christian lore is irrelevant. It still demonstrates that religion is bad because it causes people to make bad, irrational decisions based on false premises.
I only respect religions that practice peace. So should you.
Well, that rules out Christianity in all its forms. What are we left with? I think the only religion that was truly peaceful during its entire history was that episode of Star Trek where a pre-warp society started worshiping Captain Picard, who ironically would be a better god than any that has every been written about in human history.
You finally said something that makes sense.
I always make sense. You just aren't intelligent enough to realize it.
Oh God, you are making no sense at all. Making sense once is not the same as making sense always. You are using your cop logic - If one cop is bad, all cops are bad.
They must not be allowed to have nukes. But the moment we start taking them out, Dan will be the first to yell "foul" "It's murder." " We have no right to kill them without a trial." "Who made us policeman of the world" "They are innocent"
When have I ever stated that we should allow Iran to have nukes? When have I ever said "Who made us policeman of the world"?
And how the fuck does killing allege terrorists rather than bringing them to a fair trial allow for Iran or any other state to obtain nuclear weapons? I think it's you who needs to start taking medication.
There you go again. The only way to not allow Iran to have nukes is to take them out. How the hell are we gonna take them out without some people, both guilty and innocent dying in the process?
I only respect religions that practice peace. So should you.
Well, that rules out Christianity in all its forms. What are we left with? I think the only religion that was truly peaceful during its entire history was that episode of Star Trek where a pre-warp society started worshiping Captain Picard, who ironically would be a better god than any that has every been written about in human history.
You missed something. Sam Harris mentions "Jainism" a religion of India as truly peaceful.
You finally said something that makes sense.
I always make sense. You just aren't intelligent enough to realize it.
A high school teacher once told me "You are lazy, useless and will never amount to anything"
The same teacher told my mom "I was one of the smartest students she ever had"
What did your teacher tell you Dan?
If one cop is bad, all cops are bad.
I never said anything even remotely resembling that. The fact that you accuse me of saying such a thing shows that you have the reading comprehension of a drunken 3-year-old.
The only way to not allow Iran to have nukes is to take them out.
Are you seriously saying that the only way to prevent the state of Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons is to nuke the entire country killing all of them? Unfortunately, that's not even the stupidest thing I've read on PatNet, or this thread, today. And that's sad.
Sam Harris mentions "Jainism" a religion of India as truly peaceful.
OK, one fucking religion out of ten thousand manages to avoid being completely evil. That's about the batting average of finding good men in the Gestapo.
What did your teacher tell you Dan?
Who cares? Unlike you, I don't need daily affirmations of my self-worth.
Sam Harris mentions "Jainism" a religion of India as truly peaceful.
That's because it's so plain.
Sam Harris mentions "Jainism" a religion of India as truly peaceful.
That's because it's so plain.
Being peaceful does not require any fancy rituals. All religions should be "plain"
Buttercup, I am not referencing 'lore'.
I am referencing your reference to 'lore'.
Not the same.
so what is it called when an atheist argues the lore of a religion that he is projecting onto you, that you have no part of?
If you are going to reference lore, you had better get it right.
so what is it called when an atheist argues the lore of a religion that he is projecting onto you, that you have no part of?
Oh wait, I know....Liberal Logic!
Never argue the lore of your religion with an atheist.
The evidence shows she knew but chose to ignore that part, unless you have evidence she did not know
Honey,
Buttercup,
I'm getting jealous here. :(
Really? Christianity is "Particularly" more vile, evil dangerous......than Islam or the other world's religions?
The irony apparently fails to register in Dan's small mind that Christian institutions like Notre Dame will allow someone like Sam Harris to come to their campus and openly trash their religion without it's adherents going ape-shit and trying to kill unbelievers.
But Dan has to put the qualifier (particularly Christianity) because he is an unthinking PC Prog or a coward.
Anyway, I'll take the Pepsi challenge and compare the atrocities (and charitable work) of Christians in the last 100+ years to the other man-made religions like Communism any day of the week. Christians (even Muslims) are pikers compared to the killing machine of Communism of the 20th century.
Really? Christianity is "Particularly" more vile, evil dangerous......than Islam or the other world's religions?
No. Nor was any such statement said or implied by this thread. Again, you need to read carefully and accurately. The title of this thread is Why religion (particularly Christianity) is vile, evil, narcissistic & dangerous not Christianity is more evil than Islam.
The reason this thread has that title is that Sam Harris is talking particularly about Christianity, but what the ideas behind what he says applies to all religion.
You'll find a lot less to complain about if you increase the accuracy of your reading.
But Dan has to put the qualifier (particularly Christianity) because he is an unthinking PC Prog or a coward.
Of course, since your premise is flawed as shown in the above post, all of your conclusions are invalid. The only question that remains is whether or not you are man enough to admit your mistake, apologize, and retract your statements.
The evidence shows she knew but chose to ignore that part, unless you have evidence she did not know
Honey,
Buttercup,
I'm getting jealous here. :(
Don't be. SoftShell is the bottom. And yes, his shell is quite soft from years of pounding.
par·tic·u·lar·ly
pə(r)ˈtikyələrlē/Submit
adverb
1.to a higher degree than is usual or average.
synonyms: especially, specially, very, extremely, exceptionally, singularly, peculiarly, unusually, extraordinarily, remarkably, outstandingly,
par·tic·u·lar·ly
Haven't you learned from the SATs that the meaning of a word in context is not always the first definition listed in the dictionary?
3: in particular : specifically
Now if you actually watched the video and paid attention, it would be crystal clear that the video if talking about the particular examples of Christianity being vile and cruel. At no time does the video compare Christianity to other religions or make a quantitative assessment of how bad Christian morality is compared to Islam or any other religion.
If you didn't bother to watch the video, then any misinterpretation of the title is solely your fault. The title's intended meaning is clear and accurate to anyone who actually watched the video. Any misunderstanding is all on you.
The Christianity vs. Islam vs Judaism argument is like
"Well, Stalin killed 30 Bazillion People, so Hitler and Franco's murderous binges don't count."
The Christianity vs. Islam vs Judaism argument is like
"Well, Stalin killed 30 Bazillion People, so Hitler and Franco's murderous binges don't count."
When the numbers are something like 1000 to 1 and you have to go back 4 centuries to document Christianity's worst atrocities compared to Commie or Islam's atrocities a few decades ago.........I think it is germane.
The Christianity vs. Islam vs Judaism argument is like
"Well, Stalin killed 30 Bazillion People, so Hitler and Franco's murderous binges don't count."
When the numbers are something like 1000 to 1 and you have to go back 4 centuries to document Christianity's worst atrocities compared to Commie or Islam's atrocities a few decades ago.........I think it is germane.
So Son of Sam killing people 40 years ago isn't important, because some Son of Sam Junior killed a few more people last year. Got it.
You know why Christianity doesn't kill people like they used to? The Enlightenment, and God is Dead. That's why. The West has gloriously moved past barbarian superstition.
Of course, in Eastern Europe about 60-70 years ago, there were plenty of people who killed for religious reasons. Go look at who donated to Jon Demanjuk's several decades of appeals, hearings, and trials. Way beyond the capacity of a "retired autoworker" to pay by himself. Hint: Mel Gibson's Dad.
Oh, and in Spain too. It wasn't just anti-communism, Franco was leading a "Crusade"
Viva Christo Rey!
Can't we all get along?
The Abrahamic religions (Judaism, Christianity and Islam) are all disgusting outgrowths of the same putrid origin.
Just keep that in your mind, and you can't go wrong.
Can't wait for Unbreakable Kimmy Schmidt to come out:
That will be funny, for an episode or two. Then you'll get bored of how she remains so eternally innocent.
Dan is right on. I grew up going to church regularly, sat quietly, but very little of it made any sense to me. God loves you, but murders babies every day. God listens to you, but capriciously decides which prayers do and don't get answered. God is all-powerful, and once chose to part the Red Sea, but he's been taking a nap from those duties for a while...
God is a complete psycho!
So Son of Sam killing people 40 years ago isn't important, because some Son of Sam Junior killed a few more people last year. Got it.
Sure, going back decades is relevant. Comparing numbers from Bronze age man..........not so much.
For the record, all man made organizations (religion, political parties, unions) are capable of violence and greed.
I just don't think atheists can feel so smug when they have the horrible record of Communism to deal with in terms of human rights atrocities.
I just don't think atheists can feel so smug when they have the horrible record of Communism to deal with
Uhh ... there are plenty of atheists who are neither Bolsheviks nor Stalinists.
(Since 99.9% of all humans aren't Stalinists, this really isn't much of a claim.)
Uhh ... there are plenty of atheists who are neither Bolsheviks nor Stalinists.
And lots of Christians (and Muslims) who aren't crusaders or jihadis.
The Christianity vs. Islam vs Judaism argument is like
"Well, Stalin killed 30 Bazillion People, so Hitler and Franco's murderous binges don't count."
Exactly. They are all bad and for the same reasons. The only difference is degree, and even that is a function of time.
So unenlightened man conjours up a skydaddie to assuage his fears of mortality, and you call this disgusting and putrid?
Why do you hate evolution?
The Abrahamic religions (Judaism, Christianity and Islam) are all disgusting outgrowths of the same putrid origin.
And lots of Christians (and Muslims) who aren't crusaders or jihadis.
There is no atheist handbook which advocates labor camps in the Taiga, mass executions, terror, or centralized government control of the means of production.
The scriptures of all three Abrahamic religions have passages which can be, and have been, interpreted to call for violent action against outsiders.
you have to go back 4 centuries
How long ago it was is irrelevant. What matters is what has changed to reign in Christianity in the modern world. The answer to that is a weakening of the religion, a stripping of its power and influence over the state, and a rebuttal of its truthfulness by vocal atheists. That is why Christianity is less of a threat today than it was during the Middle Ages. It has nothing to do with age.
So Son of Sam killing people 40 years ago isn't important, because some Son of Sam Junior killed a few more people last year. Got it.
Well put.
The problem with almost all religions is they eventually become more about control then spirituality. The religion becomes at odds with your freedom of self, of thought, of action, etc. It ends up becoming more limiting then freeing.
Also: If you can have your own sense of spirituality (which everyone is capable of having), why do you need a religion?
« First « Previous Comments 41 - 80 of 172 Next » Last » Search these comments
Sam Harris simply destroys Christianity
http://www.AcO4TnrskE0